7 Surgical Techniques in Percutaneous E ndoscopic Cervical Diskectomy
The successful use of percutaneous endoscopic cervical diskectomy has been reported by several authors.1–3 The techniques used are summarized in this chapter.
Surgical Technique
Anesthesia
Performed under local anesthesia
Neuroleptanalgesia (intravenous injection of fentanyl, 50 mg, and intramuscular injection of midazolam, 3 mg) along with 1% lidocaine
Position
Supine on radiolucent table
The neck is slightly extended by placement of a towel roll under the shoulder blade.
The head can be stabilized by applying a plaster tape across the forehead.
A plastic tent is placed over the patient’s face to prevent a feeling of suff ocation and also for ease of communication during the procedure.
The shoulders are pulled down and the arms are fixed to the sides of the table for better viewing ( Figs. 7.1 and 7.2 ).
Procedure
The level and midline are marked with the help of a Carm fluoroscope ( Fig. 7.3 ).
For lower cervical levels the C-arm may have to be tilted obliquely for better visualization.
The anterior cervical skin is painted and draped.
Lidocaine (1%) is infiltrated into the skin and subcutaneous tissue at the entry site.
For foraminal disk herniation approach from the contralateral side is preferable, whereas for a midline disk herniation entry from the right side is better for a right-handed surgeon.
The carotid pulse is palpated by the left hand.
The tracheoesophageal complex is then pushed by the fingernail while the anterior part of the cervical vertebra is felt ( Fig. 7.4 ).
The anatomy of the tracheoesophageal complex helps in retracting both esophagus and trachea together.
The shift of the complex is confirmed under fluoroscopy.
An 18-gauge needle is inserted into the interval created.
Further advancement of the needle past the skin, subcutaneous tissue, and up to the anterior margin of the disk space is done under fluoroscopic guidance ( Figs. 7.5 and 7.6 ).
The disk is penetrated between the longus colli m uscles.
This helps prevent bleeding and any sympathetic injury because the sympathetic chain is located medially in the lower cervical segments ( Fig. 7.7 ).
The stylet is advanced up to the center of the disk, then diskography is performed with 0.5 mL of a mixture of radiopaque dye, normal saline, and indigo carmine dye in the ratio 2:2:1.
Diskography helps to confirm the disk space and to identify the stained herniated nucleus pulposus during diskectomy ( Figs. 7.8 and 7.9 ).
Then a guide wire is passed through the needle and the needle is withdrawn.
While the needle is withdrawn, the guide wire should be firmly held to prevent slippage of the wire; otherwise the steps may have to be repeated ( Figs. 7.10 and 7.11 ).
A 5-mm transverse incision is placed on the skin and underlying subcutaneous tissue.
Serial dilators are passed over the guide wire from 1 to 4 mm until final placement of the obturator ( Fig. 7.12 ).
If the space between the tracheoesophageal complex in the middle and the carotid artery on the lateral side is wide, the obturator can be directly passed over the guide wire.
A 5-mm working cannula is passed over the obturator and the obturator is removed; the final position is determined depending on the pathology ( Figs. 7.13, 7.14, and 7.15 ).
For central disk herniation the tip of the working cannula should be in the midline on the anteroposterior (AP) view,
For foraminal herniation the tip should be directed toward the respective foramen in the AP view ( Figs. 7.16, 7.17, 7.18, 7.19, and 7.20 ).










In the lateral view the tip of the working cannula is advanced by gentle tapping up to the posterior vertebral line. If required minimal disk removal can be done by forceps under fluoroscopic guidance.
A 4-mm endoscope is passed through the working cannula; it has a 1.9-mm central working channel and two additional ports ( Fig. 7.21 ).
The central port is for the forceps/laser, whereas the additional ports are for input and output of irrigation.
Irrigation is done by cold saline to which intravenous cephazolin and epinephrine are added for hemostasis and to prevent infection ( Fig. 7.22 ).
Initial location of the fragment may be difficult; a side-firing holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser is useful. It helps to ablate the annulus and create an opening for the advancement of the scope to locate the fragment.
The cannula is advanced posteriorly to locate the inter-canalicular fragments if required, using the laser and grasping with the forceps.
Sometimes the posterior end plates are narrow due to osteophytes; the laser can be used to ablate the vertebral margins also.
The advantage of the laser is also that the penetration depth in continuous irrigation is less than 1 mm, so there is less chance of neural damage. Also it is side firing and thus avoids direct trauma to the tissues ( Figs. 7.23, 7.24, and 7.25 ).















The fragment freed from the annulus and fibrotic adhesions can be easily grasped with the help of forceps and removed ( Figs. 7.26, 7.27, 7.28, 7.29, 7.30, and 7.31 ).
Some bleeding may ensue after the fragment removal, which can be controlled by continuous irrigation and usually stops by itself.
Laser can be used for ablation of free fragments too small to be removed by forceps.
Laser is also used for ablation of osteophytes and painful nociceptors of the posterior annulus.
The adequacy of decompression can be checked by the free course of the nerve root/dural pulsations.
The patient’s symptoms are assessed, and hand compression hemostasis is done on the skin entry site after removing the scope and the working cannula.
A single stitch is taken, and the patient is discharged the same day with oral analgesics and antibiotics.






References
1. Choi G, Lee SH. The Textbook of Spine. Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society; 2008:1173–1185 2. Lee SH, Lee JH, Choi WC, Jung B, Mehta R. Anterior minimally invasive approaches for the cervical spine. Orthop Clin North Am 2007;38:327–337 3. Ruetten S, Komp M, Merk H, Godolias G. Full-endoscopic cervical posterior foraminotomy for the operation of lateral disc herniations using 5.9-mm endoscopes: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008;33:940–948
Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Full access? Get Clinical Tree


