Approach to Thoracic Disc Herniaton Guided by 3D Navigation System

Fig. 1

Case 1: preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in sagittal (a) and axial (b) planes. Computed tomography (CT) scans in sagittal (c) and axial (d) planes show calcified midline disc herniation

Case 2

was a 62-year old woman with severe paraparesis mainly in the right leg with impairment of standing and walking, sensory loss at a low thoracic level, and urinary retention. MRI showed a median disc herniation with compression of the spinal cord and T2 hyperintensity at the T7–T8 level. A CT scan showed calcific consistency of the disc. Preoperative MEPs and SSEPs showed only slight activity in the left leg.

Preoperative Preparation

Before surgery, a CT scan is performed to acquire the images that will be matched with the intraoperative field to create a 3D image base for navigation. The procedure is performed under total intravenous anesthesia. Inhalational anesthetic agents are not used in conjunction with electrophysiological monitoring because they interfere with electrical conduction. We used a modified park-bench position, with the side of the surgical approach facing upwards. Localization of the correct level was obtained by anteroposterior and lateral fluoroscopy after the positioning of the patient on the operation table.

Electrophysiological Monitoring

Electrodes were applied to the patient’s limbs and scalp for continuous intraoperative spinal cord monitoring of SSEPs and transcranial MEPs.

Surgical Procedure

A midline linear skin incision was made, extended approximately 4 cm over the spinous processes at the level adjacent to the disc herniation. The paraspinous muscles were reflected to expose the medial portion of the transverse processes and facet joints at that level. The reference system for navigation (BrainLab Munich, Germany) was inserted on the spinous process below the level of surgery. Then we proceeded to match the selected vertebra with the preoperative images. In case 1, we removed—alternating drilling and the use of a Kerrison punch—the hemilamina of D8 and D9, the medial facet of D8, and the lateral facet of D9, and we did a partial pediculectomy of D9. The depth of the pedicle resection was established by the transition from the cancellous bone of the pedicle to the posterior cortical bone of the vertebral body. The rib was kept untouched. In case 2 we performed the same procedure at the upper level (D7–D8). Under microscopic view, we started removing osteophytes from the endplates and then we progressively reduced and debulked the compression, using an ultrasonic bone curette with a 30-degree angled tip (Misonix Farmingdale, NY). The disc space was incised and a large cavity was created using curettes, the Kerrison punch, and the ultrasonic bone curette, working in a lateral-to-medial direction. During the resection, we sometimes checked the extent of the removal by placing the navigation system pointer, in an oblique way, on the contralateral side of the surgical field, which was covered by the spinal cord. The residual thin layer of calcification on the contralateral side, not adherent to the dura, was dislodged with Penfield dissectors. The shell strictly attached to the dural plane was left. At the end of the procedure we checked the extent of removal by moving the pointer as described above, and by further assessment with endoscopy (Fig. 2 and 3).

Fig. 2

Case 1: removal of calcified thoracic disc herniation guided by navigation system

Results

Case 1

During the surgical procedure we observed the depression of MEPs and SSEPs after moving the shell of the calcified disc herniation that was attached to the dura, so we decided to fracture the shell and leave it in situ. At the end of the procedure an improvement in the monitoring parameters was observed. In the early postoperative period this patient did not present with any neurological worsening. The postoperative CT scan showed the removal of the herniated disc and the dislocation of the shell attached to the spinal cord (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3

Case 1: comparison between the position of the pointer on the blind side during surgery and postoperative CT scan

Case 2

During surgery no alterations of the monitoring parameters were observed. After 9 months of rehabilitation therapy the patient was able to maintain a standing position and to walk with support and she had achieved urinary control. Postoperative MRI and CT scans showed the removal of the herniated disc.

Discussion

Incidental thoracic disc herniations are common, but symptomatic ones are rare [20]. Surgery is usually not recommended for asymptomatic patients, because the great majority of thoracic disc herniations remain stable or decrease in size, without the onset of neurological symptoms [6, 24]. However, no predictors currently exist to suggest which patients will develop symptoms [4]. In a review of ten surgical series, Bilsky [4] found that indications for surgery were myelopathy in 70 %, intractable radiculopathy in 24 %, and back pain in 6 % of cases.

The choice of the surgical approach for thoracic disc herniation depends on the location on the axial plane and on the consistency of the herniated disc.

There is general agreement in the literature about the preference for anterior transthoracic approaches to treat calcified midline thoracic disc herniations [2, 3, 7, 9, 13, 14, 19–21]. Transthoracic approaches have a high risk of bronchopulmonary complications [25], which has not been completely overcome by the introduction of thoracoscopy [1, 23]. However, posterolateral approaches do not provide adequate exposure of the ventral surface of the spinal cord without manipulation, with a blind angle between the midline dura and the calcified disc herniation, representing a critical phase of the surgical procedure [13, 18, 19]. This problem has been partially overcome by the use of a transforaminal approach, which provides tangential exposure of the ventral dura, albeit through a narrow passageway. In our experience, these drawbacks could be bypassed applying neuronavigation and endoscopic systems in standard posterior approaches. These simple and easily available tools allow the quick verification of the intraoperative position, in order to obtain complete removal of the midline calcified disc herniation, even beyond the standard surgical corridor. The application of angled endoscopy in surgery for thoracic disc herniation has already been described, and it is currently a standard procedure in our department [15]. Neuronavigation systems, however, have been reported only in the thoracoscopic approach [11]; to our knowledge, the present study reports the first employment of such a system in the posterior approach to the thoracic spine to be described in the literature. However, even when these systems are used, the complete removal of calcified disc herniations can be difficult because of the presence of tight adhesions between the calcification and the dura. In some cases a transdural extent of the herniated disc is also possible. Such conditions increase the risk of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) fistula and neural injuries. In such conditions a safe and feasible surgical target could be considered to be the emptying of the disc herniation, leaving an external shell, still obtaining satisfactory decompression [15].

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue