Childhood Onset Schizophrenia and Other Early-Onset Psychotic Disorders

Childhood Onset Schizophrenia and Other Early-Onset Psychotic Disorders
Nitin Gogtay
Judith Rapoport
Background
Psychotic disorders are rare in children although transient psychotic phenomena are more common in healthy and mildly disturbed children than generally recognized (1,2,3). As is often the case with other very early onset illnesses, psychotic disorders in children are usually more severe than their adult counterparts (4), and the disruption of cognitive and social development and the burden to the family can be devastating. Systematic research in this area has been limited by diagnostic uncertainty and the general lack of knowledge about the psychotic processes in children (5).
History of Very Early Onset Psychoses
Although the existence of childhood schizophrenia was recognized early in the twentieth century (6), the term psychosis was used so broadly in children that a spectrum of behavioral disorders and autism were grouped together under the category of childhood schizophrenia (7). The landmark studies of Kolvin (1971) first established the clinical distinction between autism and other psychotic disorders of childhood (8). However, even today high rates of initial misdiagnosis remain due to symptom overlap, particularly for mood disorders, and the presence of relatively fleeting hallucinations and delusions in nonpsychotic pediatric patients (9,10). Anxiety and stress are probably the most common causes of hallucinations in preschool children, and the prognosis of these phenomena is usually benign (11). On the other hand, psychotic phenomena in school age children generally tend to be more persistent, and are more likely to be associated with drug toxicity or significant mental illness (2,3,12,52). Moreover, recent data from large birth cohort studies suggest that self-reported psychotic symptoms at age 11 years predicted a very high risk (odds ratio 16.4, confidence interval 3.9–67.8) of schizophreniform diagnosis at age 26 years, suggesting that psychotic symptoms probably exist as a continuous phenotype rather than an all-or-none phenomenon (14).
Childhood Schizophrenia— Diagnosis, Clinical Presentation, and Differential Diagnoses
Kolvin’s work established that children can be diagnosed with unmodified criteria for schizophrenia, although such cases are rare (15,16). Childhood-onset schizophrenia (COS) shows a pattern similar to that of poor outcome adult cases, and the psychosis of COS can usually be distinguished by its severe and pervasive nature and its nonepisodic, unremitting course (5). Additionally, these children show poorer premorbid functioning in social, motor, and language domains, learning disabilities, and disruptive behavior disorders (17,18,19), and although not reported in studies of the premorbid history of adult-onset schizophrenia (20,21), transient autistic symptoms such as hand flapping and echolalia in toddler years are common (17,22), probably reflecting more compromised early brain development.
Childhood-onset schizophrenia is rare and must be distinguished from several childhood conditions that can manifest with psychotic symptoms and/or deterioration in function:
  • Affective disorders: Hallucinations are relatively common in pediatric bipolar disorder and major depression (23,24). However, the psychotic symptoms in these conditions tend to be mood congruent and followup studies on this population generally suggest a stable clinical outcome (25,26,27,52).
  • Psychosis due to medical conditions, and substance abuse disorders should be carefully ruled out (29,30).
  • Pervasive developmental disorders and childhood disintegrative disorder can often be mistaken for psychosis, as they show severe impairment in reciprocal communication, social interactions, and odd stereotyped behaviors.
  • Conduct disorder and various other behavioral disturbances can be associated with hallucinations (28,29).
  • Atypical psychosis [provisionally labeled as Multi Dimensionally Impaired (MDI) by the NIMH group] is an important differential diagnosis and is described in detail below.
The Multi Dimensionally Impaired (MDI) Group
A sizeable, heterogeneous group of children referred to the NIMH childhood onset schizophrenia study over the past 15 years had transient psychotic symptoms and multiple developmental abnormalities, but were not adequately characterized by existing DSM-IV categories (31,32,33). In the DSM nosology these patients might be considered as having either psychosis NOS or mood disorder NOS.
The MDI group, although showing similarities with childhood onset schizophrenia, has distinct features which were used as the operational diagnostic criteria by the NIMH group, as listed below (31,32):
  • Brief, transient episodes of psychosis and perceptual disturbance, typically in response to stress (as opposed to the pervasive hallucinations/delusions in COS)
  • Nearly daily periods of emotional lability disproportionate to precipitants
  • Impaired interpersonal skills despite the desire to initiate peer friendships (distinction from childhood onset schizophrenia)
  • Cognitive deficits as indicated by multiple deficits in information processing
  • No clear thought disorder (although this can be difficult to define clinically, particularly in the presence of a communication disorder)
  • Comorbid ADHD
These children somewhat resemble syndromes such as the borderline syndrome of children, or a behavioral syndrome of affective dysregulation and impairments in social behavior but with more prominent autistic spectrum characteristics labeled as the multiplex developmental disorder (MCDD) (33,34,35,52). However, these syndromes have more predominant symptoms of pervasive developmental disorder; greater evidence of a formal thought disorder; and onset before age 5 (as opposed to about age 8 for the MDI group) (33,37,38,52).
Initially, the neuropsychological test profiles, smooth pursuit eye movement abnormalities, and familial risk factors suggested that some of the MDI children fell within the schizophrenia spectrum (32), but our MDI cohort appears to have a distinct long-term clinical course (described later), while none have progressed to schizophrenia (40).
The NIMH COS and MDI Experience
The NIMH childhood onset schizophrenia (COS) study has been ongoing since 1990. Inclusion criteria for the study are: onset of psychosis before 12, premorbid IQ of 70 or above, and absence of significant neurological disorder. In the last 15 years, about 2,000 charts have been reviewed, of which 80% are rejected from further consideration as they fail to meet our stringent criteria for childhood onset schizophrenia. Over 250 children have been screened in person, of whom about 60% receive other psychiatric diagnoses, such as affective disorders, anxiety, or behavioral disorders. About 150 children who appeared likely to meet criteria for COS have been admitted to the research unit and undergone a complete medication washout followed by 1 to 3 weeks’ drug-free inpatient observation. An additional 20% did not meet criteria for childhood onset schizophrenia, most frequently because a diagnosis of affective disorder was made (5,31,41). A recent 4- to 6-year followup study of 33 of the ruled out cases indicated good stability of the alternative diagnoses and confirmed their nonschizophrenic status (42). To date, 32 children have been given the provisional diagnosis of MDI after the medication washout period and have been followed prospectively along with the COS group. Demographics of the NIMH COS and MDI cohorts are summarized in Table 5.3.1.
TABLE 5.3.1 DEMOGRAPHICS OF NIMH COS AND MDI SAMPLES
  COS (“MDI”) T-Test or Chi-Square COS Parents MDI Parents T-Test or Chi-Square
Subject number 89 33 NA 141 53 NA
Age of onset 10.0 ± 2.1 7.7 ± 2.1 p <.0001 N/A N/A NA
Years ill (for probands) 3.7 ± 2.2 3.6 ± 2.2 ns N/A N/A NA
Age at first contact 13.6 ± 2.7 12.0 ± 2.7 p =.004 47.6± 8.1 43.7 ± 12.6 ns
Gender (males) 52 (58%) 27 (84%) p =.016, 70 (50%) 25 (47%) ns
Caucasian 43 (48%) 26 (82%) p =.022 72 (51%) 45 (85%) p =.0008
African American 25 (28%) 2 (6%)   37 (26%) 5 (9%)  
Hispanic 8 (9%) 1 (3%)   14 (10%) 2 (4%)  
Asian 4 (5%) 0 (0%)   9 (5%) 0 (0%)  
Other 9 (10%) 3 (9%)   9(5%) 1 (2%)  
Parental SES 2.7 ± 1.2 2.8 ± 1.2 ns N/A N/A NA
Phenomenology and Neurobiology of COS
Premorbid Development
A striking phenomenological feature of COS relative to adult onset schizophrenia appears to be the higher rates of early language, social, and motor developmental abnormalities, possibly reflecting greater impairment in early brain development. In the NIMH sample, premorbid development (defined as development prior to 1 year before psychosis onset and assessed using the Cannon-Spoor Premorbid Adjustment Scale (PAS)(43) and the Hollis premorbid development scale (19)) and social and speech and language impairments were clearly impaired in COS, as has been previously observed by four other independent research centers 17,18,19,22,44,45,46,47.
Risk Factors
Since COS represents a more severe phenotype of schizophrenia than the adult onset illness, our initial hypothesis was that most risk factors identified in adult studies would be more striking in our very early onset cases.
Parental Age and Obstetric Complications
Adult schizophrenia studies suggest that association of the illness with advanced paternal age, raising the possibility of increased de novo mutations in the paternal germ cells, and also increased rates of maternal/fetal obstetric complications (48,49,50). The NIMH COS cohort showed no correlation with maternal or paternal age (51). In a recent analysis, we compared the obstetric records of 60 children with COS and 48 healthy siblings using the Columbia Obstetrics Complication Scale (52), a comprehensive measurement scale consisting of 37 variables. Contrary to our hypothesis, the incidence of obstetric complications in COS patients did not differ from that for the healthy sibling control group (53).
Eye Tracking
Smooth pursuit eye movement (SPEM) abnormalities have been reported in 25–40% of first-degree relatives of schizophrenic probands (54). Other studies have suggested more striking abnormalities in COS than in AOS, with a bilineal pattern of inheritance (55). In a recent analysis we compared 70 COS parents, 64 AOS parents, and 20 COS siblings to separate matched control groups and found that the effect sizes for SPEM abnormalities were higher for COS than for AOS relatives, indicating that genetic factors underlying eye-tracking dysfunction may be more salient for COS (56).
Familial Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders
Schizophrenia spectrum disorders consist of schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorders on Axis I, and schizotypal, paranoid, and schizoid personality disorders on Axis II (44). A prior study by Asarnow et al. showed higher rates of schizophrenia spectrum diagnoses for COS relatives than for relatives of probands with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder or community controls (57). Similarly, as expected in our recent analyses of parental diagnosis in 97 parents of COS probands, 97 parents of AOS probands and matched community controls, also found that rate of familial schizophrenia spectrum disorders was higher for COS than AOS, and both were higher than community controls, supporting the continuity between COS and AOS, and the particularly salient familial/genetic risk in COS (58).
Familial Neurocognitive Functioning
It is well documented that subtle cognitive deficits, including abnormalities of attention (59,60), executive functioning (61), spatial working memory (62), and verbal memory (63) are seen in healthy relatives of patients with AOS (64). Deficits in auditory attention, verbal memory and executive functioning are generally considered consistent (65,66), although it is unclear whether these represent an underlying global cognitive deficit or each deficit represents a discrete endophenotype transmitted in families of patients with schizophrenia (66). When we compared neuropsychological deficits in 67 parents and 24 full siblings of COS probands to matched community controls in the Trail Making Tests A and B and the Wechsler Intelligence Scale-Revised Digit Span and Vocabulary, COS siblings had significantly poorer performance than community controls, although the rates of neuropsychological abnormalities for COS were not significantly higher than for AOS (67).
Pervasive Developmental Disorder and COS
The diagnosis of autism or pervasive developmental disorder (PDD) has been raised early in the development in our cases (n = 19, 25%) and several studies have claimed that autism per se might be a risk factor for later psychosis (68,69,70). Premorbid PDD may be a nonspecific manifestation of impaired neurodevelopment, and also may provide an independent additive risk factor for COS. We ascertained the premorbid diagnosis of past or current autism or PDD in 75 COS probands in whom the diagnosis of PDD was made according to DSM-IV criteria (American Psychiatric Association, 1994) based on early chart reviews and clinical interviews of patients and parents. The diagnosis of PDD was made in cases when per history there were clear symptoms of autistic/PDD spectrum present prior to the onset of psychosis that were still observable at the time of the NIH evaluation.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jul 20, 2016 | Posted by in PSYCHIATRY | Comments Off on Childhood Onset Schizophrenia and Other Early-Onset Psychotic Disorders

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access