4 Decompressive Craniectomy for Intracranial Hypertension and Stroke, Including Bone Flap Storage in Abdominal Fat Layer
Introduction
The use of a decompressive craniectomy to treat the symptoms of intracranial hypertension was first proposed in the late 19th century by Sir Victor Horsley. 1 Kocher popularized its use in Europe. Cushing introduced it in the United States in the early 20th century as a palliative treatment for multiple conditions causing intracranial hypertension, including tumors, hydrocephalus, and trauma. 2 The operation fell into disfavor as advances in neurosurgery during the first half of the 20th century transformed most of the original indications for decompressive craniectomy into treatable conditions. In the 1970s, advances in life support increased the survival of patients with severe head injuries. This operation was revisited with the goal of treating traumatic brain injury patients with intracranial hypertension not responsive to “medical treatment.” 3 , 4 A collection of good results over the past two decades 5 – 7 has turned decompressive craniectomy surgery into an accepted option for the management of severe traumatic brain injury with refractory intracranial hypertension; new indications are being explored. Several studies have demonstrated a decrease in mortality and improved outcomes when this operation is performed in the correct patient population. 8 – 10
Indications
There is accumulated evidence to support the use of decompressive craniectomy for the following pathologies:
Traumatic brain injury with diffuse or localized cerebral edema or multiple contusions refractory to medical therapy. 10
Large cerebral infarctions resulting in severe edema and mass effect. 11 , 12
Some studies have shown promising results using decompressive craniectomy for other pathologies presenting with diffuse cerebral edema like aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, 13 venous thrombosis, 14 or infectious encephalitis, 15 but the available evidence is not strong enough to allow for a standard indication.
Two primary types of decompressive craniectomies are performed:
Frontotemporoparietal (occipital) decompressive hemicraniectomy. This procedure is indicated for traumatic lesions or edema concentrated in one hemisphere with midline shift and risk of uncal herniation. This type of craniectomy may also be performed in the setting of an ischemic cerebrovascular event involving a unilateral, large vascular territory (usually middle cerebral artery [MCA] or internal carotid artery [ICA])
Bifrontal decompressive craniectomy. This procedure is indicated in cases of diffuse, bilateral cerebral edema or in the setting bilateral frontal lesions with associated severe edema.
Decompressive craniectomy may be performed early or late 16 :
Early decompressive craniectomy is performed soon after the patient arrives to the emergency department. Early craniectomy should be considered in patients with more than 5 mm of midline shift or if the midline shift is out of proportion to the size of the extra-axial mass lesion (usually hematoma) to be evacuated. 10
Late decompressive craniectomy is usually performed within 48 hours of the original insult, in the setting of medically refractory elevated intracranial pressure (ICP; defined as ICP. 30 mm Hg for greater than 20 minutes by protocol at the authors’ medical center). Late decompressive craniectomy should only be considered after failure of primary tier therapy for intracranial hypertension.
“Later” decompressive craniectomy—longer than 48 hours after the initial insult—may be indicated for patients who develop malignant edema following ischemic stroke, delayed expansion of contusions, or delayed malignant cerebral edema and/or hyperemic brain syndrome.
Preprocedure Considerations
Radiographic Imaging
Computed tomography (CT) is the most common imaging modality used to evaluate potential candidates for a decompressive craniectomy. CT images not only demonstrate acute intracranial pathology but also provide information concerning bony anatomic landmarks—useful for surgical planning—and allow for identification of skull fractures that might complicate the operation.
CT angiography can be useful to diagnose major vascular occlusions and vascular injuries associated with head injuries, particularly when skull base fractures are present.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is used more sparingly in the context of trauma due to the added difficulty of organizing the logistics for life support in the MRI suite and the long duration of the study, which a critically ill patient may not tolerate. MR diffusion-weighted images are useful for early detection of large ischemic strokes. Early involvement of the neurosurgeon in such cases is essential in the event that later neurologic deterioration might provide an indication for emergent decompressive craniectomy.
Preoperative imaging ( Fig. 4.1 ).
Medication
If the patient is showing signs of imminent neurologic deterioration (dilated nonreactive pupil, hemiparesis, decerebrate or decorticate posturing), a bolus dose of mannitol (0.5 to 1 g/kg) can be administered as a temporizing measure en route to the operating room.
Perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis should be administered within 1 hour of skin incision. The authors prefer cefazolin. In the setting of an open skull fracture and/or penetrating brain injury, triple antibiotic coverage (gram-positive, gram-negative, and anaerobic organisms) is initiated.
Operative Field Preparation
The hair is clipped with an electric razor. Any foreign bodies may be removed from the scalp at this time.
Hexachlorophene (or similar) soap is used to cleanse the skin, and then 70% alcohol is applied.
The skin incisions are marked, and povidone iodine or chlorhexidine may be applied as a final prep.
The surgeon also needs to make a decision at this time about how the bone flap will be preserved for future skull reconstruction. There is not enough evidence in the literature to support the preferential use of subcutaneous or cryopreservation. 17 , 18 In most institutions, sterile deep-freezing storage (280°C) is available. If storage is not available, or if the patient is anticipated to continue treatment at a different institution before the anticipated time of reconstruction, the surgeon should proceed to prep the abdomen for subcutaneous storage. We prefer to store the bone flap in the right lower quadrant of the abdomen. Many patients who sustain a traumatic brain injury will eventually need a gastrostomy tube, so the left side should be avoided. The right upper quadrant should be reserved in the event that the patient might require a ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt in the future.
Consideration should be given to perioperative placement of an invasive pressure monitor, contralateral to the planned surgical site. When feasible, placement of an external ventricular drain (EVD) is preferred. An EVD will permit both continuous assessment of ICP to guide therapy and therapeutic drainage of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) for treatment of intracranial hypertension.