28 Treatment of Chronic Vertebral Compression Fractures



10.1055/b-0040-175477

28 Treatment of Chronic Vertebral Compression Fractures

Alexios Kelekis and Dimitrios K. Filippiadis


Summary


Vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) can be persistently painful even past the acute or subacute phase. Chronic fractures are defined as fractures older than six months. Osteonecrosis of the vertebral body is one of the more common conditions that can lead to bone resorption and loss of mechanical integrity necessitating treatment with vertebral augmentation. Chronic fractures can be treated with either vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty and numerous studies have shown this to be effective and to produce significant pain relief provided the patient’s pain is coming from the vertebral compression fracture. Although the presence of bone marrow edema tends to be predictive of pain relief after vertebral augmentation with a greater amount of bone marrow edema indicating the potential for greater pain relief, the absence of marrow edema does not mean that the patient will not improve after vertebral augmentation and patients have been shown to improve after treatment of chronic fractures irrespective of their appearance on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).




28.1 Introduction


Depending upon the duration of fractures, all vertebral fractures can be defined as acute (<6 weeks), subacute (6–24 weeks), and chronic (>24 weeks). 1 The pathophysiology behind unhealed chronic, longer-lasting pain in these patients is multifactorial, including structural changes, nonunions, fibrous unions, osteoarthritis, and nerve irritation that results in chronic radiculopathy or complex regional pain syndrome. 2 In the early era of vertebral augmentation, treating older fractures was controversial; however, numerous literature publications have proven efficacy of cement injection in these unhealed fractures as well. 3 6 According to international reporting standards both painful chronic traumatic fracture with nonunion or internal cystic changes and painful fractures associated with osteonecrosis are included in the indications of vertebral augmentation. 7 , 8



28.2 Preoperative Evaluation


Preoperative imaging evaluation is a pre-requisite in chronic cases as well. Radiographs of the spine in anteroposterior and lateral projections can provide initial information concerning the number and the extent of vertebral collapse, but defining the levels of treatment by standard radiographs is inaccurate in both acute and chronic lesions. 2 , 9 Similarly, in chronic vertebral fractures the usefulness of scintigraphy is controversial. 2 On the other hand, MRI is governed by high sensitivity for bone marrow edema indicating osseous activity at the fracture site, irrespective of the fracture’s age. Timing of the fracture (acute or chronic) should not be confused with the presence of bone edema in short TI inversion recovery (STIR) sequence of MR examination. Both acute and unhealed chronic fractures can show bone edema (illustrated as increased signal intensity on the STIR sequence) as a sign of bone marrow activity. MRI with STIR and T1-weighted sequences should be used to verify the fracture’s age and healing status (acute vs. chronic, incompletely healed vs. consolidated) (▶Fig. 28.1). 8 Tanigawa et al reported that the improvement after vertebral augmentation is related to the bone edema pattern illustrated in the pretherapeutic MRI (▶Fig. 28.2). Specifically according to this study patients with an extensive bone marrow edema pattern involving more than 50% of the vertebral body reported significantly greater clinical improvement than those without this pattern 10 (▶Fig. 28.3).

Fig. 28.1 Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) depicting in short TI inversion recovery (STIR) sagittal sequence an L1 wedge vertebral fracture (white arrow), with no hyperintensity signal, hence no bone edema.
Fig. 28.2 Sagittal magnetic resonance (MR) image of vertebral body with short TI inversion recovery (STIR) (a) and T1W (b) sagittal sequences of a patient with T11 wedge fracture (white arrow in a and b). The vertebral edema (high in STIR and low signal in T1 as is indicated by white arrowheads in both images) extends through less than 50% of the vertebral body.
Fig. 28.3 Sagittal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of a patient consulting for low back pain. On short TI inversion recovery (STIR) there are two fractures of the upper end plate, one in L1 and one in L5 (white arrows in a). The L1 fracture has bone edema in more than 50% of the vertebral body (high signal in STIR and low in T1 as indicated by the white arrowheads in a and b) and may be clinically more painful than the L5 fracture, which has less than 50% bone edema (white ovals in a and b).


28.3 Vertebral Osteonecrosis


Vertebral body osteonecrosis is characterized by cellular death and bone resorption that result in mechanical insufficiency and vertebral collapse (▶Fig. 28.4). It can be idiopathic or secondary to trauma, cytotoxicity, and genetic factors. 11 13 The process of osteonecrosis and subsequent rapid collapse of a vertebral body has been given the eponymous name Kummell disease after the German surgeon Hermann Kummell who first described this condition in 1891. The pathognomonic sign of vertebral osteonecrosis is the intravertebral vacuum sign that may contain gas, fluid, or both. 13 MRI cannot easily distinguish between gas and compact bone, as both appear as low signal intensity areas. In case of suspicion of a gas pocket, CT imaging can easily detect the osteonecrotic gas cavity (▶Fig. 28.5). The literature examination of vertebral osteonecrosis is limited and inconsistent with substantial overlap with cases of nonunion, fibrous union, and pseudoarthrosis. 14 The most common reported risk factors include low bone density and the use of glucocorticoids but many factors may work in combination. Recently, vertebral osteonecrosis was classified into four stages based upon radiological findings and sagittal alignment: 13

Fig. 28.4 L3 vertebral fracture in short TI inversion recovery (STIR) sagittal sequence illustrating a fluid-filled cleft (black arrow), just below the superior end plate. The edema (high signal in STIR as indicated by white oval) extends through the middle third to the anterior third of the vertebral body. Notice the bone marrow edema, which is characterized by its high intensity on STIR, has a lower signal than the fluid seen in the cleft (black arrow).
Fig. 28.5 Thoracic spine imaging showing a hypointense area in T7 and T10 vertebral bodies (black arrows in a) as noted on the T1-weighted sagittal magnetic resonance (MR) image. The decreased signal in the T7 vertebral body remains hypointense on the T2-weighted image (white arrows in a and b). This area of decreased T1 and T2 signal was shown to be an air-filled cleft on a CT exam (area within the white circle in c). Four vertebral levels were augmented, to treat the two fractures, as well as to augment the osteoporotic vertebral bodies in between. The augmentation (white arrows in d) is best seen on the post-treatment CT.



  • 0: Theoretical phase.



  • 1: Early phase.



  • 2: Instability phase.



  • 3: Fixed deformity phase.


According to this classification proposed by Formica et al, stage 1 is managed with nonsurgical management (NSM) as opposed to stages 2 and 3 which require different therapeutic approaches according to local and global sagittal alignment. 13 It is evident that the treatment of vertebral osteonecrosis should be adjusted according to symptoms and disability, neurological status, comorbidities, and surgical risk.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

May 3, 2020 | Posted by in NEUROSURGERY | Comments Off on 28 Treatment of Chronic Vertebral Compression Fractures

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access