Butterfly high-grade glioma





Introduction


Patients with high-grade gliomas are known to have poor ­survival. Among these patients, it is argued that butterfly ­lesions that cross the corpus callosum and involve both cerebral hemispheres have the worst prognoses. , Because of this presumed poor prognosis of butterfly lesions, patients with these lesions typically only undergo biopsy followed by ­adjuvant therapy. , However, more recent studies show that these ­patients may also benefit from extensive resection similar to their counterparts that only involve one hemisphere. , In this chapter, we present a case of a butterfly high-grade glioma.



Example case


Chief complaint: lethargy


History of present illness


A 29-year-old, right-handed woman with no significant past medical history who was transferred after a needle biopsy revealing glioblastoma for increasing lethargy. She initially presented with worsening headaches, and imaging revealed a large brain tumor. She underwent a right frontal needle biopsy consistent with glioblastoma 3 days prior. In the interim, she developed progressive lethargy and was transferred for further evaluation and management ( Fig. 29.1 ).




  • Medications : Dexamethasone 4 mg every 6 hours, levetiracetam.



  • Allergies : No known drug allergies.



  • Past medical and surgical history : Right frontal needle biopsy 3 days prior.



  • Family history : No history of intracranial malignancies.



  • Social history : Graduate student. No smoking, social alcohol.



  • Physical examination : Sleepy, arouses to voice, oriented to person, place, and time; Language : intact naming and repetition; Cranial nerves II to XII intact; Unable to participate with drift, moves all extremities with good strength.




Fig. 29.1


Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. (A) T1 axial image with gadolinium contrast; (B) T1 coronal image with gadolinium contrast; (C) T1 sagittal with gadolinium contrast magnetic resonance imaging scan demonstrating a bifrontal likely butterfly high-grade glioma.
























































































































































Chetan Bettegowda, MD, PhD, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States Zvi Ram, MD, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel Michael E. Sughrue, MD, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, Australia Shota Tanaka, MD, PhD, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
Preoperative
Additional tests requested None DTI
Neuropsychological assessment
DTI
fMRI
PET methionine
Ophthalmologic examination
Surgical approach selected Bifrontal craniotomy Left frontal craniotomy with 5-ALA Left frontal craniotomy Right frontal craniotomy with 5-ALA
Anatomic corridor Bifrontal Left MFG Left MFG Right frontal
Goal of surgery Debulking Gross total resection of enhancing component Gross total resection Debulking
Perioperative
Positioning Supine neutral Supine neutral Supine neutral Supine neutral
Surgical equipment Surgical navigation
IOM (SSEP, EEG)
Surgical microscope
Ultrasound
Ultrasonic aspirator
Surgical navigation
Surgical microscope with 5-ALA
Ultrasonic aspirator
Brain stimulator
IOM
Surgical navigation
Surgical microscope
Surgical navigation
IOM (MEP)
Surgical microscope with 5-ALA
Doppler
Medications Mannitol
Steroids
Antiepileptics
Steroids Mannitol
Steroids
Mannitol
Steroids
Antiepileptics
Anatomic considerations Frontal sinus, superior sagittal sinus, lateral ventricles, ACAs, internal capsule, basal ganglia, choroid vessels, fornices ACA, lateral ventricles, CST ACA, DMN/salience network, cingulum, caudate, contralateral cingulate gyrus ACA
Complications feared with approach chosen Vascular injury, injury to Sylvian vessels, forniceal injury Motor deficits, intraventricular hemorrhage, ACA stroke Preserving DMN/salience networks Vascular injury to ACA
Intraoperative
Anesthesia General General General General
Skin incision Bifrontal Bifrontal Bifrontal Curved
Bone opening Bilateral frontal Left frontal Left frontal Right frontal
Brain exposure Bilateral frontal Left SFG/MFG Left SFG/MFG/IFG Right frontal
Method of resection Bifrontal incision with pericranial graft, right frontal and separate left frontal craniotomies, start on right side, open dura around biopsy sight and enter tumor along biopsy tract and tumor debulking, open left frontal dura, enter left side and debulk tumor, leave intraventricular component, EVD placement Bifrontal incision, left frontal craniotomy to midline, U-shaped dural opening based on midline, expose SFG, access tumor through the SFG, debulk using ultrasonic aspirator, chase tumor to contralateral side with removal of genu, attempt to avoid ventricular entry and spare bilateral ACAs, stimulate posterior to avoid CST injury Left frontal craniotomy, expose MFG, access tumor through superior/medial surface and expose tumor lateral to cingulate, resect posterior and deep areas avoiding caudate head, resect between callosal sulcus and ventricle, enter ventricle and section septum pellucidum, identify right caudate head and resect tumor medial to it, stay superior to rostrum to avoid septal nuclei, EVD placement Right frontal craniotomy, dural opening, expose right SFG/MFG, entry into tumor under microscopic visualization, resection with careful attention to ACAs, further resection into genu and opening of left frontal cystic/necrotic component, reconstruction of ventricular wall if entered
Complication avoidance IOM, separate bifrontal craniotomies, follow previous surgical track, debulk tumor until reduction in mass effect, EVD Expose SFG, stay within tumor, stimulate posterior aspect to avoid CST injury, avoid aggressive right-sided resection Identify and avoid bilateral caudate heads, cingulate gyrus, callosal sulcus, EVD Right frontal entry, IOM
Postoperative
Admission ICU ICU ICU ICU
Postoperative complications feared Hydrocephalus, intraventricular hemorrhage, ACA injury, seizures, weakness, language deficit ACA injury, intraventricular hemorrhage, CST injury, SMA syndrome Hydrocephalus, vasospasm Vasospasm, infarction
Follow-up testing HCT immediately after surgery
MRI within 24 hours after surgery
Physical/occupational/speech therapy
CTA if motor deficit
MRI within 48 hours after surgery
MRI within 24 hours after surgery MRI within 48 hours after surgery
Follow-up visits 14 days after surgery 14 days after surgery 14 days after surgery
7 days after surgery for neurooncology
14–21 days after surgery
Adjuvant therapies recommended
IDH status Mutant–radiation/temozolomide
Wild type–radiation/temozolomide
Mutant–radiation/temozolomide + TTF
Wild type–radiation + TTF
Mutant–radiation/temozolomide
Wild type–radiation/temozolomide
Mutant–radiation/temozolomide
Wild type–radiation/temozolomide
MGMT status Methylated–radiation/temozolomide
Unmethylated–radiation/temozolomide
Methylated–radiation/temozolomide + TTF
Unmethylated–radiation + TTF
Methylated–radiation/temozolomide
Unmethylated–radiation/temozolomide
Methylated–radiation/temozolomide
Unmethylated–radiation/temozolomide

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Feb 15, 2025 | Posted by in NEUROSURGERY | Comments Off on Butterfly high-grade glioma

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access