Convexity meningioma





Introduction


Meningiomas are among the most common primary brain tumor in adults, with an incidence that ranges from 1 to 8 per 100,000 people. One of the most common locations for these lesions is along the cerebral convexity, in which they account for 20% to 30% of the lesions. Even though convexity meningiomas are considered to be among the most surgically accessible brain tumors, these lesions can be associated with significant morbidity in which complications occur in about 10% of cases in most series. In this chapter, we present a case of a patient with a convexity meningioma.



Example case


Chief complaint: left arm and leg weakness


History of present illness


A 39-year-old, right-handed woman with a history of bipolar disorder presented with left arm and leg weakness. Over the past several months, she had lost a lot of her hand strength and coordination in which she is unable to button her shirt with her left hand. She has also noticed that it feels like her left leg is weaker than her right and that she has to drag it to move ( Fig. 44.1 ).




  • Medications : Lithium.



  • Allergies : No known drug allergies.



  • Past medical and surgical history : Bipolar disorder.



  • Family history : No history of intracranial malignancies.



  • Social history : Lawyer, no smoking or alcohol.



  • Physical examination : Awake, alert, oriented to person, place, and time; Cranial nerves II to XII intact; Left drift, left upper extremity 4+/5 except hand 3/5, left lower extremity 4+/5, right upper extremity/right lower extremity 5/5.




Fig. 44.1


Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging.

(A) T1 axial image with gadolinium contrast; (B) T2 axial image; (C) T1 coronal image with gadolinium contrast; (D) T1 sagittal image with gadolinium contrast magnetic resonance imaging scan demonstrating an enhancing lesion involving the right parietal convexity.


































































































































































Arturo Ayala-Arcipreste, MD, Hospital Juarez de Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico Carlos E. Briceno, MD, Paitilla Medical Center, Panama City, Panama Ricardo J. Komotar, MD, University of Miami, Miami, FL, United States Michael W. McDermott, MD, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL, United States
Preoperative
Additional tests requested Angiogram (venous and arterial)
EEG
Neuropsychological assessment
Psychiatry evaluation
Neuroanesthesia evaluation
DTI
fMRI
MRA/MRV
Neuropsychological assessment
EEG
Psychiatry evaluation
Angiogram with possible embolization
Cerebral angiogram with embolization
Surgical approach selected Right parieto-occipital craniotomy Right parietal craniotomy Right parietal craniotomy Right frontoparietal craniotomy
Anatomic corridor Right parieto-occipital Right parietal Right parietal Right frontoparietal
Goal of surgery Simpson grade I Simpson grade I Simpson grade I Simpson grade I
Perioperative
Positioning Right three-quarters prone with left head rotation Left dorsal decubitus with left head rotation Right supine with left rotation Right lateral
Surgical equipment Surgical microscope
Ultrasonic aspirator
Surgical navigation
Surgical microscope
Ultrasonic aspirator
Surgical navigation
IOM (MEP)
Ultrasonic aspirator
Surgical navigation
Ultrasonic aspirator
Medications Steroids
Antiepileptics
Steroids
Antiepileptics
Mannitol, hypertonic saline
Steroids
Mannitol
Steroids
Antiepileptics
Mannitol
Anatomic considerations Vein of Trolard, SSS, branches of MCA and PCA Motor and somatosensory cortices Motor cortex, vein of Labbe and Trolard, SSS Vein at posterior margin, SSS, primary motor and sensory cortices
Complications feared with approach chosen Venous infarct Venous infarct, motor deficit, sensory deficit, residual tumor Motor deficit, venous infarct Venous infarct
Intraoperative
Anesthesia General General General General
Skin incision Linear Lazy S-shaped incision Linear Inverted U-shaped crossing midline
Bone opening Right parieto-occipital Right parietal Right parietal Right frontoparietal
Brain exposure Right parieto-occipital Right parietal Right parietal Right frontoparietal
Method of resection Linear incision calculated transversely with navigation, scalp flap preserving superficial temporal artery, craniotomy wide enough to cover the entire tumor and extra margin, dural tack up sutures, dural opening adjacent to tumor, devascularize tumor early on dural surface, protect brain surface with cottonoids, attempt to identify tumor-arachnoid interface, debulk center of tumor, once tumor volume has decreased sufficiently then sharp dissection of arachnoid from the tumor capsule, identify and protect venous structure at bottom of tumor, copious irrigation to allow hydrodissection, continue dissection until tumor completely removed, periosteum as dural substitute, insertion of subgaleal drain Right parietal incision guided by navigation, harvest pericranium, parietal craniotomy guided by navigation, meticulous coagulation of dura, dural tack up sutures circumferentially incise dura and coagulate dural vessels leaving a wide margin (1–2 cm) of tumor-free dura, preservation of transdural veins, folding of involved dura over tumor to assist with tumor retraction, identify subarachnoid planes at tumor-brain interface, sharply opening planes avoiding pial violation, protect extracapsular en passage vessels, attempt en bloc resection with circumferentially dissecting tumor from brain with tumor coagulation, internal debulking if cannot be removed en bloc, protect brain with cottonoids, dissect deeper until tumor can be removed, inspect for dural tails and residual tumor nests, repair dural defect with pericranium or dural substitute, epidural drain Right parietal craniotomy guided by navigation, open and resect involved dura, devascularize tumor early from dural feeders, protect veins (vein of Labbe and Trolard) and superior sagittal sinus if exposed, internal debulking with ultrasonic aspirator, dissect margins from brain, protect exposed critical structures, complete resection, dural substitute over dural defect Subgaleal flap opening, pericranium raised separately, burr holes placed anteriorly and posteriorly 1.5 cm from midline and another laterally, right frontoparietal craniotomy guided by navigation, epidural space is dissected across midline, secondary flap is elevated across midline, sagittal sinus controlled with bipolar cautery and gelfoam, tack up sutures, tension of dura is palpated and measures to lower ICP are used if needed, margins of tumor marked on dura, cruciate dural opening over center of tumor and tumor debulked, after enough debulking dura is opened around tumor, brain-tumor interface developed, pericranium used for dural reconstruction, gaps in bone filled with bone cement
Complication avoidance Devascularize tumor early, internal debulking of tumor, sharp dissection of tumor from arachnoid and critical structures, hydrodissection with irrigation Devascularize tumor early, circumferentially remove dura, preservation of transdural veins, using dura for retraction, protect cortex, identify arachnoid planes, attempt en bloc resection Devascularize tumor early, identify and protect critical venous structures, internal debulking prior to capsular manipulation Pericranial harvest, bone flap in two separate pieces, internal debulking of tumor before developing interface
Postoperative
Admission ICU ICU ICU ICU
Postoperative complications feared Cerebral edema, seizures, venous infarct, CSF leak Cerebral edema, seizures, motor and sensory deficit, CSF leak, cognitive deficit Motor deficit, venous infarct Seizures, venous infarct
Follow-up testing CT within 24 hours after surgery
MRI 1 month and 4 months after surgery
MRI within 72 hours after surgery
MRI 2 months after surgery
MRI within 24 hours after surgery MRI within 48 hours after surgery
Follow-up visits 10 days after surgery
Physical therapy evaluation
14 days after surgery 14 days after surgery 2 weeks after surgery
6–8 weeks after surgery
Adjuvant therapies recommended for WHO grade Grade I–observation, surgery for residual
Grade II–oncology/radiation oncology evaluation
Grade III–oncology/radiation oncology evaluation
Grade I–observation
Grade II–observation vs. radiation
Grade III–radiation
Grade I–observation
Grade II–radiation
Grade III–radiation/chemotherapy
Grade I–observation
Grade II–observation if Simpson grade I resection with MiB-1 <7% C, radiation if >7%
Grade III–radiation

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Feb 15, 2025 | Posted by in NEUROSURGERY | Comments Off on Convexity meningioma

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access