22 Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion



10.1055/b-0039-166431

22 Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Ankur S. Narain, Fady Y. Hijji, Philip K. Louie, Daniel D. Bohl, and Kern Singh

22.1 Case Presentation


A 52-year-old woman presents to the clinic with right leg pain of 6-month duration. The patient denies any benefit from nonoperative management prescribed by her primary care physician, which included nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), epidural steroid injections, and physical therapy. On physical examination, the patient exhibits a positive straight leg test and sensory deficits along the lateral leg. The patient also demonstrates mild weakness on great toe dorsiflexion. There is no noted hypo- or hyperreflexia or Babinski’s sign present. Lumbar radiographs are shown in Figs. 22.1 and 22.2 . The patient’s radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are presented. The patient is subsequently scheduled to receive a minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF) of the L5S1 disk space.

Fig. 22.1 Anteroposterior (a) and lateral (b) lumbar radiographs. There is moderate spondylosis of the L5–S1 disk space. Note the loss of disk height and narrowing of the neuroforamen.
Fig. 22.2 Sagittal (a) and axial (b) T2-weighted MRI. There is significant foraminal and moderate central stenosis at the L5–S1 disk level.


22.2 Indications




  • Lumbar disk herniations.



  • Compression of lumbar nerve roots.



  • Lumbar instability.



  • Access to the posterior lumbar spine with minimal blood loss and shortened patient recovery time.



22.3 Positioning




  • Prone.



  • Landmarks identified through fluoroscopic imaging:




    • Spinous processes.



    • Pedicular line (lateral edge of the pedicle).



22.4 Approach




  • Superficial dissection:




    • The skin incision is made lateral to the midpedicular line (1.0 cm; Fig. 22.3a ):




      • Lateral fluoroscopy is utilized to confirm the location of the placed dilators at the correct level ( Fig. 22.3b ).



      • There is no true internervous plane here, as the incision and entry point is made in between the paraspinal muscles, which are segmentally innervated.



    • Dilators are docked over the lamina at the level of pathology with removal of residual paraspinal musculature.



  • Deep dissection:




    • The lamina and facet joint are resected:




      • The superior articular process of the caudal vertebrae is removed first during the facetectomy:




        • Inadequate facet removal can result in a narrowed working space, increasing the risk for excessive nerve root retraction and interbody cage misplacement/migration.



    • Once laminectomy and facetectomy are completed, the ligamentum flavum is removed:




      • The disk space, dura, and nerve root are exposed ( Fig. 22.4 ).



      • Veins overlying the disk space and dura can cause profuse bleeding.

Fig. 22.3 Intraoperative fluoroscopy showing the placement of a dilator overlying the lamina of the targeted disk level (a) with corresponding lateral radiograph (b). Note the off-midline approach. (Reproduced with permission from Singh K, Vaccaro AR, eds. Pocket Atlas of Spine Surgery. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Thieme; 2018.)
Fig. 22.4 Top-down view. The lamina, superior and inferior articular facets, and ligamentum flavum have been resected, exposing the dura and nerve root. (Reproduced with permission from Singh K, Vaccaro AR, eds. Pocket Atlas of Spine Surgery. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Thieme; 2018.)

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

May 17, 2020 | Posted by in NEUROSURGERY | Comments Off on 22 Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access