14 Joint “Jamming” as a Treatment for Atlantoaxial Dislocation and Basilar Invagination



10.1055/b-0034-81391

14 Joint “Jamming” as a Treatment for Atlantoaxial Dislocation and Basilar Invagination

Goel, Atul

This chapter discusses an alternative technique for atlantoaxial fixation that involves blocking, or “jamming,” movements of the atlantoaxial joint.1 The technique features forcible impaction of spiked titanium metal spacers and bone graft within the distracted atlantoaxial facet joints. Wires, metal loops, rods, and screws are not used for fixation. Onlay and interfacetal bone grafts subsequently produce bone fusion. The technique simulates to an extent interbody fixation of the subaxial spine in cases of spinal instability and spondylolisthesis. Joint jamming as a stand-alone method or in combination with other fixation methods could provide firm stabilization in selected cases of atlantoaxial dislocation and basilar invagination.



Role in Atlantoaxial Dislocation


Our successful experience suggests that joint jamming can be used in highly select cases of atlantoaxial dislocation. We are still not entirely convinced that it can be a stand-alone method of atlantoaxial fixation in all cases. It can, however, be a useful method of fixation when used in combination with other posterior fixation techniques. The utility and indications of use of this technique are still under evaluation.



Indications


Our preferred technique for mobile atlantoaxial dislocation is Goel and Laheri’s technique of lateral mass plate and screw fixation, as discussed.26 In our experience, we have observed that in select cases, placement of the bone graft and titanium spacers by themselves made the region stable, and the need for additional plate and screw fixation could be avoided. Patients with atlantoaxial dislocation following trauma and those having only subtle or moderate recent-onset abnormal mobility of the joint and “normal taut” ligamentous assembly were more suitable for the described technique. The excessive mobility of the atlantoaxial joint and the laxity of ligaments in cases with congenital and long-standing dislocation probably make them unsuitable for the described technique in isolation, but it can still be employed in combination with most other methods of fixation. Direct operative observation of the nature of the facets and the joint and the stability of the impacted spacer within the joint space also determine if any additional fixation device is necessary.



Surgical Technique


The basic surgical steps in exposure of the region have been described in our articles on the subject.28 Cervical traction is given prior to induction of anesthesia, and the weights are progressively increased to ~4 to 5 kg, or one-eighth of the patient’s total body weight. The patient is placed prone with the head end of the table elevated to ~35°. The atlantoaxial facet joints are widely exposed on both sides after either sectioning or elevating superiorly the large C2 ganglion. The joint capsule is excised, and the end-plate articular cartilage is widely removed using a microdrill. The facets are distracted with the help of varying sizes of osteotomes, which are introduced in the joint with their sharp edge and then turned 90° to effect distraction. The joint space is assessed, and a specially designed spiked titanium spacer suitable for the region is impacted, or “jammed,” into the joint space using suitable instruments. The average size of the spacers used measures 12 mm in length, 10 mm in breadth, and 6 mm in height. Customized titanium spacers have multiple small holes and are tapered on one side for easier insertion during placement in the joint space ( Figs. 14.1, 14.2, 14.3, and 14.4 ). The base of the spacer has a transverse slot that assists in placement and stabilization of the instrument used for its impaction into the joint cavity. Introduction of the bone graft pieces within the joint cavity provides stability to the implant and additional opportunity for bone fusion. Multiholed titanium spacers allow bone incorporation and fusion across the distracted joint space. Corticocancellous bone graft pieces harvested from the iliac crest are stuffed into the space available around the spacers. Additional bone graft is placed over the posterior elements of C1 and C2 after decorticating the host bone area with a burr. Postoperatively, the traction is discontinued, and the patient is placed in a four-post hard cervical collar for 3 months; all physical activities involving the neck are restricted during this period. However, sitting and standing are encouraged, as during these maneuvers, the weight of the head helps in further impaction of the spacers and stability of the joint.

Fig. 14.1a–e Images of a 56-year-old female patient. a Preoperative computed tomography (CT) scan with the neck in flexion shows atlantoaxial dislocation. Assimilation of the atlas can be observed. b Preoperative CT scan with the neck in extension showing reduction of the atlantoaxial dislocation. c Sagittal image of the postoperative CT scan showing the spacer within the atlantoaxial facet joint. d Coronal image showing the spacers within the facet joints on both sides. Distraction of the facets can be observed. e Lateral radiograph with the neck in flexion with spacers in both facet joints 28 months after surgery. Solid bone fusion can be seen.
Fig. 14.2a–d Images of a 24-year-old male patient. a Lateral radiograph with the neck in flexion showing atlantoaxial dislocation. b Postoperative CT sagittal image with the spacer in the atlanto-axial joint. c Postoperative coronal image showing spacers in both of the atlantoaxial joints. d Postoperative radiograph with the neck in flexion showing reduction of the dislocation and spacers in position.

Although the biomechanical properties need to be evaluated further, the technique of facet distraction as described here simulates several successfully employed and evaluated interbody fixation techniques used for the subaxial spine. From our experience, it appears that distraction of the facets increases stability, as multiple ligamentous structures and axial loading of the spine contribute to stability. The extent of the stability achieved is significantly enhanced by the use of specially designed spiked spacers. The release of distraction after introduction of the spacers and bone graft assists in further impaction of the spikes of the spacers into the facets and stabilization. The distraction of the facets and impaction of the spacer and bone graft can be technically challenging, but they are c ertainly less complicated than interarticular and transarticular screw fixation methods. Because no screws are implanted, the problem of vertebral artery injury is avoided.

Fig. 14.3 Picture showing spacers of various sizes. The spacers are made of titanium and have spikes. There are multiple holes within the body of the spacers for assistance with bone healing. The spacers are tapered at the leading edge to assist insertion within the joint. The base of the spacer has a transverse slot for stability of a suitable osteotome during hammer insertion.
Fig. 14.4a–i Images of a 17-year-old male patient. a Preoperative CT scan showing basilar invagination. Assimilation of the atlas can be observed. b Preoperative CT scan showing the abnormal alignment of the atlantoaxial joint. c Coronal image of the CT scan showing the craniovertebral junction and the joints. d Axial section of a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan showing marked rotation of the odontoid process. CVJ, craniovertebral junction. e Postoperative CT scan showing the reduction of the basilar invagination and improvement in the craniovertebral alignments. f Postoperative sagittal cut through the atlantoaxial joint showing marked realignment of the facets and the joint. g Postoperative sagittal cut showing the spacer in the atlantoaxial joint and realignment. h Postoperative coronal section showing spacers in both of the atlantoaxial joints. i Postoperative radiograph (lateral view) showing spacers in both of the atlantoaxial joints. Evidence of bone fusion is noted.

Between January 2003 and January 2007, six patients underwent the discussed method of fixation.1 All six patients had posttraumatic mobile and reducible atlantoaxial dislocation. The mean follow-up period was 16 months (range 5–47 months). Successful atlantoaxial stabilization and ultimate bone fusion were achieved in all patients and were documented with dynamic radiography. There were no neurological, vascular, or infective complications. During the follow-up period, all patients showed neurological recovery, and there was no indication of implant migration or failure, suggesting the effectiveness of the operation.


Because no wire, screws, plates, or rods were used for fixation, as is the norm in other fixation procedures, the extent of stability provided by the implant will have to be assessed by a larger series done over a longer period of time. The issues of the most appropriate size and type of spacer and the extent of optimum distraction necessary also will have to be evaluated further.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jul 14, 2020 | Posted by in NEUROSURGERY | Comments Off on 14 Joint “Jamming” as a Treatment for Atlantoaxial Dislocation and Basilar Invagination

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access