13 Cervical Burst Fractures



10.1055/b-0035-121759

13 Cervical Burst Fractures

Teresa S. Purzner, James G. Purzner, and Michael G. Fehlings

Introduction


Cervical burst fractures are the result of flexion compression injuries and are characterized by loss in vertebral body (VB) height, cortical fracture of the posterior VB wall, retropulsion of fragments into the canal, and an increase in intrapedicular distance (IPD). Burst fractures that present with neurologic deficit have persistent canal compression or that involve the posterior elements usually require surgical intervention—typically in the form of corpectomy and anterior reconstruction. However, burst fractures that do not affect the posterior elements and present neurologically intact can be managed with external orthosis. In the following chapter we discuss the surgical indications, medical management, radiographic findings, surgical approach, and postoperative care of patients with subaxial cervical spine burst fractures.



Indications


There are a variety of classification systems for subaxial cervical burst fractures. The Allen classification 1 categorized subaxial spine injuries into six major groups of injury: three compressive injuries (flexion compression [20%], extension compression [25%], and vertical compression); two distraction injuries (flexion distraction [40%], extension-distraction); and finally one lateral flexion injury. Burst fractures belong to both flexion compression and vertical compression categories.


Perhaps the most clinically useful classification system was put forward in 2007 by Vaccarro et al who developed the subaxial cervical spine classification system (SLIC) guidelines ( Table 13.1 ). 2 These guidelines are unique in their consideration of bony morphology, involvement of the discoligamentous complex (DLC), and neurologic presentation. Numerical values are given under each category depending on the severity of involvement. When the sum of all three categories amounts to less than 4 points, then conservative management should be considered. Greater than 4 points is suggestive of surgical management. Based on the SLIC scale, burst fractures without disruption of the DLC or change in neurologic status would be given 3 to 4 points and be treated with external orthosis while those with deterioration in neurologic status and disruption of the DLC would have > 4 points and therefore require surgical stabilization. The proposed algorithm included in this chapter is also dependent on neurologic status and the status of the posterior ligamentous complex ( Fig. 13.1 ). Isolated burst fractures without neurologic deficit are managed with external orthosis while those presenting with neurologic symptoms and disruption of the posterior elements require both anterior decompression and posterior reconstruction.


Panjabi and White proposed an alternative point-based classification system targeted toward the subaxial cervical spine as well as thoracic and lumbar injuries. They considered angulation > 11% or > 3.5 mm of subluxation as unstable. 3 Cooper et al based their decision on the presence of irreducible facet fractures, retropulsed fragments causing persistent canal compromise in an incomplete SCI, progressive neurologic deficit from spinal instability, root decompression, or chronic progressive deformity with incomplete spinal cord injury or nerve root deficit. 4 Hadley et al recommended the following indications for surgery: irreducible bone alignment, irreducible spinal cord compression, instability post reduction, ligamentous injury with facet instability, > 15% kyphosis, or > 20% subluxation. 5 To better determine the correlation of radiographic findings of canal compromise and neurologic outcome, Fehlings et al performed an evidence-based analysis of published criteria in patients with acute cervical SCI. 6 , 7 They went on to develop a prospective study investigating magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings associated with canal compromise and found that maximum spinal cord compression as well as spinal cord hemorrhage and cord swelling were most associated with a poor prognosis for neurologic recovery. 8























Table 13.1 SLIC guidelines

Category


Points


Morphology


No abnormality


Compression


Burst


Distraction


Rotation/translation


0


1


2


3


4


Discoligamentous complex


Intact


Indeterminate


Disrupted


0


1


2


Neurologic status


Intact


Root injury


Complete cord injury


Incomplete cord injury


Continuous compression


0


1


2


3


+1


Note: Subaxial cervical spine injury classification system based on bony morphology, involvement of the discoligamentous complex, and clinical presentation. Injuries with a score of less than 4 are managed with rigid orthosis while injuries with a score of greater than 4 should be considered for surgical fixation. Injuries with a score of 4 can be treated with either rigid orthosis or surgical instrumentation.

Fig. 13.1a–f Mechanisms of injury in cervical burst fractures. (a) Flexion compression injuries often result in injuries of the vertebral body whereas (b) flexion distraction injuries result in facet dislocations. (c) Extension compression injuries will often result in crush injuries of the posterior elements whereas (d) extension distraction injuries result in anterior avulsions and injuries of both the vertebral body and posterior elements. (e) When rotation or translation are involved, there is often widespread involvement of the discoligamentous complex (DLC). (f) The cervical spine is composed of both bony and ligamentous structures. #, fracture; DLC, discoligamentous complex; PLL, posterior longitudinal ligament; ALL, anterior longitudinal ligament.


Initial Evaluation and Medical Management


The initial management of cervical burst fractures occurs outside of the hospital at the scene of injury. These fractures often occur in the setting of polytrauma where other life-threatening injuries can distract from possible neurologic deterioration. Full cervical spine precautions with immobilization and transfer to an appropriate trauma center should be performed efficiently and safely. Once at the trauma center, the Advanced Trauma Life Support protocol is instituted. In the setting of retropulsed segments and compressive spine injury, particular attention is paid to oxygenation and maintenance of adequate perfusion. Strict blood pressure control is important with a target mean arterial pressure (MAP) above 80. Hypotension can initially be managed with fluid boluses; however, initiation of vasopressors should be considered if adequate perfusion is not achieved with fluid boluses alone. The role of steroids remains ambiguous and is well reviewed elsewhere. Once the patient is stabilized, a thorough history can reveal the mechanism of injury and timing of neurologic deterioration. Cervical flexion compression injuries are particularly concerning for burst fractures.


Following the primary survey, a thorough physical exam is required. Initial inspection and palpation can identify obvious deformities, external soft tissue injuries, and local areas of tenderness or asymmetry. When a history is not available, patterns of injuries can sometimes suggest the mechanism of injury. Next, a dedicated neurologic exam should focus on limb strength, sensation and reflexes, truncal sensation, and perspiration as well as bowel and bladder sphincter function. The American Spinal Injury Association classification system (ASIA) is a common clinical classification system that allows for an organized approach to the neurologic exam and categorizes degree of injury into four groups. 9 ASIA A injuries are complete SCIs where no sensory or motor function is preserved. ASIA E injuries have no motor or sensory deficit. ASIA B to D injuries are incomplete SCIs where sensory function is preserved but with varying degrees of loss in motor function. Importantly, ongoing progression of neurologic deficits can suggest ongoing or progressive compression whether by unstable or retropulsed fracture fragments or an expanding hematoma. These are important to identify early as timely decompression can have significant impact on overall outcome.


Early optimization of medical management has been shown to benefit long-term prognosis; however, the timing of surgical intervention remains somewhat more controversial. There exists a large body of literature investigating the role of early surgical intervention. The best evidence to date was put forward by Fehlings et al in the Surgical Timing in Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study (STASCIS trial). 10 This international multicenter prospective cohort study looked at 313 patients with acute cervical SCI. Of these, 182 underwent early surgery (within 24 hours) and 131 underwent late surgery (after 24 hours). Primary outcome was change in ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS) grade at 6 months. Secondary outcomes were rates of complication and mortality. Twenty percent of patients undergoing early surgery showed a ≥ 2 grade improvement compared to 8.8% in the late decompression group. Mortality and rates of complication were not statistically significant between the two groups. This study would suggest that decompression within 24 hours is beneficial.


Closed reduction, if attempted, is a relatively well-tolerated procedure with an overall reduction rate of approximately 80%, 30% recurrent displacement or malalignment, 2 to 4% chance of transient deficit, and 1% chance of permanent deficit. Overall rates of failure in compression fractures of the subaxial C-spine were found to be around 5%. Similarly, Koivikko et al found a rate of reoperation in patients treated with orthosis to be 4% (compared to 3% in surgically managed patients). 11 While nonsurgical management is certainly the appropriate decision in a large percentage of patients, there is some evidence that neurologic improvement, kyphotic deformity, and canal stenosis were all improved in patients treated surgically. 11 Most studies, however, were retrospective reviews and outcomes were generalized to a spectrum of fracture patterns. Furthermore, the differences in recovery between surgical and nonsurgical management is far outweighed by the status at presentation than choice of treatment. Patients who are treated with a halo vest or hard cervicothoracic orthosis for 2 to 3 months should be followed up with flexion-extension X-rays to help determine success of fusion.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jun 13, 2020 | Posted by in NEUROSURGERY | Comments Off on 13 Cervical Burst Fractures

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access