7 Encephalo-duro-arterio-synangiosis: In Adults



10.1055/b-0039-172621

7 Encephalo-duro-arterio-synangiosis: In Adults

Hao Jiang, Michael Schiraldi, and Nestor R. Gonzalez


Abstract


Encephalo-duro-arterio-synangiosis (EDAS) is a form of indirect bypass revascularization that was initially developed for the treatment of pediatric patients with moyamoya disease, but its application has now extended to adults. Although selection bias and lack of equipoise limit side-to-side comparisons with direct bypass, several clinical studies have shown that EDAS is a durable procedure, with excellent outcomes and low complication rates in adults with moyamoya disease. Scrupulous surgical technique is a key contributor for successful EDAS. In addition, judicious perioperative care is also crucial to prevent perioperative ischemia. Here, we systemically describe the EDAS technique, including its indications, surgical steps, operative challenges, surgical pearls of management, complications, and salvage maneuvers. Additionally, we present detailed EDAS-specific anesthesia and postoperative management protocols important in guaranteeing the success of the procedure.




7.1 History and Initial Description


Surgical approaches with direct external carotid to internal carotid bypass operations to treat moyamoya patients were introduced in the early 1970s by Kikuchi and Karasawa 1 in Japan and Krayenbühl 2 in Europe with the intention of providing additional blood supply to hypoperfused vascular territories. Despite initial successes with this technique, a direct bypass depends on patency and suitability of both donor and recipient vessels. In moyamoya patients, often the recipient or donor arteries are either small or fragile and pose significant challenges for direct vasculary anastomosis; this is true in pediatric as well as adult patients. In 1964, Tsubokawa et al, reported successful cerebral revascularization in a 6-year-old female patient with use of a dural autograft containing the middle meningeal artery (MMA). Almost a decade later, Ausman et al reported the development of spontaneous anastomotic connections between the scalp and the cortical surface following direct superficial temporal artery (STA) to middle cerebral artery (MCA) bypass. Subsequent attempts at revascularization without a direct anastomosis led to the development of the encephalo-duro-arterio-synangiosis (EDAS) technique for the treatment of pediatric patients with moyamoya disease published by Matsushima et al in 1979. In 1980, Spetzler et al 3 were the first to report an “alternative method” for revascularization of the MCA, in which the STA was sutured to the cortical arachnoid in adults “in whom no adequate cortical recipient could be found.” Subsequent angiography demonstrated neovascularization and the patient remained neurologically intact postoperatively. Since then, numerous authors 4 8 have reported good clinical results with the use of EDAS in adults with moyamoya.



7.1.1 Literature Support for the Use of EDAS in Adults


Although a paucity of literature comparing EDAS with direct bypass surgery exists, this technique has frequently been employed when the conditions do not permit a direct arterial anastomosis. 7 ,​ 9 Thus, selection bias and lack of equipoise remain hurdles when comparing EDAS with direct bypass. Nevertheless, a literature search using the query “moyamoya disease AND surgery AND adult” yielded 646 references published between November 1971 and February 2015. Twenty-two of these references were clinical trials, of which 20 provided clinical outcome information; none were randomized. 9 25 A total of 1,862 patients were included in these 20 studies. Of all patients, 603 (32.4%) had a direct bypass, 814 (43.7%) had indirect revascularization, and 445 (23.9%) patients underwent combined procedures. An overview of these 20 studies appears in Table 7‑1. Overall, the clinical outcomes indicate that both forms of surgical revascularization produce durable good outcomes, at least when performed in experienced centers. Interestingly, 4 of the 20 studies were performed with the intention of comparing direct bypass with indirect revascularization, but none showed statistically significant differences. The value of other studies is limited by utilization of perfusion imaging as an outcome measure, a diagnostic modality which lacks consistent correlation with clinical results. Until better surrogate markers are found, lack of postoperative ischemic stroke is the most adequate outcome to evaluate.














































































































































































































Table 7.1 Studies on the use of EDAS in adults

Author(s)


n


Surgery


Prospective


Independent outcome assessment


Term of follow-up (months)


Endpoint(s)


Result(s)


Baek et al 12


12


Bypass


Yes


No


3


SNSB


NSD


Agarwalla et al 10


37


Indirect


No


No


6


mRS


Improved p = 0.002


6% neurological deficit


2% hemorrhage


Cho et al 14


60


Combined


No


No


70


mRS


Karnofsky


mRS: 0.4; SD: 0.7


Karnofsky: 96.2; SD 8.4


Stroke: 13%


4% permanent deficit


Seizures: 2.6%


Wound infection 1.3%


Jiang et al 18


113


Combined


Yes


Yes


30


Stroke


Death


Hemorrhage


Stroke at 2y:1.9% Annual re-bleeding = 1.87%


Miyamoto et al 23


80


Bypass


Yes


Yes


52


Composite: rebleeding or stroke


Rehemorrhage:


Surgical: 14.3%


Medical: 34.2%


Stroke:


HR 0.39 (95% CI 0.15–1.03)


Lin et al 26


36


Indirect


No


No


70


Stroke


TIA


Death


Seizure


mRS


Stroke: 8.3%


TIA: 14%


Seizures: 5.5%


Death: 0


mRS 0–2: 90.6%


Sundaram et al 27


36/15


Bypass or indirect vs. medical


No


No


28


mRS 0–2


mRS 0–2:


Surgery: 75%


Medical: 94%


Mallory et al 22


75/7/60


Bypass, indirect, and combined


No


No


120


Composite: stroke or death or hemorrhage


Event free survival (all techniques) at 5 years: 95%; at 10 years: 90%


Amin-Hanjani et al 11


13


Combined


No


No


18.6


Stroke, seizure, NOVA flow


Stroke: 7.7%


Seizures: 15.4%


NOVA bypass flow decline: 68.8%


Abla et al 9


68/39


Bypass vs. indirect


No


No


25–36


mRS


NSD


Bypass mRS improved: 0.39 (SD: 1.23)


Indirect mRS declined: 0.14 (SD: 1.86)


Liu et al 21


97/4/10


Bypass vs. indirect vs. burr hole vs. medical


No


No


85.2


Rebleeding


Death


NSD


Bao et al 13


470


Indirect


No


No


26.5


Stroke


mRS


Stroke rate at 2 years 10%


Stroke rate at 5 years 13%


mRS 0–1: 74.4%


mRS 0–3: 95%


Kim et al 19


96/62


Indirect vs. combined


No


No


38


mRS


NSD


Fujimura and Tominaga 16


106


Combined


Yes


No


58.4


Stroke


Hemorrhage


Hyperperfusion


Stroke: 1%


Hemorrhage: 1.8%


Hyperperfusion 25.5% (no permanent deficit)


Lee et al 20


169/67/29/18


Bypass vs. indirect vs. combined vs. medical


No


No


55


Stroke


NSD


Czabanka et al 15


30


Combined vs. indirect


Yes


No


12


Stroke


Combined: stroke: 10%; no significance was evaluated


Guzman et al 17


233


Bypass (95.1% of cases)


No


No


59


mRS


Stroke


Hemorrhage


Death


Mean MRS: Preop = 1.62, postop=0.83


(p < 0.0001)


Stroke rate: 3.8%


Hemorrhage rate: 3.4%


Death: 2.3%


Starke et al 25


43


Indirect


No


Yes


41


mRS


Stroke


mRS deterioration 9%


5-year stroke free survival: 94% (95% CI 0.84–0.98)


Narisawa et al 24


49


Bypass


No


No


NA


Stroke


No strokes


Mesiwala et al 28


39/4


Bypass vs. indirect


No


No


43


Death


Bypass: 3


EDAS: 0


Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; EDAS, encephalo-duro-arterio-synangiosis; HR, hazard ratio; mRS, modified ranking scale; NSD, no significant difference; SD, standard deviation; SNSB, Seoul Neuropsychological Screening Battery; TIA, transient ischemic attack.



7.2 Indications


EDAS surgery is indicated for the management of all adult patients with intracranial arterial steno-occlusive disorders who present with symptoms of transient ischemic attack (TIA) or stroke in the territory of the affected vessel despite optimal medical management with antiplatelet agents. In our institution, and in a large number of centers in the United States, EDAS is the first choice of revascularization for any patient with intracranial arterial steno-occlusive disorders. For patients who have suffered stroke to be eligible for surgery, they need to have either functional independence (modified ranking scale < 3) or perfusion studies demonstrating tissue at risk for further ischemic damage in the territory of the stenoses. The diagnoses of the steno-occlusive disorder for which EDAS is indicated include:




  • Moyamoya disease defined as bilateral stenoses of the terminal internal carotid artery and proximal anterior cerebral artery (ACA) or MCA, with different degrees of angiographically evident lenticulostriate, leptomeningeal, or dural collaterals, in patients without risk factors for intracranial atherosclerosis, vascular dissection, or vasculitis.



  • Probable moyamoya disease defined as unilateral findings suggestive of moyamoya—as described above—in patients without risk factors for intracranial atherosclerosis, vascular dissection, or vasculitis.



  • Intracranial atherosclerosis defined as intracranial arterial disease with evidence of vessel wall calcification plus atherosclerotic risk factors, including history of hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus, smoking, and/or coronary or peripheral vascular atherosclerotic disease, failing intensive medical management with antiplatelets, statins, and risk factor reduction may benefit also from indirect EDAS revascularization. 5



7.3 Key Principles for the EDAS Surgery in Adults


Candidate patients for EDAS surgery are at risk for stoke during the perioperative period, both in the vascular territory to be treated and the contralateral hemisphere, if there is bilateral involvement. To reduce the risk of ischemic events associated with artery-to-artery embolisms, we recommend performing the operation under continuous antiplatelet therapy with aspirin. To reduce the risk of ischemia due to hypoperfusion, strict management of the patient’s blood pressure and fluid balance status must be maintained.


A successful EDAS is most dependent on scrupulous surgical technique. As the patients continue antiplatelet therapy throughout the procedure, meticulous hemostasis needs to be achieved while balancing avoidance of excessive cauterization of the arterial cuff, dura mater, or any other tissue that is used as a donor angiogenesis. Fastidious surgical technique can further minimize vasospasm and tissue injury, thus preventing intra- and postoperative complications. Finally, to facilitate the desired intracranial angiogenesis, donor arteries are positioned and fixed in close proximity to the pial surface while avoiding excessive arterial cuffs, tissue injuries, or bleeding.


As patients remain at risk for untoward events during and after surgery, the intraoperative anesthesia and postoperative critical care management are crucial to prevent stroke in adults undergoing EDAS. A detailed description of the anesthesia management is provided elsewhere. 29 In brief, the goals of management include strict control of: (1) blood pressure, (2) fluid balance, (3) cerebral vascular reactivity, (4) platelet aggregation, (5) hematocrit, and (6) oxygenation. Some aspects of this management can seem unusual for a standard neurosurgical case; particularly the need to maintain a sufficiently high blood pressure at all times to avoid cerebral hypoperfusion in the territory of the stenosis may be overlooked with devastating consequences. Close coordination between the anesthesiologist and surgeon is therefore indispensable.


It is important to keep in mind that the surgery itself merely provides the starting point for revascularization, which may take several weeks to occur. Consequently, the perioperative care requires as much diligence as the surgical procedure. This includes continued adherence to anesthesia management goals in the immediate postoperative period until a stable and sufficient systolic blood pressure is reached. Thereafter, continued adherence to strict medical management is the key to obtain good clinical outcomes in adult patients undergoing EDAS.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

May 9, 2020 | Posted by in NEUROSURGERY | Comments Off on 7 Encephalo-duro-arterio-synangiosis: In Adults

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access