7 Demyelinating Disease and Brain Atrophy




7.1 Multiple Sclerosis


(Synonym: Disseminated sclerosis)


Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory autoimmune disease of unknown etiology that involves demyelination of the central nervous system (CNS) with resultant neurologic dysfunction. The clinical manifestations are extremely variable in type and severity. Its onset is usually between 10 and 59 years (between 20 and 40 years approximately for 70% of patients). Prevalence is higher in Caucasians/Northern Europeans with female-to-male ratio of 2:1.


Most cases are sporadic; 25% concordance rate in monozygotic twin studies and studies of first-degree relatives (children of patients with MS have 30 to 50 times increased risk). Risk factors that are considered are the temperate latitudes, the family history, and the female preponderance.


MS is associated with conditions such as optic neuritis, trigeminal neuralgia, Bell’s palsy, uveitis, transverse myelitis, and Devic’s syndrome.


The clinical course of MS:




  1. In 20% of patients with MS, the disease has a benign clinical course.



  2. In 30% patients, the disease is relapsing (loss or deterioration of a neurologic function) and remitting (return to or toward normal function).



  3. In other 50% patients, the disease is primarily progressive and secondarily progressive with relapse.


MS is sometimes classified as clinically definite, laboratory supported, probable, and possible depending on the history of attacks, signs on examination, and laboratory abnormalities (MRI, oligoclonal banding) supporting the diagnosis.


In the absence of a pathognomonic biomarker, MS remains a clinical diagnosis. An abnormal MRI without convincing clinical symptoms or signs cannot be used to make the diagnosis. Conversely, a normal MRI of the brain and spinal cord with a compatible history or examination does not exclude the diagnosis.


The laboratory tests are useful for diagnosing MS in the proper setting and with proper caution. The diagnosis of MD is seldom made without some laboratory support, especially in patients who do not quite meet all of the clinical criteria. However, no one test proves the diagnosis, and all laboratory data have sufficient problems with sensitivity and specificity to impair their usefulness.


Prospective studies have shown that two factors most reliably identify patients who do not have MS. The first is their lack of typical symptoms: no optic neuritis, Lhermitte’s sign, sensory level, neurogenic bladder, or other common deficits. The second is their lack of typical findings on MRI and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) examination. Very few patients with MS have a normal MRI of the brain or normal CSF.


When to doubt the clinical diagnosis of MS:




  1. Dementia



  2. Aphasia



  3. Seizure



  4. Pain (except trigeminal neuralgia)



  5. Movement disorders



7.1.1 Symptoms and signs of MS


Any symptom/sign appropriate to a lesion in more than one area of CNS (brain and spinal cord) may raise the suspicion for MS. Gray matter signs, such as seizures and altered mental state, occur rarely.


Common symptoms of MS are as follows:




  1. Sensory (numbness, tingling, heaviness in an extremity, sensory level)



  2. Visual (visual loss, color vision change, field defects)



  3. Brain stem (diplopia, dizziness, difficulty swallowing or speaking)



  4. Motor (weakness, spasticity, cramping)



  5. Bowel and bladder dysfunction: urinary urgency and incontinence


    The usual bladder dysfunction is sphincter dyssynergia: simultaneous contraction of the urinary bladder detrusor smooth muscle and the voluntary muscles of the pelvic floor.



  6. cerebellar (ataxia of gait or of an extremity)



  7. Cognitive complaints



  8. Fatigue (midday loss of energy unrelated to other MS signs or symptoms)


Following are the common signs:




  1. Corticospinal tract (weakness, spasticity, hyperreflexia, asymmetric reflexes, Babinski sign)



  2. Sensory (vibration loss, decreased pin sense, sensory level, Lhermitte’s sign which is an electric sensation descending the vertebrae with neck flexion. In addition to MS, another cause of this is cervical stenosis or other mechanical irritation to posterior column)



  3. Brain stem (nystagmus, internuclear ophthalmoplegia. Internuclear ophthalmoplegia (INO) [Inability to adduct the eye with voluntary lateral gaze, but with preservation of adduction on convergence], facial weakness)



  4. Optic nerve (loss of visual acuity, central scotomas, loss of color vision, optic nerve atrophy, afferent papillary defect/Marcus Gunn pupil, optic disc appearance: Pink, swollen with indistinct margin if papilla is involved; normal if involvement is retrobulbar. In optic atrophy pallor especially temporal area, distinct margin.)



  5. Charcot’s triad (intention tremor, nystagmus, scanning speech)



  6. Uhthoff’s phenomenon (worsening of symptoms and signs after exposure to heat or exercise)



7.1.2 Differential diagnosis




  1. Postinfectious encephalomyelitis


    This is a subacute syndrome caused by autoimmune response or a viral infection. Patients complain of acute or subacute onset of gait abnormalities, confusion, disorientation, problems with bladder or bowel control, muscle weakness, and other symptoms. Abnormalities consistent with demyelinating lesions can be seen on MRI. This condition may or may not be reversible. Typically, however, it presents itself as a monophasic illness, but chronic cases do occur and require long-term treatment.



  2. Primary CNS vasculitis


    Primary CNS vasculitis may result in syndromes resembling MS. Most notable symptoms include severe headaches, confusion, and sudden stroke-like episodes. High protein levels can be seen in CSF, as well as high erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). Patients may have abnormal angiogram of cerebral vessels. Antinuclear or antiphospholipid antibodies may be present. Patients with vasculitis-related disorders, such as meningovascular syphilis, Sjogren’s syndrome, lupus erythematosus, Bechet’s disease, Wagener’s granulomatosis, and isolated CNS vasculitis, may present with an MS-like picture. Asking about the features of the systemic disease and watching for atypical MRI or clinical appearance are helpful in diagnosis.



  3. Lyme disease and brucellosis


    Sometimes infections of the CNS may present like MS, but usually they have a different CSF and clinical picture. Lyme disease is known to cause intermittent neurologic events. Some of the most frequent problems include Bell’s palsy, nonspecific symptoms of numbness, fatigue, and amnesia. CSF findings may resemble those found in the MS and MRI may show a white matter disease. History of tick bites, rashes (erythema chronicum migrans), and arthralgia should be sought after. Screening for Lyme titer and/or a Lyme polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in the CSF or blood should help in diagnosis; predominantly axonal neuropathy on electromyography (EMG).



  4. Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)


    This condition may cause multiple neurologic pathology such as optic abnormalities, encephalopathy, transverse myelitis, and strokes. One needs to look for systemic abnormalities, such as elevated antinuclear antibody (ANA), leukopenia, hematuria, elevated ESR. On some occasions, lupus erythematosus and MS may be found in the same patient.



  5. Tropical spastic paraparesis


    It is a retroviral disease caused by human T-cell leukemia virus (HTLV)-1 virus. It is uncommon in the continental United States, but may be seen infrequently in patients who reside for some time around the Caribbean Sea Basin. The major clinical manifestations are progressive spastic paraparesis or generalized white matter disease.



  6. Bechet’s syndrome


    This syndrome can result in MRI findings that are very similar to MS. However, the main distinguishing features of this condition are oral and genital ulcers, and uveitis, as well as possible involvement of lungs, joints, intestines, and heart. This group of patients may present with either quadriparesis, pseudobulbar palsy, cranial neuropathy, cerebellar ataxia or cerebral venous thrombosis.



  7. Sarcoidosis and Sjogren’s syndrome


    Sarcoidosis and Sjogren’s syndrome may show lesions on MRI that resemble those found in MS. These are autoimmune conditions that affect multiple organ systems and should not be confused with MS. A chest X-ray may show granulomatous disease of the lungs, and meningeal enhancement is seen in patients with CNS involvement. Oligoclonal bands and IgG are raised in CSF of patients with sarcoidosis; peripheral facial palsy is common; reduced glucose is seen in CSF. CNS involvement and the course of the disease may show striking similarity to MS. Angiotensin-converting enzyme determination may be used for further differential diagnosis. It may be elevated in either serum or CSF but it is not reliably abnormal.



  8. Vitamin B-12 deficiency and tertiary syphilis


    Vitamin B-12 deficiency and tertiary syphilis may result in dorsal column abnormalities and dementia. These two conditions need to be ruled out when patients present with the abovementioned symptoms as their chief complaints. Serum and CSF VDRL test and the reflex loss in tabes dorsalis are discriminating features of neurosyphilis.



  9. Leukodystrophies of adulthood


    Leukodystrophies of adulthood (metachromatic leukodystrophy, Krabbe disease, and adrenal leukodystrophy) show large areas of involvement on the MRI scan where no normal white matter can be found.



  10. Spinocerebellar degenerations


    These are hereditary degenerative disorders (olivopontocerebellar degeneration, spinocerebellar degeneration, etc.). Pedigree analysis; insidiously progressive course; progressive involvement; atrophy without demyelination. Initially may resemble chronic-progressive MS. However, characteristic white matter lesions on the MRI scan are usually absent and the CSF is normal in these patients.



  11. Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy


    CT and MRI lesions are nonenhancing; no oligoclonal banding; prominent dementia and aphasia; underlying immunosuppression always present (e.g., HIV, post-transplantation chemotherapy). HIV antibody positive; subcortical dementia; diffuse subcortical gray and white matter involvement on MRI.



  12. Compressive myelopathy


    Revealed by MRI of spinal cord and craniovertebral junction (e.g., cervical spondylosis, Chiari malformations). Lower motor neuron signs in upper limbs, lower cranial nerve palsies.



  13. Intracranial tumors (gliomas, lymphomas)


    Course gradually increasing in severity; recurrent seizures; normal evoked responses or lumbar puncture.



  14. Craniocervical-junction anomalies



  15. Central pontine myelinolysis


    Dysarthria; dysphagia; ophthalmoparesis; quadriparesis; rapidly corrected hyponatremia.



  16. Motor neuron disease


    Lower motor neuron signs; abnormal EMGs; cerebral, sensory, or sphincter involvement against this diagnosis.



  17. Inborn errors of myelin metabolism


    Usually presenting in childhood.




    1. Metachromatic leukodystrophy, a deficiency of the enzyme aryl sulfatase



    2. Adrenoleukodystrophy, a defect in metabolism of very-long-chain fatty acids



    3. Krabbe globoid leukodystrophy, a deficiency of the enzyme galactosylceramidase



  18. Psychiatric disease


    By far the most important disease confused with MS is psychiatric illness (45–76%). Most patients referred to a neurologist for a possible MS who do not have the disease instead suffer from some of psychiatric disorder: somatization, hypochondriasis, malingering, depression, anxiety or similar problems. There are seven conditions that account for almost all the alternative diagnoses at three MS centers in the United States as listed in the following table.
























































Conditions that account for almost all the alternative diagnoses at three MS centers in the United States


Disorder


Colorado (N = 139)


Dalhousie (N = 2)


Marshfield (N = 70)


Psychiatric disease


63 (45%)


14 (27%)


53 (76%)


Migraine headaches


29 (21%)


7 (14%)


2 (3%)


Stroke or TIA


7 (5%)


3 (6%)


2 (3%)


Peripheral neuropathy


6 (4%)


3 (6%)


1 (1%)


Cervical stenosis


4 (3%)


1 (2%)


1 (1%)


Benign sensory symptoms


0


11 (22%)


8 (11%)


Vertigo


0


3 (6%)


0


Abbreviation: TIA, transient ischemic attack.


Katzan I, Rudick RA. Guidelines to avoid errors in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis Ann Neurol 1996;40:554


Rolak LA. The diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Neurol Clin 1996;14(1):27–43


Rolak LA, Fleming JO. The differential diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Neurologist 2007;13(2):57–72



7.1.3 Differential diagnosis based on the pathogenesis of MS




  1. Autoimmune




    1. SLE



    2. Sjogren’s syndrome



    3. Bechet’s syndrome



    4. Neurosarcoidosis



    5. Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy



    6. Antiphospholipid antibody syndrome



    7. Hashimoto autoimmune encephalopathy



  2. Genetic disorders




    1. Hereditary spinocerebellar ataxia



    2. Hereditary paraplegia



    3. Leber’s optic atrophy and other mitochondrial cytopathies



  3. Infections




    1. HIV-related myelopathy



    2. Lyme disease



    3. Meningovascular syphilis



    4. Viral myelitis



    5. Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML)



    6. Postinfectious (postvaccination) encephalomyelitis



    7. Subacute sclerosing panencephalitis



    8. Whipple’s disease



  4. Metabolic and nutritional




    1. Vitamin B12 deficiency



    2. Leukodystrophies (metachromatic leukodystrophy, adrenoleukodystrophy and globoid cell (Krabbe’s disease), and Pelizaeus–Merzbacher disease)



    3. Reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy



    4. Central pontine and extrapontine myelinolysis



  5. MS-related




    1. Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM)



    2. Optic neuritis



    3. Transverse myelitis



    4. Devic’s syndrome (neuromyelitis optica)



  6. Neoplastic




    1. Primary CNS lymphoma



    2. Spinal cord tumors



    3. Paraneoplastic syndromes (limbic and brainstem encephalitis, progressive spasticity, and dementia associated with anti-amphiphysin antibodies)



    4. Posterior fossa/foramen magnum neoplasms



    5. Gliomatosis cerebri



    6. Chemotherapy and radiation-induced CNS syndromes



  7. Posterior fossa/spinal cord




    1. Chiari malformations



    2. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (important in differential diagnosis with progressive MS)



  8. Psychiatric disorders




    1. Conversion reaction



    2. Malingering



  9. Vascular




    1. CNS vasculitis (e.g., periarteritis nodosa, primary CNS angiitis, drug-induced and infection-associated vasculitis, retinocochlear vasculopathy of Susac)



    2. Spinal and brainstem arteriovenous malformations



    3. Cavernous hemangiomas



    4. Moyamoya vasculopathy



    5. Thromboembolic stroke



    6. Cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL)



    7. Takayasu disease



    8. Carotid and vertebral artery dissection



7.1.4 Laboratory diagnostic procedures for MS


There is no definitive laboratory test that is conclusive for MS.




  1. Blood studies: (to exclude other disorders)




    1. ANA (can be positive in low titer in up to 80% of MS patients)



    2. Anti-SSA antibody (if sicca symptoms)



    3. HLTV-1 antibody (if spastic paraparesis appears)



    4. Vitamin B-12 level



    5. Fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption (FTA-ABS) test



    6. Serum Lyme antibody titer



  2. CSF studies: If cranial MRI findings are not typical or diagnostic, CSF examination may provide additional support for diagnosis of MS.




    1. WBC: normal or slight lymphocytosis (< 50 cell/mm)



    2. Total protein should be normal or mildly increased in 25% of patients (> 54 mg/dl)



    3. Protein electrophoresis:




      • i. Two or more oligoclonal bands (OCBs) in CSF, in the absence of corresponding serum OCBs. OCBs are not directed against specific antigens and are not involved in pathogenesis of disease. They are present in 30–40% of possible and 90–97% of definitive MS patients. OCBs are also observed in other chronic inflammatory diseases of the CNS, in infectious disorders, and in 7% normal controls.



      • ii. Elevated IgG index (CSF IgG/CSF albumin)/(serum IgG/serum albumin) reflects activation of immune cells within CNS, present in 80% with definite MS (values > 0.68 support the diagnosis).



      • iii. Increased IgG synthesis rate (> 3 mg/day)



      • iv. Kappa light chains



      • v. The sensitivity of these tests is improved during acute exacerbations



    4. The appearance of the CSF and the opening pressure are normal


      Differential diagnosis of increased CSF IgG:




      • i. Guillain–Barre and other inflammatory neuropathies



      • ii. CNS neoplasms



      • iii. CNS lupus, sarcoidosis, Behcet’s disease



      • iv. Subacute sclerosing panencephalitis



      • v. Encephalitides



      • vi. Fungal meningitis



  3. Neuroimaging




    1. Cranial CT scan is not sensitive enough to detect most MS lesions.



    2. MRI is the most powerful diagnostic tool. It shows abnormalities in 90% of patients with clinically definite MS, 60–70% probable MS, 30–50% possible MS.


      Cranial MRI: Common locations include periventricular white (Dawson’s fingers), corpus callosum, tapetum, brain stem, and spinal cord (especially posterior cervical cord). Active lesions tend to enhance with gadolinium. Characteristic lesions are ovoid, multifocal, and of varying ages (and intensities). Serial MRI scans can be useful to demonstrate dissemination in time by the appearance of new T2 (and proton density) or gadolinium-enhancing lesions at least 3 months after an initial scan without a second clinical exacerbation.


      T2-weighted lesions are nonspecific and can be related to edema, inflammation, demyelination, gliosis, remyelination, or axonal loss. T1-weighted lesions without gadolinium enhancement (“black holes”) are more specifically indicative of axonal loss or gliosis and correlate better with physical disability measures. (+)


      Spinal MRI (cervical and/or thoracic levels): It is useful to rule out compressive lesions in cases of myelopathic presentation and may show either cord hypersensitivities when cranial MRI is not diagnostic, or cord atrophy in chronic cases. Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images enhance T2 lesion resolution, especially in the spinal cord. The contribution of myelin loss versus axonal loss to brain atrophy in MS is not differentiated by current MRI measures.



    3. Neurophysiologic tests


      Evoked potentials identify clinically silent white matter lesions and document dissemination in space (e.g., whether different parts of the CNS are affected). Patients may have significant defects along visual evoked response (VER), somatosensory evoked response (SSER), and brainstem auditory evoked response (BAERs) pathways without clinical symptoms or signs. In uncooperative patients and patients in whom MRI cannot be performed (e.g., due to pacemaker), measuring evoked potentials is an alternative. The sensitivity of evoked potential testing is high but its specificity is low.


      Visual evoked potentials (VEP) are the most helpful; these record the electrical response from the visual cortex in the occipital lobe. Normally, a response appears approximately 100 milliseconds after the stimulus is presented to the eye, and a delay implies demyelination in the visual pathways.


      VEPs are abnormal in approximately 40, 60, and 85% of possible, probable, and definite MS patients, respectively. Somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) are abnormal in approximately 50, 70, and 80% of possible, probable, and definite MS patients, respectively. BAERs are abnormal in approximately 30, 40, and 70% of possible, probable, and definite MS patients, respectively (see the following table).


Wallace CJ, Sevick RJ. Multifocal white matter lesions. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 1996;17(3):251–264


Francis GS, Evans AC, Arnold DL. Neuroimaging in multiple sclerosis. Neurol Clin 1995;13(1):147–171


Gronseth GS, Ashman EJ. Practice parameter: the usefulness of evoked potentials in identifying clinically silent lesions in patients with suspected multiple sclerosis (an evidence-based review): Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 2000;54(9): 1720–1725


Lee KH, Hashimoto SA, Hodge JP, et al. MRI of the head in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. A prospective 2-year follow-up with comparison with clinical evaluation, evoked potentials, oligoclonal banding, and CT. Neurology 1991;41:657–660



7.1.5 Diagnostic criteria for MS

































Clinical presentation


Additional data needed


= / > attacks (relapses)


None; clinical evidence will suffice (additional evidence desirable but must be consistent with MS)


= / > objective clinical lesions


= / > attacks


1 objective clinical lesion


Dissemination in space demonstrated by MRI OR


Positive CSF and = / > MRI lesions consistent with MS, OR Further clinical attack involving different site


1 attack


= / > objective clinical lesions


Dissemination in time demonstrated by MRI OR Second clinical attack


1 attack


1 objective clinical lesion (monosymptomatic presentation)


Dissemination in space demonstrated by MRI OR positive CSF and = / > 2 MRI lesions consistent With MS AND


Dissemination in time demonstrated by MRI OR Second clinical attack


Insidious neurologic progression Suggestive of MS (primary progressive MS)


Positive CSF AND


Dissemination in space demonstrated my MRI Evidence of


= / > T2 brain lesions, OR


= / > spinal cord lesions, OR


4–8 brain and 1 spinal cord lesion, OR


positive VEP with 4–8 MRI lesions, OR


positive VEP with 4–8 brain lesions + 1 spinal cord lesion AND


Dissemination in time demonstrated by MRI OR


Continued progression for 1 year


Source: McDonald WI, Compston A, Edan G, etal. Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the International Panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 2001;50(1)1:121–127



McDonald criteria for definite MS

The McDonald criteria make use of the clinical presentation and the advances of MRI.


When a patient presents with two or more attacks with clinical evidence of two or more neurological deficits, there is no need for additional requirements to make the diagnosis of MS, because there is dissemination in place and time (▶Fig. 7.1).



No Image Available!

No Image Available!




Fig. 7.1 Multiple sclerosis in a 22-year-old woman with a 6-week history of sensory disturbances in her right arm. No other symptoms were present. CSF was positive for oligoclonal bands. (a) Axial FLAIR sequence of the brain demonstrates multiple hyperintense lesions. (b) Axial DIR sequence of the brain. The lesions are depicted in higher contrast. (c) Sagittal T2w image of the cervical spine demonstrates multiple hyperintense lesions. Each of the lesions spans no more than one vertebral body height. (d) Sagittal T1w sequence after contrast administration. Individual lesions show marked enhancement. (Reproduced from Intramedullary Space. In: Forsting M, Jansen O, ed. MR Neuroimaging: Brain, Spine, Peripheral Nerves. 1st edition. Thieme; 2016.) Multifocal large confluent lesions demonstrating T2-hyperintensity (e), T1-hypointensity (f), and heterogeneous enhancement (g) in the periventricular white matter bilaterally. (h) The susceptibility-weighted image demonstrates the normal periventricular white matter venules (arrows) crossing through these confluent active MS plaques, a finding not usually seen with brain neoplasms. (Reproduced from Case 86. In: Tsiouris A, Sanelli P, Comunale J, ed. Case-Based Brain Imaging. 2nd edition. Thieme; 2013.) Tumefactive demyelinating lesions (TDLs). TDLs are demyelinating lesions > 2 cm in diameter, frequently showing mass effect and surrounding edema. (i) Axial fluid-attenuated inversion recovery image show two examples (arrows). (j) Axial enhanced T1-weighted image shows the enhancing edges that represent areas of increased inflammatory activity. (k) The lesion periphery frequently shows restricted water diffusion, with hyperintensity on diffusion weighted imaging (l) and hypointensity on the apparent diffusion coefficient map. (Reproduced from Diffusion Weighted Imaging and Diffusion Tensor Imaging in Demyelinating Diseases. In: Leite C, Castillo M, ed. Diffusion Weighted and Diffusion Tensor Imaging. A Clinical Guide. 1st edition. Thieme; 2015.) (l) Sagittal T1-weighted MRI of the cervical spinal cord following the administration of gadolinium-DTPA in a patient with acute multiple sclerosis showing slight enhancement at the C2-C3 level. There is virtually no widening of the spinal cord. (m) Axial T1-weighted MRI following the administration of gadolinium-DTPA shows characteristic quadrantic location of enhancement in the dorsolateral region of the cervical spinal cord. (Reproduced from Diagnostic Imaging Studies. In: Dickman C, Fehlings M, Gokaslan Z, ed. Spinal Cord and Spinal Column Tumors. 1st edition. Thieme; 2006.)


In all other cases (less than two attacks or less than two clinical lesions), there is a role for MRI to fulfil the diagnostic criteria be demonstrating dissemination in space (DIS), in time, or both.


The McDonald criteria are very specific, because if you want to use MRI for the diagnosis of MS, you have to make sure that the patient really has MS.


For dissemination in space (DIS), lesions in two out of four typical areas of the CNS are required:




  • Periventricular



  • Juxtocortical



  • Infratentorial



  • Spinal cord


For dissemination in time (DIT), there are two possibilities:




  • New T2 and/or gadolinium-enhancing lesion(s) on follow-up MRI, with reference to a baseline scan, irrespective of the timing of the baseline MRI.



  • Simultaneous presence of asymptomatic gadolinium-enhancing and nonenhancing lesions at any time.



Schumacher criteria for definite MS



  1. Two separate CNS symptoms



  2. Two separate attacks—onset of symptoms is separated by at least 1 month



  3. Symptoms must involve the white matter



  4. Age 10–50 (although usually 20–40)



  5. Objective deficits are present on the neurologic examination



  6. No other medical problem can be found to explain the patient’s condition


The key to the Schumacher criteria for the clinical diagnosis of MS is the first two features, i.e., two separate symptoms at two separate times or lesions disseminated in space and in time.


Noseworthy JH, Lucchinetti C, Rodriguez M, Weinshenker BG. Multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 2000;343(13): 938–952


Lucchinetti C, Brück W, Noseworthy J. Multiple sclerosis: recent developments in neuropathology, pathogenesis, magnetic resonance imaging studies and treatment. Curr Opin Neurol 2001;14(3):259–269



7.2 Isolated Idiopathic Optic Neuritis


(Synonyms: retrobulbar optic neuritis, optic papillitis, inflammatory optic neuropathy)


Optic neuritis is a common disorder, the pathogenesis of which refers to inflammation of the optic nerve with variable demyelination affecting individuals between the ages of 15 and 45, with a white (85%) predominance. Women are affected approximately three times more frequently than men. Optic neuritis occurs as the initial symptom of MS in 35–62% patients and is likely a forme fruste of MS in its isolated form. In pregnant women with MS, there is a diminished risk of new exacerbations including optic neuritis, especially during the third trimester.


Optic neuritis may be classified as follows:




  1. Anatomically (retrobulbar optic neuritis, papillitis, neuroretinitis)



  2. By incidence (retrobulbar being the most common, followed by papillitis, and neuroretinitis)



  3. Related to etiology:




    1. MS


      Patients with known MS are at significant risk of optic neuritis. It is the first symptom in 20% of MS patients and occurs in 70% of patients sometimes during the course of the illness. In patients presenting with isolated optic neuritis, the risk of developing MS is approximately 30% after 5–7 years. In long term follow-up studies, 75% of women and 34% of men developed clinically definite MS.



    2. Viral and parainfectious causes


      Adenovirus, coxsackie, cytomegalovirus, HIV, hepatitis A, Epstein–Barr virus, measles, mumps, rubella, varicella zoster, herpes zoster



    3. Post vaccination



    4. Vasculitides (SLE, Wegener’s granulomatosis)



    5. Syphilis



    6. Sarcoidosis



    7. Lyme disease



    8. Tuberculosis



    9. Mycobacterium pneumoniae



    10. Autoimmune



    11. Sinus infection



    12. Toxoplasmosis



7.2.1 Clinical features


Isolated idiopathic optic neuritis is characterized by the following:




  1. Acute onset of orbital pain, particularly eye pain on an eye movement test



  2. Central or paracentral scotoma



  3. Color desaturation (dyschromatopsia)



  4. Progressive, often unilateral vision loss over hours or days



  5. Diminished contrast sensitivity (98%); photopsia (30%)



  6. Excellent prognosis for visual recovery over months


On examination, a patient with isolated idiopathic optic neuritis will exhibit:




  1. Decreased visual acuity



  2. Impaired visual field. Central visual scotoma is the hallmark of optic neuritis, accounting for over 90% of the visual field defects, whereas the optic disc may appear normal in retrobulbar neuritis (two-thirds of patients), inspiring the adage “the patient sees nothing and the physician sees nothing.” In anterior optic neuritis (or papillitis), the disc may be swollen, and in less than 6% of patients hemorrhage may occur at the disc margin. The optic disc may become pale weeks after the initial episode.



  3. Impaired color perception



  4. Afferent pupillary defect (Marcus Gunn pupil)



7.2.2 Differential diagnosis


Acute optic neuritis can usually be distinguished from other conditions on clinical grounds. History is usually suggestive with compressive optic neuropathy from intracranial tumors, anterior ischemic optic neuropathy, sinus disease, autoimmune optic neuropathies, radiation-induced optic neuropathies, and central serous choroidopathy.


Optic nerve diseases that may be confused with optic neuritis/papillitis include:




  1. Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy



  2. Diabetic papillopathy



  3. Venous stasis retinopathy



  4. Impending central retinal vein occlusion



  5. Ischemic optic neuropathy



  6. Optic nerve drusen



  7. Carcinomatous meningitis



  8. Infiltrating neoplasm (lymphoma)



  9. Paraneoplastic disorder



7.2.3 Investigations



Special testing

A complete neuro-ophthalmologic examination emphasizing visual acuity at near and far distances, a search for the relative afferent pupillary defect (Marcus Gunn pupil), color vision testing, and careful perimetry are essential in evaluating optic neuritis.


Optic neuritis typically causes prolongation of the latency and decreased amplitude of the P100 of the VEPs, the first large positive peak occurring approximately 100 milliseconds after stimulus. Pattern reversal stimulus presentation yields more reproducible results. Abnormalities of the VEP indicate dysfunction at any point along the visual pathways from the retina to the striate cortex, and are not pathognomonic for demyelinating optic neuropathy. Other disorders, such as compressive lesions, glaucoma, hereditary and toxic optic neuropathy, and papilledema, can also cause VEP disturbances.



Imaging studies

Gadolinium enhancement on MRI is demonstrated in the optic nerves of the majority of patients with acute optic neuritis and correlates with recovery of visual acuity and improvement of VEP amplitudes. The incidence of white matter lesions found with MRI was 48.7%. However, more recent information showed that 36% of placebo-group patients with two or more periventricular lesions of at least 3 mm in size, identified by MRI developed definite MS within 2 years, compared with only 3% of those in whom MRI was normal (▶Fig. 7.2).



No Image Available!




Fig. 7.2(a–c) Idiopathic optic neuritis or Devic’s disease. The optic nerves and the spinal cord are usually involved. Often there are few T2 lesions in the brain (thick arrow). There are extensive spinal cord lesions (> 3 vertebral segments) involving most of the cord with low T1 and high T2 signal intensity and swelling of the cord. Unlikely in MS the lesions are usually smaller and peripherally located.



Blood testing

Initial analysis of the Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial led to the conclusion that the use of the ancillary studies, (e.g., ANA, fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption test, Lyme titer, serum and/or CSF angiotensin-converting enzyme level, CSF studies including IgG index and synthesis rate, oligoclonal bands, cryptococcal antigen, cytology, and hypercoagulable studies in selected patients, such as anticardiolipin antibodies, protein C & S, antithrombin III, activated CRP, factor V Leiden, plasma viscosity, fibrinogen, and homocysteine) was limited for defining a cause for visual loss other than optic neuritis associated with demyelinating disease.


Optic Neuritis Study Group. The five-year risk of multiple sclerosis after optic neuritis; experience of the Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial. Neurology 1997;49:1404–1413


Beck RW. Optic neuritis. In MIller NR, ed. Walsh and Hoyt’s Clinical Neuro-ophthalmology. 5th ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins;1998


Sedwick LA. Optic neuritis. Neurol Clin 1991;9(1):97–114



7.3 Acute Disseminated Encephalomyelitis


Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM) is an acute, monophasic postinfectious or parainfectious (occurs after a viral illness or vaccination) encephalitis. In 50–75% of cases, the beginning of the disease is preceded by a viral or bacterial infection, usually a sore throat or cough (upper respiratory tract infection 7–14 days prior). Occasionally, ADEC occurs 3 months after a vaccination (most commonly after measles, mumps, and rubella vaccination). It is more common in children than in adults (more than 80% of childhood cases occur in patients younger than 10 years, the ratio of boys to girls is 1.3:1) and is believed to be caused by an immune response triggered by an antigen (viral or vaccine). ADEM is found in all ethnic groups and races. The prognosis for recovery is generally good; recovery is usually spontaneous. Mortality has been estimated as high as 10–20% and as low as less than 2%). Morbidity usually involves visual, motor, autonomic, or intellectual deficits, and epilepsy if grey matter is affected. Deficits may persist for several weeks; however, most deficits resolve within 1 year. Mental retardation is possible, especially in children younger than 2 years of age at disease onset.



7.3.1 Signs and symptoms


Early physical manifestations:




  1. Irritability and lethargy are common first signs.



  2. Fever returns nearly in half of cases.



  3. Headache is reported in 45–65% of the cases.



  4. Meningism is detected in 20–30% of cases.


Neurologic abnormalities:


May occur over hours to 6 weeks from onset of early symptoms.




  1. Visual disturbances




    1. Visual field defects



    2. Ophthalmoparesis



    3. Optic neuritis (10–30%)



  2. Cranial nerve palsies (35–40%)



  3. Language disturbances (10%)



  4. Psychiatric abnormalities




    1. Irritability



    2. Depression



    3. Personality changes



    4. Psychosis



  5. Seizures, focal or generalized (25%)



  6. Weakness (50–75%)



  7. Sensory changes (15–20%)




    1. Posterior column/hemisensory changes



    2. Band or girdle dysesthesia or Lhermitte’s sign



  8. Extrapyramidal disorders




    1. Choreoathetosis



    2. Dystonia



7.3.2 Diagnosis


Criteria that facilitate diagnosis include:




  1. History of recent infection (although it may have been clinically silent)



  2. Monophasic disease course



  3. Disseminated CNS disease with neurologic findings



  4. Absence of metabolic or infectious disorders


The history of events is the single most important part of the diagnostic criteria. In many cases, especially in the absence of preceding illness or recent vaccination, ADEM is a diagnosis of exclusion. ADEM tends to have neurologic signs and symptoms not typically present in MS, such as headache, nausea, vomiting, drowsiness, and meningismus.


Neither MRI nor CSF results alone are adequate for diagnosing ADEM. MRI is useful in highlighting the disseminated involvement of the white matter and identifying extend and location. MRI findings are virtually impossible to distinguish from MS lesions.


MRI of the brain typically shows multiple high-signal intensity lesions involving white matter. The lesions usually are symmetric, and occipital head regions are predominantly involved. The lesions can affect gray matter and basal ganglia as well. In contrast to MS plaques, the lesions are usually of the same age (i.e., they show more uniform enhancement). If the spinal cord is involved, ADEM lesions are continuous affecting multiple levels, whereas a typical MS lesion is confined to one spinal cord level. The typical MS lesions are also posterior in location on axial, cross-sectional views of the spinal cord, whereas in the ADEM lesions tend to be more diffused throughout the entire cord.


In regard to ADEM, the CSF can be normal or, more likely, show nonspecific changes including an elevated protein and pleocytosis with lymphocytic predominance, a normal glucose, and negative cultures. Electroencephalogram (EEG) is also often performed, eliciting abnormal, yet nonspecific results including generalized and focal slowing and epileptiform discharges (▶Fig. 7.3).



No Image Available!




Fig. 7.3 (a–d) Young patient with acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM). On MRI, there are often diffuse and relatively symmetrical lesions in the supra and infratentorial white matter which may enhance simultaneously. There almost always is preferential involvement of the cortical gray matter and the deep gray matter of the basal ganglia and thalami.



7.3.3 Differential diagnosis


There is a close diagnostic association between MS and ADEM that is difficult to differentiate on the basis of a single clinical encounter or radiographic image alone. See the following table.


It is also important to differentiate between ADEM and viral encephalitis. The striking feature of ADEM is the prodromal illness or history of recent vaccination, the visual loss in one or both eyes, and spinal cord involvement which are uncommon in encephalitis. A history of recent travel abroad or to areas of high risk for arboviruses is useful information for the diagnosis of encephalitis.








































Differentiation between acute disseminated encephalomyelitis and multiple sclerosis


Features


ADEM


Multiple sclerosis


Age


< 12 Years


Adolescents and adults


Provoking factor


Preceding infection


None


CSF oligoclonal IgG


Normal


Positive


Recurrence


Uncommon


Common


MRI


Plaques more amorphous, less sharply defined particularly at gray–white matter junction


Thalamus involved


Rounded, elongated plaques with sharp margins in periventricular white matter


Thalamus not involved


Clinical features


Accompanied by fever, lethargy, and disturbances of consciousness, seizures, or movement disorders


No other constitutional symptoms



List of differentials



  1. MS



  2. Acute inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy



  3. Guillain–Barre syndrome



  4. Aseptic meningitis



  5. Cardioembolic stroke



  6. Lymphoma



  7. Toxic/metabolic encephalopathy



  8. Infectious encephalitis (herpes simplex, Lyme disease)



  9. Vasculitis (polyarteritis nodosa)



  10. Post-malarial neurological syndrome



  11. HIV-1-associated CNS complications



  12. Metastatic tumor



  13. Glioblastoma multiforme



  14. Antiphospholipid antibody syndrome



  15. Neurosarcoidosis



  16. Cavernous sinus syndromes



  17. Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis



  18. Neurosyphilis



  19. Systemic lupus erythematosus



  20. Wagener’s granulomatosis



  21. Brucellosis



  22. Spinal cord infarction



  23. Spinal epidural abscess


Gabis LV, Panasci DJ, Andriola MR, Huang W. Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis: an MRI/MRS longitudinal study. Pediatr Neurol 2004;30(5):324–329


Höllinger P, Sturzenegger M, Mathis J, Schroth G, Hess CW. Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis in adults: a reappraisal of clinical, CSF, EEG, and MRI findings. J Neurol 2002;249(3):320–329


Petzold GC, Stiepani H, Klingebiel R, Zschenderlein R. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of acute disseminated encephalomyelitis. Eur J Neurol 2005;12(9):735–736



7.4 Transverse Myelitis


(Transverse myelopathy: The term doesn’t imply any etiological factor, whereas “myelitis” refers to inflammatory diseases of spinal cord)


This is a neurologic syndrome caused by inflammation of the spinal cord that is localized over several segments of the cord and functionally transects one level of the cord. Transverse myelitis (TM) is uncommon with an incidence of 1–5 cases per million. It occurs in both adults and children. TM is generally a monophasic illness (one-time occurrence), but a small percentage of patients with a predisposing underlying illness may suffer a recurrence.



7.4.1 Etiology


TM may occur in isolation or in the setting of another illness. When it occurs without apparent underlying cause, it is referred to as idiopathic. Idiopathic TM is assumed to be a result of abnormal activation of the immune system against the spinal cord which causes inflammation and tissue damage. TM often develops in the setting of viral and bacterial infections, especially those which may be associated with a rash (e.g., rubeola, varicella, variola, rubella, influenza, mycoplasma, Epstein–Barr virus, cytomegalovirus, and mumps). Approximately one-third of patients with TM report a febrile illness (flu-like illness with fever) in close temporal relationship to the onset of neurologic symptoms. In some cases, there is evidence that there is a direct invasion and injury to the cord by the infectious agent (especially poliomyelitis, herpes zoster, and AIDS). A bacterial abscess can also develop around the spinal cord and injure the cord through compression, bacterial invasion, and inflammation.



7.4.2 List of illnesses associated with transverse myelitis




  1. Parainfectious: occurring at the time of and in association with an acute infection or an episode of infection.




    1. Viral: herpes simplex, herpes zoster, cytomegalovirus, Epstein–Barr virus, enteroviruses (poliomyelitis, coxsackie virus, echovirus), human T cell leukemia virus, human immunodeficiency virus, influenza, rabies



    2. Bacterial: Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Lyme borreliosis, syphilis, tuberculosis



  2. Postvaccinal (rabies, cowpox)



  3. Systemic autoimmune disease




    1. Systemic lupus erythematosus



    2. Sjogren’s syndrome



    3. Sarcoidosis



  4. MS



  5. Paraneoplastic syndrome (uncommon; the immune system produces an antibody to fight off the cancer and this cross-reacts with the molecules in the spinal cord neurons)



  6. Vascular (primarily due to inadequate blood flow to the spinal cord instead of actual inflammation)




    1. Thrombosis of spinal arteries



    2. Vasculitis secondary to heroin abuse



    3. Spinal arteriovenous malformation



7.4.3 Signs and symptoms


Signs and symptoms of TM may develop rapidly over several hours to several days or more slowly over 1–2 weeks. Typical symptoms include:




  1. Pain


    TM-associated pain often begins in the neck or back. Sharp, shooting sensations may also move down the legs or arms or around the abdomen.



  2. Abnormal sensations


    Some patients with TM report numbness, tingling, coldness, or burning sensations below the affected area of the spinal cord. These patients are especially sensitive to the light touch of clothing, or the extreme heat or cold.



  3. Weakness in arms or legs


    Some patients with mild weakness notice that they are stumbling, dragging one foot, or that their legs feel heavy as they move, where others may develop severe paralysis.



  4. Bladder and bowel problems


    Increased urinary urgency, difficult micturition and constipation.



  5. Muscle spasms (e.g., especially in the legs)



  6. Headache



  7. Fever



  8. Loss of appetite



7.4.4 Screening and diagnosis


The general history and physical examination do not give clues about the cause of spinal cord injury. The first step concerning a patient with complaints and examination suggestive of a spinal cord disorder, is to rule out a mass lesion which might be compressing the spinal cord (e.g., tumor, herniated disc, spinal stenosis, and abscess). This is important because early surgery to remove the compression may sometimes reverse neurologic injury to the spinal cord. The easiest test to rule out such a compressive lesion is an MRI of the cord. If MRI is not available or the images are equivocal, myelography must be performed.




  1. MRI


    T2-weighted MRI and contrast enhancement should be performed for complete spinal cord urgently. MRI also gives information about inflammation of the spinal cord and may suggest MS, intramedullary tumor, or abscess. Lesions with hyperintense signal on T2-weighted images over several cord segments are often found in TM. Sometimes the cord is swollen. An MRI of the brain is often performed to screen for lesions suggestive of MS (▶Fig. 7.4).



  2. CSF


    Some patients with TM may have abnormally high numbers of white blood cells (lymphocytic pleocytosis) with normal or elevated total protein level suggesting an infection or an inflammation. Oligoclonal bands are present in 20–40% of patients with TM.



  3. Blood work


    There are no specific blood tests to diagnose TM. The following work-up should be done to identify potential underlying causes: complete blood count (CBC)/differential, rapid plasma regain (RPR), ANA, double-stranded DNA, anti-SSA and anti-SSB antibodies, serum vitamin B12 level, HTLV-1 antibody, and serum angiotensin-converting enzyme.


Dec 8, 2021 | Posted by in NEUROSURGERY | Comments Off on 7 Demyelinating Disease and Brain Atrophy

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access