38 Midbasilar Artery Aneurysms



10.1055/b-0038-162167

38 Midbasilar Artery Aneurysms

Vikas Y. Rao, Mandy Binning, Daniel R. Felbaum, and Erol Veznedaroglu


Abstract


Midbasilar aneurysms compromise less than 1% of cerebral aneurysms. Treatment decision making for aneurysms in this region constitute whether the aneurysm is ruptured, unruptured, fusiform/dolichoectatic or dissecting, or saccular. Anatomically, the middle third of the basilar artery is one of the most surgically inaccessible regions that is heavily laden with brainstem perforators. Standard imaging workup with computed tomography angiography or magnetic resonance angiography can provide information regarding mass effect and ischemia. Digital subtraction angiography illustrates the vascular architecture and balloon testing can be performed to determine the feasibility of Hunterian ligation. On imaging, aneurysm size, growth on serial imaging, or aggressive morphology is reviewed. The patient should be examined for referable cranial neuropathy or symptomatic mass effect on the brainstem. In giant aneurysms, ischemic symptoms or thromboembolic events should also be investigated. Open surgery often necessitates complex skull base approach techniques that increase morbidity, but can allow for immediate reduction of mass effect. Bypass techniques can also be applied to treat aneurysms in this region. Endovascular techniques may allow for potentially decreased anesthesia and procedure times. Advances in endovascular techniques and technology can allow for gradual decrease in aneurysm pulsatility, thereby reducing mass effect. Despite the wide variability in treatment options, no treatment modality has clearly resulted in better outcomes than the other. Overall, the decision to treat patients should be a careful individualized treatment plan based on the patient anatomy and goal of intervention. This chapter will detail a basic treatment algorithm for these challenging aneurysms.




Introduction


Midbasilar artery aneurysms are defined as aneurysms that involve the basilar artery trunk below the superior cerebellar arteries and above the vertebrobasilar junction. These lesions are rare, comprising less than 1% of all aneurysm encountered in some series, and can be one of the most treacherous aneurysms to treat. Historically, these lesions were treated via surgical means with significant morbidity and mortality. With recent advances, endovascular therapy has become increasingly promising, yet controversy remains as to when to treat and the ideal treatment for these lesions.


Major controversies in decision making addressed in this chapter include:




  1. Whether or not treatment is indicated.



  2. Open versus endovascular treatment for midbasilar artery aneurysms.



  3. Management of unruptured midbasilar artery aneurysms causing mass effect and thromboembolisms.



  4. Role of flow diverters in midbasilar artery aneurysms.



Whether to Treat


The decision to treat a basilar trunk aneurysm is similar to the decision process for all intracranial aneurysms. One must weigh the natural history of a lesion, the presence and severity of symptoms, and the risk of treatment. Balancing these factors in a way that is personalized for the patient and the lesion to be treated is vital to make appropriate clinical decisions. Aneurysms of the midbasilar can present with many different symptoms including rupture with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), mass effect on the brainstem or cranial nerves, and stroke due to thromboembolism ( 1 , 2, 3 in algorithm ).

Algorithm 38.1 Decision-making algorithm for midbasilar artery aneurysms.

As with any intracranial aneurysm, rupture of the aneurysm portends a terrible natural history and would in almost all cases necessitate treatment ( 4–10 in algorithm ). The exceptions to this might be, as with other aneurysm, cases where the patient′s likely outcome is so poor due to poor aneurysm grade, advanced age, or medical comorbidities.


The decision to treat unruptured aneurysms in this region is more nuanced. In general, asymptomatic midbasilar aneurysms thought to have a significant rupture risk per standard aneurysm criteria (size, growth on serial imaging, aggressive morphology, history of previous rupture, etc.), basilar aneurysms symptomatic due to mass effect on the brainstem or cranial nerves, and giant aneurysms presenting with ischemia and thromboembolic events should be considered for treatment ( 4–7 in algorithm ).



Conservative Management


In general, conservative management is not appropriate for ruptured intracranial aneurysms. In the case of unruptured midbasilar aneurysms, historical studies indicate that symptomatic and giant midbasilar aneurysms carry a high rate of mortality if left untreated with some authors stating that the 2-year survival of patients with a symptomatic midbasilar aneurysm is a mere 20% ( 4–10 in algorithm ).


Conservative management includes observation with serial imaging, medical management in order to decrease the risk of subsequent rupture or thromboembolic phenomenon if the aneurysm is thrombosed, and control of any symptoms (if present) ( 4 in algorithm ). This includes lifestyle and comorbidity modifications such as smoking cessation and control of hypertension. If a thrombosed giant aneurysm presents with embolic strokes, anticoagulation or antiplatelet medications could be used to prevent further symptoms ( 6 in algorithm ). If mass effect from aneurysm growth is causing symptoms, steroids can be used to manage symptoms in the short term. If the mass effect is significant enough to cause hydrocephalus, some patients may require ventriculoperitoneal shunting ( 7 in algorithm ).



Anatomical Considerations


The basilar artery directly supplies the brainstem via pontine perforators and the posterior fossa via its major branches—anterior inferior cerebellar arteries (AICA), superior cerebellar arteries (SCA), and posterior cerebral arteries (PCA). The midbasilar artery is defined as the basilar artery beginning at the vertebrobasilar junction and ending at the paired SCA origins (▶ Fig. 38.1 ). It is an approximately 3 cm segment of the artery running in the median groove along the anterior surface of the pons. Some anatomical variation exists in this segment′s course with patients occasionally having quite tortuous basilar arteries. Ectasia of the midbasilar can sometimes be so extreme that it can cause compressive symptoms on paramedian structures such as cranial nerves (▶ Figs. 38.2 38.4 ).

Fig. 38.1 Artist′s illustration depicting a large midbasilar aneurysm and its relation to associated branches.
Fig. 38.2 A 35-year-old woman with an incidentally discovered midbasilar aneurysm. (a) Two-dimensional digital subtraction angiography reveals an apparent saccular aneurysm of the midbasilar artery. (b) 3D volume rendering angiography further demonstrates disease and fusiform dilatation of the basilar artery. (c) Lateral and (d) anteroposterior angiography at 6-month follow-up after stent-assisted coiling shows no aneurysm recurrence and although flow diversion was not used (an Enterprise stent was used), there is apparent remodeling of the diseased basilar artery.

This segment of the basilar artery gives rise to the paired AICAs. These course laterally from their origin at the basilar artery and provide blood supply to the lateral pons, cerebellopontine angle, and petrosal surface of the cerebellum. Additional branches originating from the midbasilar artery include a number of perforators that can be divided into two groups—median pontine branches and transverse pontine branches. The numerous median pontine branches arise from the posterior surface of the basilar and enter the pons directly. The larger and less numerous transverse pontine branches arise from the lateral basilar artery, course along the surface of the pons wrapping around the brainstem, and provide multiple perforators to the pons′s lateral regions.


The middle third of the basilar artery is one of the most surgically inaccessible locations intracranially. The selection of surgical approaches to the midbasilar artery depends heavily on individual variation of skull base anatomy and the location of the pathology in relation to the petrous bone. Many approaches have been described to this area including transpetrosal approaches, far lateral approaches and extreme lateral variations, posterior supra- and infratentorial combined approaches, and in select cases extended anterior transylvian approaches or anterior transclival approaches.



Pathophysiology/Classification


Aneurysms of the midbasilar artery can be classified in many ways. The most straightforward way when discussing a treatment algorithm is morphology—saccular versus fusiform.


Saccular aneurysms have been described at all branch points along the basilar including the AICAs and the midbasilar perforators. These tend to be true aneurysms with all layers of the vessel dysplastically expanded. Saccular aneurysms can also arise directly from the trunk of the basilar. The pathophysiology of aneurysm formation in these cases can also involve a contained dissection with the dome of the aneurysm lacking intima.


Fusiform aneurysms of the basilar trunk can be divided into dolichoectatic and dissecting aneurysms. Dolichoectatic fusiform aneurysms are the consequence of disease of an entire segment of vessel circumferentially, usually as a result of atherosclerosis. The affected vessel becomes dysplastic, tortuous, elongated, and dilated. This process can be progressive leading to neurological deficits from compression on adjacent structures, intraluminal thrombus formation and thromboembolic events or perforator infarcts, hydrocephalus from mass effect, and rupture from weakness in this wall.


Dissecting fusiform aneurysms of the basilar artery trunk, however, arise secondary to intimal damage and the creation of a false lumen along the basilar artery. This is usually related to atherosclerotic damage to the vessel but can be spontaneous or traumatic as well. The false lumen can fill with blood or clot and result in symptomatic thromboembolism, perforator infarcts, and also rupture.



Workup



Clinical Evaluation


Clinical assessment of patients with midbasilar artery aneurysms is the same as for other intracranial aneurysms and depends on the ruptured or unruptured status of the aneurysm. SAH is the most common clinical presentation of basilar aneurysms. The clinical evaluation of a patient with SAH is the same as for other aneurysms and should focus on airway management and immediate management of hydrocephalus. Unruptured aneurysms may be discovered incidentally and be asymptomatic.


Large or giant midbasilar artery aneurysms may present with posterior fossa symptoms such as compressive cranial neuropathies or ischemic symptoms such as transient ischemic attack (TIA) or stroke. A detailed neurological exam including a cranial nerve exam should accompany basic evaluation of these patients.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

May 19, 2020 | Posted by in NEUROSURGERY | Comments Off on 38 Midbasilar Artery Aneurysms

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access