Chapter 4 – General Adult Psychiatry




Abstract




You are working in liaison psychiatry. Mr Theophilus Grantley, a 21-year-old student, has been brought to the ED by his friends due to concerns that he is not eating. He has been isolating himself, and they fear he is depressed.





Chapter 4 General Adult Psychiatry


Dominic Cottrell , Jonathan Rogers


Practice Stations




  • Station 4.1: Delusions



  • Station 4.2: Emotionally Unstable Personality Disorder



  • Station 4.3: Depression Post-Myocardial Infarction



  • Station 4.4: Hypochondriasis



  • Station 4.5: Clozapine Explanation



  • Station 4.6: Mania Mental State Examination



  • Station 4.7: Depression Collateral History



  • Station 4.8: Psychotic Depression



  • Station 4.9: Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder



  • Station 4.10: Suicide Risk Assessment



  • Station 4.11: Psychosis Mental State Examination



  • Station 4.12: Akathisia



  • Station 4.13: Obsessive Compulsive Disorder



  • Station 4.14: Panic Disorder



  • Station 4.15: Treatment-Resistant Depression



  • Station 4.16: Lithium Explanation



  • Station 4.17: Electroconvulsive Therapy



  • Station 4.18: First-Rank Symptoms



  • Station 4.19: Capacity Assessment



  • Station 4.20: Schizophrenia Explanation



  • Station 4.21: Body Dysmorphic Disorder



  • Station 4.22: Metabolic Syndrome Management



  • Station 4.23: Antidepressant Side Effects



  • Station 4.24: Adult Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder



  • Station 4.25: Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome



  • Station 4.26: Traumatic Brain Injury



  • Station 4.27: Non-Epileptic Seizures



  • Station 4.28: Hyperprolactinaemia



  • Station 4.29: Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotic Explanation



  • Station 4.30: Overdose Risk Assessment



  • Station 4.31: Request to Self-Discharge



  • Station 4.32: Psychosis Collateral History



  • Station 4.33: Suicide Risk Assessment



  • Station 4.34: Temporal Lobe Epilepsy



  • Station 4.35: Agoraphobia



  • Station 4.36: Breaking Bad News



  • Station 4.37: Gender Incongruence


    Physical Examinations



  • Station 4.38: Frontal Lobe Examination



  • Station 4.39: Neurological Examination



  • Station 4.40: Cardiovascular Examination



  • Station 4.41: Extrapyramidal Side Effects



  • Station 4.42: Thyroid Examination



  • Station 4.43: Fundoscopy



  • Station 4.44: Respiratory Examination



  • Station 4.45: Abdominal Examination


    ECG Refresher



  • Station 4.46: ECG Interpretation 1 – QTc Prolongation



  • Station 4.47: ECG Interpretation 2 – Myocardial Infarction



  • Station 4.48: ECG Interpretation 3 – Presenting an ECG



Station 4.1 (90 Seconds)



Candidate Instructions


You are working in liaison psychiatry. Mr Theophilus Grantley, a 21-year-old student, has been brought to the ED by his friends due to concerns that he is not eating. He has been isolating himself, and they fear he is depressed.


Interview Mr Grantley and take an appropriate history.



Actor Instructions


You are Mr Theophilus Grantley, a 21-year-old male English literature student. You are content to be in the ED because you think there is something wrong with your body, but you are not sure what.


Throughout the interview, your manner is very perplexed and you do not show much emotion. You speak quite monotonously, and there is sometimes a bit of a delay in your answers to questions. Sometimes your answers do not address the question and are a bit random.


You have been feeling ‘strange’ for the last few months, but you are starting to realise what has been happening. You think people have been coming into your room every night and raping you. You don’t remember it happening because they put a ‘memory glove’ over you. However, you are fairly sure it has taken place because in the morning, the shadows through the curtains fall on a different part of the room. You have no other evidence of having been raped.


You don’t know who is doing this, but it might be related to Nazis, as your hall of residence has a German-sounding name. You are beginning to think that your friends who brought you here must know something about it.



If asked about whether thoughts are put into your head, say you are worried that the food makes you think ‘monstrous things’, but you will not say what. This is why you eat very little.


You do not ‘hear voices’ and are annoyed if this question is asked in an insensitive manner because you know you’re not mad. You do want medical help, though, because you don’t know what these disgusting people have been doing to you.


Your mood is ‘Okay’, but you are concerned about your situation. There aren’t many activities you enjoy anymore because you need lots of time to think through what is happening. Your sleep and energy levels are fine. You do not think you are underweight.


You do not want to harm yourself – you want to save yourself from these people. You have called the police about it, but they didn’t seem to want to help; however, you wouldn’t dream of confronting your persecutors because there are too many of them.


You don’t have any history of mental illness, but your uncle was ‘really odd’ and spent lots of time in a ‘mental hospital’. You occasionally smoke cannabis but otherwise do not use alcohol or drugs.



Feedback Domains



Differential Diagnosis

The main differential diagnosis is between psychotic depression and a primary psychotic illness. Both possibilities should be explored by the candidate, but questions should make clear that the latter is the more likely diagnosis.



Additional Relevant History

Candidate briefly includes past psychiatric history, substance misuse history, and family history of psychotic disorders.



Risk Assessment

The candidate assesses for self-neglect (e.g. food and fluid, personal hygiene) and suicide. When asking about harm to others, the candidate makes it as natural as possible (e.g. ‘It’s clear that some awful things have been happening to you. Do you ever get angry with these people? Do you ever want to get back at them in any way?’).



Communication

The candidate asks detailed questions to probe the mental state in a manner that does not make the patient feel that he is ‘mad’ (e.g. avoids potentially stigmatising terms such as hallucinations and delusions). The candidate rolls with resistance and avoids antagonising the patient.



Author’s Note


There is a large amount of psychotic content in this station, and a good candidate will demonstrate the extent of the systemisation of the delusion. Variants on this station might include more specific tasks, such as assessing delusional beliefs or determining whether a delusion is primary or secondary.



Station 4.2 (90 Seconds)



Candidate Instructions


You are called to assess Ms Lizzie Eustace, a 22-year-old woman, in the ED. She has been flagged as a frequent attender. She has been medically cleared after presenting with an intentional overdose of 12 tablets of paracetamol 500 mg.


Take a history from Ms Eustace to establish a psychiatric diagnosis.



Actor Instructions


You are Ms Lizzie Eustace, a 22-year-old unemployed woman who has dropped out of university. You feel fed up with the hospital and want to go home. You do not see why you have to speak to yet another doctor. You will only be persuaded to discuss more about yourself if the doctor is respectful and explains why it is important to speak to them.


This morning, you had an argument with your boyfriend, Freddie, on the phone. He accused you of flirting with another guy, when actually you were just being friendly. Freddie shouted at you, and you yelled back at him, ‘Get out of my life!’ You then drank half a bottle of wine and took the paracetamol tablets that you had in the cupboard. You wanted to end your life at the time and thought that you had nothing left to live for.


You then called an ambulance a half hour later because you didn’t want to die and you were worried about your cats if you did. You shouted at the paramedics because one of them rolled their eyes at you. You now feel okay and just want to go home. You no longer wish to end your life.


You have taken several overdoses in the past, sometimes paracetamol, sometimes ibuprofen. Usually, it was only a few tablets. You sometimes self-harm by using a razor blade to cut your arms; this relieves some of the frustration you often experience.


Your mood seems to go up and down all the time (within a few minutes); even things like being stood up by a friend can make you want to end your life. You think of yourself as pretty worthless. You get angry with yourself and with others a lot. You always seem to be getting into arguments with other people and you don’t know why. With a previous boyfriend, you’d sometimes hit each other during these arguments, but nobody got hurt.


Your mother always used to say that you have ‘no sticking power’, and you know that you give up on things easily. You tend to do things on the spur of the moment and then regret them afterward, like when you saw a necklace you liked in a store and stole it; this led to a police caution.


You have dropped out of university and don’t know what to do with your time now.


You have had a series of short-term relationships. To start with, the guy seems like the best person in the world – really kind and sympathetic – but after a few weeks, you inevitably find out that he is an idiot. There seems to be a pattern – you can’t live with them and you can’t live without them. You always worry that they’re going to leave you, but you can’t stand them when they’re around.


You know you drink quite a lot of alcohol, bingeing on bottles of wine three to four times a week. You’ve experimented with cannabis, ecstasy, and ‘meow meow’, but you’ve never injected drugs.


You don’t hear voices, but you do sometimes worry that people are ‘out to get you’, though you know they’re not really.



If asked, as a child, your mother died and your father neglected you. You don’t really want to talk about this further.



Feedback Domains



Knowledge

The candidate establishes the features of emotionally unstable personality disorder. These are emotional instability, unstable relationships, disturbed self-image, impulsivity, feelings of abandonment, recurrent self-harm, feelings of emptiness, angry outbursts, and transient psychotic or dissociative symptoms.



Risk Assessment

This should be brief. The candidate includes suicide, self-harm, and violence in relationships.



Communication

The candidate effectively explains the reason for the interview and demonstrates an empathetic manner toward the patient. They use a structured approach to elicit the history and avoid psychiatric jargon such as ‘feelings of chronic emptiness’ or ‘real or imagined abandonment’. It may be helpful to start with open questions about mood, relationships, and substance use, but the candidate ensures that clarity is obtained (e.g. duration of mood states, actual substances used, and sequence of events).



Station 4.3 (4 Minutes)



Candidate Instructions


You are working in liaison psychiatry and have assessed Mr Septimus Harding, a 63-year-old man on the cardiology ward. He had a non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) three weeks ago, and the ward staff are concerned that he is not making sufficient progress.


He describes feeling ‘really rubbish’ ever since his heart attack, having previously felt very positive and carefree – he was particularly looking forward to retirement. He lacks the energy to make progress with his cardiac rehabilitation even though the doctors tell him that his heart is doing well. He said that ‘all the fun just seemed to be sucked out of life’. His real passion in life was music, but he can’t have his cello on the ward to play.


His mood just seems to be getting worse. He tends to wake up at 4:00 a.m., but he’s not sure if that’s just the beeping from all the machines. He has lost his interest in food and just eats because the nurses tell him he has to; he doesn’t like the hospital food anyway. He thinks he has lost a bit of weight.


He tells you that he feels very guilty about his wife having to travel up to the hospital so often. He thinks that the NSTEMI is all his own fault because he has never been a person who exercises much. He is worried that he might lose his job.


Previous medical history: Essential hypertension, type 2 diabetes


Current medication: Amlodipine 10 mg OD, metformin MR 1 g OD, aspirin 75 mg OD, clopidogrel 75 mg OD, atorvastatin 80 mg OD, bisoprolol 2.5 mg OD


Social history: Lives with his wife in a flat; has a difficult relationship with his daughter, as he doesn’t like her husband; works as a salesman


Substance use: Has not drunk anything since being admitted to the hospital, but used to drink three to five pints of beer each night; used to smoke 30 cigarettes per day but has been told he should quit; has never used recreational drugs


Risk: Denies any thoughts of ending his life or harming others, no previous history of other relevant risk behaviours


There is currently a bright young medical student in your team, Henrietta Lacks. The consultant has asked you to present the case to her as a teaching opportunity.


Present the case to the medical student and answer her questions. Explain the most likely diagnosis and discuss an appropriate management plan.



Actor Instructions


You are Henrietta Lacks, a medical student in a liaison psychiatry team. It has been arranged that the doctor in front of you is going to teach you about an interesting case. The case regards a person whom the doctor recently assessed, who had become very low in mood following a heart attack (you should ideally say ‘myocardial infarction’, which means the same thing). Time is limited, so if the doctor is taking a very long time (e.g. two to three minutes) answering one question and you think they will run out of time before answering them all, try to move them on to another. Your questions are as follows:




  1. (1) Ask the doctor to summarise the case.



  2. (2) Ask whether there is any additional information they would like to know. If they need prompting, ask whether there is anybody else it could be helpful to speak to, as you’ve often seen other doctors do this.



  3. (3) Ask what they think the most likely diagnosis is, and whether there are other possibilities. Keep this relatively brief.



  4. (4) Ask for their treatment plan. If they do not cover each of biological (e.g. medications, alcohol reduction), psychological (e.g. a ‘talking therapy’ such as cognitive behavioural therapy or interpersonal therapy), and social factors (e.g. peer support, sick note for employer), then encourage them to consider those they have missed (e.g. ‘Is there anything psychological that could be done to help?’). If they do not cover short- and long-term management, encourage them to consider both (e.g. ‘What about in the longer term?’).


Encourage the candidate to be specific. If they mention antidepressant medication, ask them which one(s) and why. If they mention psychological therapy, ask which modality (i.e. type) they would consider.



Feedback Domains



Differential Diagnosis

The candidate successfully identifies that this is a case of (mild to moderate) depression following a myocardial infarction. Differential diagnoses would include an adjustment disorder, an anxiety disorder, or (less likely) alcohol dependence/withdrawal associated with low mood, but the main task is to identify the depression.



Management

The candidate considers sources of further information:




  • Collateral history from the patient’s wife



  • Collateral history from nurses on the ward



  • Medical notes (including GP records) and investigation results


They devise an individualised management plan covering a biopsychosocial strategy in the short and long term. Medication and psychological therapy should both be considered, but the other examples are just suggestions – there are other possibilities.



Biological



  • Antidepressant medication – SSRIs are preferred, as they are effective and relatively safe. Citalopram is cautioned due to the risk of prolonging the QT interval. Good SSRI options are sertraline, fluoxetine, and paroxetine. Mirtazapine is a good alternative to SSRIs. The candidate could helpfully refer to the potential for interactions with current and future medications for physical health (e.g. SSRIs can increase bleeding risk, here exacerbated by aspirin).



  • Review of food options – A dietician referral may be helpful to find more acceptable alternatives.



  • Smoking cessation support



  • Alcohol use support



Psychological



  • There is evidence for psychological therapy following myocardial infarction, but no strong evidence for any particular modality. If mild, guided self-help or computerised CBT could be good options. If unresponsive to these, or if depression is considered more severe, CBT or IPT could be considered.



  • Guilt could be addressed in CBT as a negative cognition.



  • Behavioural activation could be helpful and would be synergistic with cardiac rehab.



  • The relationship with his daughter might be good to explore in IPT.



Social



  • Side room to reduce noise and improve sleep



  • Physical activity groups



  • Peer support



  • Sick note that he can provide to his employer



  • Visits from different family members



  • Music to listen to, even if he can’t play the cello



Author’s Note


Depression following myocardial infarction is common, and the NICE guidance for depression in people with chronic physical health problems is a bit different from other groups. First-line interventions for mild to moderate depression are a structured group physical activity programme, a peer support programme, guided self-help based on CBT principles, or computerised CBT. If depression is moderate to severe, the same algorithm for those with and without chronic physical health problems is used and offers either an antidepressant or a high-intensity psychological therapy (usually CBT or IPT).


Variants on this station could include discussing the diagnosis with a consultant, taking a social history, or including a capacity assessment.



Station 4.4 (90 Seconds)



Candidate Instructions


You are working in a community mental health team. You have been asked to conduct an initial assessment for Mrs Arabella Gresham, a 52-year-old woman who has been referred by her GP, Dr Thorne, for ‘constant, baseless concerns about her health’.


Mrs Gresham has had a wide variety of investigations, including X-rays, ultrasound scans, and CT scans, which have revealed no abnormalities. She recently had liver function tests (which were normal), performed after she raised concerns that her skin was yellowing (although medical professionals did not perceive any change in the colour of her skin or corneas).


Take a brief history from Mrs Gresham and explain the diagnosis and management plan.



Actor Instructions


You are Mrs Arabella Gresham, a 52-year-old housewife. You are feeling very anxious and uncomfortable about this appointment. However, you are happy to answer any questions the doctor may have.


Your problems started six years ago when your mother died from pancreatic cancer. A few months after she died, you started to worry that you might have cancer. You sometimes feel a rumbling in your stomach and worry that this might be a sign. Occasionally, when you look in the mirror you think you are going a bit yellow, which could also mean you have cancer like your mother. You saw your GP, who performed some blood tests, but the normal results did not reassure you.


Since then, you have been worried about lots of diseases. Usually it is a type of cancer that you have read about in a magazine or online. Sometimes it is about other diseases, such as vasculitis, for which you think you might have some of the symptoms, such as tiredness and feeling cold sometimes.


Recently, you have been concerned that you might have an osteosarcoma because sometimes you get pain in your joints. Your GP said it was probably just arthritis, and this reassured you to start with. However, you then became anxious about it again and got an X-ray. This was normal, but you have read that it doesn’t always show up on an X-ray, so you are worrying about it again.


Your worries about your health do affect your life quite a lot. You spend a couple of hours each day reading online about your worries. You probably see your GP every week, and you have gone to the ED a few times in the last year because you thought you had something serious. You like to have tests done, but often you don’t find the results that reassuring.


You have had lots of blood tests and a couple of CT scans in the past. These investigations never seem to make you feel any better, as you worry that they must have missed something. You are under a surgeon because of a strange feeling in your abdomen, but he is useless and won’t operate to see what is going on.



If asked, you may reveal that on one level you do think the worrying is a bit silly, but it’s very hard to stop. It does get you down, but you’re still able to enjoy time with your family.


You live with your husband and your grown-up son. Your husband is a stockbroker, and you think he may be having some financial difficulties at the moment.


You are not sure what is going on, but your husband thinks you are a ‘hypochondriac’. You would like to get help because this is really getting you down. You are interested in an explanation of your problems. If the doctor suggests a form of talking therapy, ask what it would involve.



Feedback Domains



Differential Diagnosis

The candidate considers the following:




  • Hypochondriasis (fear of/preoccupation with having a serious disease, misinterpreting normal sensations, help-seeking behaviour)



  • Somatisation/body distress disorder (excessive attention on symptoms that are distressing)



  • Delusional disorder (fixed, unchangeable belief that is resistant to challenge or alternative explanations)


They establish that hypochondriasis is the most likely diagnosis.



Additional Relevant History

The candidate establishes the timing of the symptoms and relates this to the major stressor of her mother’s death. They explore the impact of symptoms on the patient’s life, the extent of medical investigations and healthcare appointments, and time spent reading about the disorders.



Explanation

The candidate explains that the patient is suffering from hypochondriasis, or health anxiety. They explain that some concern about our health is normal and can be helpful, but it can become a problem when it interferes with our lives. The symptoms include worrying a lot about your health and fearing that you have a serious illness. This drives people to spend a lot of time checking their health. Part of it is the misinterpretation of normal body experiences: excessive focus on a part of the body causes you to notice more, and this can enhance the worry. Sometimes it can be triggered by a stressful event. Overall, there is vicious cycle of health worries, maladaptive behaviours (e.g. checking symptom lists, taking time off work), anxiety, and focus on bodily symptoms.


In terms of treatment, seeking more tests and healthcare appointments is not the answer: it only provides temporary reassurance without addressing the underlying problem.



Management

For mild symptoms, self-help resources are the first-line treatment. Health anxiety responds well to psychological therapy delivered in a CBT model. The candidate should be able to illustrate the basic principles of CBT for health anxiety (e.g. the cognitive approach challenges catastrophising and emotional reasoning, whereas the behavioural approach deals with health-seeking behaviours and neglect of other activities). CBT may be delivered in a group setting, by a book, or online, as well as in traditional individual therapy.



Communication

The candidate doesn’t just provide a generic explanation of hypochondriasis; instead, they relate it back to the symptoms the patient has. In order to illustrate the relationship between thoughts, feelings, and behaviours, a diagram can be very useful.



Author’s Note


The actor has a lot of material in this station, but don’t feel you have failed if you have not managed to elicit all the content. One of the main challenges in this station is to take a very concise history to establish a diagnosis. An explanation of health anxiety is challenging, and it can be helpful to practise a few bullet points that you can deliver in an exam.



Station 4.5 (4 Minutes)



Candidate Instructions


You are working on an acute male inpatient ward. Mr Gerald Palliser is a 25-year-old man with paranoid schizophrenia who is currently under your care. This is his second psychiatric admission and, after two months on the ward, he remains psychotic. He is experiencing persecutory delusions about the prime minister monitoring his phone and the Chancellor of the Exchequer trying to change his money. He hears third-person auditory hallucinations, which he perceives to be other patients on the ward talking about him. He is frequently verbally abusive and occasionally physically violent.


On his first admission, he was treated with aripiprazole and seemed to improve, but since then he has relapsed despite reasonable compliance. During this admission, he was initially treated with olanzapine without effect. He is currently being treated with haloperidol 10 mg BD, but his psychosis does not seem to have improved. He is also being treated with clonazepam 1 mg QDS and promethazine 25 mg BD.


After a discussion in ward round, a decision has been made to initiate treatment with clozapine. This will be cross-titrated with the haloperidol.


Gerald’s mother, Mrs Glencora Palliser, would like to speak to you about her son’s treatment plan.


Explain the current plan to Mrs Palliser and answer her questions. You have Gerald’s permission to disclose details of his treatment.



Actor Instructions


You are Mrs Glencora Palliser, the mother of Gerald Palliser. You are worried about your son but keen to hear what the doctor has to say.


Your son became unwell about three years ago when he started talking about trees speaking to him. He seemed to get better with a medication called aripiprazole during his first admission, but since then it doesn’t seem to have been doing much for him.


During this admission, you have seen Gerald more unwell than he has ever been before, and he seems to have gotten worse rather than better. You are aware that he has been treated with two different antipsychotic medications already during this admission, but you do not know their names. You know that the doctors and nurses are trying to help your son, but you are concerned that they seem to be making less progress than on Gerald’s previous admission.


You are open to trying a new treatment, but you want to know quite a lot of detail about it first. You have not heard of clozapine before, but you hope it is not an awful old-fashioned drug that would turn Gerald into a zombie.


If clozapine is discussed, you would like to know the answers to the following questions:




  • If it is so good, why hasn’t it been tried before?



  • What are the side effects?



  • What can be done if it causes him to put on weight?



  • Won’t clozapine mean that he dies young with all the side effects it causes?



  • Is there any monitoring that needs to take place?



  • How often will he need to have blood tests?



  • How long does it take to work?



  • In the past, doctors have discussed with you the possibility of giving Gerald an injection to help him take his medicines. Would this be possible with clozapine?



  • He seems to be on a lot of medications at the moment, and clozapine would just be another one. Is there any way we could reduce his medications?


You are keen to hear the answers to these questions and, if the answers sound reasonable, you agree that clozapine treatment may be in Gerald’s best interests.



Feedback Domains



Management

The candidate should be able to cover the following details of treatment with clozapine. The actor will prompt with questions.


Clozapine is an effective antipsychotic medication that is recommended for patients for whom two other antipsychotics have not proven effective.


Common side effects are constipation, drowsiness, dizziness, fast heart rate, and increased saliva production. Many of these improve with time. These common side effects can all be monitored, and medications can be given to alleviate constipation and hypersalivation if necessary.


Severe side effects are a very low white blood cell count (meaning that a person is very vulnerable to infections), seizures, bowel obstruction, and heart problems (myocarditis, cardiomyopathy). These are not common, but they are extremely important to consider because they can occasionally be fatal.


To reduce the risks of severe side effects, monitoring is necessary. Some monitoring is in common with all antipsychotics (i.e. blood pressure, BMI, blood lipids, HbA1c). Some are more specific to clozapine. In particular, patients and carers must be aware to seek medical attention if constipation develops or if there are any signs of an infection. An ECG will also be performed. There is a mandated programme of blood count monitoring, which must occur weekly for the first 18 weeks of treatment, fortnightly for weeks 19 to 52, and monthly thereafter.


The dose of clozapine must be titrated up over approximately two weeks. Response can be seen after this time, but in some patients, it can take several months.


There is no long-acting injectable form of clozapine, so it is important that Gerald is able to take tablets in the long term. There is a short-acting clozapine injection, but this is only for short-term use.


A cross-titration from one antipsychotic to another is in progress. As the dose of clozapine is increased, haloperidol will be decreased. Once Gerald is established on clozapine, haloperidol may be stopped. If clozapine is effective in treating Gerald’s illness, it may be possible to discontinue his other medications.



Communication

The candidate establishes Mrs Palliser’s understanding about her son’s condition and treatment early in the consultation (though they do not spend more than a minute on this, as it is not the primary purpose of the station). This should allow the candidate to neatly link to the next steps in treatment. If she is anxious about his lack of progress so far, this allows the candidate an opportunity to empathise with her concerns and suggest that this next phase of treatment should help address her worries. The candidate offers a basic explanation of clozapine treatment, stopping periodically to check understanding. They leave at least two minutes to address any questions that have not already been answered.



Author’s Note


When explaining clozapine therapy, it is common to discuss haematological monitoring, but do not omit the other equally important aspects of monitoring, particularly vigilance for infections and constipation.



Station 4.6 (90 Seconds)



Candidate Instructions


Mr John Bold is a 34-year-old man who self-presented to the ED in order to view his medical records. He is not known to psychiatric services, but nursing staff report that he is thought to have a mental illness. He is referred to the mental health liaison team for an assessment because he is behaving bizarrely.


Conduct an examination of Mr Bold’s mental state.



Actor Instructions


You are Mr John Bold, a 34-year-old man. You are rather dishevelled and very agitated. You are wandering around when the doctor enters. You speak quickly, and it is sometimes difficult for the doctor to get a word in. You move from one topic to another without the connection between topics being obvious. You are irritable and are sometimes distracted by things in the room. However, if the doctor is willing to listen, you are prepared to sit down after about a minute. You respond best to simple, brief questions; you lose concentration if the doctor tries to talk at length.


The main thing you want to talk about is how you have a mission to find all corruption ‘anywhere, everywhere, in the whole world’. You believe that there is a conspiracy involving the health service, Hiram’s Hospital, and the church. Between them, they are managing to embezzle ‘a million thousand billion pounds’. You are concerned because you have a lot of money (you own all of Europe), so you believe that they will try to take money from you. Consequently, you have come to the hospital to find your medical records to prevent them from using these against you.


You have contacted lawyers in the last few days in order to take action against this conspiracy involving bishops and the hospital. You have also written to newspapers, but they have not published your letters. You have tried to involve a woman called Eleanor who you think loves you, although you don’t have any evidence for this – you just know it.


You believe that you are the only person who is able to get to the bottom of this conspiracy because you have special powers, such as being a genius, being able to see people’s souls, and being the greatest supermodel ever.



If asked, you have been diagnosed with ‘manic depression’ in the past, but you think that’s all rubbish and you are ‘the perfect human being’. You deny taking any recreational drugs, but you have not been taking the lithium you were prescribed for the last five months. You have been feeling like this for the last couple of weeks.



If asked, you have hardly been sleeping (because you don’t need sleep anymore), you have only eaten one chocolate bar in the last two days, and you think your clothes are looser than they used to be. If asked about your libido, state that you feel that you need to have sex, and that a million women want to be fertilised by your sperm.


You have no thoughts about harming yourself or others. You have a council flat elsewhere in the country, but you came here in order to stop the conspiracy. You have not been hearing voices or seeing anything unusual.



Feedback Domains



Risk Assessment

Certain risks are suggested by the history and should be enquired about by the candidate:




  • Harm to others – The patient suggests that he is angry about a conspiracy; therefore, the candidate would be expected to check whether he wants to harm the conspirators. The patient also suggests a delusional belief about a woman being in love with him (see Station 8.4), so the candidate is advised to check whether he would seek revenge if she rejects his advances.



  • Self-neglect – The patient’s lack of oral intake, accompanied by weight loss, is concerning.



Additional Relevant History

The candidate will not have many opportunities for specific questions, so they must choose the most important ones, namely:




  • Features of mania. such as reduced sleep, reduced appetite, weight loss, and increased libido



  • Recreational drug use



  • Past psychiatric history



Communication

These are some of the most important aspects of this station. The candidate ensures the following:




  • They remain calm and avoid confrontation.



  • They encourage the patient to sit down.



  • They speak clearly and succinctly – long explanations will cause the patient to lose concentration.



  • They are willing to listen but are occasionally firm about asking important questions.



Station 4.7 (90 Seconds)



Candidate Instructions


You are working in a community mental health team. You had been due to complete an initial assessment with Ms Lily Dale, a 21-year-old woman who had been referred for low mood and poor oral intake. However, she has not attended and instead her mother, Mrs Mary Dale, has come.


Take a collateral history from Mrs Dale about her daughter, Lily. Lily has given permission for you to speak to her mother.



Actor Instructions


You are Mrs Mary Dale, mother of 21-year-old Lily. Lily was due to have an initial appointment today with the community mental health team, which you have been eager for her to attend. However, this morning Lily said she just couldn’t face coming, so you decided to come on your own. You are very apologetic about this and are very grateful that the doctor has agreed to see you. You are worried about your daughter and keen for her to get all the help she can.


Lily was doing really well up until about a year ago. She was studying English literature at university and had a lovely boyfriend called Rupert. However, Rupert broke up with her this time last year, and she’s been heartbroken ever since. Initially, you just thought that she would get over it, but it’s been a long time now and, if anything, she’s just gotten worse.


You took Lily to see the GP a few weeks ago because she is eating so little. She says that food just tastes so bland now, and she’s not interested in it. You manage to get her to eat a small breakfast (e.g. a couple of slices of toast), but she then won’t eat anything until the evening, and even then, she only finishes half a meal. It doesn’t seem like she is trying to lose weight; she just isn’t interested in food. You estimate she has lost about a stone in weight over the last six months.


Her mood is low almost all of the time. She used to enjoy seeing friends, but she doesn’t seem to have any interest in them anymore. She had to drop out of university because she said she couldn’t concentrate and that her memory ‘wasn’t up to it’. She spends most of her day lying in bed, and she doesn’t seem to have the ‘get-up-and-go’ she used to.



If specifically asked, you reveal that Lily appears to move and speak more slowly than she used to. Her sleep is dreadful – she goes to bed at around 10 p.m., but she can’t fall asleep until after midnight. Despite this, she wakes up really early, between five and six in the morning, and cannot get back to sleep.


Lily doesn’t seem to be particularly anxious, but she does seem to feel guilty a lot of the time. You don’t think she did anything wrong in the relationship, but she is constantly blaming herself for the break-up. Related to this, she thinks that she is a worthless individual, which doesn’t make sense because she has everything to live for. She doesn’t see it that way, though, and thinks that she has no future ahead of her.



If specifically asked, Lily does talk about life not being worth living and wishing she were dead. However, she has never mentioned wanting to kill herself, and she has never done anything to harm herself. She has never expressed any violent thoughts toward her ex-boyfriend.


Lily has never had any episodes like this in the past. She used to binge-drink quite a lot when at university, but she doesn’t drink much now. She doesn’t use illegal drugs at the moment, but you’re not sure what she used at university.



If specifically asked, Lily’s father had depression and committed suicide when Lily was 13.



Feedback Domains



Knowledge

The candidate efficiently elicits the features of depression: low mood, anhedonia, anergia, sleep disturbance, appetite/weight change, and cognitive disturbance. It is also possible for the candidate to explore the patient’s thought content with a collateral history, noting the negative views about the self, world, and future, as well as guilt.



Differential Diagnosis

The main differential diagnosis is between depression and an eating disorder. A few questions about her eating, exploring her dietary intake, her attitude to food, and her attitude to body image should reveal that this is not a primary eating disorder.



Risk Assessment



  • Suicide/self-harm – It is important that the candidate elicits the family history of suicide.



  • Self-neglect – This can be explored with a basic history of dietary intake.



  • To others – The candidate considers the possibility of violence toward the ex-boyfriend.



Station 4.8 (4 Minutes)



Candidate Instructions


You are working on an acute psychiatric ward where a 54-year-old man, Mr Josiah Crawley, has just been admitted. Prior to admission, he was being treated under the home treatment team (HTT) for depression. The HTT had been particularly concerned about Mr Crawley’s poor self-care and limited oral intake.


Unfortunately, Mr Crawley was unable to engage with the HTT, and they were having difficulty gaining access to his accommodation for assessments. Consequently, he was admitted to the hospital for further assessment and treatment.


The HTT report that Mr Crawley’s recent compliance with his prescribed medication has been poor and that prior to admission he had been spending most of the day sitting in a dirty armchair in his living room.


He has a background of recurrent depression that has required ECT in the past.


Past Medical History




  • Hypertension


Medications




  • Sertraline 150 mg OD



  • Mirtazapine 15 mg ON



  • Ramipril 5 mg OD


Please assess Mr Crawley’s mental state.



Actor Instructions


You are Mr Josiah Crawley, a 54-year-old man. You are feeling very low and anxious. When the candidate enters, you are sitting down, anxiously stroking your face. You do not look up when the candidate enters, and you do not speak initially. After about 30 seconds, you say, ‘Oh dear, oh dear’. When you speak, your voice is quiet and you sometimes trail off at the end of sentences. You only give short answers to questions.


If the candidate gives you space, you gradually open up. You are worried about a cheque you wrote for a plumber when you were in your 20s. You think you may have misspelt the name of the person on it, preventing the plumber from getting their income. You think that you are therefore an evil person. It is an awful situation because you have no money at all to pay this plumber now. Your wife keeps saying that you have money, but you don’t believe her.


You are feeling very low, and nothing gives you pleasure anymore. You do not know when you last slept. You see no point in eating or drinking, and you don’t know when you last did either.



If specifically asked, you do not want to end your life because you are already dead and are in hell because of what you have done. You might have died from an awful illness, such as brain cancer, but you are not sure. You sometimes hear the devil calling to you, but you don’t know what he says.



Feedback Domains



Knowledge

The candidate identifies that this is a case of psychotic depression. They screen for nihilistic delusions, including poverty, illness, and Cotard’s syndrome (i.e. belief that they are dead). They also remember to screen for hallucinations and to check for depressive symptoms.



Risk Assessment

The candidate screens for suicidal ideation and, importantly, for self-neglect. The main risk to be elicited in this scenario is poor oral intake.



Communication



  • The candidate approaches the patient in a gentle and sympathetic manner.



  • They leave lots of time to allow the patient to respond.



  • They do not expect the patient to give full answers.



  • They are encouraging when the patient does speak.



Author’s Note


The key to this station is getting the patient to open up by using effective communication skills. This may take some time, and some candidates will get nervous during this period. However, it is quite common for actors’ instructions to include an initial minute or two when they are not encouraged to engage.



Station 4.9 (90 Seconds)



Candidate Instructions


You are working in a community mental health team. Major Jim Pountney, a 45-year-old man, has been referred by his GP for difficulties coming to terms with some of his experiences whilst on a tour of duty in Afghanistan.


Take a history in order to arrive at Major Pountney’s diagnosis.



Actor Instructions


You are Major Jim Pountney, a 45-year-old officer in the British Army. You are very ‘on edge’. You are constantly anxious and are unable to relax throughout the consultation.


You joined the Army after graduating from university and have been a soldier ever since. You have enjoyed your career and have been successful. However, two years ago, when you were on a tour in Helmand Province in Afghanistan, something awful happened.



If the candidate asks you sensitively, you may reveal that you were part of a convoy moving between two bases when an IED (improvised explosive device) blew up underneath the vehicle in front of you. Two men were killed and a woman was seriously injured. You were not hurt yourself. You don’t quite remember what happened next, and the next week or so is a bit of a blur.


After a few days, you started to have nightmares. It was the same dream over and over again in which you were riding along in the convoy before the IED exploded. You then started to experience something similar during the day – you would start to feel as if you were back in the moment; at times, you would even start acting as if the event were happening all over again. Initially, this tended to be triggered by travelling in armoured vehicles, but over the last 12 months it has started occurring indiscriminately. Vivid pictures of the explosion and the bodies come into your mind sometimes; you can’t get rid of them, and they are very distressing.


You find that you are quite on edge these days. Any loud noise, such as a door slamming or fireworks going off, can make you really jump. Additionally, you have noticed that you seem unable to experience emotions in the ways you used to. You know your wife and children care for you, but you lack the ability to engage emotionally with them. You find it very difficult to sleep at night and often don’t drop off until about 2:00 a.m.


Initially, you kept working after the traumatic event, but you have been off on sick leave for the last six months, partly because of the stress and partly because you have been unable to concentrate. You find yourself constantly mulling over what happened and wondering whether it was your fault.


The stress has had a massive effect on your life. You are not sure if you will ever be able to go back to work. It has also meant it is harder for you to pursue your interests in local politics. Your family are very sympathetic, but it feels as though you are still away on tour – there is a sense in which you are just not with them. You are a bit more irritable, but you are never verbally aggressive or violent. You avoid travelling because being in a vehicle reminds you of what happened and gives you flashbacks.



If specifically asked about alcohol or how you cope, you may state that the one thing that does seem to help you relax and engage with people is drinking alcohol. Over the last couple of years, your alcohol use has escalated from drinking a couple of beers when out with friends to drinking about five cans of lager each night on your own. Alcohol also seems to help you get to sleep. You do not use any illegal drugs.


You would not say that your mood is low, but rather ‘just numb’. You find it difficult to enjoy things because of this. You constantly feel sleep-deprived, but your energy levels are fine when you get out of the house. You do not tend to worry much about things unrelated to your traumatic experiences. You have never had a panic attack. You want to get better and do not want to end your life. You do have access to firearms, but you have never considered using them in a civilian context.



Feedback Domains



Knowledge

The candidate elicits symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder, using the mnemonic TRAVEL:




  • Trauma: severe +/– amnesia



  • Reliving: nightmares, flashbacks (i.e. feeling or acting as if the event is recurring), and vivid mental images



  • Avoidance: Memories or situations



  • Vigilance: insomnia, irritability, angry outbursts, difficulty concentrating, exaggerated startle



  • Emotional numbing: feeling of detachment from others, lack of pleasure



  • Length of time: onset usually within one month and persisting for at least one month


In addition, the candidate considers the following:




  • Rumination over event



  • Guilt


The candidate asks about the impact of symptoms on the patient’s life, including occupation, relationships, and hobbies.



Risk Assessment

Being in the armed forces and having access to firearms increase the risks to both self and others. The candidate should briefly enquire about these.



Differential Diagnosis

The candidate briefly screens for depression and anxiety.



Additional Relevant History

It is common to use alcohol and other recreational drugs as a coping mechanism.



Communication

The candidate approaches the trauma carefully. It is useful to have some idea of how objectively dangerous the trauma was because a diagnosis of PTSD requires it to be ‘exceptionally threatening or catastrophic’. However, the candidate avoids re-traumatising the patient in a very brief consultation. One approach would be to state something like, ‘I know it might be very difficult to think about what happened, but is it possible for you to give me just a bit of an idea of what took place?’



Author’s Note


This is a quite straightforward station, as it essentially just requires a history of PTSD. However, this means that quite a lot of detail is expected in the questioning in order to elicit the many facets of the psychopathology.



Station 4.10 (90 Seconds)



Candidate Instructions


You are working out of hours providing liaison psychiatry cover to an ED. Mr Ferdinand Lopez, a 30-year-old man, was brought in by police last night after a staff member raised concerns about his behaviour on the platform of a busy railway station.


Conduct a risk assessment of Mr Ferdinand Lopez.



Actor Instructions


You are Mr Ferdinand Lopez, a 30-year-old taxi driver. You feel very stressed, but you are willing to speak. You have come to the end of your tether and do not know what to do next.


The relationship with your girlfriend, Emily, has been rocky for a few months. You would probably have broken up if it weren’t for the nine-month-old baby girl you have together. You argue frequently, but there has never been physical violence. Your daughter is getting on really well.


One of your ex-girlfriends, Tara, is due to be in town this week, and you had arranged to meet up with her. Yesterday, Emily suggested in a half-joking way that you were cheating on her with Tara. This made you very upset and angry because you have been working really hard to keep the relationship with Emily together.


In a moment of extreme distress and frustration last night, you spontaneously decided to end your life by throwing yourself in front of one of the trains at a nearby station. You had not planned this in advance, but you scribbled a note to Emily on your way to the station to tell her how hurt you felt. You loitered around on the platform waiting for a fast train. A staff member came up to you because she was concerned about the way you were behaving. As she tried to engage you, you threatened to jump onto the rails. A few passers-by managed to stop you and hold you until the police arrived.



If specifically asked, you reveal that you drank half a bottle of vodka last night before going to the train station. You felt low before that, but you don’t think you would have done anything like this without the alcohol.


Looking back on it now, you think it was all a bit stupid really and are pleased that people intervened to stop you. You don’t want to end your life anymore because you see things a bit more positively. Emily has come in to visit, and you have made up.


You have never tried to end your life before. However, about five years ago, when you were evicted from the flat you were living in for smoking cannabis, you self-harmed by cutting the backs of your arms with a pencil sharpener blade.


In the future, you want to have another child and have ambitions to set up your own taxi firm. You hope you won’t do anything like this again, but you could imagine it happening if things do not work out with Emily. You would be willing to stay a bit longer in the ED, see your GP, or talk to someone about what happened.


In general, your mood is a bit ‘up and down’. You find that even small things can send you into a downward spiral where you ‘can’t think straight’. However, you usually feel fine the next day. You are able to enjoy things like going out for the night. Your energy and sleep are generally fine, but they are impacted by having a baby.



If asked, you admit to being quite an impulsive person. You get into arguments quite easily but never physical fights. You don’t tend to worry about people leaving you without support. You don’t hear voices or get paranoid. You tend to binge-drink, and you use cannabis occasionally.



Feedback Domains



Differential Diagnosis

The diagnosis is not entirely clear from this scenario. The following should be considered by the candidate: depression, acute stress reaction, acute alcohol intoxication, and emotionally unstable personality disorder.



Risk Assessment

The main risk for the candidate to consider is a further suicide attempt. They are advised to explore the following:




  • Precipitation: triggers, use of alcohol or drugs, planning, preparatory acts (writing a note, making a will)



  • Method: method (including likelihood of success), perceived fatality of the attempt, methods to avoid detection



  • After the attempt: reflections on attempt, feelings about still being alive, current suicidal ideation and plans


Additionally, the candidate should consider the following:




  • Absconding: whether he will leave the ED before any assessment has been concluded



  • Self-harm without suicidal intent



  • Harm to his girlfriend and baby



Additional Relevant History



  • Drug and alcohol use



  • Personality (impulsivity)



  • Social environment: particularly the current relationship and employment



Author’s Note


The diagnosis is not clear in this scenario, so it is a lesson in being able to tolerate uncertainty. The patient is certainly very impulsive, and this elevates the risk. The use of alcohol prior to the attempt should be identified because this alters the risk and represents a therapeutic target.



Station 4.11 (90 Seconds)



Candidate Instructions


You are working in an ED. Mr Obadiah Slope, a 38-year-old man with known paranoid schizophrenia, has been brought to the hospital by staff at the hostel where he resides. They state that he has been hearing voices and behaving ‘oddly’. They are worried he is relapsing. He is known to a community mental health team and has recently been switched from risperidone to aripiprazole 10 mg.


Conduct a mental state examination of Mr Slope.



Actor Instructions


You are Mr Obadiah Slope, a 38-year-old man with a history of schizophrenia. You are suspicious of what is happening and a bit unclear about what is going on. You are willing to speak to the doctor, but you show very little emotion. Occasionally, you stop and stay quiet for a few seconds, as you are hearing something others cannot hear. You sometimes say things that do not logically follow from each other.


You first noticed something strange was happening a couple of weeks ago. You realised that unbeknownst to everyone else, there was a baby in the hostel who is actually very old – hundreds of years old in fact. You also discovered that there is ‘energy’ in your body that can overcome evil.


You are concerned that others can read your mind and take thoughts out of your head. You are unclear why they might do this, but you have been reading about issues like Armageddon, dark matter, and the anti-Christ that all seem to relate to this.


Most of these revelations just came to you suddenly – you just knew they were true. You became suspicious about the hostel manager a few days ago when you saw somebody cycling on the pavement.



If asked about hearing voices, you are initially reluctant to disclose, stating that they are ‘personal’. However, if gently pressed, you describe hearing a large family called the Quiverfuls talking about you. You don’t understand why you can hear them even if you go outside. They say things like ‘I hate this guy’, ‘He is a loser’, and ‘Why do you hang around with him?’ The Quiverfuls seem to know what you are thinking and sometimes comment on what you are doing. You do not hear them all the time, but they have been around a lot recently. They do not tell you what to do.


You do not want to harm anybody. You have no thoughts of harming yourself – you want to live so you can get to the bottom of all this.


Your mood is ‘just the same – not up, not down’. You do not see anything abnormal, but you do sometimes feel as if people are moving your arms for you. You know you are in the hospital, whom you are speaking to, and what time it is.


You know you have been diagnosed with schizophrenia in the past, but you don’t believe it really. You certainly don’t think you are mentally unwell at the moment. You have not taken any drugs. You are eating and drinking normally.



Feedback Domains



Knowledge

This station assesses the ability to perform a thorough examination of mental status in the context of psychosis. The candidate elicits or enquires about the following:




  • Auditory hallucinations: frequency, verbal versus non-verbal, content, person (1st person, 2nd person, 3rd person), identity of voices



  • Hallucinations in other modalities: visual, somatosensory, olfactory, gustatory



  • Passivity phenomena



  • Thought alienation: thought insertion, withdrawal, and broadcast



  • Delusions: content (e.g. paranoia, grandiosity, nihilism, identity), how fixed they are, aetiology (e.g. based on hallucinations, delusional perception, or arising from nowhere), systemisation, logicality



  • Mood



  • Cognition: orientation and attention



  • Insight



Additional Relevant History

The candidate screens briefly for substance misuse.



Risk Assessment

The candidate briefly screens for risks to self and others along with self-neglect.



Communication

In the early stages of the interview, it is helpful if the candidate encourages the patient to talk as much as possible to elicit the extent of the delusions and hallucinations. Thereafter, the candidate is able to direct questioning as necessary to establish specific features of the psychopathology. They try to use the cues the patient gives, such as asking them why they pause sometimes.



Station 4.12 (90 Seconds)



Candidate Instructions


You are working on an acute inpatient unit. Your colleague has asked you to review Mrs Agatha Achebe, who is a 31-year-old woman with a long-established diagnosis of paranoid schizophrenia. She was switched from aripiprazole to haloperidol three weeks ago, but she is now ‘non-adherent’ with her medication, stating that it is ‘driving her mad’. Your colleague has been unable to convince her to take the medication.


Please explore Mrs Achebe’s concerns regarding her current medication; once you have identified her main concern, please attempt to explore possible solutions.



Actor Instructions


You are 31-year-old Mrs Agatha Achebe. You have been diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia since you were 23, and this is your second inpatient admission. Due to concerns that aripiprazole was not fully controlling your symptoms, you have been switched to haloperidol. The dosage has been steadily increased to 15 mg over 24 hours and has been effective, insofar as you are free of psychotic symptoms.


Unfortunately, over the last few days you have noticed that you are struggling with a feeling of ‘ants in your pants’; you are unable to sit still for more than 10 minutes at a time before a horrible feeling of tension and restlessness (mainly in your legs) compels you to get up and move. This sensation is at its worst when you are having to stand still (e.g. when queueing for medication). Subjectively, you feel anxious, tense, and generally ‘awful’ (in a way that you struggle to put into words). During your discussion with the doctor, you struggle to sit still at all and feel the urge to pace, cross your legs, and roll on the balls of your feet. At times, you must stand up, walk a few steps, and sit back down again. You have no feelings of stiffness, tremor, or other EPSEs.


This feeling is getting in the way of your ability to sleep, eat, and enjoy anything in life. You were worried you were relapsing, but this feels very different.



If asked directly, you cannot imagine continuing like this, and if there is no way of getting rid of this feeling, you are confident you would not want to live anymore. Presently, you do not have any active desire or plans to take your own life.


You are otherwise managing well on the ward and are keen to ensure your mental illness is well managed with a medication you can take in the longer term. You have no other psychiatric symptomatology (no depressive, anxious, or psychotic symptoms), and you have no plans to harm others.


Your main concern is that you are taken seriously, and that your doctor will work with you to help find an appropriate solution.



If you feel that you are being dismissed, or that the doctor is only concerned with ensuring you take your medication as prescribed, you will become irritable and withdrawn, hoping to discuss this with the consultant as opposed to the doctor in front of you.



Feedback Domains



Knowledge

The candidate identifies that the issue at hand is akathisia, a common and potentially disabling side effect of psychotropic medication. The candidate is able to identify the core features of akathisia (i.e. objective restlessness; subjective feelings of ‘tension’, which are unpleasant and may be more apparent in certain parts of the body such as the legs).


The candidate disentangles the symptoms of akathisia from anxiety, primary low mood, and worsening of psychotic symptoms through a brief but appropriate review of symptoms. A key feature, and one that may potentially lead an otherwise successful candidate to fail, is the risk of suicide. It is important that thoughts of self-harm are elicited and that they are attributed to the akathisia, as opposed to another cause (e.g. low mood).


If called upon to examine the patient, the candidate should ask the patient to stand up and be as still as they can; the candidate should then observe them for signs of restlessness and assess for EPSEs (see Station 4.41).


The candidate offers sensible options to the patient to improve their symptoms; this may include a reduction in the present antipsychotic, a switch to an alternative agent, or adding an appropriate adjunct (e.g. propranolol or mirtazapine).



Communication

A key task in this station is to quickly form a collaborative relationship with the patient. The candidate does not minimise the side effects reported and avoids ‘convincing’ the patient to continue with the current treatment.


The candidate elicits and empathises with how unpleasant the reported side effects are and demonstrates a willingness to explore alternative options.



Author’s Note


It is unlikely that you will be required to take a history, examine the patient, and offer advice for treating akathisia in one station. However, a combination of two of these is certainly possible, and it is worth practising all three, just in case.


A key feature in this station is taking akathisia seriously, as it is often missed in clinical practice and the consequences of this (in terms of misery, medication non-adherence, and worse) can be significant.



Station 4.13 (4 Minutes)



Candidate Instructions


You are working in a busy psychiatric outpatient department. You are scheduled to see Corporal Ernie Wratten, a 29-year-old soldier, for a follow-up appointment.


Corporal Wratten was recently placed on medical leave from the Army due to his intense desire to wash his hands and clothes for hours at a time. Your consultant recently completed an initial assessment and made a diagnosis of obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD). Corporal Wratten’s Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Score was 25/40, suggestive of ‘severe OCD’. Corporal Wratten has returned to the clinic today to discuss the diagnosis and learn about potential treatment options.


Briefly explain the diagnosis of OCD and outline the treatment options for this disorder; you do not need to take a history or assess risk.



Actor Instructions


You are Corporal Ernie Wratten, a 29-year-old soldier. You have attended clinic today to discuss your recent diagnosis of OCD. You present as calm and settled, and are happy to engage with the candidate.


You are in agreement with the diagnosis of OCD, having read up about it online. You know that you have ‘bad thoughts’ that come into your mind again and again, despite your best efforts. These thoughts make you anxious because they are both upsetting and, you feel, absurd. You know that ‘giving in’ to the desire to wash your hands will make the thoughts come back stronger, but you find them ‘uncontrollable’. In your case, you are embarrassed, as you can’t stop thinking about being infested with lice and scabies (which you know is not true). Washing your hands and clothes offers some relief, but this doesn’t last long.


You are keen for any help available, but you are unsure if anything will work or if ‘people with this problem ever get better’. You are unsure about talking therapy, as you worry the doctor will just ask you about your (perfectly happy) childhood, but you are willing to consider all options.



If asked directly about your views on OCD, explain that you fear you developed it because you were anxious as a child and that this is ‘just who you are’.


If given the opportunity to ask questions, you ask that while you agree with the diagnosis, you wonder whether maybe you could finally get rid of these thoughts if you washed your hands and clothes ‘properly’ (you do not know what this means), or whether you could maybe have a course of antibiotics ‘just in case’. You are receptive to explanations why this would not be helpful. You are unsure about taking an antidepressant because you are not depressed, and you have heard that antidepressants are ‘addictive’.



Feedback Domains



Knowledge

The candidate demonstrates an understanding that OCD consists of ‘obsessions’ (i.e. recurrent, intrusive, unpleasant thoughts, though they do not need to use these words precisely) and ‘compulsions’ (i.e. repeated behaviours intended to alleviate the anxiety induced by these obsessions). They explain that obsessional thoughts are very common; they can often provoke anxiety, shame, or disgust. Compulsions are often utilised to manage this anxiety; by performing compulsions, the anxiety is reduced in the short term but is maintained in the longer term.


CBT, utilising exposure response prevention (ERP), is the psychological mainstay of OCD treatment (see Station 10.3). This involves inducing anxiety within a therapeutic setting and allowing the resulting anxiety to terminate on its own, without recourse to compulsions. Doing this repeatedly will reduce the frequency of obsessions and the intensity of subsequent anxiety. It is a practical, time-limited therapy that focuses on the here and now.


The mainstay of pharmacological treatment is with SSRIs. These are effective in treating OCD; however, they are associated with side effects (e.g. nausea, mild agitation, sexual dysfunction). SSRIs are not addictive; however, they can be associated with ‘withdrawal’ symptoms (i.e. unpleasant symptoms upon stopping an SSRI). This is known as SSRI discontinuation syndrome. It can be mitigated by gradual withdrawal of the medication under medical supervision.


CBT and SSRIs work well in combination, and together, most people’s symptoms improve and many are ‘cured’. This combination is advocated by NICE, and there is a strong evidence base for both psychotherapy and medication in OCD.



Communication

The candidate clearly explains the relevant information without resorting to jargon. They use techniques such as summarising, checking understanding, and offering opportunities to ask questions. They explore a patient’s understanding of their illness and treatment options, and address specific concerns the patient may have.



Author’s Note


OCD is relatively easy to explain and is therefore a highly examinable topic. It is also a pleasant opportunity to discuss a condition with a high treatment success rate. It is important to normalise symptoms and emphasise hope for recovery, as those with anxiety disorders will often suffer with their symptoms for years before seeking professional help.


It is worth having a broad understanding of CBT and how SSRIs are prescribed, as both are first-line treatments in several different psychiatric conditions. This will allow you to approach a number of possible CASC stations.



Station 4.14 (90 Seconds)



Candidate Instructions


You are working in an outpatient clinic. You have been asked to see Mr Henry Little, a 34-year-old accountant who has been experiencing ‘sudden and unbearable terrors’ that are making his life ‘completely miserable’.


Take a history of these symptoms with a view to reaching a diagnosis.



Actor Instructions


You are 34-year-old Mr Henry Little. You are generally calm and engaged with the process. You are unsure whether you should be seeing a psychiatrist, as you initially thought your symptoms were due to ‘heart problems’. You are worried you won’t be taken seriously by this doctor.


You have been experiencing intermittent ‘bouts of terror’ for the last three years. These occur roughly once a week, with no obvious trigger. They feel ‘indescribably awful’, as if ‘I’m going to die’, and last for roughly 15–30 minutes. The first symptom you notice is your mouth getting dry, and then quickly your heart begins to thud in your chest, you feel as though you can’t breathe, you become dizzy, and – weirdly – your lips and fingers tingle. You worry that you’ll die if the episode doesn’t pass in time, which only heightens your distress, as you feel there must be something medically wrong. The main feeling is one of ‘absolute terror’, but when things get very bad, it feels as though ‘the world isn’t real anymore’, which makes you worry you’ve gone mad. You feel the intense urge to get out of whatever situation you are in.


As a result of these episodes, you socialise less and have avoided taking on a management role at work (for fear you’ll have an attack whilst supervising others). In general, you wouldn’t describe yourself as an anxious person; you manage well in crowds as well as when socialising one-to-one. There has been no obvious traumatic event triggering these symptoms.



If asked, you have no intrusive thoughts or ‘tics’/habits/repetitive behaviours. Your mood is generally good, and you enjoy life. You would never consider harming yourself. You have never heard voices when no one else is around or had any other ‘weird’ experiences. You are not prescribed any regular medications, and you do not use illicit substances.


You recently went to your GP for a ‘full check-up’, including a 24-hour cardiac monitor and blood tests (including thyroid function and full blood count) – nothing untoward was found.



Feedback Domains



Knowledge

The candidate elicits the core features of panic disorder: random, unpredictable, discreet episodes of panic associated with somatic symptoms (e.g. dry mouth, palpitations, sweatiness, tingling sensations, rapid breathing) and negative cognitions, especially catastrophisation (e.g. this patient has a fear of dying, of losing control, and of going mad). They assess what impact the disorder has on the patient’s life (e.g. what is happening at work or in their private life?).



Differential Diagnosis

The candidate explores at least three other anxiety problems (e.g. asking after obsessions and habitual behaviours for OCD; difficulties in smaller social situations for social anxiety; pervasive anxiety symptoms for generalised anxiety disorder). They also assess the patient’s mood state (by asking about mood directly, as well as enquiring after problems with anhedonia, energy, and sleep) and screen for psychotic symptoms (e.g. auditory hallucinations, delusions, and thought disorder).


The candidate remembers to enquire about co-morbid health conditions, illicit substance use, and prescribed medications to rule out these as potential causes for the patient’s symptoms.



Communication

The candidate validates the patient’s experience by acknowledging the distress and potential embarrassment shown by the patient. They ask open questions, allowing scope for the patient to give clear information about their experience; only later do they ask more direct questions.



Author’s Note


Panic attack disorder is a relatively straightforward topic and rewards familiarity with the anxiety disorders as a whole, to allow rapid exclusion of other anxiety problems. A focus on the patient’s subjective experience, as well as what they attribute these symptoms to, is key.


You may be asked to offer a brief overview of the CBT model for panic disorder or a brief overview of treatment options.



Station 4.15 (90 Seconds)



Candidate Instructions


You have been asked to review 45-year-old Ms Clarissa Jones. She has been treated for a depressive episode for the last eight months by her GP. She has tried a number of medications (fluoxetine for three months, citalopram for three months, and currently mirtazapine for two months) and has attempted psychological therapy.


Please take a history of Ms Jones to assess for treatment-resistant depression and briefly discuss appropriate management strategies.



Actor Instructions


You are Ms Clarissa Jones, a 45-year-old woman. You are feeling low and hopeless. This is your third bout of depression: you had a three-month episode in your late teens, which resolved spontaneously, and another in your mid-30s, which responded to fluoxetine and CBT co-therapy. This is the first time you have suffered an episode that is as bad and as prolonged as this.


For the last eight months, you have felt low in mood every day. This is associated with tearfulness and a marked feeling of distress, which is worse in the mornings. You do not enjoy the things you used to (e.g. spending time with your supportive husband, reading) and you lack motivation, spending whole days in bed. You struggle to sleep and wake around 5:00 a.m. each day; you lack appetite and have lost at least a stone. You are beginning to lose hope in ever recovering.


You have no thoughts of ending your life – you are deeply religious and to harm yourself would be a ‘grave sin’ (although you often fantasise about being caught up in an accident or a terrorist attack). You have never wanted to harm others. You feel guilty about being unproductive during the day, but have no irrational thoughts of being a bad person (e.g. harming others, being responsible for tragedies). You have no concerns about your health. You do not feel anxious about any particular matter. There has never been a time when you have been ‘high’ or ‘up’ in mood. You do not drink or use other substances.


You have been prescribed three antidepressants during this current bout of depression; you have taken them consistently when prescribed, with no breaks in treatment, and had minimal side effects – even at maximal doses. You tried as hard as you could to engage with CBT, but this was difficult due to lack of energy. You have never had ECT.


You have had a recent check-up with your GP. You have no biochemical or hormonal abnormalities, and no difficulties with chronic pain.



Feedback Domains



Knowledge

The candidate obtains a clear history of the present depressive illness, assessing chronicity, severity, and associated features (e.g. somatic or psychotic symptoms). The candidate elicits a history of treatment refractory to two treatment options, given for adequate time and dosage.


The candidate makes certain to take a competent past psychiatric history, focusing on number and duration of previous depressive episodes, evidence of any underlying bipolarity or other psychiatric disorders, and a history of relevant treatment (including assessment of side effects and adherence).


The candidate briefly outlines strategies in the treatment of refractory depression. Examples include, though are not limited to, augmentation with lithium, combination therapy (e.g. SSRI and antipsychotic, SSRI/venlafaxine and mirtazapine), or other possible strategies (including ECT).



Risk Assessment

The candidate assesses for relevant risks, such as suicide, self-harm, self-neglect, and substance misuse. Particular attention should be given to feelings of hopelessness and helplessness, as well as any periods of increasing impulsivity.



Communication

The candidate is open and empathetic, offering sympathy to the patient’s (very distressing) situation. Whilst gathering the relevant information, the candidate should attempt to offer hope, explaining that treatment-resistant depression is not an uncommon problem and that there are a wide number of treatment strategies available.



Author’s Note


This is a difficult station to master, as there is a large amount of material to cover. It is important that you are able to cover the relevant ground without feeling rushed. This will come with practice, and this is, in many ways, a standard history (i.e. history of presenting complaint, historical treatments).



Station 4.16 (4 Minutes)



Candidate Instructions


You are working in a CMHT and are due to see 27-year-old Mr Carl Bianco for a medication review. Mr Bianco has suffered with bipolar affective disorder since the age of 23. Since diagnosis, he has required five inpatient admissions due to manic episodes.


In terms of medication, Mr Bianco has previously been trialled on quetiapine and sodium valproate; however, he continued to experience manic and depressive relapses on a regular basis.


Mr Bianco was discharged from the hospital six weeks ago after suffering a manic relapse. He was treated with olanzapine while in the hospital and has continued to take it since discharge. Although he has remained well, he has been complaining of significant weight gain and lethargy.


When well, Mr Bianco has very good insight into his mental illness and avoids risk factors that he recognises can precipitate a relapse (e.g. lack of sleep, stress, drugs and alcohol).


Mr Bianco has always been compliant with his prescribed medication and regularly attends his outpatient appointments. He is currently well and wishes to discuss alternative medication options.


Discuss lithium therapy with Mr Bianco.



Actor Instructions


You are Mr Carl Bianco, a 27-year-old music student. You suffer from bipolar affective disorder and are keen to discuss any alternative medication with your doctor. You have been very unwell in the past, with multiple hospitalisations, and you are willing to consider most options for your treatment. Your only relevant medical history is acne when you were an adolescent and a family history of high blood pressure.


You are keen to take charge of your illness and wish to take notes during the assessment.



If asked what is important to you, your priority is relapse prevention.


You explain that you are particularly concerned about side effects (olanzapine caused you to put on 10 kg) as well as the impact medication may have on having children – you are hoping to start a family with your partner. You are particularly receptive if your doctor allocates time to discuss side effects.



Feedback Domains



Knowledge

There is much that can be said on the subject of lithium, and what follows is not an exhaustive list. The candidate is advised to touch on most of the subjects below and to be able to speak in more detail at the patient’s request.




  • Indication: Lithium has uses as an effective prophylactic in BPAD, as well as an augmentation agent in treatment-resistant depression. It is used less commonly as an anti-manic agent (i.e. during an acute episode) due to the relatively prolonged period until it becomes effective. Lithium is a significant commitment, as discontinuation appears to be particularly associated with relapse.



  • Pretreatment concerns: Lithium mainly interacts with medications that alter sodium handling (especially ACE inhibitors and thiazide diuretics) as well as NSAIDs (e.g. naproxen). Levels increase when dehydrated, so adequate fluid intake is important. Lithium can exacerbate acne and can negatively impact on renal and thyroid function.



  • Pregnancy: Lithium must be used with caution in pregnancy, as it is teratogenic. For this reason, it is not a first-line treatment in women. There are no similar concerns in its use in men.



  • Initiating and monitoring: Prior to starting on lithium, baseline FBC, U&Es, TFTs, and an ECG are taken. Lithium is then titrated upward, and, while this occurs, weekly lithium levels are taken until a steady therapeutic level is reached. Following this, lithium levels are taken every three months, and TFTs and U&Es are taken every six months. Annual BMI is recommended due to the risk of weight gain.



  • Side effects




    1. Early and common side effects:




      1. Common side effects include a fine, resting tremor (over half of patients develop this, but this typically abates over the coming weeks). Patients will also often experience weight gain and fatigue; again, these are often expected to abate.



      2. Increased thirst, passing more water, and a metallic taste in the mouth are also commonly noted.




    2. Later and more serious side effects:




      1. The main long-term risk of lithium treatment is nephrotoxicity. This can be progressive and irreversible unless lithium is ceased. It is a significant problem with lithium therapy that every patient should be informed about.



      2. Lithium can also affect the thyroid and parathyroid glands.





  • Toxicity: It is important that the candidate counsels the patient on toxicity so that they are positioned to notice signs of this developing. Early symptoms include GI dysfunction (e.g. nausea, diarrhoea, and vomiting) and worsening neurological signs (e.g. ataxia, coarse tremor, confusion, and, eventually, coma). Lithium toxicity is potentially lethal and requires prompt medical attention.



Communication

Explaining treatment with an agent such as lithium is challenging, especially within time constraints. The candidate shows evidence of having a structure prepared for such a discussion and considers outlining this to the patient before launching into an explanation.


The candidate attempts to tailor the explanation to the given priorities and concerns of the patient. They allow opportunities for the patient to ask questions or seek clarification, and endeavour to summarise information when need be.


If time is short, the candidate is able to offer further opportunities to discuss the matter at a later point and mentions additional resources (e.g. leaflets, reputable web resources).



Author’s Note


Lithium is a big topic, and there is a lot to cover. It is important to show an understanding of the basics, and if you feel there is information you don’t have at your fingertips right there and then, don’t try to make something up. Offer an outline of the information and state you will be able to give more information at a later point.



Station 4.17 (4 Minutes)



Candidate Instructions


Mr Ron McMurphy, a 64-year old man, has been admitted to your ward with a recurrence of psychotic depression. He has sadly not responded to two separate courses of high-dose antidepressant therapy, lithium augmentation, and antipsychotic medication. His mental state continues to deteriorate, and he has been refusing food and fluid over the last three days. There are increasing concerns that he is at risk of renal injury (due to his rising creatinine) or complications such as thromboembolism. At present, he is not communicating in any way and appears to have fallen into a state of depressive stupor.


Following the ward round, the consultant has recommended electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). As Mr McMurphy is not communicating, it is determined that he lacks capacity to consent to treatment at this time.


Mr McMurphy’s daughter, Kasey, has asked if she could speak with you separately, as she is unhappy with the proposed management plan.


Speak to Ms Kasey McMurphy to explore her concerns and to explain the rationale, potential side effects, and alternatives to ECT.



Actor Instructions


You are Ms Kasey McMurphy, Ron’s daughter. The welfare of your father is your primary concern. Your (deceased) mother told you that he had previously suffered from problems with ‘feeling down’ but had never suggested how bad things could get. You don’t know much about mental health or psychiatry and have no idea why your father has become so depressed, though you harbour suspicions it is due to a ‘bad childhood’.


You are worried your father is getting worse, despite being treated with many different medications. You are aware that he is not eating or drinking, but you are unaware of the potential complications of this.


You have heard of ECT, or ‘shock therapy’, but did not know it is still being used. As far as you are aware, it stopped being used in the last century and was used in ‘asylums’. You fear that the treatment is painful and that your father will never forgive you for letting the doctors do this to him.



If you feel the doctor is being honest and giving you an opportunity to express your concerns, you admit that you are also concerned about the impact of ECT on his physical health and memory.


All told, your priority is doing the best for your father, and any scepticism is borne of a desire to ‘get it right’. You want to care for him in the same way he has always cared for you.



Feedback Domains



Knowledge

The candidate demonstrates a clear understanding of the reasons for ECT in depression, the general process involved, and the potential risks.




  • Overview: ECT is an effective antidepressant therapy that can have a rapid onset of action. It is reserved for patients with life-threatening depression who require urgent improvement in symptoms, or when conventional treatments have been unsuccessful. A typical course of ECT consists of 6–12 sessions provided twice weekly, over three to six weeks.



  • Process: The patient is taken to an appropriate ECT suite (the candidate can potentially offer to show this to the patient/relative), where they are given a general anaesthetic and a muscle relaxant, typically via drip in the hand. These ensure that the process is painless and that resulting seizures are not associated with pain or injury. This process occurs under the supervision of an anaesthetist. Following anaesthesia, a current of electricity is passed across the head of the patient, which causes a brief seizure. After therapy, the patient recovers from the anaesthetic and can return either to the ward or home (if the latter, ensuring appropriate arrangements for getting home are made).



  • Associated risks:




    1. Risk of death through anaesthetic: This is the same as for any operation using a general anaesthetic, roughly 1/100,000.1 Experienced anaesthetists and nursing staff are on hand to prevent problems with the anaesthetic.



    2. Early issues: Early confusion following ECT (e.g. disorientation) typically persists for a few hours after the procedure and resolves. Headache following ECT is also common and typically resolves. There appear to be early problems with amnesia, both anterograde and retrograde, which are most pronounced around the time of the ECT treatment.



    3. Longer-term concerns: The main longer-term concern regarding ECT therapy is an impact on memory that persists after the treatment has ended. This seems to mainly affect autobiographical memory and varies from person to person. Another key concern is that the effects of ECT are often short-lived, and relapse after a successful course of ECT is not uncommon.




Communication

The candidate conveys all or most of the pertinent information in a way that is comprehensible to a nonmedical audience, structured, and relevant.


The candidate demonstrates basic information-sharing abilities, such as exploring patient/relative understanding prior to explanation, asking the patient/relative what topics they particularly want to know about, checking in (with summarising), and inviting questions.



Author’s Note


ECT explanation is relatively straightforward; therefore, it is an important station to be familiar with. You are strongly advised to have all the relevant information ‘to hand’ so that even under stressful exam conditions you can rely on knowing what topics to cover and what to say.


As well as knowledge, you must show sensitivity and empathy. ECT is a treatment that carries the weight of significant fear and stigma, partly due to cultural representations. Consequently, you must be able to simultaneously normalise its usage in those who need it but not dismiss the concerns raised by those you are speaking with.



Station 4.18 (90 Seconds)



Candidate Instructions


You are working in an Early Intervention for Psychosis (EIP) service. You have been asked to assess Mr Kurt Tailor, a 25-year-old man who was referred following a year’s history of becoming more socially isolated, having dropped out of university, and having started saying ‘odd things’ to his mother.


Speak to Mr Tailor with a view to eliciting the first-rank symptoms (FRS) of schizophrenia. Do not undertake a risk assessment or explore other diagnoses.



Actor Instructions


You are Mr Kurt Tailor, a 25-year-old man. You are keen to speak to a doctor about what you have experienced. You feel that your family doesn’t understand the strange experiences you have been having, but you hope that a doctor might. Throughout the interview, just as at home, you feel slightly confused, as if something were ‘not quite right’ with the world, but you are only just starting to understand what.


Your main concern is that your mind is being ‘revolutionised’ (the only word that seems to describe what is happening). Thoughts feel as if they are not yours, but rather just appear in your head, and you suspect they are actually the thoughts of those around you. Equally, your thoughts feel as if they are ‘leaking’ out of your head, and you feel that others can pick up on them.


Over the last few months, you have been increasingly convinced that this is the work of the ‘Illuminati’ and that you are able to ‘tune’ (i.e. hear their secret communications). You experience this as voices emanating about a foot above your head. They are usually commenting about you (e.g. ‘he needs a bath’, ‘he knows what’s happening’), but they sometimes argue with each other as well. Occasionally, they seem to be saying the things you are thinking on a one-second delay.


Increasingly, you worry how much of your thoughts are yours. They feel as if they have been ‘made’ by the Illuminati, and some of the things you feel, even your desire to eat, seem to be coming from outside. Last week, you began scratching your nose and felt this was because you were being ‘puppeteered’. Increasingly, you are feeling this more ‘persuasively’, to the extent you can feel the vibrations of their speech in your belly.



If asked directly, and you feel rapport with the candidate, you admit that things have recently become much clearer for you after having seen the ‘funny way’ the light bulb in your bedroom came on; in that instant, you knew that you were being experimented on. You are keen to seek advice about this.



Feedback Domains



Knowledge

The candidate elicits most, if not all, of the following:




  • Thought interference




    1. Thought insertion: The experience of thoughts as being ‘put into’ the mind, and therefore alien.



    2. Thought withdrawal: The subjective experience of a thought being suddenly ‘taken out’.



    3. Thought broadcast: The feeling that one’s thoughts are not confined to one’s own mind, and that others are privy to them.




  • Auditory hallucinations




    1. Commentary: A third-person (‘he/she/they’) voice, which describes what the patient is doing as they do it.



    2. Arguing voices: The voices speak to each other, often but not necessarily about the patient.



    3. Thought echo: Thoughts are re-experienced as an external voice.




  • ‘Made’ experiences – One’s own thoughts, emotions, and actions are experienced as having been ‘manufactured’ or created externally.



  • Passivity phenomena – Physical sensations are felt to be coming into the body from an external source.



  • Delusional perception – A real perception leads to a sudden, strongly held belief that has no relation to the initial experience (e.g. seeing three birds out of a window, and therefore knowing that your internal organs have been replaced).



Communication

The candidate attempts to put the patient at ease by showing an interest in what the patient is saying. The stance shown is non-judgemental, and the patient’s concerns and ideas are not dismissed.


The candidate encourages the patient to elaborate on their experiences and avoids approaching the interview like a ‘checklist’. Ideally, they allow the patient to describe their experiences through open questioning, and only once this is finished do they utilise more specific, ‘closed’ questions.



Author’s Note


FRS are considered persuasive, but not diagnostic, of schizophrenia. It is important to appreciate that they can appear in other disorders (e.g. bipolar affective disorder or delirium) and that there are other features commonly seen in schizophrenia (e.g. psycho-social decline, negative symptoms such as apathy and lack of motivation). However, in light of both their historical significance and presence in many patients with schizophrenia, it is important you are aware of them.



Station 4.19 (4 Minutes)



Candidate Instructions


You are working in the liaison psychiatry department of a busy teaching hospital. You have been called to one of the medical wards to determine whether a patient there ‘has capacity’ to refuse insulin.


Mr William Cheshire is a 56-year-old male with a previous history of paranoid schizophrenia and type 2 diabetes mellitus. He is known to be poorly compliant with his physical health medications and suffers from a range of micro- and macrovascular complications.


Mr Cheshire was admitted to the hospital three days ago, having been found collapsed in the street. Upon arrival to the hospital, he was found to be in a state of hyperosmolar non-ketotic coma. He required emergency treatment but is now stable.


Mr Cheshire has been assessed by a consultant endocrinologist on the ward and has been informed that he requires insulin to manage his high blood sugar levels. Despite this advice, Mr Cheshire has been refusing all doses of insulin since admission.


Assess Mr Cheshire’s capacity to refuse insulin.



Actor Instructions


You are Mr William Cheshire, a 56-year-old man. You are frustrated at being in the hospital and at being ‘lectured to’ by various doctors; you have been told you are not even allowed to leave the ward to smoke until you are seen by ‘a doctor from the liaison team’. When you discover that you are speaking to a psychiatrist, you are automatically on the defensive, as you think that the staff here are attempting to make out that you are ‘mad’.


You are aware that you have a diagnosis of diabetes, which you have been managing through a healthy diet and exercise. Your GP has discussed medication with you in the past; however, you have not felt it was necessary.



If asked directly, you do not understand presently why you collapsed, or why insulin is now needed. If this is explained to you appropriately, you are able to quickly grasp that you may now need insulin to control your blood sugars; you can retain this information and repeat it back on request. If you feel the assessing doctor is being honest and empathetic, you demonstrate the ability to balance your desire to not take regular medication against your desire to live longer.


You do not feel you are unwell in your mental state and have been fully adherent with your olanzapine, knowing that if you do not take it, you will hear voices and develop delusions (these are invariably grandiose delusions that you are a prophet; you do not have persecutory delusions, and your thoughts about the poor intentions of doctors predates your becoming unwell). You do not wish to die and have no symptoms of low mood; in fact, you are keen to be as fit and healthy as you can be, and wish for a long life.


You are fully orientated to time, person, and place and, despite your high blood sugars, are not in any way confused. You are happy to consult with the psychiatrist, as long as they are open about why they are assessing you in this way.


Ultimately, you wish only to be approached by doctors as equals, as opposed to feeling as though medication is being ‘forced’ on you. If given the opportunity, you would appreciate another discussion with the diabetic team to ensure that there is no alternative to insulin medication.



Feedback Domains



Knowledge

The candidate appreciates the following key features of capacity and attempts to elicit them in the interview:




  • Capacity is for a specific decision at a specific time (i.e. focuses on the specific question at hand).



  • For capacity to be impaired, there must be evidence of a disorder of the mind or brain (i.e. efforts are made to explore the potential role of confusion or psychiatric disorder in the relevant decision).



  • The candidate explores the four components of capacity.




    1. Understands: The candidate explains the relevant information to the patient and seeks to ensure that the patient understands what is being said. They offer an opportunity for clarifying questions or repeat relevant information.



    2. Retains: The candidate checks that the important information is being held over the period of time necessary for the patient to consider their decision.



    3. Weighs: The candidate seeks an understanding of why the patient has come to the conclusion that they have, with evidence of a balancing of pros and cons. They do not assume that a decision in non-capacitous purely because it is unwise.



    4. Communicates: This will be apparent in the station, but it is a core component of a capacity assessment.



The candidate explores relevant features that may impair capacity, such as acute confusion and psychotic illness. They ensure that there is no component of low mood or suicidal ideation, which may also affect the decision.


The candidate understands the relevant consequences of insulin non-adherence in this context (micro- and macrovascular complications, coma, and death) to a level commensurate with a doctor who has completed foundation training and is able to convey these risks appropriately.



Communication

The candidate is empathetic, open, curious, and non-judgemental. They do not enter the discussion assuming that capacity is lacking, nor do they seek to ‘persuade’ the patient of a certain course of action.


The candidate respectfully tests the patient’s understanding of the decision in a robust fashion and does not minimise or ignore the potentially serious consequences of the patient’s stated course of action.


The candidate remembers that it is possible to return to the patient, possibly with the medical team, in order to further discuss the patient’s decision.



Author’s Note


This is a station that rewards good communication skills as much as knowledge about a given intervention. Capacity assessments are a common task in clinical practice and could be examined as stations in the CASC within several different sub-specialties (see Stations 5.9 and 7.2).



Station 4.20 (4 Minutes)



Candidate Instructions


You are working on a general adult psychiatric ward. Mr Frank Anders, a 21-year-old man, has recently been admitted to the ward and was reviewed today at ward rounds.


Mr Anders dropped out of university six months ago due to being unable to keep up with his coursework. His friends commented at the time that he was increasingly isolating himself in his room and had stopped socialising, which was very out of character. Mr Anders moved back home with his parents but remained reclusive. His parents have been concerned that he is depressed, as they report they have been having difficulty persuading him to shower and change his bedsheets. Recently, he has been refusing to eat any meals unless he prepares them himself, and his parents have noticed he has started muttering to himself.


Prior to his admission, Mr Anders’s parents were awoken by Mr Anders shouting and screaming. They found him in his bedroom clutching a knife and bleeding from a laceration on his upper arm. An ambulance was contacted, and he was transferred to the ED; there, his wound was sutured and he was referred to the liaison mental health team, who recommended a psychiatric admission.


During the ward round today, Mr Anders disclosed that he had been attempting to remove a microchip from his arm, as the archangel Gabriel had warned him that it had been implanted by MI5 in order to control his thoughts. He admits that he has been communicating with the archangel for several months.


Your consultant suspects Mr Anders is psychotic and has commenced treatment with olanzapine.


Mr Anders’s mother, Ms Carol Anders, has attended the ward and has requested to speak with you about her son’s diagnosis. Mr Anders has consented for you to share information with his mother.


Address Ms Anders’s concerns and answer any questions she may have.



Actor Instructions


You are Ms Carol Anders, Frank’s mother. You present as upset and angry and do not let the candidate speak until you have got your concerns off your chest.


While visiting Frank on the ward earlier, you overheard a nurse refer to Frank as having schizophrenia. This confused you, as you believe schizophrenia is a condition associated with drug use and violence. You think Frank is simply depressed because ever since he dropped out of university six months ago, he has been isolating himself in his room and has lost interest in all his old hobbies and friends. Depression would also explain why he self-harmed by cutting his arm prior to admission.


Once you have expressed your concerns, ask the candidate to explain what’s wrong with Frank and how they arrived at their diagnosis. Specific questions you would like answered during the consultation are as follows:




  • What’s the difference between psychosis and schizophrenia?



  • What causes psychosis?



  • How is psychosis treated?



  • Will Frank ever get better, and, if so, will he become unwell again in the future?



Feedback Domains



Knowledge

Schizophrenia is a type of psychotic disorder. It is a severe mental illness that has often been misrepresented in the media. Historically, the disorder is characterised by first-rank symptoms (see Station 4.18). However, it can also be described in terms of positive and negative symptoms:




  • Positive symptoms




    1. Hearing, seeing, feeling, and smelling things that are not there (hallucinations)



    2. An unshakable belief in something that is objectively untrue (delusions)



    3. Confused/muddled thoughts (thought disorder)




  • Negative symptoms




    1. Social isolation/withdrawal



    2. Loss of enjoyment/interest in activities (anhedonia)



    3. Poor self-care



    4. Loss of motivation



Typically, patients develop negative symptoms months, or sometimes years, before presenting with positive symptoms. This is known as the ‘prodromal’ period and often has an insidious onset. Patients can be mistakenly diagnosed as depressed during this period, as many of the symptoms overlap.


The term psychosis/psychotic tends to be used to refer to the presence of positive symptoms, particularly hallucinations and delusions. Several different psychiatric conditions are associated with psychosis:




  • Schizophrenia



  • Schizoaffective disorder



  • Bipolar affective disorder



  • Psychotic depression


There are many different factors that can increase a patient’s chance of developing a psychotic disorder. Evidence suggests that genetics play a significant role, as well as environmental factors (e.g. traumatic life experiences, stress, drug misuse).


The mainstay of treatment for psychosis is antipsychotic medication. Medication may need to be commenced in a hospital environment, as patients suffering from psychosis often do not believe they are unwell (i.e. lack insight). Although antipsychotic medications can be effective, they are associated with a number of side effects; therefore, patients may need to be trialled on a selection of medications before the most tolerable/effective treatment is established.


Psychotic disorders tend to be chronic; in other words, patients are rarely ‘cured’. A proportion of patients will recover and never experience another episode of psychosis, a proportion will follow a ‘relapsing–remitting’ course, and a proportion of patients will have symptoms that are very difficult to improve.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jun 20, 2021 | Posted by in PSYCHIATRY | Comments Off on Chapter 4 – General Adult Psychiatry

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access