70 Extracranial Vascular Tumors



10.1055/b-0038-162199

70 Extracranial Vascular Tumors

Alfred Pokmeng See, Ramsey Ashour, and Mohammad Ali Aziz-Sultan


Abstract


Certain head and neck tumors are hypervascular and their management can be challenging. The most common extracranial vascular tumors include carotid body tumors, juvenile nasopharyngeal tumors, paraganglioma, and metastasis. Patients can present with a variety of clinical symptoms including pulsatile mass, lower cranial nerve dysfunction, and hemorrhage. Initial imaging should include computed tomography (CT) angiogram and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of head and neck. Digital substraction angiography is recommended to evaluate the angioarchitecture of the tumor, presence and extension of vascular anastomosis, and possible tumor embolization. Compared with intracranial tumors, extracranial tumors have multiple arterial supplies with collateralization between major arteries. The goals of embolization include decreasing intraoperative blood loss, achieving better resection, and temporary or permanent obliteration of acute hemorrhage. Embolization can be achieved through a transarterial, transvenous, or direct tumor puncture approach. Complications are related to unidentified anastomoses to eloquent vascular territories.




Introduction


Glomus tumors, carotid body tumors, and juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibromas (JNAs) are the most common extracranial hypervascular tumors seen by neurosurgeons. These tumors present a challenge because the hypervascularity increases morbidity and mortality from the pathology and from the treatment regimen. The full range of interventions is beyond the scope of this chapter. However, it is worth mentioning that the treatment modalities available include observation, radiation, surgery alone, surgery with preoperative embolization, embolization alone, and in certain pathology, endovascular chemotherapy. Selective management of the hypervascular nature of these tumors can be accomplished with open surgical or endovascular techniques. However, the extensive parenchymal vascularity can present a challenge for hemostatic control during open surgical approaches unless the primary arterial feeders are easily accessible during exposure. Preoperative embolization may devascularize the tumor and improve intraoperative visualization, operative duration, operative blood loss, and possibly the extent of resection. Furthermore, embolization may be applied in isolation for the management of acute tumor hemorrhage.


Major controversies in decision making addressed in this chapter include:




  1. Whether or not treatment is indicated.



  2. Indications for diagnostic cerebral angiography.



  3. Case selection for preoperative endovascular embolization and adequate timing for surgery after embolization.



  4. Potential complications of endovascular embolization and technical nuances.



Whether to Treat


The goals of care form one aspect of the decision to intervene, while the risks of intervention form the countering perspective. Intervention for these tumors can be classified as therapeutic or palliative ( 1 , 3 in algorithm). The majority of these lesions require operative intervention for definitive therapeutic intervention, while radiation or a less aggressive surgical intervention may provide symptomatic control or palliative benefits. The risks of intervention are an integration of underlying medical comorbidity, and the complexity due to the intervention itself. While surgery and radiation may modify the natural history of the lesion, both of these may also cause injury to the local neurovascular structures and may be associated with hemorrhagic complications. Particularly with open surgical approaches, embolization may reduce the risk of intraoperative hemorrhage and modify the overall risk–benefit profile ( 3, 4, 5, 6 in algorithm ). However, the ultimate indication for preoperative embolization is based on a risk–benefit analysis of the combined risk of embolization and surgery compared with that of surgery alone. The multidisciplinary nature of combined embolization and surgery may make it challenging to accurately assess the risks of each and the combination.

Algorithm 70.1 Decision-making algorithm for extracranial vascular tumors.

Finally, in the management of acute, refractory hemorrhage, embolization may be an effective solitary intervention ( 1 , 2 in algorithm). In medically refractory epistaxis, operators have reported more than 80% sustained control with less than 25% recurrent hemorrhage. Although results are not well reported for control of tumor hemorrhage, short-term control is likely comparable. However, in the absence of definitive treatment of the underlying neoplastic lesion, small series have demonstrated variable recurrent hemorrhage.



Workup



Clinical Evaluation


Glomus tumors, or paragangliomas or chemodectomas, are neuroendocrine tumors from the adventitia of the jugular bulb (glomus jugulare) or from the carotid body (carotid body tumor). They also occur in other regions of the head and neck in proximity with the parasympathetic system. Local mass effect leads to lower cranial nerve dysfunction. Glomus jugulare may also be associated with tinnitus and carotid body tumors may be a palpable pulsatile mass. In some, particularly glomus jugulare and vagale, the catecholamines in the clusters of neurosecretory granules may cause hypertension. This is less common in carotid body tumors. Patients should routinely be screened with urinary and serum catecholamine levels because treatment may occasionally cause acute changes in systemic catecholamine with resultant cardiovascular collapse.


JNAs form at the sphenopalatine foramen and are thought to be from the vascular plexus of the first branchial arch. These present with nasal fullness, obstruction, or epistaxis. Furthermore, patients with JNA and metastatic tumors may present with acute hemorrhage refractory to conservative management. In the head and neck region, this may manifest as acute airway compromise due to pharyngeal hemorrhage. Tumor hemorrhage has also been reported to result in consumptive coagulopathy, which may resolve upon treatment of the hypervascular tumor.



Imaging


Radiographic workup of paragangliomas demonstrates “salt-and-pepper” appearance on T1- and T2-weighted MRI and occasionally occlusion of the sigmoid sinus and internal jugular vein. Hyperintensity CT imaging will better demonstrate the osseous abnormality, which is an eroded pattern due to growth of the mass. Cross-sectional imaging is also useful in identifying multiplicity of lesions, which occurs in 30 to 40% of familial presentations. In paragangliomas, angiography is helpful in defining the extent of hypervascularity (3, 5, 6 in algorithm). Occasionally, radioactively labeled octreotide uptake is used on single-photon emission CT (SPECT) study.


MR of a JNA will demonstrate flow voids consistent with hypervascularity, with prominent enhancement of the lesion. Angiography is helpful to further delineate the vascular supply from the internal and external carotid arteries, such as the internal maxillary, ascending pharyngeal, or ophthalmic arteries (3, 5, 6 in algorithm).


In comparison with intracranial tumors, tumors of the head and neck are more likely to have multiple arterial supplies with collateralization between multiple major arteries, such as bilateral carotid supply or carotid and vertebral supply. In contrast, tumors of the vertebral column are typically supplied by segmental vessels at that level or at the immediately adjacent levels (5, 6 in algorithm).



Treatment


The treatment of extracranial vascular tumors involves a multidisciplinary approach that includes head and neck surgeons, neurosurgeons, endovascular interventionists, plastic surgeons, and among others. Although risks of surgery associated with the patients’ systemic health and most of the attributes of the tumor cannot be modified, complications from hypervascularity of the tumor can be reduced via preoperative embolization. Embolization itself is not without risk. Therefore, the risk of surgery must be compared against the risk of embolization followed by surgery to assess the appropriateness of the tumor embolization. The patient should be aware that the risks of embolization are distinct from those of surgery. Thromboembolic or vascular complications with resultant ischemic tissue injury, hemorrhage at the site of embolization and the access site, reaction to intravascular contrast, and inadequate or unsuccessful embolization. Although the aggressiveness and goal of embolization will alter the complication rate, 2.5% is a reasonable estimate of embolization-associated complications from meta-analysis of outcomes from multiple groups (supports algorithm steps 2 and 4–8).



Embolization Objective


To decrease intraoperative blood loss, embolic agents can be employed to sacrifice specific arterial pedicles or devascularize the parenchymal capillary base of the tumor. In cases of hypervascular metastasis (▶ Fig. 70.1 ) or JNA (▶ Fig. 70.2 ) presenting with acute hemorrhage, embolization may also be a temporizing measure to arrest active hemorrhage while awaiting definitive management. There is not a widely applied scale to describe the extent of embolization, but a general framework is based on this distinction between the main arterial pedicles and the intralesional capillaries.

Fig. 70.1 Neck tumor metastasis. (a) Computed tomography (CT) with contrast demonstrating a large metastatic tumor at the left supraclavicular region. (b) Left thyrocervical trunk angiogram demonstrating a hypervascular tumor blush. (c) Postembolization CT scan demonstrating the Onyx cast within the tumor and the thyrocervical trunk branches. (d) Immediate postembolization angiogram of the thyrocervical trunk demonstrating successful devascularization of tumor. (Images courtesy of Leonardo Rangel-Castilla, MD, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.)
Fig. 70.2 Juvenile nasal angiofibroma (JNA). Transarterial approach: lateral digital subtraction angiogram (DSA) from the external carotid artery (a) demonstrates hypervascular tumor blush of the JNA supplied by the sphenopalatine artery. Lateral fluoroscopy postembolization (b) demonstrates the Onyx cast of the sphenopalatine artery and the distal internal maxillary artery achieved via a transarterial approach.


Endovascular Management—Operative Nuances


Access to the tumor hypervascularity can be accomplished via a transarterial route. This may involve femoral or radial access. Navigation into the tumor arterial supply is complicated by tortuosity of vessels, which typically increases with increasing age as well as hypertension. Transarterial embolization typically devascularizes only the pedicle via which the access is achieved. Therefore, multiplicity of arterial supply to the tumor requires multiple catheterizations, and may be more common in tumors of the head and neck than in intracranial tumors (▶ Fig. 70.1 ). However, tumors of the vertebral column may have fewer total arterial pedicles, favoring transarterial access.


Percutaneous access to the tumor parenchyma is an alternative means of delivering embolic agent (▶ Fig. 70.3 ). A percutaneous route avoids the complexity of multiple significant arterial feeders and bypasses tortuous anatomy. In both the head and neck and the spine, most tumors are accessible via a percutaneous route with appropriate image guidance. In the distinct case of JNA, direct puncture of the tumor parenchyma can be accomplished via endoscopic-guided endonasal needle infiltration via the nasal mucosa.

Fig. 70.3 Carotid body tumor. Lateral plane digital subtraction angiogram (DSA) (a) of the carotid bifurcation demonstrating tumor hypervascularity and displacement of the proximal internal and external carotid arteries. Lateral projection DSA (b) with direct tumor puncture and contrast injection demonstrating hypervascular tumor blush and normal venous outflow. Lateral DSA with right common carotid artery injection (c) during tumor embolization and (d) after completion of tumor embolization with resolution of hypervascular tumor blush. Lateral (e) and anterior–posterior (f) projection DSA with faint contrast injection from the right common carotid artery after tumor embolization demonstrating liquid embolic cast of the carotid body tumor after direct puncture access for embolization. Intraoperative (g,h) images of dissected tumor. The left side is rostral, and the right side is caudal. Vessel loops encircle the internal carotid artery (left inferior loop) and the external carotid artery (superior loop). A hemostat displaces the internal jugular vein posterolaterally. Although the tumor demonstrates some dark discoloration from the embolic agent, the discoloration of the carotid bifurcation is from coagulation. There is excellent hemostasis with the assistance of preoperative embolization. The resected tumor (i) is approximately 4.5 cm in length.

The choice of access, whether transarterial or direct puncture is guided by ease of embolization. Tortuous anatomy, multiple arterial feeders, and collateral supply to sensitive vascular territories determine the difficulty of transarterial access. Direct puncture can be limited by local normal anatomy or body habitus but is overall less variable. However, most cases would require a pre-embolization angiogram to assess the tumor vascularity; therefore, transarterial access in a tumor with a single main arterial pedicle may still present an attractive approach. Patterns of typical arterial supply may suggest an appropriately focused angiographic evaluation; for example, the ascending pharyngeal is typically the primary arterial supply to glomus tumor. As discussed earlier, safely achieving the embolization objective is the primary concern. This distinction may be a result of multiple arterial supplies, including arterial collateral supply which is subangiographic or inaccessible via transarterial catheterization. Despite comparable angiographic outcomes, the principal objective is optimizing intraoperative hemostasis without an increase in overall risk. This would suggest that when feasible, a direct puncture approach with extensive embolization of the tumor capillary bed is most appropriate. In our previously reported experience, direct puncture also provided faster embolization, with direct puncture taking an average of 39 minutes, while transarterial access required 50 minutes for embolization of a JNA. Patients should be informed that in the direct puncture approach, there is occasionally skin induration at the puncture sites, but rare occurrence of skin necrosis.


Options for tumor embolization agent include particle embolic agents, liquid embolic agents, and less commonly coils or other devices. Coils and other embolic devices are employed embolize larger vessels, which can help with flow modulation when high flow interferes with delivery control. Coaxial dual-lumen balloon catheters such as the ASCENT (Codman Johnson and Johnson, Raynham, MA) now offer a temporary alternative tool for flow modulation. Attributes of an ideal embolic agent for safe and effective delivery include visibility, controlled deployment, noninflammatory, and nonneurotoxicity. For effective embolization, the agent needs to penetrate the small vasculature. For subsequent resection, the embolic agent should not interact with electrocautery and should be mechanically manipulable and transectable.


Durability of the agent is important for solitary embolization but less important when the patient will undergo operative resection within 72 hours of the embolization. However, it is important to consider the durability of embolization in cases where total resection may not be accomplished. Historically, recanalization is thought to occur following particle embolization, with as much as a 20% rate of rehemorrhage over the course of 2 months if the source is otherwise untreated. Most preoperative embolization is followed by the definitive surgical procedure within 1 to 3 days in the absence of clear increased risk from serial endovascular and open surgical procedures. Occasionally, when tumor swelling is of particular concern, embolization is immediately followed by operative resection, but this can be logistically limited if the embolization and operation are each complicated and time-consuming.


Parenchymal penetration is determined by liquid viscosity or particle size. Unfortunately, there is not a well-defined technique for determining the size of the hypervascular channels. Therefore, in practice, embolic agents are delivered via manually modulated delivery that is titrated on fluoroscopic feedback. Successful embolization with particles leads to increasing contrast stagnation and reflux, while the liquid embolic agents are mixed with tantalum or Ethiodol (Savage Laboratories, Melville, NY) which demonstrate the extent of polymerization but do not demonstrate the nature of the perfusion. It is easier to assess the extent of embolization with the liquid embolic agents. Particles such as polyvinyl alcohol (PVA; Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN; Contour, Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA) or Embospheres (Merit Medical, South Jordan, UT) can penetrate vessels from 40 to 1,300 µm depending on selection of particle size. Ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer (Onyx; Covidien Medtronic, Plymouth, MN) is reported to penetrate vessels as small as 5 µm, while N-butyl cyanoacrylate (NBCA; Codman Johnson and Johnson, Raynham, MA) penetrates less deeply into vessels as small as 20 µm.


Each embolic agent also has particular attributes which can complicate delivery. Some types of particles form aggregates, leading to irregular vascular penetration and occlusion. Other particles may have nonuniform size and penetrate in an inconsistent fashion. These particles may also accumulate in the inside of the catheter or completely occlude the hub of the catheter. Associated with this, particle delivery generally requires a larger catheter than may be required for the liquid embolic agents. Particle embolization does not typically form a coherent cast which is observed or manipulated during surgical exposure (▶ Fig. 70.3 ). Delivery of particle embolic agents has not been described in direct puncture techniques. There may be limited by the ability to propagate upstream against capillary flow. The liquid embolic agents have been well described with transarterial techniques and are increasingly described with the direct puncture technique. Direct puncture also obviates catheter entrapment by the liquid embolic agent because the delivery is achieved via a rigid needle. However, the slowly diffuse nature of injection via direct puncture makes application of NBCA, which polymerizes relatively quickly, difficult in comparison to Onyx embolization. Reflux of NBCA into the intracranial supply has been reported both intraprocedurally due to unexpectedly low resistance, and in a delayed fashion following completion of embolization due to delayed polymerization. With gradual centripetal polymerization and diffusely infiltrative spread of the agent into low resistance channels, Onyx can be effectively delivered throughout the hypervascular capillary network via a single direct puncture and intervals of injection. In addition to varying viscosity of liquid embolic agents, variation in needle caliber used for direct puncture may alter the embolic penetration.


The liquid embolic agents are delivered with nonionic solutes. In comparing the liquid embolic agents, NBCA is mixed with Ethiodol (Savage Laboratories), which is radiopaque and conveys viscosity to the agent, while Onyx is delivered in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), which has been reported to cause vasospasm and discomfort when delivered quickly. However, NBCA polymerizes more quickly and is at higher risk of trapping the catheter and due to its adhesive nature. In contrast, Onyx delivery can be started and stopped on the order of several minutes at a time due to a slower precipitating reaction, and Onyx is cohesive in nature and therefore less likely to cause catheter retention. The Apollo detachable-tip catheter (Covidien Medtronic) is also designed to minimize complication from catheter tip trapping by the embolic agents. Although some groups hesitate to deploy a retained catheter device in addition to embolic agents, this catheter can be particularly useful in preoperative embolizations since the mass itself will be resected shortly thereafter. Furthermore, the Onyx cast is more brittle and there are reports of complications with monopolar electrocautery due to conductivity of the tantalum radio-opaque agent. However, NBCA can be delivered with a larger variety of catheters, including highly navigable catheters such as the Magic (Balt), while the DMSO solvent for Onyx is restricted to use in specifically designed catheters.


Consider the following example and decisions of embolization technique. A patient with JNA presents with recurrent epistaxis and supplied by multiple branches from bilateral internal maxillary arteries, which also supplies significant transethmoidal collateral supply to the ipsilateral choroidal blush. In such a case, the number of arterial pedicles that must be catheterized to achieve successful devascularization of the tumor and the risk of embolizing an “en passant” vessel with retinal embolization may lead one to use a direct puncture approach with Onyx. This can be accomplished via a percutaneous or an endonasal–transmucosal–endoscopic-guided approach. The ability to penetrate diffuse hypervascularity from multiple arterial sources would enable cerebral embolization, while the controlled distribution and high visibility of Onyx decrease the risk of off-target embolization.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

May 19, 2020 | Posted by in NEUROSURGERY | Comments Off on 70 Extracranial Vascular Tumors

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access