There are four basic categories of supratentorial and infratentorial craniotomy:
Convexity craniotomies may be performed anywhere according to the surgical target and goal of the operation. They range from burr holes and mini-craniotomy to decompressive hemicraniectomy, which is the most extensive variant.
Midline craniotomies are used for midline approaches that take advantage of subdural anatomical corridors to reach superficial, deep, or contralateral targets. The supratentorial suboccipital craniotomy with an intradural approach along the falx and the tentorium or an infratentorial suboccipital craniotomy with a supracerebellar approach are possible variants.
Skull base craniotomies range from the frontal midline to the foramen magnum, covering the entire skull base. ▶Fig. 1.1 and ▶Fig. 1.2 demonstrate the continuum of approaches which are often overlapping and are named according to their location at the skull base.
Skull base extensions are added to standard skull base craniotomies. They allow access with angles of approach or to structures that cannot be easily reached with standard skull base craniotomies. Typical skull base extensions are anterior clinoidectomy, removal of the orbital rim or zygoma (orbitozygomatic), transpetrosal approaches, the suprameatal extension after retrosigmoid craniotomy or the far-(enough) lateral extension to the foramen magnum (see Chapter 6, Skull Base Extensions).
Supratentorial skull base craniotomies can be divided according to their location, their frontal and temporal extension (size), and their relation to the sylvian fissure. There is no uniform classification, but the following general rules may serve as a guide to the terminology (see ▶Table 1.1).
Table 1.1 Systematics of skull base craniotomies—supratentorial
Extends 1–3 cm lateral to the midline to approximately the sphenoid wing, but does not cross it. The proximal sylvian fissure is exposed intradurally, and targets within the sylvian fissure, the anterior skull base, and the temporal lobe can be reached. There are mini- and standard sizes. “Frontolateral” is the term that was historically first used for this approach.
Supraorbital
Usually a smaller variant of the frontolateral approach; typically by eyebrow (transciliary) incision, which limits the size of the craniotomy. Extends 2.5–3 cm lateral to the midline to approximately the sphenoid wing, but does not cross it. The proximal sylvian fissure is exposed intradurally, and targets in the sylvian fissure, skull base, and temporal lobe can be reached. Some surgeons use the term supraorbital as synonymous with frontolateral.
Pterional
Extends 1–3 cm lateral to the midline to the anterior temporal region: centered around the “H” of the sutures that form the pterion (see Chapter 2.2, Craniocerebral Topography). The sphenoid wing is always crossed. Typically defined as two-thirds of the craniotomy frontal and one-third temporal exposure of variable sizes (2:1). There is also a mini-pterional variant.
Frontotemporal
Usually a large exposure (1:1 to 2:1 frontal:temporal) centered above the sphenoid wing = sylvian fissure.
Anterior temporal
Sphenoid wing is crossed.
Temporobasal
The exact position varies according to the surgical target: does not cross the sphenoid wing. Typically used for subtemporal intradural approaches. There may be a more anterior and a more posterior variant.
Infratentorial skull base craniotomies are performed along the sigmoid sinus or the foramen magnum (see ▶Table 1.2 for further details).
Table 1.2 Systematics of skull base craniotomies—infratentorial
Location
Description
Suboccipital median infra-transverse-sinus
Midline craniotomy for supracerebellar median or paramedian approaches, e.g., for access to the pineal region or tentorial dural fistulas.
Suboccipital lateral infra-transverse-sinus
These are craniotomies based on the same principle as the midline craniotomies for an intradural approach along the subdural space parallel to the tentorium. Typically, they are used for supracerebellar lateral approaches to the midbrain or other regions. They are horizontally oriented compared to the retrosigmoid craniotomy, with more exposure along the transverse sinus and less along the sigmoid sinus. A modification is the suboccipital far-lateral infra-transverse-sinus craniotomy.
Retrosigmoid
Typically ranges from the transverse sinus to the base of the posterior fossa along the sigmoid sinus to gain access to the cerebellopontine angle. May vary in size and be centered more superiorly or inferiorly: vertically oriented.
Suboccipital median periforaminal craniotomy with opening of the foramen magnum
Typically bilateral, there is a mini-version, for example, in Chiari-decompression surgery.
Suboccipital lateral periforaminal craniotomy with opening of the foramen magnum
The lateral suboccipital craniotomy with opening of the foramen magnum is the basic craniotomy for the far lateral approach which can be regarded as a skull base extension of the basal suboccipital craniotomy.
1.2 Difference between Approach and Craniotomy
Andreas Raabe
Although often used synonymously, there is a difference between a craniotomy and an approach. Approach is the broader term and is often used for craniotomy and intradural preparation. In this book, we discuss only the steps of the craniotomy, i.e., to reach bony exposure. With a few exceptions, we stay outside the dura. We will therefore mostly use the term craniotomy instead of approach, and generally reserve the latter to describe the dissection and exposure after opening the dura mater. Craniotomy and approach may be different as in the examples given below. However, as already mentioned, the term “approach” often overlaps with craniotomy and intradural preparation.
Examples:
Supraorbital craniotomy and subfrontal approach.
Pterional craniotomy and transsylvian approach.
Temporobasal craniotomy and subtemporal approach.
Suboccipital lateral craniotomy and supracerebellar lateral approach.
Median suboccipital craniotomy and telovelar approach.
1.3 Craniotomies We Have Omitted from This Book and Why
Andreas Raabe, Bernhard Meyer, Peter Vajkoczy, and Karl Schaller
This book is intended primarily for young residents, to serve as a guide to understanding the various craniotomies. It describes the most often used craniotomies, but we decided not to include those that are used only very rarely. Therefore, it does not cover highly specialized skull base craniotomies and their extension, such as posterior transpetrosal, translabyrinthine, transcochlear, or combined approaches, nor is it our aim to provide a complete atlas of approaches and extensions.
We acknowledge that these specialized skull base approaches had their place in the heyday of skull base surgery. However, nowadays they are often replaced by a staged procedure or a combination of simpler craniotomies that provide a less invasive strategy with lower morbidity than a technically demanding and more invasive approach. Moreover, radiosurgery and endovascular treatment often complete a less invasive treatment for many patients.
We are also aware that the nomenclature for the craniotomies varies around the world and that experienced surgeons use their own tricks and modifications when performing craniotomies.
1.4 Positioning
1.4.1 Basic Rules
Andreas Raabe and Janine Abu-Isa
Time spent on careful positioning is time well spent. Mistakes in positioning may render any surgical plan, even if it is conceptually perfectly elaborated, impossible. Positioning is the first strategic step for the operation; it is the first digit of the code number to unlock the door to the target of brain surgery. Correct positioning can open the surgical field, achieve gravity retraction, reduce bleeding, and provide the most relaxing position for the surgeon.
Positioning should be highly standardized in each department to improve communication, to save time, and to achieve the goal of the surgery. Use of photographs, step-by-step instructions, and a checklist is recommended.
The surgical trajectory is the line between the craniotomy and the surgical target, i.e., the midline craniotomy and the tumor in the third ventricle, or the subtemporal craniotomy and the midbrain cavernoma, or the convexity craniotomy and the underlying meningioma (▶Fig. 1.3).
2. Position of the Surgeon
The same surgical trajectory can vary according to the preferred position of the surgeon (see below).
3. Gravity Retraction or Drainage
When gravity retraction is a major part of the surgery, it may become the dominant principle, for instance, in contralateral or midline approaches via the dependent hemisphere or when the semisitting position is preferred in some cases for posterior fossa surgery for pineal or cerebellopontine targets.
4. Measures for Avoiding Potential Position-Related Complications
Such measures include positioning to minimize intracranial pressure, venous congestion, and air embolism, as well as improved orientation if only standardized head positions are allowed.
Every head position can be achieved by combining head rotation (▶Fig. 1.4a) with patient’s body positioning (▶Fig. 1.4b):
Rotation of the head from 0° to 60° (this can be tested in the awake patient before surgery: in younger patients a rotation up to 90° may be possible, whereas in elderly patients head rotation may be limited to 30°), with the desired degree of head flexion and tilting.
Selection of one of five supplemental positions of the patient’s body to achieve the final desired head position. These five body positions should be standardized.
Except for special positions (e.g., semisitting), one of the following five basic positions are applied (▶Fig. 1.4b):
Supine: quick and easy.
Supine oblique (45°) upper body rotation with the pelvis and legs supine: still quick.
Lateral recumbent: more complicated, takes more time.
Lateral oblique or park bench (135°): more complicated, takes more time.
Prone: more complicated, takes more time and should be avoided if possible because of increased venous congestion.
For instance, a horizontal head position can be achieved by combining:
Use side pads to prop the patient if you consider rotating the patient during surgery.
Cushion the patient well and avoid wrinkles in the sheets to prevent decubiti.
Elevate the head by approximately 5 to 10 cm to facilitate venous drainage.
1.4.3 Supine Lateral
Christian F. Freyschlag and Claudius Thomé
Supine lateral positioning (45°) of the patient’s upper body is used to enable access to the posterior fossa and the cerebellopontine angle, but may also be used for other approaches where the head is placed with the midline horizontally. In our experience, a sitting or semisitting position offers no advantage over lateral positioning. Although this has long been debated, we do not consider that gravitation-facilitated dissection outweighs disadvantages such as the complexity of positioning, need for exclusion of a persistent foramen ovale, and the risk of venous air embolism.1,2Furthermore, operating on a patient in the sitting or semisitting position is less ergonomic and more exhausting for most surgeons. Refer to ▶Fig. 1.9, ▶Fig. 1.10, ▶Fig. 1.11, and ▶Fig. 1.12.
Checklist
Make sure the patient’s body is moved sufficiently toward the top end of the operating table (when operating on a patient in a supine lateral position, you tend to sit at 90° to the patient’s longitudinal axis).
Always support the patient’s position—you might want to rotate the table for better exposure.
Positioning needs three crucial head movements: rotation, inclination, and lateral flexion.
References
[1] Nozaki K. Selection of semisitting position in neurosurgery: essential or preference? World Neurosurg 2014;81(1):62–63[2] Feigl GC, Decker K, Wurms M, et al. Neurosurgical procedures in the semisitting position: evaluation of the risk of paradoxical venous air embolism in patients with a patent foramen ovale. World Neurosurg 2014;81(1):159–164[3] Wait SD, Gazzeri R, Galarza M, Teo C. Simple, effective, supine positioning for the retrosigmoid approach. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2011;54(4):196–198[4] Elhammady MS, Telischi FF, Morcos JJ. Retrosigmoid approach: indications, techniques, and results. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2012;45(2):375–397, ix
Use separate armrests for both arms; use a cushion between the legs.
Flexing the legs, correct positioning of the arms, and using a subabdominal side pad stabilize the patient ventrally.
Propping with pads on the patient’s buttock and scapulae stabilizes the patient dorsally.
Cushion the shoulder and the hips well to avoid decubiti.
1.4.5 Lateral Oblique or Park Bench
Daniel Hänggi
The lateral oblique (135°) or park bench position with the arm on the table is suitable for posterior fossa or occipital midline and lateral craniotomies as well as for subtemporal and temporal approaches. It allows rapid positioning of the patient and is less often associated with serious complications—including venous air embolism, hypotension, pneumocephalus, and laryngeal trauma—than the sitting position. In addition, in comparison to the prone position, it offers considerable advantages to the neurosurgeon in terms of gravity-assisted drainage and reduced cerebellar retraction.
The patient is placed in a lateral recumbent position with the contralateral (lower) arm stretched out on top of the table.
The shoulders should be rotated about 45° away from the surgeon.
The head should be inclined as much as possible.
Head rotation depending on the point of access required for posterior fossa midline or lateral craniotomies.
Finally, the operating table is turned into reverse Trendelenburg position.
1.4.6 Park Bench
David Bervini and Janine Abu-Isa
The park bench position is suitable for approaches to the posterior fossa, including retrosigmoid and occipital midline, and for lateral infratentorial craniotomies in general. Unlike in the lateral recumbent position, the patient’s shoulder and lower arm hang over the edge of the table. This may allow greater contralateral head flexion and tilt, and hence a wider opening of the lateral craniocervical corridor. See ▶Fig. 1.24, ▶Fig. 1.25, ▶Fig. 1.26, ▶Fig. 1.27, ▶Fig. 1.28, ▶Fig. 1.29, and ▶Fig. 1.30.
Potential Complications of Park Bench Position
Potential complications of the park bench position include pressure palsies of the shoulder or arm, brachial plexus injuries, and stretch injuries. Excessive head flexion can cause jugular vein compression and venous outflow congestion.
Checklist
Lateral position, upper body tilted 15 to 30° in anti-Trendelenburg position to minimize venous pressure in the head.
Body secured at the level of the lumbosacral spine and pelvis with two supports.
Pay special attention to possible pressure points (elbow, axilla, knee, ankle).
Lower arm on arm board between the table and the Mayfield clamp; support the arm so that it does not hang from the shoulder.
Upper shoulder rotated by gravity about 30 to 45° away from the surgeon.
Further gentle downward draping of the shoulder may be needed; avoid excessive traction.
Head is rotated and tilted as far as needed.
Maximum head flexion limited to two finger widths between the chin and clavicle/sternum.
Final adjustment of the table position is made to suit the surgeon.
Further Reading
Rozet I, Vavilala MS. Risks and benefits of patient positioning during neurosurgical care. Anesthesiol Clin 2007;25(3):631–653
1.4.7 Prone/Concorde
Christian Fung
The prone position is used to access lesions in the occipital or superior parietal lobe and the posterior cervical spine. Putting the patient into the prone position increases abdominal pressure and decreases venous reflux. Special tables or frames (e.g., Wilson frame, Jackson table) enable free movement of the abdominal wall and increase venous backflow, therefore decreasing surgical bleeding due to venous congestion. Higher head positions improve venous reflux but increase the risk of air embolism.
The Concorde position is a modification of the prone position and enables access to the suboccipital region. It is a position often used for craniotomies of the posterior fossa for cerebellar approaches, approaches to the infratentorial supracerebellar region, and the foramen magnum. See ▶Fig. 1.31, ▶Fig. 1.32, ▶Fig. 1.33, and ▶Fig. 1.34.
Potential Complications of Prone/Concorde Position
Potential complications of the prone/Concorde position include cervical strains with postoperative pain. Patients can develop skin necrosis due to compression and insufficient padding. Excessive downward taping of the shoulders can lead to brachial plexus injury. If the patient is in the prone or Concorde position, the risk of air embolism is lower than in a sitting position but may still occur. In addition, an obstruction of the cerebral lymphatic and venous outflow can cause swelling of the face, tongue, and neck, leading to macroglossia and airway obstruction. The same mechanism can also cause intraoperative brain swelling with increased intracranial pressure. Occasionally, blindness or corneal abrasion after a patient has been in the prone position has been described.
Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue