CHAPTER 64 Challenges and Opportunities in Future Meningioma Research and Care
INTRODUCTION
There has never been a more exciting time in meningioma research and care. As analytic tools improve and interest grows, great strides can occur toward understanding and treating meningiomas. Patient advocacy and funding agency interest will help to generate better and better paradigms for management and the analytic tools are increasingly available. This chapter discusses some future possibilities in basic and translational research, pathology, imaging, surgical management, radiation, chemotherapy, and outcome analysis.
BASIC AND TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH
Basic research is the engine that drives the future development of medical care. For meningiomas, it involves not only molecular biology but also epidemiology, new therapeutic agents, non-invasive surgical techniques, side effects of treatment, and a host of other topics. Often the greatest improvements are made when techniques allow a definitive to answer to some long-standing questions. We now have very powerful molecular techniques, and many of them are just awaiting application to meningiomas. Modern molecular biology and genetics can significantly support research on the oncogenesis, epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of meningiomas. At present, techniques of single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analysis, high-throughput screening for molecular profiling, and proteomics have been applied to other tumors with great success. Only personnel and interest among investigators are needed to apply these techniques in meningioma research. Here are some of the questions that should be answerable in the next 10 years:
EPIDEMIOLOGY
One of the most important areas for meningioma research is epidemiology, including molecular epidemiology. Despite almost a century of ongoing research, there are still numerous unknowns regarding the epidemiology of meningiomas. A striking example is that we still do not know which meningiomas will grow after diagnosis and which will not, and the clinician regularly faces several of these dilemmas in daily practice. Classical epidemiology studies such as the INTERPHONE study and other large-scale studies of causal or permissive factors in meningiomas are important contributions to the literature. The INTERPHONE study is the largest case control study to date to examine the risks of mobile-phone use and includes more than 2400 meningioma cases. Also in 2005, the NIH funded a very large study led by Dr. Elizabeth Claus, which will begin to answer several ongoing questions in meningioma pathogenesis:

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

