Ernesto Pasquini, Diego Mazzatenta, Matteo Zoli, Michael Ghirelli, Giorgio Frank
Introduction
The endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) to cavernous sinus (CS) tumors is a safe and effective route for the treatment of tumors located in the medial and lateral compartments of the CS. This approach allows the surgeon to follow the extension of the tumor into the CS through a straightforward and completely extracranial route, and permits to tailor the approach for each specific case. At the beginning of the last decade, the main issues related to CS surgery were the high invasiveness and elevated morbidity rate of standard transcranial approaches.1–3 These factors led to a progressive abandoning of CS surgery in favor of radiosurgery.1–5 The renewing interest of the CS surgery started thanks to the works of Alfieri and Jho, who reconsidered the anatomy of the CS under the endoscopic endonasal perspective.6,7 The contribution of these and many other authors has permitted this approach to become widely adopted with satisfactory results in terms of tumor removal and complications rate.8–10 In recent years, the endonasal CS approach has proved to be a replicable technique with similar results in different surgical series.8–10 Thus, it represents a technique that can be learn, transmitted, and adopted with satisfaction by incoming generations of neurosurgeons after a proper endoscopic endonasal training. In this chapter, we will analyze the anatomic and surgical premises and the results of this approach.
13.1 Indications
The case selection is one of the most important features to maximize the potentiality of the EEA to CS and minimize the morbidity. There are two main parameters that must be kept in consideration: (1) the biologic features, in terms of tumor infiltration of vessels and nerves; and (2) the pattern of growth, in particular in relationship with the dural layers. Some tumors, for example, meningiomas, metastasis, or carcinomas, tend to infiltrate the walls of internal carotid artery (ICA) and the cranial nerves (CNs). Thus, for these cases the EEA can cause catastrophic consequences, such as ICA rupture or permanent CN palsies, as dissection between the tumor and the surrounding structures is not possible.9 It is noteworthy that for these cases, and especially for meningiomas, the risk of massive intra- or postoperative bleeding is represented by the occurrence of ICA rupture and/or by the injury of the hypertrophic tumor feeders from the intracavernous ICA, such as the meningohypophyseal trunk or the inferolateral artery.11 The latter makes this surgery particularly hazardous, as it is quite complex to identify the course of these vessels even with neuronavigation or intraoperative Doppler. For meningiomas or malignancies of the CS, some authors only recommend an endoscopic endonasal osteodural decompression as a palliative measure in cases of ophthalmoplegia. This technique consists in drilling the posterior wall of the sphenoid in the sella and parasellar area, followed by the opening of the dura layer to decompress the neural structures.12–14
A further parameter to be considered is the growth of the tumor. Some substantially extradural tumors, for instance, chondrosarcoma or chordomas, could, in their growth, compress and displace the CS without any invasion.15,16 In these cases, the EEA allows to approach the tumor through an extradural route, following the same extension of the tumor to the CS. Also in case of infiltration of the CS, for example, by a pituitary macroadenoma, this approach permits as well to follow the direction of growth of the tumor.17 When persistent trigeminal arteries (PTAs) involve only the medial or posterosuperior compartments of CS, displacing laterally the ICA, a midline transsphenoidal approach is enough to manage the entire extension of the tumor. Conversely, when the tumor involves the anteroinferior or lateral compartments, displacing medially the ICA, we consider an ethmoido-pterygoido-sphenoidal (EPS) corridor more appropriate. A third selection criterion that should be taken into account for the case selection is the tumor consistency. When the tumor is soft, its resection is clearly favored; conversely, a hard, fibrous consistency with a hemorrhagic aspect greatly increases the surgical complexity, hampering the tumor resection with a greater risk of vessel or nerve damage during the surgical maneuvers. Unfortunately, this crucial feature of the tumor, which is associated with better outcome, is still scarcely predictable before surgery. Until now, this selection criterion is purely theoretic;16,18–27 but in the future, neuroimaging exams, such as magnetic resonance elastography, would maybe ensure the consistency of the tumor preoperatively.27
13.2 Surgical Steps
Depending on the different types of tumor invasion, two different surgical approaches to CS can be adopted: the mid to line transsphenoidal and the EPS.
For the former, the first target of the surgeon should be the identification of the sphenoid ostium. The tail of the superior turbinate points to the sphenoidal ostium as an arrow, and it is the more useful landmark in the nasal stage (Figs. 13.1and 13.2). For such approach, in case of normal pneumatization of the sinus, a complete sphenoidotomy is enough to identify the landmarks on the posterior wall of the sphenoid sinus and to identify the sellar bulge, the ICA protuberances, and the optic nerves (Figs. 13.1–13.3). In case of conchal or presallar variant of the sphenoidal sinus, the adoption of neuronavigation and intraoperative Doppler is mandatory to identify the course of the carotid artery, while drilling off the bone to expose the sella and parasellar region.
The CS region is represented by the quadrangular space limited by the optic nerve superiorly, a horizontal line passing at the level of the vidian nerve inferiorly, the sellar bulge medially, and the junction between petrosal and cavernous ICA laterally (Fig. 13.2). This anatomic exposure allows dissecting the entire extension of the CS both medially and laterally to the ICA. However, it is disadvantageous to work laterally to vessel, because it imposes an angled trajectory to the surgeon. To expand this approach laterally, it is necessary to expose and partially remove the upper part of pterygoid plates. This maneuver requires the resection of the middle turbinate and the exposure of the uncinate process and the bulla ethmoidalis (Fig. 13.4). By removing these structures, the natural ostium of maxillary sinus is usually visible. The tail of the middle turbinate permits locating the sphenopalatine foramen. When this landmark is identified, it is possible to enlarge the sphenopalatine foramen on the vertical process of the palatine bone, which is the posteromedial border of maxillary sinus. After its removal, the upper part of pterygoid plates is exposed (Fig. 13.5). The EPS ends when the medial and superior aspects of these processes are removed and the ethmoid is completely resected. This permits to clearly identify from a more lateral perspective all anatomic landmarks from the pterygoid canal with the vidian nerve to the opticocarotid recess, exposing frontally the entire region of CS (Fig. 13.6). Opening the dura medially or laterally toward the ICA, the medial or lateral compartment of CS can be accessed (Figs. 13.7–13.12). The course of the ICA can be verified by the auxilium of neuronavigation and intraoperative Doppler to avoid the damage this vessel (Fig. 13.13).
The tumor removal can be performed with the microsurgical two-hand technique. Dissection of the tumor from the surrounding dural structures and normal pituitary gland is made in a progressive central debulking manner with suction or curettes. In this phase, we prefer to keep the endoscope fixed on a holder. The portion of the tumor invading the medial compartment is resected, following its extension and using the same opening in the medial wall of CS that the tumor created to invade the compartment (Fig. 13.14). In case of involvement of the posterosuperior compartment of CS, the resection is extended to this portion following the tumor growth through the intracavernous carotid loop. At the end of the tumor removal, venous bleeding is usually not significant and can easily be controlled with hemostatic absorbable material. Afterward, the inspection of the surgical field with 30- and 45-degree- angled endoscopes permits the detection and removal of neoplastic residues (Fig. 13.14). The dura can be opened also laterally to the ICA, after its identification with technological devices, to access lateral compartments of CS (Fig. 13.15). The tumor removal technique in this region is not dissimilar to the previous one. Also in this case, bleeding from CS is usually not significant and can be controlled with hemostatic absorbable material. The surgical defect can be closed using absorbable material, whereas in the case of a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak we usually repair using free graft with fat and/or mucoperiosteum taken from the middle turbinate or nasoseptal flap.
Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue