14 Louise Fouché Occupational Therapy private practitioner, Tulbagh, Western Cape, South Africa Sexuality is an integral part of being human (Couldrik 1998a). When treating a client holistically, the occupational therapist is obliged to address the client’s sexuality. Sexual rehabilitation has been described as part of the occupational therapists’ role with physically disabled clients. Specific interventions with heart, spinal cord injured clients, multiple sclerosis, hip replacement, stroke and rheumatoid arthritis clients have been documented. However, there is a lack of research and literature available on sexual rehabilitation with psychiatric clients. The reason may be found in Williams and Wood’s (1982) statement that working with mentally disabled children raises volatile ethical and social dilemmas. Couldrik (1999) adds that society also has issues that are deterrents, for example, cultural taboos, language, legal and ethical boundaries as well as moral dilemmas. According to Esmail et al. (2010), the sociocultural view of sexuality forms one of the largest barriers. This is even more true for psychiatric clients where complex dynamics and numerous factors influence their sexuality, for example, change in libido, influence of diagnosis and medication, decreased inhibitions, poor social judgement and viewing the disabled as asexual (Esmail et al. 2010). The question that arises is that if occupational therapists are obliged to treat a client comprehensively and holistically, does this not apply to all clients, in all the different fields of occupational therapy, irrespective of the diagnosis? If the answer is ‘yes’, then what is an occupational therapist’s scope in addressing the sexuality of psychiatric clients? Due to limited information on this subject, the author would like to stimulate debate, share ideas and build up a body of knowledge and experience on the subject in an attempt to answer the preceding question and in order to ascertain the content required for occupational therapy curricula. Before considering treatment, it is important to have an understanding of the concept of sexuality and sexual rehabilitation. Sexual rehabilitation should not be confused with sex therapy. The primary objective of sex therapy is to relieve the client’s sexual dysfunction. Some sex therapists incorporate a broader objective that may include the improvement of a couple’s communication and their general relationship, but ultimately all focus is on improving sexual dysfunction (Kaplan 1974). Ultimately, therefore, sex therapy focuses on sexual intercourse and the experiencing of sexual satisfaction. Focusing only on the biological aspect of sexual functioning is however insufficient for some disabled clients. Zola (1982), who has a physical disability, states that there is too strong a focus on sex as a capacity and technique that emphasises ‘one ability, one organ and one sensation’ and neglects other components and skills influencing sexuality. A broader perspective is therefore required. There are numerous different definitions of sexuality. Four different definitions of sexuality have been included: The preceding definitions indicate how broad the concept of sexuality is and how it permeates every aspect of being human. Esmail et al. (2010) view sexuality as a form of pleasure and an expression of love. However, since the definition is so broad, it is important to stipulate which aspects may be viewed as sexuality in order to know which aspects an occupational therapist should assess and treat. Bodenheimer et al. (2000) suggest that body image, psychosocial adjustment and interpersonal relationships form part of a client’s sexuality. Evans (1987) implies that self-esteem, personal hygiene, appropriate social skills and grooming are part of sexuality. Couldrik (1998a) adds self-concept, social relationships, motivation and roles as aspects of sexuality. Fontaine (1991) identified intrapersonal and interpersonal factors necessary for satisfactory sexual functioning. The intrapersonal factors are identifying and accepting responsibility and managing sexual and non-sexual feelings appropriately, positive self-esteem and accepting one’s body. The interpersonal factors are ability to communicate feelings, sharing intimacy and resolving conflict. Sexual rehabilitation can then be defined as the treatment of relevant psychosocial and physiological aspects that influence sexuality. Occupational therapists are not trained in sex therapy, and additional formal, specialised training is required (Miller 1984). In contrast, according to Evans (1987), occupational therapists have the necessary knowledge and skills to provide sexual rehabilitation. These skills include the occupational therapist’s ability to analyse the components and qualities of activities and find ways to adapt an activity or the environment to enhance performance. The therapist has the knowledge of the interrelated dynamics of the client’s physiological, neurological, psychological and interpersonal relationship components that influence a client’s sexuality (Evans 1987). Fouché (2006, p. 3) has incorporated some of the components and extended the list of components to include the following, which are viewed as sexual rehabilitation for psychiatric clients: The World Health Organisation (WHO) (in Couldrik 1998a) recognises sexual expression, regardless of illness or disability, as a fundamental human right. Pan American Health Organisation and WHO (in Higgins et al. 2012) list people’s sexual rights as being: Kitzinger (in Couldrik 1998a) states that people who do not have sexual relationships are seen as abnormal. Disability does not alter humans’ need for affection and intimacy (Northcott & Chard 2000). If disability prevents or inhibits the full expression of a person’s sexuality or is of concern to the individual, then these aspects should be addressed. Sexuality is an integral part of humankind. According to Weiss and Diamond (in Agnew et al. 1985), patients who avoid realistic acceptance of their own sexuality also fail to accept their disabilities. Agnew et al. (1985) found that not only clients’ attitudes but also the negative attitudes of professionals towards clients’ sexuality are thought to play an important role in hindering a person’s ability to adapt to physical disability. In a study by Northcott and Chard (2000), clients explained that their condition affected their sexual functioning. They believed that they should have received sexual rehabilitation as a routine part of their health care and that they should not have had to seek this out themselves. There is a correlation between the sexual well-being of disabled people and life satisfaction (Gatens in Couldrik 1998a), and satisfaction in sexual relationships is regarded as a component of a quality life. Therefore, sexual difficulties can have a profound influence on the well-being of the whole family (Christopher in Couldrik 1998a). According to numerous studies (Agnew et al. 1985; Evans 1985; Kennedy 1987; Novak & Mitchell 1988; Couldrik 1998b; Kingsley & Molineux 2000), it would appear that occupational therapists are in agreement that sexual rehabilitation should fall within an occupational therapy regime. Novak and Mitchell (1988, p. 110) go so far as to state that: A therapist who advocates treatment designed to assist the patient in achieving the highest level of functioning but does not consider the interdependence of a patient’s sexuality and his/her other areas of functioning in the treatment model, is not practising from an occupational therapy perspective of holistic care. Additional reasons for occupational therapists to provide sexual rehabilitation are briefly discussed from the theorist’s point of view as follows: It can be argued that if occupational therapists advocate holistic client care irrespective of the client population, and sexuality is considered as part of the scope of occupational therapists in the physical field, then it must form part of the occupational therapy treatment of psychiatric clients. There are additional unique reasons why sexual rehabilitations should be addressed in psychiatric clients. According to the DSM-5 (American Psychiatric Association (APA) 2013), the diagnostic criteria and clinical features of some psychiatric disorders, for example, major depression and bipolar disorder, include a decrease in libido in the depressed client and an increase in the client’s libido when in a manic state. These symptoms will have a direct influence on the client’s sexuality and his/her relationship with his/her partner. The majority of medication prescribed for psychiatric disorders have side effects that influence the clients’ libido and sexual performance. For example, some antidepressant medication may inhibit erection in men and vaginal lubrication in women (Barrett 1999). Clients diagnosed with major depression experience poor libido and isolate themselves. The client may not understand the role the disorder and medication play, as he/she only experiences the decreased libido, social isolation and the physical problems caused by the medication. The partner may not understand his/her partner’s withdrawal and decreased libido and could feel no longer attractive. The client’s feelings of guilt and a sense of worthlessness are exacerbated, and the partner feels hurt and rejected, which in turn damages the relationship. The South African Mental Health Care Act 2002: Chapter 3 Clause 14(1), which is based on the United Nations Charter of Human Rights, stipulates that therapists and nursing personnel will only be allowed to prevent or withhold psychiatric clients from intimate relationships if ‘due to the mental illness the ability of the user to consent is diminished’. How the therapist will be able to distinguish between clients that can consent and those that cannot is still uncertain. However, this clause indicates that there is a move to allow the clients more choice. This could create an increase in the sexual activities in mental institutions, and psychiatric clients’ sexual problems can be expected to increase. It has been noted that psychologists and social workers are helping sexually abused clients to come to terms with the abuse, yet few are directly addressing issues like the increase in their personal space and poor sexual self-image which arise from the abuse. These aspects have a negative influence on the clients’ sexuality and relationships with others, especially with members of the opposite sex. During her research, Fouché (2005) had undignified and unacceptable case scenarios of psychiatric clients shared with her. For example, a couple who were both suffering from chronic mental illness were separated as one of them became psychotic and was placed in a closed ward. They had no private facilities and were found having sexual intercourse through a wire fence. Although sexual rehabilitation is within the scope of occupational therapy, few occupational therapists are actually incorporating it into their treatment since they feel unprepared for the task and explain that they do not have the necessary knowledge and skills. Agnew et al. (1985) and Couldrik (1998a) found that occupational therapists expressed their lack of confidence and doubt in their abilities to close the gap between theory and practice. Therefore, although the need to address client sexuality has been realised, the way forward remains unclear. There are limited models or suggestions for sexual rehabilitation provided in literature by occupational therapists. Higgins et al. (2012) advise the use of the P-Li-SS-It model which addressed permission, limited information, specific suggestions and intensive therapy as part of an interdisciplinary team. Neistadt (1986) proposes three sexual rehabilitation competencies (viz. awareness, knowledge and interpersonal skills) for occupational therapists. Although these competencies are appropriate for clients with physical disabilities, it is still uncertain how some of these can be implemented with psychiatric clients. A brief overview will be given, and it will be evaluated critically with regard to the implementation for psychiatric clients. Sexuality is still viewed by numerous cultures as a private and sensitive matter, and the occupational therapist should at all times be aware of his/her client’s level of comfort on the subject. Neistadt (in Hopkins & Smith 1993) recommends that occupational therapists become aware of their own attitudes regarding sexuality as well as society’s views on sexual roles, preferences and disability. These awareness competencies of occupational therapist can be summarised as: Neistadt (in Hopkins & Smith 1993) suggests that occupational therapists become aware of their personal attitudes towards sexuality by giving thought to the development of their own sexuality from infancy to young adulthood. The occupational therapist should reflect on the attitudes of those close to him/her and critically evaluate how their views influenced the development of his/her own attitudes today. It is important for the occupational therapist to be in touch with his/her own sexuality and the effects of his/her own experiences and his/her confidence regarding the subject. Past personal sexual abuse and failed sexual relationships will impact on the occupational therapist’s attitudes. The occupational therapist needs to reflect on these experiences. Pizzi (1992) states that knowledge of cultural differences provides clues for health care providers to adapt to services accordingly. Pizzi views cultural issues and differences as including sexuality and gender roles. Johnson (in Pizzi 1992) found that black women in America had at that time little or no voice in sexual matters such as refusing sex or demanding the use of condoms as, in their opinion, it can mean the loss of income or loss of housing and childcare. These women were of the opinion that they had to do as a man said in order to please and satisfy him so that he would remain in the relationship. The author believes that these views could be stereotypes of the female role rather than of the culture. In South Africa, there are many different cultures, and the occupational therapist should be aware of the different cultural views on sexuality. He/she should be sensitive towards differences and ask the client for any clarification. Occupational therapists should be aware that clients still have needs for intimacy, affection and sexual intercourse and that a disability does not remove these needs. The occupational therapist should reflect on the sexuality of the client and his/her relationship with the client. Fouché (2005) found that occupational therapists who feel comfortable with their psychiatric client’s sexuality are more likely to provide sexual rehabilitation than those who do not. The question is asked, do occupational therapists feel more uncomfortable with a physically disabled client’s sexuality than they would with a psychiatric client?
An Occupational Therapist’s Perspective on Sexuality and Psychosocial Sexual Rehabilitation
Introduction
Defining sexuality and sexual rehabilitation
Sex therapy
Sexuality
Sexual rehabilitation
Importance of sexual rehabilitation for all clients including psychiatric clients
A perspective on sexual rehabilitation
Awareness competencies
The occupational therapist’s comfort with his/her client’s sexuality
The occupational therapist’s comfort with sexual practices, preferences and views that differ from his/her own

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

