Internal neurolysis is the exposure of nerve fascicles after epineurotomy and their separation by interfascicular dissection or by removal of interfascicular scar tissue. It is an essential part of some procedures [2] as follows: (1) separation of intact from damaged fascicles in partially damaged nerves, (2) separation of a fascicle during a nerve transfer, and (3) separation of intact fascicles during removal of a benign nerve tumor. Another indication for this procedure is given when there is an incomplete nerve tissue loss distal to the lesion, but the patient has pain of neuritic nature which does not respond to conservative management. When performing this technique, the surgeon should keep in mind that the removal of abundant fibrous tissue between the fascicles may impair the blood supply to this structure [18] with the potential risk of some loss of function.

Since Hueter in 1873 [6] described an end-to-end coaptation of nerve ends by placing sutures in the epineurium, the end-to-end suture became the procedure of choice for nerve lesions where opposition of stumps can be gained without excessive tension. Excessive tension across a nerve repair site is known to impair the local blood circulation, to increase the scarring at the coaptation site, and finally to impair regeneration. The opposition of the nerve ends is facilitated by mobilization of the stumps, transposition of the nerve, and, in selected cases, mild flexion of the extremity. Every nerve repair should be performed with optical magnification (surgical loupes or microscope) and adequate lighting. The end-to-end neurorrhaphy should be done only when the nerve gap is small (usually less than 2 cm). A test to evaluate the possibility of direct suture without prohibitive tension involves passing an epineurial suture of 7-0 nylon. If the suture keep the stumps together without tearing the epineurium, the end-to-end neurorrhaphy is possible.

There are three types of end-to-end neurorrhaphy: epineurial, perineurial, and group fascicular. All three procedures always initiate with the preparation of the nerve ends. Transverse cuts, distant 1 mm from each other, are progressively made with a sharp instrument (micro scissors or surgical blade) until an area of healthy appearing fascicles without fibrotic tissue is reached. Following resection of the devitalized tissue hemostasis is imperative because bleeding could lead to excessive fibrosis and distortion of the nerve architecture. A small tipped bipolar coagulator or sponges dipped in a solution of 1:100,000 epinephrine in 10 ml of saline should be used for this purpose. The prepared nerve ends are then gently mobilized and approximated to be coapted, without excessive tension. In the epineurial technique the entire nerve trunk is sutured as a unit. Finely spaced interrupted nylon sutures inserted into the epineurium are used to approximate the stumps, first laterally and then along volar and dorsal epineurial surfaces. Suture material should be passed through the epineurium only, as the incorporation of neural elements results in scar tissue formation. The sutures should be placed approximately 0.5–1.0 mm from the incised edge, with the needle piercing the surface of the nerve and emerging just subepineurially. In the opposing nerve stump, the second passage of the needle begins subepineurially and emerges on the surface. The size, the depth, and the number of sutures should be minimized to decrease iatrogenic trauma and the formation of foreign body granuloma. The number of sutures required for adequate alignment of the stumps varies depending upon the nerve diameter. Having in mind that an adequate alignment is paramount for the success of the surgical procedure, it is desirable to perform the smallest number of sutures possible because all suture materials evoke an inflammatory reaction, which can result in production of excess granulation tissue. To maintain alignment of the nerve stumps, the first two sutures are placed in the nerve trunk 180° apart. Additional sutures are then placed in the upper portion of the nerve. Grasping carefully the ends of the two first sutures, the nerve trunk is rotated to expose the underside of the nerve where additional sutures are placed, completing the apposition of the nerve stumps. All sutures should be tied with equal tension. The tension applied should be just enough for alignment and contact of the neural bundles. Excessive tension may result in crushing and malalignment of the nerve bundles. Identification of the longitudinal epineurial blood vessels, which are not always present, helps to avoid rotation of the nerve ends and consequent malalignment of the fascicles. The visualization of fascicular patterns on the cut nerve surfaces can also be effective to help the correct realignment of peripheral nerve stumps in areas of consistent topography (e.g., distal ulnar and median nerves). The fascicular topography changes after 1–2 cm of neural trimming, but groups of fascicles can usually be opposed as closely as possible even though the repair is done at epineurial level. The epineurial technique is the most performed end-to-end neurorrhaphy in clinical practice and illustrated in Fig. 4.2.

As expertise and technical development in microsurgery have progressed, suture repair of peripheral nerve subunits, like the perineurial or fascicular repair, has increased in popularity. The technique involves resection of the outer epineurium, followed by intraneural dissection of fascicles in both nerve stumps and perineurial suturing of individual fascicles with one or two sutures of 10-0 suture material. The perineurial repair represents the best possibility of nerve alignment by the surgeon. However, this advantage may be offset by the amount of neural trauma the technique demands. In clinical practice this procedure is seldom performed. Grouped fascicular repair is a less aggressive method of nerve alignment done by the identification of grouped fascicular patterns in both nerve ends and suturing through the thickened inner epineurium. This technique is used mainly in areas of well-defined nerve topography such as the distal median and ulnar nerves and the radial nerve around the elbow.

Superiority of one end-to-end neurorrhaphy over another has never been clearly demonstrated [8]. In practice, the accurate alignment of the fascicles or grouping of fascicles is often difficult because of trauma, edema, and scarring that can distort the normal topography.

End-to-side neurorrhaphy was first described by Letievant in 1873 [30], but the idea was abandoned due to poor results. More than a century later, Viterbo et al. [32] reintroduced the technique with apparently promising results. The end-to-side neurorrhaphy involves coaptation of the distal stump of a transected nerve to the trunk of an adjacent healthy donor nerve. It has been proposed as an alternative technique when the proximal stump of an injured nerve is unavailable or when the nerve gap is too long to be bridged by a nerve graft. Collateral sprouting is the accepted mechanism of nerve regeneration following end-to-side neurorrhaphy, where regenerating axons originated from the most proximal Ranvier’s node of the donor nerve grow toward the coaptation site [29, 37]. Whether the receptor nerve should be coapted to the donor nerve through an epineurotomy or a perineurotomy is still controversial. Although some experimental papers revealed no difference if a nerve window at the coaptation site was made or not [32, 33], other investigators claim that the greater degree of axonal damage to the donor nerve after a perineurotomy enhances axonal regeneration with better histological results [35, 36]. The clinical experience with this technique has been published in the form of case reports and small clinical series, and no randomized clinical trials have been performed in order to compare end-to-side coaptation to other reconstructive techniques. The clinical outcomes of end-to-side repair are often disappointing. In a recent published review of the clinical applications of the technique, Tos et al. [30] demonstrated that a discrepancy between experimental and clinical results still exists, and the authors concluded that at present the end-to-side repair could not substitute standard techniques in most situations. In the majority of cases, it will provide only limited sensory recovery [23, 28, 34]. It can be considered a valid therapeutic option only in cases of failure of other attempts of nerve repair or whenever other approaches are not feasible, especially when protective sensibility is a reasonable goal.

Nerve grafting dates back to Philippeaux and Vulpian in 1817 [9]. In extensive injuries, especially those due to blunt mechanisms, loss of nerve tissue may produce lengthy lesions which, when resected, result in a large nerve gap. A nerve gap is defined as the distance between two ends of a severed nerve and consists not only of an amount of nerve tissue lost in the injury or debridement but also of the distance that the nerve has retracted due to its elastic properties [15]. Small nerve gaps (<2 cm) can be overcome by stretching the nerve stumps to a limited extent to attain apposition, making possible a primary repair. But when a significant amount of stretching and mobilization is necessary, the consequent increase in the suture line tension endangers the extrinsic vascular supply to the nerve leading to connective tissue proliferation and formation of scar tissue [13]. In this situation of an irreducible nerve gap, the gold standard management continues to be autologous nerve grafting. The nerve grafts serve as a guide for the axons of the proximal stump as it regrows toward the distal stump.

Small-caliber grafts seem to serve better than longer whole nerve grafts [14]. For a nerve graft to survive, it must be revascularized, and when the nerve is too thick, the central part of the nerve graft will not become revascularized, and the outcome of the repair will be poor. The sural nerve, by far the most commonly used donor nerve, is harvested from the ankle until near the knee, and 30–40 cm of the nerve is usually obtained in adults from each leg for grafting. Other sensory nerves like the medial antebrachial cutaneous or the sensory branch of the radial nerve are used as well. The grafts should be harvested after the injured nerves have been exposed, the extent of lesion defined, and the gap between the prepared nerve stumps measured. Then the number of grafts required is calculated. To release tension on suture lines, the length of the grafts should be about 15–20% greater than the measured gap because they always present some shrinkage owing to a relative initial hypovascularization. The nerve grafts are initially similar to other devascularized tissue implants. The regeneration of the blood supply must be provided by the nerve stumps and surrounding tissues and takes some time. In the beginning the graft relies on the imbibition from the surrounding for nutrition. Consequently, long grafts and a poorly vascularized tissue bed could be responsible for ischemic necrosis of the central graft core, with destruction of Schwann cell tubules and failure of axonal regeneration through the graft.

The most popular as a graft technique is an interfascicular grouped fascicular approach described by Millesi in the early 1970s [16, 17]. The principles and surgical technique of nerve grafting are similar to direct repair. The proximal and distal ends of the nerve are transversely sectioned until viable fascicles are visualized, and groups of fascicles are then isolated both proximally and distally. Usually oriented in a reverse fashion to minimize the diversion of regenerating fibers from the distal neurorrhaphy, a number of small-caliber nerve grafts are attached between the nerve ends, connecting corresponding groups of fascicles. The coaptation is maintained by one or two fine sutures often supplemented by fibrin glue. As much of the fascicular structure of each stump as possible is covered in this fashion. Individual grafts should be positioned loosely, not too close to each other, to permit maximal contact with a viable recipient bed. Figure 4.3 illustrates a brachial plexus injury that has been repaired by an interfascicular grouped fascicular approach.