5 Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Systems



Simon P. Lalehzarian, Benjamin Khechen, Brittany E. Haws, Jordan A. Guntin, Kaitlyn L. Cardinal, and Kern Singh

5 Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Systems



5.1 Introduction


Pedicle screws evolved from the original facet screw technique to improve spinal internal fixation while maintaining vertebral range of motion. 1 With the use of plates or rods, pedicle screws can provide load sharing between vertebrae, improving overall fixation and preventing vertebral collapse. 2 , 3 Multiple methods have been developed to improve pedicle screw fixation strength, such as improving insertional torque, cross-linking adjacent screws, and triangulating the insertion of the screw. 2 In minimally invasive spine surgery, percutaneous pedicle screw insertion techniques are utilized. The pedicle screw is oriented approximately 30° from vertical to allow for accurate pedicle insertion in addition to improving screw pull-out strength (▶ Fig. 5.1). 4 Surgical indications for percutaneous pedicle screws are described in ▶ Table 5.1.



5.1.1 Pedicle Screw Components


A pedicle screw is composed of a head, or tulip, neck, and shaft. The head is where the rods are placed to interconnect consecutive screws. Screw heads can be fixed (monoaxial) or can allow motion at the shaft–head interface (polyaxial). While polyaxial screws allow for easier rod insertion, they are also associated with failure at lower loads and greater rates of screw-head slippage than monoaxial screws. 5 , 6 Monoplanar screws have also been introduced, which allow for motion in the axial plane while maintaining rigidity in the sagittal plane. 7 , 8 In percutaneous pedicle screw placement, tulip extensions provide a corridor through which the screw head can be accessed from outside of the patient. 9 These extensions can either be removable or fixed with a break-off tab for removal. Tulip extensions are traditionally rigid, but can be malleable or lie flat against the skin for increased visualization. Additionally, some systems have capabilities for reduction or deformity correction. However, literature comparing the efficacy between tulip extension designs is limited and thus, choice of system is largely based on surgeon preference.

Fig. 5.1 Illustration of the target trajectory for pedicle screw placement.










Table 5.1 Surgical indications for percutaneous pedicle screws

Indications




  • Posterior approach spinal fusion



  • Thoracolumbar procedures



  • Degenerative disk disease



  • Spondylolisthesis



  • Spinal fracture/dislocation



  • Spinal stenosis



  • Spinal deformity


The screw shaft can be conical or cylindrical in shape. Conical screws have previously been associated with greater insertional torque and bending performance. 10 , 11 However, concerns exist regarding the pullout strength of conical screws when backed out 360°. 12 The shaft also contains the threads of the screw. The height and size of the thread crests determine the inner and outer diameter of the screw shaft (▶ Fig. 5.2). The outer diameter of the screw shaft has been identified as a major determinant of pullout strength, while the inner diameter is reported to determine the fatigue strength. 12 , 13 Different thread options are available, including double lead and dual thread screws which facilitate faster insertion and increase insertional torque. 12 , 14 The distance between the crest of each thread is called the pitch, and this measurement is also thought to be crucial in determining pullout strength of the screw. When screw pullout occurs, the bone in between the crests of each thread is often fractured. As such, the amount of bone in between the threads and the quality of bone can directly impact screw strength.


Percutaneous pedicle screw placement is performed by using Kirschner wires to determine accurate trajectory under fluoroscopic guidance. Cannulated screws are then introduced over the guidewire. The hollow core of cannulated screws has raised concerns over increased risk for screw breakage as compared to solid screws. Studies have suggested that cannulated screws exhibit decreased mechanical strength, stiffness, and axial failure loads when compared to solid screws of similar diameters. 15 , 16 As such, it is recommended that cannulated cores not exceed 2.0 mm in diameter. 17 However, previous reports have determined that cannulated conical screws are able to maintain the bending performance of solid screws, suggesting that conical designs are preferred for cannulated screw placement. 18 , 19 Newer designs have been proposed that use an additional pin to fill the cannulated core in an attempt to recreate the structural stability of the solid screw. However, this design has not been determined to improve the bending performance of cannulated screws. 18

Fig. 5.2 Illustration of the components of a pedicle screw.


5.1.2 Pedicle Screw Constructs


Multiple constructs have been developed to improve pedicle screw strength and efficacy. These devices are often classified as rigid, semirigid, or dynamic stabilization systems. Variations in the materials utilized to create interconnecting rods and screws are what determine the type of stabilization system. Lumbar fusion with rigid posterior instrumentation is thought to increase fusion rates in cases of degenerative spinal disorders. 20 However, these rigid systems have also previously been associated with some undesirable outcomes, including loss of lumbar lordosis, stress-shielding, adjacent segment degeneration, and fatigue fractures. 21 , 22 Semirigid and dynamic systems were developed as a method of enhancing load sharing as opposed to stress shielding. Additionally, dynamic stabilization is thought to reduce susceptibility to adjacent segment degeneration. 23 , 24 , 25 Despite the theoretical benefits of less rigid systems in the setting of lumbar spinal fixation, superiority over rigid systems has been difficult to elucidate. 20 , 26



5.1.3 Complications


The complications associated with pedicle screws and the accuracy of pedicle screw placement have been reviewed thoroughly throughout the literature. 27 Inaccurate screw placement is a common concern, particularly with percutaneous techniques, as visualization is limited. Medially misplaced screws can result in impingement or displacement of traversing nerve roots or dural tears. Additionally, screws angled cephalad with superior facet joint violation have been suggested to increase the risk of early failure or adjacent segment disease due to increased intrapedicular bending movements. 28 , 29 While superior facet violation has been suggested to occur in approximately 18% of pedicle screw placements, similar rates have been demonstrated for both open and percutaneous techniques. 30



5.2 Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Systems





























Table 5.2 Alphatec Spine Illico® MIS Posterior Fixation System

Design


Set screws specifications


Standard T25 drive mechanism


Designed to limit cross-threading


Reduction capabilities


Zodiac® cannulated high-top screws may be used to facilitate reduction


Modular aspects and variations


Screw diameters


5.5, 6.5, 7.5 mm


Screw lengths


35–55 mm (5-mm increments)


Rod type


Precontoured Straight


Rod lengths


30–100 mm (5-mm increments) 200 mm


Procedures


MIS TLIF, MIS posterior decompression


Radiographs unavailable



































Table 5.3 DePuy Synthes VIPER® MIS Spine System

Design


Set screws specifications


Standard T25 drive mechanism


Reduction capabilities


X-Tab reduction screw: up to 7-mm reduction


Modular aspects and variations


Screw diameter


4.35, 5.0, 6.0, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 9.0 mm


Screw lengths


30–55 mm (5-mm increments)


Rod type


Straight


Rod lengths


35, 40–120 (10-mm increments), 150, 200, 300, 400, 600 mm


Kyphosed


35, 40–120 (10-mm increments), 150, 200, 300 mm


Lordosed


30–90 (5-mm increments), 100, 110, 120, 150, 200 mm


Procedures


MIS TLIF, MIS posterior decompression





























Table 5.4 Globus Medical CREO MIS™ Posterior Stabilization System

Design


Set screw specifications


Threaded locking cap with 8.0 mm of torque for final tightening


Reduction capability


Reduction options include 10 and 30 mm


Modular aspects and variations


Screw diameters


4.5–8.5 (1-mm increments), 5.0 mm


Screw lengths


20–120 mm


Rod diameters


5.5 and 6 mm


Rod lengths


30–150 mm (5-mm increments) 160–300 mm (10-mm increments)


Procedures


MIS TLIF, MIS posterior decompression


Radiographs unavailable





























Table 5.5 K2 M EVEREST® Minimally Invasive Spinal System

Design


Set screws specifications


Modified square thread design Designed to facilitate easy introduction and limit cross-threading


Reduction capabilities


Multiple reduction constructs up to 20 mm


Modular aspects and variations


Screw diameters


5.5–8.5 mm


Screw lengths


35–55 mm (5-mm increments)


Rode type


Contoured


Rod lengths


5.5 and 6 mm


Procedures


MIS TLIF, MIS posterior decompression





























Table 5.6 Medtronic CD Horizon® Longitude® II Multilevel Percutaneous Fixation System

Design


Set screws specifications


Tulip designed to reduce anatomical impact


Reduction capabilities


Staged reduction technique allows for accurate screw placement


Modular aspects and variations


Screw diameters


4.5 mm


5.5 mm


6.5 and 7.5 mm


8.5, 9.5, 10.5 mm


Screw lengths


30, 35, 40 mm 30–50 mm (5-mm increments)


35–55 mm (5-mm increments)


90, 100, 110 mm


Rod type


Prebent


Straight


Rod lengths


30–80 mm (5-mm increments)


70–260 mm (10-mm increments)


Procedures


MIS TLIF, MIS posterior decompression





























Table 5.7 Medtronic CD Horizon® Solera® Spinal System

Design


Set screw specifications


Reverse angle thread locking mechanism


Reduction capability


Multiple reduction devices available for different diameter rods


Modular aspects and variations


Screw diameter


4–6 mm (0.5-mm increments),


6.5–9.5 mm (1.0-mm increments)


Screw lengths


20–60 mm (5-mm increments)


Rod type


Pre-bent


Straight


Rod lengths


30–120 mm (5-mm increments) 500, 600 mm


Procedures


MIS TLIF, MIS posterior decompression


Radiographs unavailable





























Table 5.8 Medtronic CD Horizon® Solera® Voyager Spinal System

Design


Set screws specifications


Utilizes tulip design to reduce anatomical impact


Reduction capabilities


Break-off section of tab extenders allows for 13.8 mm of reduction


Modular aspects and variations


Screw diameters


4.5 mm


5.5 mm


6.5 and 7.5 mm


Screw lengths


35, 40, 45 mm 35–50 mm (5-mm increments)


35–55 mm (5-mm increments)


Rod type


Percutaneous


Capped


Rod lengths


30–90 mm (5-mm increments)


30–80 mm (5-mm increments)


Procedures


MIS TLIF, MIS posterior decompression


Radiographs unavailable





























Table 5.9 NuVasive Reline® Posterior Fixation System

Design


Set screw specifications


Helical flange and metric thread locking mechanisms


Reduction capability


Reduction capabilities ranging from 9 to 50 mm


Modular aspects and variations


Screw diameters


5.5, 6.5, 7.5, 8.5 mm


Screw lengths


35–55 mm (5-mm increments)


Rod type


Lordotic


Straight


Rod lengths


25–100 (5-mm increments), 110, 120, 140, 160, 300 mm


Procedures


MIS TLIF, MIS posterior decompression


Radiographs unavailable





























Table 5.10 NuVasive SpheRx® DBR III Spinal System

Design


Set screw specifications


Designed to limit cross-threading and allow “instrument-free” compression


Reduction capability


Reduction can be achieved using DBR III counter-torque/reduction sleeve, reduction T-handle, and reducer extension


Modular aspects and variations


Screw diameter


5.5, 6.5, 7.5 mm


Screw lengths


30–55 mm


(5-mm increments)


Rod type


Pre-bent


Pre-bent dual ball


Straight dual ball


Rod lengths


20–110 (5-mm increments), 120, 130, 140, 150 mm


25–70 mm (2.5-mm increments)


17.5, 20, 22.5, 72.5, 75, 77.5, 80 mm


Procedures


MIS TLIF, MIS posterior decompression





























Table 5.11 RTI Surgical Streamline® MIS Spinal Fixation System

Design


Set screws specifications


Standard T25 drive mechanism Designed to limit cross-threading


Reduction capabilities


Simple rod inserter: up to 15-mm reduction Rod reducers: up to 30-mm reduction


Modular aspects and variations


Screw diameter


4.5–8.5 mm (1-mm increments)


Screw lengths


30–55 mm (5-mm increments)


Rod type


Pre-bent


Straight


Long


Rod lengths


35–80 mm (5-mm increments)


90–150 mm (10-mm increments)


160–250 mm (10-mm increments)


Procedures


MIS TLIF, MIS posterior decompression





























Table 5.12 Zimmer Biomet PathFinder NXT™ Pedicle Screw Fixation System

Design


Set screws specifications


Standard T25 drive mechanism Designed to limit cross-threading


Reduction capability


Reduction forceps: up to 10-mm reduction Power knob reducer: up to 30-mm reduction


Modular aspects and variations


Screw diameters


4.5–7.5 mm (1-mm increments)


Screw lengths


30–60 mm (5-mm increments)


Rod type


Pre-bent


Straight


Rod lengths


30–100 mm (5-mm increments)


100–240 mm (20-mm increments)


Procedures


MIS TLIF, MIS posterior decompression

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jan 25, 2021 | Posted by in NEUROSURGERY | Comments Off on 5 Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Systems

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access