Asian and pacific american languages and cultures

Chapter 3 Asian and pacific american languages and cultures



The purpose of this chapter is to provide information on Asian and Hawaiian and other Pacific Island American (APA/PIA) cultures and languages for speech-language pathologists (SLPs) for assessment and intervention of communication disorders. Beginning with the 2000 census, “Asian” refers to people having origins in any of the original peoples of the Far East, Southeast Asia, or the Indian subcontinent. It includes people who indicated their race or races as “Asian Indian,” “Chinese,” “Filipino,” “Korean,” “Japanese,” “Vietnamese,” or “Other Asian,” or wrote in entries such as Burmese, Hmong, Pakistani, or Thai (U.S. Census Bureau, 2000a). “Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander” refers to people having origins in any of the original peoples of Hawaii, Guam, Samoa, or other Pacific Islands. It includes people who indicated their race or races as “Native Hawaiian,” “Guamanian or Chamorro,” “Samoan,” or “Other Pacific Islander,” or wrote in entries such as Tahitian, Mariana Islander, or Chuukese (U.S. Census Bureau, 2000a). Countries in the Middle East will be considered in Chapter 6 on Middle Eastern and Arab American Cultures.


APA/PIAs are fast becoming an influential presence in the United States socially, politically, and economically. In 2010, Gary Lock was U.S. Secretary of Commerce, Stephen Chu was U.S. Energy Secretary, and Eric Shinseki was U.S. Secretary of Veteran Affairs. All are APA/PIAs. The 1990 Immigration Act relaxed immigration restrictions, which facilitated the increase in immigration eligibility worldwide. The law created flexible and separate worldwide ceiling limits per country on family-based, employment-based, and diversity immigrant visas and a lottery-based immigration eligibility. Immediate relatives of U.S. citizens are exempted from this quota. As of 2008, there are 13.5 million individuals self-identified as Asian Americans, representing 4.5% of the total U.S. population, and the increase in the Asian population alone (26.8%) was three times more than the increase in the overall U.S. population (U.S. Census Bureau, 2008). It is projected that by 2050, the white population in this nation will decrease from 70% to less than 50%, whereas the Asian and Pacific and Hispanic or Latino population will continue to increase to above 50% (U.S. Census Bureau, 2000a). By the year 2020, Asian American children in U.S. schools are projected to total approximately 4.4 million. The largest number of Asian immigrants in the United States is the Chinese, second only to the immigrants from Mexico (U.S. Census, 2011). APA/PIAs are extremely diverse in all aspects of their ways of life, including language, culture, religion, attitudes toward education, child-rearing practices, and roles within the family. The Asian and Pacific Island cultures, however, have interacted with and influenced each other for many generations and therefore share many similarities. For example, historically, Korea and Vietnam were once considered part of the Han dynasty (108 bc and 111 bc). The Japanese traveled to China in the Tang Dynasty (618 to 907 ad) and learned the Chinese language and took it back to Japan. Buddhism, which originated in India, was spread to China through the work of Tang San Zang (602 to 664 ad) in the Tang Dynasty (Wriggins, 2004). Buddhism was spread to Japan in the Tang Dynasty. In the Ming Dynasty from 1405 to 1433 ad, General Cheng Ho traveled seven times from the port of Quanzhou (Zetong) to Southeast Asia and South Asia, and finally arrived in Africa (Suryadinata, 2005). The long history of foreign cultural exchanges with the West began with the Silk Road. It was an extensive interconnected network of trade routes across the Asian continent that expanded to Europe, with Chinese silk as the major primary commodity. Since its trade began in 206 bc, it led to the inflow of many Middle Easterners and Europeans to China. However, warfare drew cultures into conflicts. After the First Sino-Japanese War (1894 to 1895), the Qing Dynasty ceded Taiwan to Japan. In the 20th century, Japan invaded China in 1938, and the war lasted 8 years until 1945 when Japan surrendered. Although the exchange of cultures through trade, politics, and religion resulted in many similarities that we observe today, it is important to also remember that each of these groups is different in its own way. The following information is presented to provide an understanding of APA/PIAs to assist the SPL in providing services to the culturally and linguistically diverse APA/PIA people.



Overview of asian and pacific american people


APA/PIAs have been immigrating to the United States for more than two centuries, with the first records of arrival of Chinese dating from 1785. Since that time, more than 20 Asian groups have immigrated to the United States. As of the 2000 census, the most numerous APA/PIAs have origins in India, China, Taiwan, Hong Kong, the Philippines, Korea, and Vietnam (U.S. Census Bureau, 2000a). Between 1975 and 2002, more than 1 million refugees from Southeast Asia settled in the United States (Jiobu, 1996; U.S. Census Bureau, 2000a). Each of the countries in Asia and the Pacific represents an individual and distinct culture with unique values, beliefs, and world views. Each has its own languages and dialects, communication behaviors, and styles. Within each of the countries, there are many different ethnic groups as well. For example, in China, there are 56 ethnic groups with many different languages and dialects. Han Chinese represents 91.6% of the population, with 55 other nationalities or ethnic groups also present throughout the country. It is critical that clinicians recognize the heterogeneity of the APA/PIA people and consider the unique characteristic of each subgroup as well as the uniqueness of individuals within the group.


In general, APA/PIA populations practice the collectivist culture in contrast to the Western individualistic culture. The collectivist culture is more interdependent, whereas the individualist culture is more independent (Buszynski, 2004; Cheng, 2010; Gudykunst, 2001). Unlike the earlier immigrants from East Asia, the Southeast Asian immigrants, who came through the three waves of immigration between 1975 and 1980, represented a diverse group from Vietnam, Kampuchea, and Laos known as “the boat people.” In addition, most of the Hmong people came from the mountains of Laos. Later immigrants since 1970 came from Hong Kong, China, India, Pakistan, Malaysia, Indonesia, and other Pacific Rim and Pacific Basin areas. After the attack on the United States on September 11, 2001, fewer immigrants came from Pakistan and Afghanistan because of immigration restrictions on persons from the Middle East.


Refugees and immigrants from Asia and the Pacific Islands come from a variety of historical, socioeconomic, educational, and political backgrounds. Like many other refugees, APA/PIA refugees are often victims of civil wars and poverty. In recent years, many Chinese entered the United States illegally and paid thousands of dollars to persons often known as “snake heads” to bring them over. They often work in squalid conditions to pay off their debts and eventually find their “American Dream.” APA/PIAs bring a variety of financial profiles, languages, folk beliefs, world views, religious beliefs, child-rearing practices, and attitudes toward education, all of which have a profound impact on speech-language pathology services.




Definitions of impairments: role of culture


A cultural definition of what constitutes an impairment or disorder is dependent on the values of each cultural group. APA/PIA folklore is full of the belief system and spiritualism. The treatment of birth defects, disorders, and disabilities is influenced by cultural beliefs and by the socioeconomic status of the individual and the family within a given group (Cheng, 1999, 2009; Gollnick & Chinn, 2005; Strauss, 1990). For example, in the Chinese language, the term for deaf is generally linked with mute; the term for deaf and mute is one term. Another Chinese term, handicap, is a combination of “broken” and “disease.” In all cultures, attitudes toward disabilities can be traced in part to folk beliefs and superstitions. Many Asian Pacific cultures define the cause of a health-related problem in spiritual terms (Cheng, 1999, 2007; Meyerson, 1990; Strauss, 1990).


Many Eastern cultures view a disabling condition as the result of wrongdoing of the individuals’ ancestors, resulting in guilt and shame. The cause of disabilities is explained through a variety of spiritual or cultural beliefs, or both, such as imbalance of inner forces, also known as Qi, which means steam or energy, bad wind, spoiled foods, gods, demons or spirits, hot or cold forces, or fright. For example, the Chamorro culture views a disability as a gift from God and believes that the person with a disability belongs to everyone in the community and is in the extended family. The person with the disability is thus protected and sheltered by the family. For example, many Chinese believe disability is caused by karma (fate). Pakistanis may view individuals with a visible disability as a curse and ostracize them from society (Cheng, 1989, 2007; Trueba et al., 1993). Attitudes toward disabilities are a reflection of current and historical beliefs about the nature of disabilities. All over the world, people use different methods to treat illnesses and diseases, including consulting with a priest, barefoot doctor, herbalist, Qi-Gong specialist, clansman, shaman, elder, or physician. Among the Hmong, for example, surgical intervention is viewed as invasive and harmful. The Hmong believe that spirits may leave the body once the body is cut open, causing death (Fadiman, 1997). Treatment procedures also vary, ranging from surgical intervention or therapy to acupuncture, message, cao (coin rubbing), gat gio (pinching), giac (placing a very hot cup on the exposed area), steam inhalation, balm application, herbs, inhaling smoke or ashes from burnt incense, or the ingestion of hot or cold foods (Cheng, 1995a).



Child-rearing practices


Child-rearing practices and expectations from children vary widely from culture to culture (Cheng, 2009; Hammer & Weiss, 2000; Heath, 1983; Van Kleeck, 1994; Westby, 1990, 2009). With the single-child policy in China, many children are considered “spoiled” and are pampered by their parents and grandparents (Cheng, 2010). There are differences in how parents respond to their children’s language, how and who interacts with children, and how parents and families encourage children to initiate and continue a verbal interaction. Differences in what are considered the best educational practices must be taken into account as well. Some families understand and support bilingual education; others believe that schools know best about how to educate their children and that English should be used in schools. Among families there is also variation about attitudes toward the first and second language and culture, various levels of formal education in the first or second language, or both, and expectation for their children (Butler & Cheng, 1996; Cheng, 1998; Heibert, 1991). In many Eastern cultures, education is considered a combination of teaching and nurturing.





Collectivism versus individualism


In general, Western cultural patterns pertain to minimal context orientation and convey information in a precise, linear, and straightforward manner (Cheng, 1993, 1995a). This logical manner is very different from the circular mode of orientation generally practiced by the Eastern culture. Another important part of the Asian culture is the practice of collectivism, which is different from individualism, and treating clients from an individualistic culture is therefore very different from treating clients from a collectivist culture. The Asian culture practices the collectivist view, in which family is the most important. Family can be a distant relative, an adopted child, a neighbor, a member of a clan, village, or town, a person who shares the same last name, or a good friend.


Individualism is respectful of personal space and privacy. Personal information may not be willingly shared even with members of the immediate family. Independence is preferred over interdependence.



Eastern and western definitions of education


Western education tends to draw out wisdom in a horizontal manner. The emphasis is on critical thinking, creativity, and problem solving. The Chinese term for education is made up of two characters: teaching and nurturing. This definition emphasizes the vertical relation of teaching to nurture. Eastern education tends to center on teaching, nurturing, and providing knowledge, which emphasizes the vertical relationship between teacher and student, or parent and child. In comparison, the English word education is derived from the Latin verb educere, which means to lead, draw, and bring out. The Latin origin appears to emphasize the horizontal “drawing out” of wisdom into vision.


The prevailing views toward education in most Asian and Pacific cultures present challenges for American educators and SPLs. People from China, Korea, Japan, and Vietnam often view education as the most important goal one can achieve in life. This is largely a result of the influence of the teachings and principles of Confucius (Cheng, 1993, 2010). APA/PIAs often have different approaches to learning, and these approaches have implications for the strategies Asian students use to learn. The selected examples in Table 3-1 are representative of some Asian attitudes toward education and their educational implications. The relative importance of each of the attitudes differs from culture to culture.


TABLE 3-1 Asian Attitudes toward Learning



























Asian Cultural Themes Educational Implications
Education is formal. Teachers are formal and are expected to lecture.
Teachers are to be highly respected.
Humility is an important virtue. Students are not to “show off” or volunteer information.
Reading of factual information is studying. Fiction is not considered serious reading.
It is important to have order and to be obedient. Students are to sit quietly and listen attentively.
One learns by observation and by memorization. Rote memory is considered an effective teaching tool.
Pattern practice and rote learning are studying. Homework in pattern practice is important and is expected.

As shown in Table 3-1, there are incongruities between Asian students’ learning styles and American teachers’ teaching styles. These differences can lead to teachers’ misconceptions of students and students’ confusion over the “proper” way of schooling, particularly with the naturalistic, whole-language approach to intervention used especially with preschool and early elementary school children. Again, the relative importance of each of the concepts varies with cultural group and among individuals within the group. Educators need to be sensitive to cultural tendencies of various APA/PIA groups. These tendencies, however, should not be viewed as static cultural rules. Generalizations must be avoided, and predictions should not be made based on a superficial survey of the culture. With the advancement of science and technology, the cyber-generation has access to the Internet, the World Wide Web, and social networks; these students share many commonalities because of their linkages in cyberspace.



Cultural characteristics of asian and pacific peoples


All APA/PIA groups and the individuals in these groups present a common background as immigrants or descendants of immigrants. However, each may have a very different story to tell. Such diverse personal and group experiences must be taken into consideration when working with these individuals.


Clearly, intragroup and intergroup differences exist among the Asian and Pacific Islander immigrant and refugee groups. Refugees are generally not prepared for emigration and often leave their country of origin suddenly because of political turmoil there. Immigrants leave their country of origin willingly and go through long periods of application and petition to the new country, and they are generally prepared for emigration. As stated earlier, caution should be taken to avoid overgeneralization of this information in relation to a particular client or family because the APA/PIA clients and their families represent diverse social, cultural, and linguistic backgrounds.



The chinese



Immigration history


Since the end of World War II, Chinese have been immigrating to the United States mainly from Taiwan and Hong Kong to study, to join their families, or for business purposes. After President Nixon’s diplomacy in the 1970s, more Chinese from the People’s Republic of China entered the United States. Between the 1980 U.S. Census and 2006, the number of Chinese immigrants increased nearly fivefold, and about one fourth of these immigrants arrived in 2000 or later, making them the largest APA/PIA immigrant group in the United States. Immigrants from the People’s Republic of China constituted one of the largest groups of immigrants. In addition to large populations settling in New York and California, increasing Chinese immigrant populations are found in other states such as Nebraska, Tennessee, South Dakota, and Idaho.


Some political history on the relationships between China, the People’s Republic of China (PRC), and Taiwan, Republic of China (ROC) is worth covering here because clinicians should be aware of the sensitivity toward the cultural terminology associated with the political tension. In 1949 after the Chinese civil war, Chairman Mao of the Communist party took over mainland China. Chiang Kai-shek and the Kuomintang party went to Formosa and established Taiwan, ROC. Postwar political tension between the two coasts persisted. The situation was exacerbated in 1971 when the General Assembly Resolution 2758 expelled Taiwan from the United Nations and was replaced by the PRC in all United Nation organs. Political controversy between the PRC and ROC continued for decades regarding Taiwan independence and distinctive political cultures. Today, the political tension is somewhat abated. Direct travel between Taiwan and China is permitted. Still, many individuals from Taiwan may consider themselves as “Taiwanese” rather than “Mainland Chinese” because of this political history, and clinicians should avoid making a reference to this national identity instead of the ethnic identity as Han Chinese. Despite the political tension, people from mainland China and Taiwan share the same official language of Mandarin and have generally similar cultural patterns (Olson, 2010).





Education


The Chinese traditionally believe that education is extremely important. Chinese Americans work hard to remove any linguistic and cultural barriers to obtain a good education. Most traditional Chinese families expect their children to do well in school. Teachers are highly respected. If a child is successful in school, the entire family receives credit. Parents do not praise their children readily, even when they excel, because excellence is generally expected. If a child does poorly in school or needs special education, the parents often feel ashamed, perceiving the difficulties as a sign of their own failure. Many Chinese American parents take their children to a Chinese language school on weekends and expect them to learn Chinese and maintain the culture.


Chinese students who have gone to school in the PRC do reasonably well in American schools because they have had a competitive education similar to that in the United States. The terms model minority, invisible minority, and silent minority have been used to describe the success of Chinese students. Their communicative disorders may be overlooked because they are quiet and often invisible. Also, Chinese students from the PRC have been coming to the United States in large numbers in the past two decades. In fact, they rank number 1 in foreign student populations on U.S. campuses. Many choose to stay in the United States after their graduation. Many sponsor their family members to come to the United States. These new immigrants tend to settle in large cities, including Los Angeles, San Francisco, Houston, New York, and Chicago. For example, Hacienda Heights and Monterey Park are two enclaves where the new Chinese immigrants gather. In addition, Queens in New York is the new “China Town.” In these concentrated areas, Mandarin is the language of communication and commerce. Many new immigrants do not speak English, and they may have difficulties owing to communication breakdown at school when their children need English as a Second Language (ESL) courses or special education services. Lo (2009) provided case studies of the challenges in service delivery when parents do not speak English.



Language


(For language characteristics, please see Box 3-1.)



BOX 3-1 Chinese Language (Mandarin/Cantonese)









The koreans





The family


As with persons from other Asian cultures, Koreans value the extended family, which typically includes three generations (Kim, 1978). Additionally, Korean values of social relations share their common influence by Confucianism with the Chinese (Keum, 2000; Yao, 2000). Traditionally, the father is the head of the family and represents the family honor. He is responsible for the welfare of the family and is typically the sole provider. The father or other men in the Korean family do not typically help with household chores (Kim, 1984). The Korean mother, who centers her work on the home, usually represents the family in dealing with the school. The elderly family members previously received a great deal of respect from younger family members.


Parent-child conflicts based on language and cultural differences have increased between immigrant children and their parents. Because of economic pressures, the size of the Korean family has decreased in the United States. Children have begun to question the traditional role of the father and to challenge his authority. According to Moon (2006), there has been a rapid decline in commitment and practice of filial piety and elder care. Particularly, most Korean American elders and caregivers do not believe that it violates filial piety to place an elderly parent in a nursing home, nor should the children live with their elderly parents who have functional limitations that require extensive care. Additionally, they prefer to move into an assisted living facility, rather than becoming a burden to family. However, most Korean American elders prefer independent living.



Education


Since 1945, the educational system in South Korea has been patterned after the American educational system of elementary school, junior high, and senior high, followed by 2 years of junior college or 4 years at a university (Kim, 1978). Teachers have a great deal of authority. Korean classrooms are orderly. Korean children are socialized into an environment in which going to the best schools is highly valued. They are accustomed to working extremely hard to obtain high scores on college entrance examinations to get into the best colleges. They are directed from the very beginning into specific fields such as business, science, medicine, or engineering and are not typically encouraged to go into fine arts and human services. There is little room for other alternatives or for students who are not capable of high achievement. On the other hand, disability is viewed as misfortune or punishment, and families of children with a disability may experience self-blame. It is important that clinicians acknowledge family interdependence and avoid stereotypes and labeling (Kim-Rupnow, 2005).



Language


(For language characteristics, please see Box 3-2.)



BOX 3-2 Korean Language








The japanese





The family


Japanese Americans are primarily U.S.-born, second (nisei)-, third (sansei)-, and fourth (yonsei)-generation citizens. Japanese families generally value obedience, dependence on the family, formality in interpersonal relationships, and restraint in the expression of emotions. As in other Asian families, Japanese family members have well-defined roles and positions of power. Japanese children are expected to maintain emotional bonds with and dependence on their parents and only secondarily develop self-reliance (Ima & Labovitz, 1990). Japanese parents, wanting children to be receptive to adult expectations, continually refer to duty and obligation and invoke fear of ridicule and shame to control their children’s lives. Many Japanese American families are fifth or higher generation in the United States. They have become one of the most assimilated of all Asian American groups. Perhaps as a direct result of this, they also have one of the highest interracial marriage rates of all Asian Americans. As more Japanese Americans intermarry, the less likely their children are to identify themselves as Japanese Americans.



Education


The teaching profession is one of the most highly regarded professions to the Japanese. To the Japanese, education is of prime importance. The Japanese student is expected to be attentive, work cooperatively, and be willing to accept the teacher’s word as significant (Ima & Labovitz, 1990). Japanese American students are often sent to after-school classes or to private tutors to ensure academic success. This contributes significantly to the pressures placed on children to be successful. On the contrary, disability, considered not conforming to the society, is often treated as a strictly private, family matter (Brightman, 2005). The adverse effect may be the family’s reluctance to seek professional remediation, and the practitioner should be mindful of this possibility and seek a nonconfrontational approach. However, this cultural attitude may diminish in strength from one generation to the next.


There are distinct cultural differences between the Japanese and Americans in classroom interaction. For example, group behavior and cooperation, important cultural concepts in Japanese society, are taught and learned in preschool: going to school in Japan is primarily training in group life, or shudan seikatsu (Peak, 1991). Lewis (1995) asserts that Japanese students do not just work in groups, they work as groups. Teachers create groups and group activities to help children enhance one another’s strengths and overcome one another’s weaknesses. Japanese children in the United States may still be expected to behave this way because of parental influence (Westby, 2009).



Language


(For language characteristics, please see Box 3-3.)



BOX 3-3 Japanese Language





Nov 8, 2016 | Posted by in NEUROLOGY | Comments Off on Asian and pacific american languages and cultures

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access