42 Staged Resection of Large Vestibular Schwannoma



10.1055/b-0039-169196

42 Staged Resection of Large Vestibular Schwannoma

Aaron Metrailer and Michael J. LaRouere

42.1 Introduction


Large vestibular schwannomas, defined as ≥3 cm in greatest posterior fossa dimension, pose a challenge to surgeons as they are associated with higher perioperative complications and worse facial nerve outcomes following surgery than for smaller tumors.s. Literatur Due to tumor size, growth, and subsequent mass effect, conservative management is rarely a treatment option. Likewise, radiosurgery is seldom used to manage large tumors due to the potential for radiation damage to surrounding critical structures as well as risk of inducing hydrocephalus from tumor swelling or parenchymal vasogenic edema. Therefore, the majority of large vestibular schwannomas are managed with surgical extirpation.


In the current era of cranial base microsurgery, mortality is exceedingly rare and outcomes are primarily measured according to extent of resection, recurrence, complication rates, as well as hearing and facial nerve preservation. Hearing preservation continues to remain a challenge in large tumors, and its importance falls far behind tumor control and facial nerve function. One of the primary cited advantages of microsurgical resection over radiosurgery and observation is definitive cure when gross-total resection is achieved. However, complete tumor removal with preservation of good facial nerve function with large vestibular schwannomas is challenging. Historically, long-term facial nerve outcomes after resection of large vestibular schwannomas have been poor, with only approximately half of patients achieving House-Brackmann (HB) grade I or II function according to pooled data (Table 42‑1 ).s. Literatur ,​ s. Literatur ,​ s. Literatur ,​ s. Literatur ,​ s. Literatur ,​ s. Literatur ,​ s. Literatur ,​ s. Literatur These disappointing results have led many groups to advocate for subtotal resection, with or without adjuvant radiosurgery. However, several studies have demonstrated that many tumors regrow following incomplete removal and subtotal resection alone should not be viewed as a long-term or definitive treatment. An evolving technique of staged microsurgical resection of large tumors has allowed for tumor removal while reducing the risk of poor long-term facial nerve outcome.







































































Table 42.1 Posttreatment facial nerve outcomes after single-stage microsurgery for large vestibular schwannomas with historical means

Study


Publication date


Tumor size (cm)


Total patients


Postoperative HB grade I or II (%)


Tos and Thomsen


1989


>4


149


64


Briggs et al


1994


>4


143


42


Naguib et al


1995


>2.5


30


30


Lanman et al


1999


>3


95


53


Wu and Sterkers


2000


>3


40


65


Sluyter et al


2001


>2


116


47


Mamikoglu et al


2002


>3


70


45


Godefroy et al


2009


>2.6


50


78


Historical summary




693


53




42.2 Staged Microsurgery


Dandy first discussed the advantages of staged surgery for vestibular schwannomas in 1925. He noted the “residual tumor was soft, necrotic, and avascular” making it more amendable to resection on a second surgery.s. Literatur In 1979, Sheptak and Jannetta first published a series on resection of large vestibular schwannomas via two-staged suboccipital approaches. Like Dandy, they noted less tumor adherence and vascularity on the second surgery. They concluded that certain advantages for staged microsurgery exist, and the decision to perform staged surgery should be based on intraoperative findings.s. Literatur


Multiple series of staged vestibular schwannoma resection followed the initial report by Sheptak and Jannetta. Advances in microsurgical instrumentation and neuromonitoring have allowed for the development of more objective intraoperative criteria for staged vestibular schwannoma surgery. Commonly cited reasons to perform staged surgery include facial nerve splaying, tumor adherence to the facial nerve or brainstem, and changes in facial nerve excitability. Less commonly, unfavorable changes in vital signs may also require early termination of the primary surgery. The approach to staged resection has largely evolved from strictly suboccipital approaches to include suboccipital removal followed by a translabyrinthine approach for the second stage. Translabyrinthine approaches have now been used for both stages as well. The advantages of staged surgery include a more robust facial nerve on the second stage, less facial nerve splaying, and residual tumor shrinkage. That is, the first surgery results in a large reduction in mass effect, which allows the facial nerve fibers to regroup and any surrounding edema to improve or resolve. In addition, the facial nerve has an opportunity to recover from any potential neuropraxia. Finally, during the time interval between surgeries, the residual tumor may coalesce or “ball up” from a blanket to a more nodular configuration that may facilitate dissection. These factors may hypothetically lead to higher rates of facial nerve preservation with near-total or total resection.



42.2.1 Indications and Preoperative Considerations


Staged resection is generally reserved for large vestibular schwannomas; however, if intraoperative factors dictate, it may be considered for medium-sized tumors as well. Patients and families should be educated preoperatively on the possibility of staged surgery with the goal of improved long-term facial nerve function. Although the decision for staged surgery is usually made intraoperatively, it is our opinion that it is acceptable to preoperatively plan a staged resection based on tumor size alone. Our experience has been that patients and families are accepting of more than one surgery if it offers improved long-term quality of life and facial nerve outcomes. Often, the patient’s recovery after subsequent surgeries is shorter and easier due to prior vestibular function loss and compensation.



42.2.2 First-Stage Surgery


Traditionally, first-stage surgery has consisted of a retrosigmoid approach. The medial tumor is debulked and removed from the cerebellopontine angle (CPA) with preservation of neurovascular structures. Advantages of the first-stage retrosigmoid approach include keeping an undissected plane around the facial nerve in the internal auditory canal (IAC). If the tumor has favorable intraoperative factors for tumor removal and neural preservation, bone can then be removed over the IAC and dissection continued. If intraoperative factors dictate a staged resection, the bony IAC is not drilled and Silastic sheeting (0.004″) is placed within the CPA to reduce adhesions between the cranial nerves, brainstem, cerebellum, and the residual tumor.


More recently, a first-stage translabyrinthine approach instead of a retrosigmoid approach has been advocated.s. Literatur Even if the preoperative plan was to stage the tumor because of very large size, we generally still pursue near-total or gross-total resection if intraoperative factors permit. If the resection does not favor a single-stage surgery, eggshell thin bone overlying the IAC is left intact, and the tumor is removed from the CPA and Silastic sheeting placed. Preserving the bony IAC allows virgin dissection planes during the subsequent surgery.



42.2.3 Intraoperative Factors


Since the first series published by Sheptak and Jannetta, intraoperative factors have served as driving forces for staged microsurgery. As mentioned earlier, some surgeons may decide preoperatively to perform a staged resection, based on patient’s health, tumor size, and degree of brainstem compression. Most often, however, intraoperative factors are used as an “ending point” for the first surgery. Early reports cited tumor adherence to the brainstem as the primary indication for staged resection; however, with technological advancements, further criteria have been found beneficial as outlined later.


The advent of facial nerve monitoring has dramatically improved facial nerve outcomes in large tumors. At the author’s institution, we routinely employ the use of stimulating dissectors to maximize the benefit of facial nerve monitoring. These instruments include stimulating needles, round knifes, and other instruments which are insulated to the tips (Fig. 42‑1 ). These instruments allow for “active” monitoring in which the surgeon is alerted to the proximity of the nerve by continuous electrical stimulation. This is in contrast to intermittent stimulation with a neurostimulator probe, or “passive” monitoring that only provides feedback to the surgeon when there is stretching or mechanical injury. Higher levels of current (e.g., 1 mA) are used to map the general location of the facial nerve, whereas low levels (e.g., 0.1 mA) are used to differentiate tumor from the adjacent neurovascular structures. The use of stimulating dissectors allows for more confident dissection of the tumor and more precise localization of the facial nerve, both of which reduce intraoperative injury to the nerve and facilitate efficient dissection.

Fig. 42.1 Kartush stimulating dissectors.


Changes in facial nerve excitability will often lead surgeons to temporarily or definitively stop resection. Prolonged or train EMG potentials indicate nerve irritation and potential damage, and should prompt the surgeon to modify dissection. An increase in the threshold of stimulation signifies facial nerve injury and serves as an indicator to stop tumor resection and consider staged surgery. The tumor and facial nerve relationship is also important in determining whether large tumors need to be staged. A thinned or splayed facial nerve and a densely adherent facial nerve are commonly cited indications for staged resection. Additionally, a meandering course of the facial nerve over the superior pole of the tumor, or much less commonly over the dorsal tumor capsule, portends a poorer facial nerve outcome and may benefit from staged surgery. Other less common indications to stage tumor resection include vital sign changes (abrupt bradycardia), prohibitive cerebellum or brainstem edema, or peritumoral bleeding.


Considering the aforementioned criteria, the guiding principle for staged surgery is the concept of “taking only what the tumor gives.” A single-stage, “conventional surgery” is ideal when facial nerve function can reasonably be preserved; however, a staged surgery or multimodality treatment (e.g., adjuvant stereotactic radiosurgery) should be considered if facial nerve preservation or patient health is potentially compromised. The use of intraoperative monitoring with stimulating instruments and surgeon experience allows the surgeon to know when facial nerve injury is imminent and modify or terminate the surgery. Understanding the above factors including the principle of “taking only what the tumor gives” should guide surgeons in making the appropriate intraoperative decision to stage tumor resection or continue with a single-stage surgery. The interested reader may also review Chapter 27 on intraoperative facial nerve monitoring, Chapter 32 on intraoperative management of the facial nerve, and Chapter 41 on subtotal resection.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

May 13, 2020 | Posted by in NEUROSURGERY | Comments Off on 42 Staged Resection of Large Vestibular Schwannoma

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access