2 Intractable Epilepsy in Children and Selection of Surgical Candidates



10.1055/b-0034-84111

2 Intractable Epilepsy in Children and Selection of Surgical Candidates

Eksioglu, Yaman, Riviello, James J. Jr.

Surgery for childhood epilepsy is now considered an established treatment for medically refractory seizures.1–3 Various surgical procedures are available, the choice depending on the etiology, the location of the epileptic focus, and the function of the cortex in which the focus is located. It is of the utmost importance to consider both the control of seizures and the quality of life after epilepsy surgery. If the epileptic focus is located in a cortical area subserving a critical neurological function (typically language, motor, primary sensory, or memory, referred to as eloquent cortex), and resection sacrifices this function, the result would cause an unacceptable compromise in quality of life despite seizure freedom. The best outcome, complete seizure freedom without a deficit, is possible when a single epileptic focus exists in noneloquent cortex that can undergo complete resection. The identification of the epileptic focus and function of its underlying cortex require data from multiple modalities: clinical, neurophysiological, and neuroanatomical ( Table 2.1 ).


The Commission on Neurosurgery of the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) developed recommended standards for epilepsy surgery.4 The ILAE also established a Pediatric Epilepsy Surgery Subcommission, which has produced criteria for the referral and evaluation of children for epilepsy surgery5 and completed an international survey on the practice of pediatric epilepsy surgery (The 2004 ILAE International Survey: 543 children younger than 18 years of age from 20 centers).6 A retrospective outcome study is in progress, and a prospective study is planned. This chapter reviews the multi-modal data used in the selection process of surgical candidates. Subsequent chapters will discuss each technique in detail.



Process of Evaluation for Selection of Surgical Candidates


The selection of surgical candidates starts with an exact description of the clinical manifestations of the seizure, called seizure semiology. This is then followed by a general physical and neurological examination, basic and computerized neurophysiological testing (electroencephalography [EEG] and magnetoencephalography [MEG]), structural (magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]) and functional neuroimaging (single photon emission computed tomography [SPECT] and positron emission tomography [PET] scans), and a neuropsychological examination. The results are analyzed to determine if there is evidence of focal, multifocal, or diffuse dysfunction. Further invasive monitoring may be needed, depending on the specifics of each case. The intracarotid amobarbital procedure (Wada test), or invasive EEG monitoring, may be needed to identify the exact location of seizure onset and to map cortical function. However, noninvasive mapping may now be accomplished with functional MRI (fMRI), EEG-guided fMRI, and MEG. The seizure focus itself can consist of several cortical zones, with each modality examining a different cortical zone ( Table 2.2 ).2,3,7,8
























































Table 2.1 Modalities to Identify the Epileptic Focus

Clinical


Semiology


Physical and neurological examination


Neurophysiological


EEG (interictal)


EEG (ictal)


MEG


Source analysis


Neuroimaging


CT scan


Structural


MRI (structural)


MRI: DTI


MRI: DWI


MRS


Functional


fMRI


SPECT (interictal/ictal)


PET (interictal)


Additional invasive tests


Intracarotid amobarbital procedure (Wada test)


Invasive monitoring: ECoG Cortical stimulation


Evoked potentials: somatosensory


Visual-evoked potentials


Abbreviations: electroencephalogram; EEG; magnetoencephalography, MEG; computed tomography, CT; magnetic resonance imaging, MRI; diffusion tensor imaging, DTI; diffusion weighted imaging, DWI; magnetic resonance spectroscopy, MRS; functional magnetic resonance imaging, fMRI; single photon emission computed tomography, SPECT; positron emission tomography, PET; electrocorticography, ECoG.














































Table 2.2 Cortical Zones

Epileptogenic zone


Cortical area indispensable for clinical seizure generation

 

May include portions or all of the following


Functional deficit zone


Cortical region abnormal in the interictal period

 

Defined by neurological examination, neuropsychological examination, EEG, and functional neuroimaging


Irritative zone


Generates interictal spikes and sharp waves


Symptomatogenic zone


Cortical area that produces the ictal symptoms when activated

 

Primary or secondarily activated from propagation of an epileptic discharge


Ictal (seizure) onset zone


Area from which the seizure is actually generated

 

Silent, if originates from a silent cortical area (noneloquent cortex)


Epileptogenic lesion


Neuroradiological lesion causing epilepsy. Important in the presurgical evaluation, but not all lesions are necessarily the lesion causing the refractory seizures


Eloquent cortex


Cortex related to a given function

 

For epilepsy surgery, typically refers to primary motor, primary sensory, language, or memory functions. The term silent cortex is a misnomer; it really means that its function is not known because the correct paradigm has not been tested.


Abbreviations: electroencephalogram, EEG.


Possible surgical procedures include multifocal cortical resection, hemispherectomy, corpus callosotomy, and multiple subpial transection (MST). These procedures are considered with either multifocal or generalized seizures. Multilobar resection or hemispherectomy are considered when the epileptogenic zone is primarily multifocal but unilateral, corpus callosotomy is done for either a bilateral or generalized seizure onset, and MST is considered when the epileptic focus is within eloquent cortex. Neurostimulation techniques, such as vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), can be performed for patients not considered ideal candidates for a focal resection: patients with multifocal seizures, or patients with the epileptic focus within eloquent cortex, for example, or when the patient or family are not interested in resective surgery.


The selection of the appropriate treatment is determined by the presurgical evaluation. This is divided into three phases: the noninvasive presurgical evaluation is phase 1, invasive monitoring is phase 2, and the surgical resection is phase 3. All three phases may not be needed in every patient. There are three major aims:




  1. To lateralize and localize the epileptic focus



  2. To determine the function of the presumed epileptic focus (brain mapping)



  3. To determine which surgical procedure has the greatest chance of controlling seizures without causing a neurological deficit



Presurgical Clinical Evaluation


This process begins with an initial outpatient evaluation.9 Several questions are addressed before any invasive procedure:




  1. Does the child truly have epilepsy?



  2. What is its etiology?



  3. Is epilepsy surgery warranted for the given seizure type or epilepsy syndrome?



  4. Is the epilepsy truly refractory, or are other therapies indicated before any consideration of surgery?



  5. What is the possibility of remission?



  6. Are the child and family prepared for surgery, including the psychological aspects of the invasive monitoring, the resection, or even its failure? ( Table 2.3 )


We find it best to review this in an outpatient visit before the admission so that the family knows what to expect and we know how to best tailor the phase 1 evaluation to the child’s individual needs and expectations.




























Table 2.3 Questions for the Presurgical Evaluation

Does the child truly have epilepsy?


Have pseudoseizures, vasovagal events, periodic movement disorders, and hyperekplexia been ruled out?


Is surgery warranted for the case?


Is there a metabolic or degenerative condition or benign rolandic epilepsy?


What is the underlying etiology?


Lesional, nonlesional, channelopathies, metabolic, degenerative, tumor, infection, etc.


Is epilepsy truly refractory?


Have appropriate AEDs been used to their therapeutic maximum levels?


Is remission still a possibility?


Have all nonsurgical avenues been exhausted?


How prepared are the child and family for surgery?


(Have they been counseled on the possible side effects or psychological aspects)


Abbreviations: antiepileptic drug, AED.


The epileptologist must first determine whether the initial diagnosis of epilepsy was correct. Many nonepileptic paroxysmal events are easily mistaken for epilepsy, treated with antiepileptic drugs, and ultimately referred for a pre-surgical evaluation. In a study of 223 children referred to a tertiary epilepsy center, 87 (39%) did not have epilepsy.10 We have seen children referred for refractory epilepsy with other diagnoses, especially pseudoseizures, vasovagal events, periodic movement disorders, and hyperekplexia. Capturing the habitual seizure on long-term EEG monitoring excludes these conditions. Appropriate AED treatment for the seizure type or epilepsy syndrome is needed before considering surgery. If an underlying metabolic or degenerative condition is responsible for the seizures, respective surgery may not be appropriate.


Epilepsy syndromes are divided into benign or malignant. This distinction refers to the ultimate course of the actual seizures in addition to the developmental outcome. The term catastrophic epilepsy applies to early onset epilepsy syndromes in which the outcome is poor unless seizures can be controlled, commonly occurring when a structural lesion causes refractory epilepsy.11 Alternatively, children with benign syndromes, such as rolandic epilepsy, may have seizures that, although difficult to control, will ultimately remit.

























Table 2.4 Definition Intractable Epilepsy

Subcommission ILAE5


Failure of either 2 or 3 appropriate AEDs, disabling seizure side effects, or disabling AED side effects


Connecticut12


Failure of more than 2 appropriate first-line AEDs, with an average of more than 1 seizure per month over 18 months and not seizure free for more than 3 consecutive months in this time interval


Halifax/Canada13


Two or more seizures in each 2-month period during the last year of follow-up, despite treatment with at least 3 AEDs as monotherapy or polytherapy


Holland14


Failure to achieve more than 3 months seizure freedom and an epileptiform EEG at 6 months after diagnosis


Philadelphia15


Persistence of any seizures between 18 and 24 months after onset epilepsy and despite at least 2 maximally tolerated AEDs


Abbreviations: antiepileptic drug, AED; ILAE, International League Against Epilepsy; electroencephalogram, EEG.









































Table 2.5 Potential Epileptogenic Lesions

Developmental lesions


Cortical dysplasia


Hamartoma


Heterotopia


Tumors


Low-grade glioma


Ganglioglioma


DNET


Vascular lesions


AVM


Cavernous malformations


Injury-related lesions


Gliosis (CVA, trauma)


Infectious lesions


Granuloma


Parasitic cyst


Abbreviations: DNET, dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumor; AVM, arteriovenous malformation; CVA, cerebrovascular accident.


The Subcommission for Pediatric Epilepsy Surgery defined refractory epilepsy as the failure of two or three appropriate AEDs, disabling side effects of seizures, or disabling side effects of medications. However, the definition of refractory epilepsy varies ( Table 2.4 ),12–15 and children considered intractable may later achieve seizure control. In a prospective, community-based study of 613 children with epilepsy, 13% of those considered refractory ultimately became seizure free and early remission periods preceded intractability in two thirds, with catastrophic epilepsy as a risk factor.12 Other factors contributing to refractory epilepsy include cryptogenic or symptomatic generalized epilepsy, high initial seizure frequency, early onset epilepsy, and focal EEG slowing.16


The subcommission listed other indications for referral to a center specialized in surgical epilepsy: seizures unable to be classified as a clearly defined electroclinical syndrome, stereotyped or lateralized seizures, other evidence of focality, or a potentially resectable epileptogenic lesion evident on MRI study ( Table 2.5 ). Specific disorders considered for surgical epilepsy syndromes are cortical dysplasia, tuberous sclerosis complex, polymicrogyria, hypothalamic hamartoma, hemispheric syndromes, Sturge-Weber syndrome, Rasmussen syndrome, Landau-Kleffner syndrome, and certain lesions (tumors, infarctions).

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jul 16, 2020 | Posted by in NEUROSURGERY | Comments Off on 2 Intractable Epilepsy in Children and Selection of Surgical Candidates

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access