Name
Description
Respondent
BEARS (Owens & Dalzell, 2005)
Assesses 5 sleep domains: B = Bedtime problems (difficulty going to bed and falling asleep); E = Excessive daytime sleepiness; A = Awakenings during the night; R = Regularity and duration of sleep; S = Snoring. For ages 5–18 years
Parent and adolescent self-repot
Children’s Sleep Habits Questionnaire (Owens, Spirito & McGuinn, 2000)
45 items; 4 subscales including bedtime resistance, sleep onset delay, sleep duration, sleep anxiety, night wakings, parasomnias, sleep-disordered breathing, and daytime sleepiness. Has been used with children with ASD ages 2–17 years.
Parent repot
Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire (Chervin, Hedger, Dillon, & Pituch, 2000)
69 items; 8 subscales including sleep-related breathing disorders, daytime sleepiness, snoring, and inattention. Ages 2–18 years.
Parent report
Sleep Disturbance Scale for Children (Bruni et al., 1996)
26 items; 6 subscales including sleep initiation and maintenance, daytime sleepiness, sleep disordered breathing, sleep arousal. Ages 5–15 years.
Parent report
Sleep Habits Survey (Wolfson et al., 2003)
63 items; 3 subscales including school performance, daytime sleepiness, sleep–wake behavior problems. Ages 10–19 years.
Adolescent self-report
Sleep Self Report (Owens, Maxim, Nobile, McGuinn, & Msall, 2000)
18 items assessing sleep habits, problems falling asleep, sleep duration, night waking, daytime sleepiness. Ages 7–12 years.
Child self-report
Some sleep questionnaires focus specifically on sleep initiation, maintenance, and quality. The Children’s Sleep Wake Scale (LeBourgeois & Harsch, 2001) is a 40-item, 1 month retrospective parent report measure that has five subscales: going to bed, falling asleep, awakening, reinitiating sleep, and wakefulness. It is designed for children ages 2–8 years of age. LeBourgeois has also developed an adolescent self-report measure of sleep initiation and maintenance (LeBourgeois, Giannotti, Cortesi, Wolfson, & Harsh, 2005). The Adolescent Sleep Wake Scale is a 28-item questionnaire designed for adolescents ages 12–18; it is a 1-month retrospective report that includes 28 items. There are five subscales: going to bed, falling asleep, awakening, reinitiating sleep, and wakefulness.
The Family Inventory of Sleep Habits (FISH) (Malow et al., 2009) is specifically designed for parents of children with ASD ages 4–10. It is the only sleep measure geared toward children with ASD. The items on the FISH assess daytime behaviors that may influence sleep and are amenable to change. Thus, the measure may yield information that can guide behavioral intervention. The items address daytime habits (such as exercise, or caffeine intake later in the day), pre-bedtime habits (including engagement in stimulating activities), sleep setting (amount of light and noise in the bedroom), presence (or lack) of a bedtime routine, and parental behaviors (such as remaining with a child until he or she is asleep.) Some of the items focus on sleep behaviors that are particularly relevant for children with ASD such as needing to wear pajamas made from certain fabrics. For each item the parent is asked to indicate how often the behavior was true during the last month on a five-point scale (1 = never, 2 = occasionally, 3 = sometimes, 4 = usually, 5 = always.) The FISH has been validated as a 12-item scale, although a full version contains 22 items.
Other sleep habits questionnaires are not specifically geared toward children with ASD, but can still provide important information. The Children’s Sleep Hygiene Scale (Harsh, Easley, & LeBourgeois, 2002; LeBourgeois & Harsch, 2001) and the Bedtime Routines Questionnaire (Henderson & Jordan, 2010) are also brief surveys that provide information about bedtime routines and activities and the sleep environment. Both of these questionnaires are parent-report measures for parents of children ages 2–8. The Adolescent Sleep Hygiene Scale (Storfer-Isser, LeBourgeois, Harsh, Tompsett, & Redline, 2013) is an adolescent-report measure for individuals ages 12–18; it was modified from the Children’s Sleep Hygiene Scale and examines behaviors that may interfere with good sleep. These include consumption of caffeine close to bedtime and level of activity before bed.
At times it may be important to specifically assess daytime sleepiness. This may be especially important when examining behaviors that may be indicative of sleep-disordered breathing . Behaviors that may be indicative of sleepiness (versus just being tired) during the day may include falling sleep during daytime activities and overall level of alertness. The Pediatric Daytime Sleepiness Scale (Drake et al., 2003; Nixon, Wawruszak, Verginis, & Davey, 2006) has been validated in children ages 5–15 years of age. It is an 8-item self-report measure that includes questions related to drowsiness, alertness, feeling the need for more sleep, and daytime hyperactivity. The Epworth Sleepiness Scale (Johns, 1991) was first designed as a measure for adults. A modified version for adolescents, The Epworth Sleepiness Scale-Revised for Children , (Melendres, Lutz, Rubin, & Marcus, 2004; Moore et al., 2009) assesses behaviors that are more applicable to teens than to adults. For example, there are items that look at sleepiness while taking a test. This questionnaire may be completed by parents or by adolescents and is designed for children and adolescents from age 2 to 18 years. The Cleveland Adolescent Sleep Questionnaire (Spilsbury, Drotar, Rose, & Redline, 2007) is a self-report measure for teens ages 11–17 years of age. Owens and her colleagues have also developed a teacher-survey, The Teacher’s Daytime Sleepiness Questionnaire, (Owens, Spirito, McGuinn, & Nobile, 2000) to assess classroom behaviors of children ages 4–10 years that may be indicative of poor sleep.
Lewandowski, Toliver-Sokol, and Palermo (2011) and Spruyt and Gozal (2011) provide excellent reviews of parent and child-report sleep measures . They describe a number of limitations of these measures and note that most of these measures need additional information regarding reliability and validity. As noted above, most of these measures have not been validated for use with individuals who have ASD. Additionally, they have not been validated across diverse cultures or ethnic groups. When used clinically, it is important to review responses to survey questions in person to better understand and confirm any sleep difficulties that may be present.
In addition to using surveys that focus exclusively on sleep and sleep-related behavior, clinicians and researchers may use questionnaires that look at a variety of daytime behaviors and also provide some information about sleep. Clinicians may find these questionnaires helpful as an initial screening tool although they will not cover all aspects of sleep that should be examined.
The Child Behavior Checklist (Achenbach & Rescoria, 2000) is a parent-report measure of childhood behavioral difficulties including symptoms that are consistent with an ASD diagnosis. It is the most common screening measure for psychopathology that is used by pediatric psychologists (Holmbeck et al., 2008). Children are rated in terms of internalizing and externalizing behavior; similar questions are grouped into a number of subscales or syndrome scales. There is a version for preschoolers (ages 18 months to 5 years) and a version for children ages 6–18 years of age. The preschool version includes a scale for sleep problems that includes 7 items (does not want to sleep alone, has trouble getting to sleep, nightmares, resists going to sleep, sleeps less than most children during day and/or night, talks or cries out in sleep, wakes often at night.) The CBCL for ages 6–18 includes multiple items that assess various aspects of sleep, but these items do not form a validated sleep scale on the CBCL. The 7 items include nightmares, overtired without good reason, sleeps less than most kids, sleeps more than most kids during the day/or night, talks or walks in sleep, trouble sleeping, and wets the bed. Parents rate their children for how true each item is currently or within the past 6 months using a 3 point scale (0 = not true, 1 = somewhat or sometimes true, 2 = very true or often true.) Research has supported the use of the CBCL as a tool in epidemiological or archival studies that do not include a more comprehensive sleep measure . It may also be useful for clinicians who do not use other validated sleep measures in their practice (Becker, Ramsey, & Byars, 2015). Becker et al. found that individual CBCL items were generally associated with sleep scales on validated sleep measures and with sleep disorder diagnoses. The CBCL sleep composite was associated with total scores on other sleep-specific measures. Some (but not all) CBCL items are also associated with other measures of sleep. For example, the item “trouble sleeping” has been found to be correlated with sleep information obtained from diaries as well as actigraphy data (Gregory et al., 2011). While the CBCL does not cover important aspects of sleep difficulties (including medical comorbidities) and will not provide a thorough evaluation of sleep problems, it does provide the opportunity to have standardized sleep scores for younger children and to directly compare sleep problems to daytime behavior.
Other measures of daytime behavior also include some sleep items. Some of these measures are: the Behavior Assessment System for Children, Second Edition (Reynolds & Kamphaus, 2004), which includes 2–4 items depending on the age of the child being assessed; the Child Depression Inventory (Kovacs, MHS, & Systems, 2003) which includes 2 items; the Pediatric Quality of Life (Varni, Burwinkle, Seid, & Skarr, 2003) which includes 1 item; and the Parental Concerns Questionnaire (McGrew et al., 2007) which includes 1 item. These questionnaires should not, of course, be relied upon for a screening of sleep difficulties, but they may provide a means to begin to identify whether there are concerns about a child’s sleep and to compare sleep problems to other aspects of a child’s functioning. Screening for daytime behavioral difficulties may also help determine whether a more comprehensive psychiatric evaluation is indicated. Psychiatric conditions such as anxiety, bipolar disorder, and depression can affect sleep and may be exacerbated by sleep difficulties. Thus, consideration of these psychiatric comorbidities should also be part of a comprehensive sleep evaluation.
Sleep Diaries
Information about sleep may also be obtained through the use of logs, sleep diaries, and homework sheets (Spruyt & Gozal, 2011). These parent or self-report measures are ideally completed just before bed and first thing in the morning. Parents, children, and adolescents with age-appropriate reading and writing skills may complete this information. Diaries or sleep logs include a variety of information. Respondents may be asked to record when a child goes to bed, total time asleep, and when a child wakes up in the morning. The number of night time wakings, the time at which they occur, and the length of time a child is awake is often recorded. Sleep logs may also include times that a child gets out of his or her bed. Children may complete sleep logs that require them to record when they went to bed and how many minutes it took them to fall asleep. Information about daytime functioning including fatigue during the day and naps may also be gathered. This information can be used for an initial assessment as well as an evaluation of the effectiveness of an intervention. Observing and recording information about daytime and nighttime routines and behaviors may often help parents become aware of effective strategies and be invested in implementing beneficial techniques. At times information from sleep diaries or logs is paired with information that is acquired through the use of actigraphy (discussed below). Table 18.2 lists the type of information that can be gathered through sleep diaries, homework, or logs.
Table 18.2
Sleep diaries, sleep logs, and homework
Daytime habits: Timing of caffeine intake, exposure to morning light, exercise, naps |
Evening habits: Timing of dinner, television, computers, electronics, video games, homework, exercise, other stimulating activities, relaxing activities, lowering of lights |
Sleep setting: Description and evaluation of location, sensory components (e.g., noise level, temperature, light), potential distractions (e.g., electronic devices, toys, materials related to focused interests) |
Bedtime routine: Time from start to finish, evaluation of consistency, inclusion of calm and relaxing activities |
Use of visual supports: Are visual schedules or other visual aids used to help a child fall asleep? |
Bedtime: What time is bedtime and is it consistent each night including weekends? |
Sleep resistance: How long does it take to fall asleep? What happens once a child is in bed? What are parental responses? |
Night wakings: How many? How long do they last? Does child leave the bed? What are parental responses? |
Wake time: What time is wake time and is it consistent each night including weekends? |
There are a variety of sleep diaries and logs available, but none have been evaluated for their psychometric properties. The Academy of Sleep Medicine has a sleep log that is available for download at http://yoursleep.aasmnet.org/pdf/sleepdiary.pdf and the National Sleep Foundation has a sleep diary that includes information about daytime behavior http://sleepfoundation.org/sleep-diary/SleepDiaryv6.pdf. Katz and Malow (2014a, 2014b) include a sleep record in their guide for families, and a copy is available online at www.woodbinehouse.com/SolvingSleepProblems.asp As Spruyt and Gozal (2011) note, there is no standardized format for sleep diaries. The wording, order of questions, format, number of questions, information requested, and time frame for completing diaries varies from study to study. Spruyt and Gozal (2011) make a number of key points about using diaries or logs. They correctly note that daily recording and/or rating of nighttime behavior will be more time intensive yet more valid than recording weekly or monthly information. They also note that specific questions may raise an awareness of nighttime behavior or patterns. It is important to confirm that families understand how to complete a sleep log and to take into account whether a family can reasonably gather and complete the required information. Spruyt and Gozal (2011) also state that it is advisable to have respondents demonstrate their understanding of what is expected, the importance of the information gathered, and the need for precision. They note that it is easy to create logs or diaries that may make it appealing and simple to complete and raise the possibility of creating programs that will allow the use of electronic (computer or mobile) logs with reminders for completion. They give an example of using text-messages or signals to a server as reminders. Children and adolescents may respond well to the use of computers with interactive touch screens. Spruyt and Gozal were not addressing the needs of children with ASD, but using such tools might be highly appealing to technology-minded individuals on the autism spectrum.
Actigraphy
Sleep diaries may be used in combination with actigraphy. This involves recording movement using a miniaturized watch-like device that is worn on the wrist or ankle during sleep. The actigraph records body movement, and this data is interpreted by computer algorithms as periods of sleep and wake. Information about sleep onset, sleep offset, sleep latency, total sleep duration, and wake after sleep onset may also be gathered. The actigraph can collect data continuously over an extended period of time (often 3 days to 2 weeks and in some cases even longer.) Data that is collected is then downloaded to a computer for analysis. New actigraphy devices, algorithms for interpreting data, and operating procedures are frequently being developed, and there is no consensus about which of these are best. There are also differences in the sensitivity settings that are used during data analysis. Sadeh and Acebo (2002) detail the ways in which actigraphy has become an essential tool in sleep research and sleep medicine . They advise new users to carefully review the scientific literature on each instrument that is being considered in order to determine which device, mode of operation and scoring algorithm will be most suitable for a researcher or clinician’s needs. There are now many devices that are designed to measure physical activity that may also be used to obtain information about sleep, and there are also computer apps on tablets and cell phones that may do the same.
There have been multiple studies that have documented the adequacy of using actigraphy to differentiate clinical groups and to identify some sleep–wake disorders ; Morgenthaler et al. (2007) detail practice parameters for the use of actigraphy in clinical practice. Meltzer, Montgomery-Downs, Insana, and Walsh (2012) provide a thorough review on the validity of actigraphy in children. Actigraphy is a useful measure of change in sleep patterns and can thus help document the effectiveness of sleep interventions for research and clinical purposes . Since it allows for data collection at home, it may provide sleep data that is obtained in a more naturalistic setting than a laboratory (Beebe et al., 2008; Blackwell, Ancoli-Israel, Redline, & Stone, 2011; Goldman et al., 2009; Goldman, Bichell, Surdyka, & Malow, 2012; Peterson et al., 2012). The most common alternative to actigraphy is polysomnography (see below for more information about this.) Polysomnography is expensive and thus usually only includes data from a single night’s stay in a sleep laboratory. Actigraphy can provide many days or weeks of data and may provide a more representative sample of sleep than what may be obtained during a night of sleep in an unfamiliar setting while wearing multiple monitors and recording devices.
As with any sleep measure, there are some limitations associated with actigraphy. Most validation studies have been conducted in sleep laboratories while research and clinical studies are conducted in the home where there is less control over factors that are not directly related to sleep (Sadeh & Acebo, 2002). For example, someone who is watching television very quietly may be scored as being asleep. Detailed information from daily logs is thus very important when interpreting actigraph data. Information about bedtime, wake time, when the actigraph is worn and not worn, and external motion (such as riding in a car) or unusual events will be critical when interpreting results (Sadeh & Acebo, 2002). Increased wakefulness during the night also decreases the accuracy of information obtained from actigraphy, and decreased accuracy has been well-documented in individuals with insomnia (Chambers, 1994; Hauri & Wisbey, 1992). Quiet wakefulness while in bed can be miscoded as sleep, and actigraphy has also been documented as less accurate in people with movement disorders (Hauri & Wisbey, 1992). Overall, actigraphy results will vary as a function of age, sex, physical health, and mental health (Sadeh & Acebo, 2002). Thus, the usefulness of actigraphy to compare sleep between different groups may be limited. By contrast, actigraphy data may be very useful for within-subjects designs that assess various factors including treatment efficacy (Sadeh & Acebo, 2002).
Actigraphy with children poses specific challenges. Children may be curious about how a device works, and this curiosity may result in damaged devices or inaccurate data. Children with ASD may have difficulty wearing an actigraph device on their wrist due to sensory sensitivity or because wearing a watch may be a new and thus stressful experience . Malow and her colleagues in the Sleep Disorders Division of the Department of Neurology at Vanderbilt University have developed a number of techniques to help children with ASD and their families successfully use actigraphy (Adkins et al., 2012). They have piloted the use of an actigraph device that is placed in a pocket on a child’s shoulder. This alternative placement may be used with children who cannot tolerate wearing an actigraph device on their wrist. Pilot results indicate that shoulder placement is promising and worthy of further study. Malow and her colleagues have also developed a number of strategies to increase caregiver knowledge and skills in obtaining actigraphy data (Fawkes et al., 2014). They found that a 1-h structured parent training session resulted in an increase in scorable actigraphy data. Training included information on how to accurately complete sleep and actigraphy diary forms and the importance of having a child wear the actigraph watch each night. They were careful to review with parents when to mark bedtime and specifically discussed the difference between activities that are part of a bedtime routine (before a parent says goodnight to a child) and activities that occur after a child should be trying to fall asleep (after saying goodnight.) The training included examples that emphasized when to press the event marker, the importance of placing the device on their children for at least an hour before bedtime, and the need to leave the device on after waking. Training also included a short quiz to verify caregiver understanding of the material that was presented. Quiz scores that were lower than 80 % resulted in a review of any necessary information.
While it may be challenging for children with ASD to wear an actigraph device, there are a number of strategies that may help. As noted above, some children respond well to the opportunity to wear an actigraph watch in a shoulder pocket. At times, a slow and gradual approach may be beneficial. Children can be desensitized to wearing something on their wrist. A hierarchy of materials to be placed on the wrist can be devised (e.g., start with a thin piece of string followed by a piece of cloth, then gradually move to items that more closely approximate a watch) and a child can practice and be rewarded for wearing objects on their wrist. Some children respond well to learning about actigraphy and become interested and motivated to learn about their sleep patterns. Using a visual schedule at bedtime and including activities related to the actigraph watch can also help children comply with the procedure.
Validity of actigraph data may differ depending on the scoring algorithm and actigraph that is being used. There are some potential artifacts of measurement that can lead to inaccurate results, and actigraphy is not adequate for diagnosis in individuals with motor disorders or high motility during sleep.
Polysomnography
A critical component of an adequate sleep assessment must include a review of any potential medical contributions to poor sleep. Reynolds’ and Malow’s (2011) medical conditions questionnaire is an important first step in determining whether there are any medical factors that are impacting sleep. These questions can be incorporated into a review of systems that can lead to medical treatment. Please see Table 18.3 for a checklist of medical comorbidities that should be assessed.
Table 18.3
Screening checklist for medical conditions associated with sleep problemsa
Gastrointestinal: Current or past symptoms of reflux, constipation, abdominal pain during the day or at night |
Seizures and other nighttime events: Frequency of nighttime seizures, unusual events (behaviors or movements during the night) |
Sleep disordered breathing: Snoring, loud breathing, gasping for breath, stops breathing, allergies, nasal congestion |
Asthma/sinusitis: Coughing at night |
Pain/itching/discomfort: Regular dental visits, tooth or gum pain, eczema/dry itchy skin, hunger at night, sensory sensitivity (light, sounds, textures, smells) |
Nutrition: Iron intake: Eat an average of at least 1–2 ounces of meat per day or take vitamins with iron |
Restless sleep: Signs of restless sleep, leg pains or “growing pains,” frequent leg movements during sleep, or unusual feelings involving the legs when in bed |
Medication: Note all medications currently being used and potential side effects |
Physical exam: Large tonsils, hypotonia, nasal congestion or signs of allergic rhinitis, dental issues, wheezing, eczema, and dry or itchy skin |
A sleep study or polysomnography (PSG) is indicated if a child is noted to have snoring more than 2 nights per week in addition to one of the following: physical signs on exam, daytime symptoms such as difficulty with attention and learning, gasping or labored breathing, pauses in breathing, or abnormal posture during sleep. Epilepsy may also disrupt sleep and if there is a concern about possible sleep-related seizures, a sleep study with electroencephalogram (EEG) may be warranted. Sleep studies may also be used to determine if an individual has Periodic Limb Movement Disorder or if the child has excessive daytime somnolence (Kotagal et al., 2012).
PSG has been called the “gold standard” for assessing sleep. Individuals spend the night in a sleep laboratory where a number of physiological measures are gathered. These include measures of brain activity (electroencephalography), eye movements (electrooculography), muscle activity (electromyography), and heart rhythm (electrocardiography.) Oxygen levels, airflow, and carbon dioxide levels are monitored throughout the night.
In order to gather this data, sensors are placed on an individual’s head, chin, legs, chest, and area near the eyes. The sensors are usually held in place with gels secured with tape or mesh netting. A person’s head also needs to be wrapped with gauze to hold the sensors in place. Belts are wrapped around a child’s chest and stomach. Pulse oximeter sensors to monitor oxygen are placed on fingers or toes and a flow sensor and nasal cannula will be used. It can take between 30 and 90 min to fully prepare an individual for a sleep study. While the procedure is not painful, it can be stressful and difficult for individuals with ASD who also have sensory sensitivities and who need to adjust to sleeping in a new environment. It is important to note, however, that with careful preparation, children with ASD can successfully complete a sleep study.
One of the first steps to take in preparing a child with ASD for a sleep study is to become familiar with the process. Reviewing a social story that includes photographs or other visual images of the sleep study may be helpful. The Vanderbilt Kennedy Center Leadership Education in Neurodevelopmental Disabilities (LEND) program (2014) has developed a very helpful toolkit that includes a social story, visual supports and concrete suggestions to help prepare a child for a sleep study (http://vkc.mc.vanderbilt.edu/assets/files/resources/sleepstudy.pdf) Some children enjoy learning about the technical aspects of the study. If possible, use pictures and/or videos from the sleep laboratory where the study will take place. A visit to the sleep lab sometime before the sleep study occurs can also be helpful. Some children may require several visits to get used to the idea of being in the lab. If possible, a child might be able to practice some of the procedures during a brief visit. Ending on a positive note and providing some rewards is often a useful strategy. Some individuals will also require systematic desensitization to specific aspects of the sleep study. They may need help to tolerate some of the sensory sensations involved in a sleep study such as having electrodes placed on their head.
During the actual preparation for the sleep study, it may help to provide distractions and comfort objects. Saving a special toy or materials related to a focused interest may also help a child sit through the preparation process. Sensory toys including squeeze balls or oil and water timers may be calming. Allowing a child to watch a special video or play a cherished electronic game may also be useful strategies. A visual schedule that depicts each step may help a child track and tolerate the procedure. Rewards may be paired with successfully completing each step. Whenever possible, try to offer a child some choices during the preparation. This may involve choosing which small prize or sticker he or she can earn. If possible, it might involve choosing which electrode will go on next. It helps tremendously if all the adults involved (parents and providers) remain calm and matter-of-fact throughout the preparation. Zaremba and her colleagues have detailed a number of strategies geared toward helping children successfully complete a sleep study (Zaremba, Barkey, Mesa, Sanniti, & Rosen, 2005). They advocate a flexible approach , the use of child-friendly terms instead of medical terminology, the use of distractors, implementation of coping strategies, appropriate modeling of parental behavior, and ongoing praise and reassurance.
Some sleep labs will complete what is called a “split-night PSG with CPAP titration .” They will evaluate a child for sleep apnea during the first part of the night. If it is determined that a child has moderate to severe sleep apnea and requires continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), technicians in the lab may use the second half of the night to obtain information about the level of CPAP pressure that will be required to treat the apnea. While this may be an efficient use of sleep lab resources , it is not a good strategy for most children with ASD. As noted above, children with ASD often need a great deal of preparation to successfully complete a sleep study. They may also need time to learn to use a CPAP device. These devices use air pressure to open up airways to allow for uninterrupted use air pressure to open up airways to allow for uninterrupted breathing and require an individual to wear a face mask. Many individuals (including adults without developmental disorders) find it difficult to adjust to using CPAP. The same techniques that help children complete a sleep study are also used to teach children to comply with CPAP treatment. Thus, a slow and gradual strategy that includes social stories, systematic desensitization, distraction, and rewards should be used. Once a child is able to use a CPAP device without difficulty, a second sleep study can be scheduled to determine the proper titration levels.
![](https://freepngimg.com/download/social_media/63059-media-icons-telegram-twitter-blog-computer-social.png)
Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel
![](https://clinicalpub.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/256.png)
Full access? Get Clinical Tree
![](https://videdental.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/appstore.png)
![](https://videdental.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/google-play.png)