This article provides an in-depth review of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunts for managing hydrocephalus and idiopathic intracranial hypertension, with a focus on advanced surgical techniques and strategies to prevent complications. It examines the placement of ventricular, lumbar, peritoneal, atrial, and pleural catheters, highlighting the benefits of neuro-navigation, endoscopic visualization, and laparoscopic-assisted approaches. Evidence-based methods to reduce shunt infections, malfunctions, and overdrainage are discussed, along with a comparative analysis of shunt types tailored to individual patient needs. The article also explores innovations such as programmable valves, antimicrobial coatings, and transesophageal echocardiography, offering insights into future directions for optimizing CSF shunting outcomes.
Key points
- •
Stereotactic neuro-navigation and laparoscopic techniques improve cerebrospinal fluid shunt placement precision, reducing complications and enhancing outcomes in hydrocephalus and idiopathic intracranial hypertension management.
- •
Detailed procedural guidance is provided for proximal and distal catheter placements, including ventricular, lumbar, peritoneal, atrial, and pleural sites, with evidence-based strategies for surgical optimization.
- •
Strategies to minimize shunt complications emphasize infection prevention bundles, appropriate valve selection, and meticulous adherence to sterile surgical protocols.
- •
Comparative analyses of ventriculo-peritoneal, ventriculo-atrial, ventriculo-pleural, and lumbo-peritoneal shunts offer patient-specific recommendations, addressing anatomic and pathological considerations for optimal outcomes.
| AIC | antibiotic-impregnated catheter |
| CAJ | cavo-atrial junction |
| COPD | chronic obstructive pulmonary disease |
| CSF | cerebrospinal fluid |
| CT | computed tomography |
| EVD | external ventricular drains |
| HCRN | Hydrocephalus Clinical Research Network |
| IIH | idiopathic intracranial hypertension |
| iNPH | idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus |
| IVH | intraventricular hemmorage |
| LP | lumbo-peritoneal |
| VA | ventriculo-atrial |
| VP | ventriculoperitoneal |
| VPL | ventriculo-pleural |
Introduction
Hydrocephalus is predominantly treated with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion via shunt systems or endoscopic third ventriculostomy. In idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH), shunting becomes necessary when pharmacologic treatments and temporary lumbar drainage fail. CSF shunt systems comprise 3 main components: a proximal catheter placed in the ventricle or lumbar cistern, a flow-regulating valve, and a distal catheter directing CSF to an absorptive site, typically the peritoneal cavity but occasionally the right atrium, pleural cavity, or other spaces. Some configurations include a Rickham reservoir for diagnostic or therapeutic access without disturbing the valve.
Global variations in shunting approaches reflect differences in preferences and regulatory factors. Ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunts are most common in North America, whereas lumbo-peritoneal (LP) shunts are preferred in Japan and other Asian countries, particularly for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH). In parts of South America, ventriculo-atrial (VA) shunts are often a first-line choice. Additionally, the choice of valve types is influenced by local markets and regulatory landscapes. Despite these differences, no single shunt design has shown universal superiority in clinical outcomes.
VP shunting is one of the most frequently performed neurosurgical procedures, with an estimated 30,000 operations annually in the United States. However, failure rates remain significant, with 15% to 25% of new VP shunts failing within 6 months in adults and up to 50% failing in high-risk populations. These failures necessitate revision surgeries, which increase perioperative risks, patient distress, and health care costs. Hospital stays related to shunt malfunction average 8 days, with a reported mortality rate of 1% to 3%. These challenges have driven advancements in surgical techniques and perioperative protocols to minimize complications such as infection, catheter misplacement, and mechanical failures.
This article reviews the surgical principles and techniques for shunt insertion, focusing on VP, VA, ventriculo-pleural (VPL), and LP shunts. It highlights strategies for addressing complications and recent innovations aimed at optimizing outcomes and reducing failure rates.
Discussion
Historical Perspective
The concept of CSF diversion dates back to 1898, when Ferguson introduced an early LP shunt. This rudimentary approach involved drilling a burr hole in the fifth lumbar vertebra and threading a silver wire from the spinal canal to the peritoneal cavity. In 1905, the first true VP shunt was attempted using a rubber tube to redirect CSF from the lateral ventricle to the peritoneal cavity. However, this pioneering effort was short-lived, as the patient survived only a few hours postoperatively. Incremental improvements followed, such as the use of silver wires to wick CSF, but it was the introduction of silicone catheters in the 1950s that revolutionized the field, establishing VP shunting as the standard treatment for hydrocephalus.
Although VP shunting remains the most widely adopted method for managing both pediatric and adult hydrocephalus, alternative distal catheter sites are sometimes necessary. Venous shunting was first explored in 1907, when Erwin Payr used an autologous saphenous vein to divert CSF into the superior sagittal sinus in a child. In 1909, McClure successfully shunted CSF into the neck veins, achieving extracranial venous drainage. However, these early efforts were hindered by complications such as thrombotic occlusion and retrograde blood migration into the proximal catheter. The development of the Seldinger technique in the 1960s revolutionized VA shunting by enabling precise catheter placement into the right atrium, significantly improving its reliability.
The evolution of VP shunting paralleled advancements in surgical methods. Initially, ventricular catheter placement relied solely on anatomic landmarks, while peritoneal catheter insertion required open surgical techniques. Modern innovations, including neuro-navigation, endoscopic visualization, and laparoscopic approaches, have enhanced the precision and safety of shunt placement. However, their adoption varies across institutions, reflecting differences in resources, neurosurgical training, and access to collaborative surgical teams, such as general surgery.
Surgical Risks in Adult Patients Undergoing Shunt Surgery
CSF shunting in adults, particularly elderly patients, presents unique challenges due to the prevalence of comorbidities, frailty, and functional limitations. , Careful patient assessment and tailored risk mitigation strategies are essential to optimize outcomes and minimize complications.
Frailty, advanced age, and surgical risk
Elderly patients often exhibit reduced physiological reserve, or frailty, which increases their vulnerability to perioperative complications. Frail individuals are approximately 2.5 times more likely to experience adverse surgical outcomes than their non-frail counterparts. Frailty assessment tools, such as the Frailty Index, are valuable for evaluating surgical candidacy, but application in hydrocephalus patients requires caution, as reversible hydrocephalus-related symptoms like gait impairment and functional decline may overestimate frailty. Individualized assessments are vital for identifying patients who may benefit from preoperative optimization.
Chronologic age alone is not a contraindication for shunt surgery in adults. , Studies consistently shows that appropriately selected elderly patients tolerate shunting well, with the benefits of clinical improvements often outweighing procedural risks. , , Multidisciplinary discussions should focus on overall health status, functional reserve, and specific risk factors rather than age as the primary determinant of surgical candidacy.
Comorbid conditions
Adult shunt candidates, especially the elderly, frequently present with comorbidities, which increases perioperative risks. Cardiovascular complications, affecting 2% to 5% of patients, are common in those with a history of cardiac disease. Preoperative cardiovascular optimization and intraoperative monitoring are critical for minimizing adverse events. Pulmonary conditions, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and obstructive sleep apnea, elevate the risks of pneumonia, pulmonary embolism, and respiratory failure. Pulmonary complications can occur in up to 7% of elderly patients and require proactive management. , Diabetes further complicate surgical outcomes, predisposing patients to infections, hypoglycemia, and cardiovascular events. Preoperative glucose optimization reduces these risks and improves outcomes.
Anticoagulation and bleeding risks
A substantial proportion of elderly shunt candidates are on anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy, which heightens the risk of perioperative bleeding. Shunt surgery, particularly in iNPH patients, is typically elective, allowing time for careful management of anticoagulation. , Current guidelines recommend pausing anticoagulants or antiplatelets 5 to 7 days before surgery, while considering each patient’s thromboembolic risk, such as those with mechanical heart valves, who may require bridging therapy with heparin to minimize thrombotic events. Postoperatively, anticoagulation should be restarted judiciously, balancing the risks of thrombosis and bleeding.
Surgical Techniques for Shunt Insertion
General surgical principles
Effective CSF shunting requires adherence to standardized protocols to optimize outcomes and minimize complications. This section outlines essential practices in preoperative preparation, sterile techniques, infection prevention, and postoperative care. A comparison of VP, VA, VPL, and LP shunts is provided as a quick reference for tailoring shunt selection to individual patient needs ( Table 1 ).
| Shunt Type | Advantages | Disadvantages | Ideal Use Cases |
|---|---|---|---|
| VP Shunts | High absorptive capacity; widely used; suitable for all ages. | Abdominal complications (pseudocysts, migration); infection risks. | General hydrocephalus management; first-line option. |
| VA Shunts | Effective for patients with abdominal contraindications; avoids peritoneal risks. | Cardiac complications (thrombosis, arrhythmias); requires precise cavo-atrial positioning. | Patients with abdominal contraindications or VP failures. |
| VPL Shunts | Viable alternative when VP and VA shunts are unsuitable. | High risk of pleural effusion, hydrothorax, pneumothorax. | Last-resort option; patients with no significant pulmonary disease. |
| LP Shunts | Avoids intracranial risks; effective for IIH and communicating hydrocephalus. | High risk of overdrainage complications; challenging malfunction evaluation. | IIH or communicating hydrocephalus; failed pharmacologic therapy. |
Preoperative preparation
Thorough preoperative planning is essential to minimize surgical risks. Patients with temporary CSF diversion devices, such as external ventricular drains (EVDs), must have negative CSF cultures before shunt placement to reduce infection risk. Elevated CSF protein levels (greater than 100 mg/dL) and cell counts should also be addressed, as these factors increase the likelihood of catheter occlusion and early shunt failure. Imaging studies are reviewed preoperatively to assess ventricular size, identify anatomic landmarks, and detect potential obstructions.
Proper positioning is critical for surgical accessibility. Most patients are positioned supine with the head rotated contralaterally and supported by a donut or horseshoe headrest. In cases of limited cervical mobility, a longitudinal bump under the ipsilateral hemi-body can improve positioning. Cranial fixation, such as the Mayfield clamp, may be required in complex cases to ensure stability, but rarely necessary.
When neuronavigation is utilized, its setup is customized to the type of system. Electromagnetic navigation systems like AxIEM are ideal for non-fixed head positioning, whereas optical systems are used when the head is stabilized in a Mayfield clamp. Prophylactic antibiotics, typically cefazolin or clindamycin for penicillin-allergic patients, are administered 30 minutes before the incision.
Sterile protocols and infection prevention bundles
Infection prevention starts with meticulous preparation of the sterile field. Hair at incision sites is trimmed with clippers, marked, and scrubbed using alcohol or chlorhexidine gluconate. Antiseptic solutions, such as ChloraPrep and DuraPrep, containing, respectively, 70% and 74% isopropyl alcohol are applied, followed by sterile povidone-iodine-impregnated adhesive drapes to maintain sterility. Double gloving is used throughout the procedure to minimize contamination risks and the outer layer of gloves is changed after draping is finished. Afterward, local anesthesia is administered.
Evidence supports infection prevention bundles as an effective strategy to lower postoperative infection rates. Key components include maintaining normothermia, proper antibiotic prophylaxis, and minimizing catheter handling during placement.
Postoperative care and imaging
Post-operative care focuses on confirming catheter placement and monitoring for complications. Imaging, including a cranial computed tomography (CT) scan, verifies ventricular catheter positioning, while an X-ray shunt series confirms the trajectory and location of the distal catheter. Patients are typically monitored overnight in a neurosurgical unit to detect early complications such as overdrainage, shunt malfunction, or bleeding.
High-risk populations require tailored follow-up care, including additional imaging and clinical evaluations to identify and address potential issues. Proactive management and regular assessments help ensure long-term shunt functionality and minimize the need for revisions.
Proximal catheter placement
Ventricular catheter
Effective placement of the ventricular catheter is critical for the functionality and longevity of the shunt system. Proper technique minimizes the risks of malpositioning, obstruction, and early shunt failure.
Surgical procedure
The procedure begins with a skin incision, followed by dissection through the subcutaneous fat and galea using monopolar cautery. The pericranium is preserved to secure the valve or reservoir. A subgaleal pocket is created distal to the incision to house the valve. A high-speed drill is used to create a burr hole at the desired site. Neuro-navigation can be used to both select and confirm the location of the burr hole. The dura is opened in a cruciate fashion and leaflets are cauterized, followed by coagulation of the pia-arachnoid layer to facilitate smooth catheter insertion. An alternative technique is to use needle monopolar cautery to simultaneously create a small, catheter-sized hole, in both the dura and pia arachnoid.
The catheter is inserted freehand or with stereotactic guidance ( Fig. 1 ). Once CSF flow is confirmed, the catheter is secured with bulldog clamps, and the proximal catheter is attached to the valve and previously tunneled peritoneal catheter using silk ties.
Technical considerations
Entry site and location of proximal catheter tip
The choice of entry site is influenced by patient anatomy, pathology, and surgeon preference. The frontal and parieto-occipital approaches are the most common.
- •
Frontal Approach : Targets Kocher’s point, located ∼1 cm anterior to the coronal suture and 3 cm lateral to midline, directing the catheter into the frontal horn of the lateral ventricle while avoiding the choroid plexus and ventricular wall. This approach often uses a curvilinear incision and a retroauricular skip incision for continuous distal catheter tunneling.
- •
Parieto-Occipital Approach : Targets Frazier’s point (∼6 cm above the inion and 4 cm lateral to midline) to access the frontal horn of the lateral ventricle.
- •
Parietal Approach : Targets the atrium of the lateral ventricle via Keen’s point (∼3 cm posterior to the bregma and 2.5 cm lateral to midline). This approach is reserved for unique anatomic scenarios or when other approaches are contraindicated.
Evidence on the optimal entry site is mixed. , Some studies suggest the frontal approach provides better catheter tip positioning compared to parieto-occipital approaches, though a randomized trial by the Hydrocephalus Clinical Research Network (HCRN) found no significant differences in outcomes between anterior and posterior placements. However, shunt survival was reduced when surgeons were randomized to an approach contrary to their preference, suggesting that surgeon expertise and familiarity play a critical role in outcomes. Proper catheter tip positioning is crucial, as tips free-floating in CSF show a failure rate of ∼20%, compared to 33% when in partial contact with brain tissue.
Role of neuro-navigation and endoscopic visualization
Stereotactic neuro-navigation significantly enhances ventricular catheter placement accuracy, particularly in patients with complex ventricular anatomy or slit ventricles, such as those seen in IIH ( Fig. 2 ). , Endoscopic visualization provides direct anatomic views, further reducing malposition risks. Combining neuro-navigation with endoscopy offers an added layer of precision, with the potential to decrease the rate of shunt failure.
Shunt revisions
Proximal catheter occlusion by choroid plexus tissue is the leading cause of proximal shunt malfunction. Removal of an occluded catheter poses risks, including intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH). To minimize these risks, a BugBee electrode or low-energy monopolar cautery with a metal stylet can be used to gently release the catheter. In cases of IVH, copious irrigation is recommended, and an EVD may be placed until the blood clears adequately.
Lumbar catheter
LP shunts offer an alternative proximal access point, particularly for patients with communicating hydrocephalus or refractory IIH. LP shunts eliminate the need for intracranial entry, reducing risks such as ventriculostomy-associated hemorrhage. However, they are contraindicated in obstructive hydrocephalus. Although recent studies show no significant differences in outcomes between VP and LP shunts for IIH or hydrocephalus, regional preferences play a key role. VP shunts are preferred in Europe and North America, while LP shunts dominate in Japan, where studies demonstrate non-inferior treatment efficacy in certain patient subgroups.
Surgical procedure
The procedure begins with the patient in the lateral decubitus position. After standard sterile preparation and draping, a 3 to 4 cm midline incision is made at the L3-4 interspinous space to expose the lumbar fascia. A Touhy needle is used to access the subarachnoid space, confirmed by CSF return. The lumbar catheter is advanced cephalad approximately 5 cm into the spinal canal after the stylet is removed, and the needle is withdrawn. The catheter is anchored to the lumbar fascia to prevent dislodgement.
A second incision is made in the flank to house the valve, and a third incision is created in the abdomen for peritoneal cavity access. Posterior-to-anterior tunneling is performed, and all catheter connections are secured with silk ties. Once the system is secured, all surgical sites are closed in layers.
Technical considerations
Overdrainage concerns
A major risk of LP shunting is overdrainage, which can result in intracranial hypotension, subdural hematomas, and Chiari type I malformations, with or without syringomyelia ( Fig. 3 ). Proper valve selection, particularly valves with adjustable resistance settings and siphon guards, is critical in mitigating these complications. In cases where overdrainage persists, management may include occluding or removing the shunt or converting to a VP shunt system.
Related posts:
Hydrocephalus Pathophysiology and Epidemiology
Adult Hydrocephalus Clinical Subtypes
Methods of Monitoring Intracranial Pressure
Guidelines for Diagnosis and Management of Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus
Diagnostic and Prognostic Biomarkers of Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus in Cerebrospinal Fluid and Blood
Temporary Drainage of Cerebrospinal Fluid for Diagnosis and Treatment of Hydrocephalus
Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel
Full access? Get Clinical Tree
