Differential Diagnosis of Clival and Spinal Tumors




Abstract


Chordomas and chondrosarcomas are distinct pathological entities that share many clinical–radiological similarities. Furthermore, a variety of different tumors may also be a part of their differential diagnosis. These include other primary osseous tumors, cartilaginous, soft tissue, and central nervous system neoplasms as well as congenital, nonneoplastic, and metastatic secondary lesions. Proper management of cranial base and spinal tumors depends, among other factors, on accurate diagnosis. A multidisciplinary team of physicians with significant experience with complex skull base and spinal pathologies should, ideally, evaluate these patients so as to decrease the likelihood of diagnostic errors and treatment delays. This chapter discusses the clinical, radiological, and histological characteristics of cranial base and spinal tumors by which they can be distinguished from chordomas and chondrosarcomas.




Keywords

Chondrosarcoma, Chordoma, Congenital tumors, Differential diagnosis, Metastasis, Nonneoplastic tumors, Primary tumors

 






  • Outline



  • Introduction 53



  • Congenital Tumors 54




    • Ecchordosis Physaliphora 54



    • Benign Notochordal Cell Tumor 54




  • Primary Cartilaginous Tumors 55




    • Chondroma 55



    • Chondroblastoma 55




  • Primary Osseous Tumors 56




    • Osteoma and Osteoblastoma 56



    • Osteosarcoma 56



    • Giant Cell Tumor 57



    • Intraosseous Hemangioma 57




  • Central Nervous System Tumors 58




    • Schwannoma 58



    • Pituitary Macroadenoma 58




  • Secondary Neoplastic Tumors 59




    • Metastatic Carcinoma 59



    • Hematological Malignancies 59



    • Plasma Cell Neoplasms 59



    • Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis 60



    • Adult T-cell Leukemia/Lymphoma 60



    • Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas 60



    • Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma 60




  • Nonneoplastic Tumors 61




    • Aneurysmal Bone Cyst 61



    • Fibrous Dysplasia 61




  • Other Tumors 62



  • References 62


© 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Please note that the copyright for the original figures submitted by the contributors is owned by Contributors.




Introduction


The differential diagnosis of clival and spinal tumors is vast and includes a variety of neoplastic and nonneoplastic lesions. These lesions may arise primarily from inside the bone and surrounding soft tissue and secondarily as metastasis from distant cancers. Their presenting symptoms are greatly dependent on tumor location and pattern of extension. Nonetheless, a confusing array of clinical findings, including nonspecific symptoms such as pain, diplopia, and bladder incontinence, can be associated with prolonged diagnostic delays. Further details about the common clinical presentation of clival and spinal tumors can be seen in Chapter 5 .


Modern MR and CT imaging techniques have significantly improved the diagnostic assessment of clival and spinal tumors. Chordomas and chondrosarcomas often manifest as an osteolytic and mineralized mass that extends into the soft tissues, is iso- or hypointense on MR T1-weighted images, hyperintense on MR T2-weighted images, and enhances with contrast (see Chapter 7 , Chapter 8 ). These radiological findings, however, are not pathognomonic.


The proper management of clival and spinal lesions depends on the patient’s overall clinical condition, neurologic status, and tumor histology. For instance, while chordomas are often aggressively treated by surgical resection and adjuvant radiotherapy, fibrous dysplasia is often managed conservatively with clinical observation and serial imaging. Radiotherapy alone is often the preferred treatment of a solitary plasmacytoma, whereas surgical resection is the main treatment modality of giant cell tumors. The choice of management of clival and spinal tumors can be a complex task that requires multidisciplinary investigation and planning by oncologists, surgeons, radiation therapists, and pathologists with significant experience in the treatment of tumors of the axial skeleton.


This chapter discusses the clinical, radiological, and histological characteristics of clival and spinal tumors by which they can be distinguished from chordomas and chondrosarcomas ( Table 6.1 ).



Table 6.1

Differential Diagnosis of Chordomas and Chondrosarcomas of the Axial Skeleton















































Congenital Tumors
Ecchordosis physaliphora
Benign notochordal cell tumor
Primary Cartilaginous Tumors
Chondroma
Chondroblastoma
Primary Osseous Tumors
Osteoma/Osteoblastoma
Osteosarcoma
Giant cell tumor
Intraosseous hemangioma
Central Nervous System Tumors
Schwannoma
Pituitary macroadenoma
Secondary Neoplastic Tumors
Metastatic carcinoma
Hematological malignancies
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma
Nonneoplastic Tumors
Aneurysmal bone cyst
Fibrous dysplasia
Miscellaneous Tumors




Congenital Tumors


Ecchordosis Physaliphora


Ecchordosis physaliphora (EP) is a benign congenital lesion derived from ectopic notochord remnants along the midline of the axial skeleton. EP arises intradurally and is not associated with bone erosion. Although EP of the spine is very rare, clival region EP is found in up to 2% of random autopsies. Ecchordosis are often clinically silent and discovered incidentally ; reports of clinically apparent EPs are scarce. In contrast, almost all clival chordomas arise extradurally, erode bone, and present clinically, causing pain, cranial neuropathies, and signs of brainstem compression.


In 1987, Wolfe and Scheithauer described a set of extraosseous chordomas having a better prognosis than classical chordomas. They distinguished these from both EP and osseous chordoma with the term “intradural chordoma.” Other pathologists contend that EP is a precursor, or even a benign form, of chordoma.


In the preoperative clinical settings, the distinction between EP and an intradural chordoma is greatly influenced by the clinical picture, particularly growth suggestive of a chordoma, and other radiologic findings. The distinction between these two lesions solely based on histologic and ultrastructural analysis of small tissue samples can be very difficult (see Chapter 2 ). Infiltrative growth, positive staining for brachyury, and an MIB-1 labeling index (i.e., cellular proliferative potential) > 2% favor chordoma.


Radiologically, EP is hypointense on T1-weighted and hypertintense on T2-weighted MR images. Distinct from an intradural chordoma, which shows considerable contrast enhancement, EP does not enhance after contrast injection. Wang et al. reported that EPs are usually smaller than chordomas, with a maximum diameter of less than 2 cm. However, as others have described EPs with diameters of 3 and 4 cm, agreement regarding the distinguishing features of large symptomatic EPs (>2 cm) and intradural chordomas is lacking. Lastly, CT imaging of a presumed EP revealed a small pedicle-like hypertrophic change in the inner table of clival bone, devoid of erosion, just anterior to the intradural mass. In general, asymptomatic patients can be treated conservatively if radiological follow-up shows a small intradural mass that does not enlarge.


Benign Notochordal Cell Tumor


Benign notochordal cell tumor (BNCT), previously called giant notochord rest or notochordal hamartoma, is an intraosseous lesions believed to be a potential precursor of chordomas. Distinct from ecchordosis physaliphora , which occur far more frequently in the skull base, BNCTs have an anatomic predilection for the spine, mainly the sacrococcygeal region. These tumors, usually microscopic in size, are located centrally within the vertebral body and are most often discovered incidentally during autopsies. In fact, small BNCTs are reported to be present in the spine of up to 20% of the population. Macroscopic BNCTs, on the other hand, are quite rare and proper differentiation of this entity from spinal chordoma is of utmost importance since the prognosis and management is completely different. Clinical observation and radiological surveillance with MR imaging is recommended for patients with a presumed diagnosis of BNCT.


As with ecchordosis, MR imaging of BNCT demonstrates low T1 signal, and high T2 signal with intraosseous lesion lacking contrast enhancement. Absence of a soft-tissue mass is also characteristic. On CT, BNCTs appear sclerotic and lack osteolytic changes. Histologically, these lesions are characterized by intraosseous sheets of adipocyte-like vacuolated chordoid cells mixed with eosinophilic cells and absence of myxoid background. Nuclei may appear atypical but mitotic figures are not identified. BNCTs also stain positively for cytokeratin-18. Nevertheless, the differential diagnosis between BNCTs and chordomas can be very difficult as these lesions share a similar histological and immunohistochemical profile. As for EP, the diagnosis of BNCT is greatly influenced by the clinical picture and radiological findings. Table 6.2 summarizes the main differences between EP/BNCTs and chordomas.



Table 6.2

Congenital Clival and Spinal Tumors




















Ecchordosis/BNCT Chordoma
Clinical Usually asymptomatic Pain, neurological deficits
Radiological Lack of contrast enhancement
Absence of a soft-tissue mass
Preservation of bone architecture
Marked contrast enhancement
Extension into soft tissue
Bone erosion
Histological Physaliphorous cells Infiltrative, brachyury, MIB-1 > 2%




Primary Cartilaginous Tumors


Chondroma


Chondromas, also named as osteochondromas, are benign tumors composed of mature hyaline cartilage that most commonly arise from the cartilaginous growth plates of long bones, pelvis, and scapulae. They may be solitary or multiple, in which case the term multiple exostosis applies. When they arise within the medullary osseous cavity, they are called enchondromas and can be a part of either Ollier’s disease or Maffucci syndrome—two different types of enchondromatosis that consist of multiple endochondral bone cysts and soft tissue/visceral hemangiomas, respectively. Vertebral involvement occurs in approximately 7% of the patients and 60% of these lesions arise in the cervical spine, with a predilection for the craniovertebral junction. Skull base chondromas usually arise from embryonic chondrocytic cells remnants located in sphenopetroclival synchondrosis and are rare.


These tumors may become symptomatic during adolescence as their growth rate tends to increase with age. Once the nearest epiphyseal center closes, the tumor growth stops. Malignant transformation should be considered if tumor growth persists into adulthood. Spinal chondromas usually manifest as a painless, slow-growing lesion, while skull base chondromas present with chronic headache and, eventually, intracranial hypertension. Neurological deficits may occur and depend on tumor location and growth pattern. Surgical resection is the treatment of choice.


CT imaging reveals a well-circumscribed, calcified mass, associated with erosion of the surrounding bone. MR imaging commonly shows a mass that is hypointense on T1-weighted images and heterogeneously hypertintense on T2-weighted images. A characteristic peripheral hypointensity, representing mature hyaline cartilage, is commonly seen on T2 weighted imaging. Contrast enhancement is often mild to moderate. Histologically, chondromas display an expansile, noninfiltrative growth pattern and contain well-differentiated cartilaginous cells, low cellularity, and no mitosis. Nonetheless, the differentiation between chondromas and low-grade chondrosarcomas may be challenging.


Chondroblastoma


Chondroblastomas are rare primary cartilaginous tumors that commonly occur in the epiphyses of long bones during adolescence and early adulthood. Skull base and spine chondroblastomas are very rare, tend to affect older people, and usually arise in the temporal bone and cervical spine, respectively. Clinically, these neoplasms may present with local pain, neurological deficits, or a painless, nontender, firm swelling. Although considered benign, these lesions may be locally aggressive and, exceptionally, become malignant. Therefore, some authors recommend a preoperative work up for metastatic disease. Surgery is the main treatment modality with the aim of total resection to avoid recurrences. Radiation therapy can be considered for recurrent disease.


CT imaging often reveals an osteolytic soft-tissue mass with internal calcification and, in some cases, enhancement following contrast injection. MR imaging shows low to intermediate signal on T1-weighted images, a heterogeneous, high signal on T2-weighted images, and heterogeneous contrast enhancement.


Tissue examination reveals a chondromyxoid stroma surrounding sheets of mononuclear polyhedral cells (chondroblasts) admixed with osteoclastic-like giant cells. Zones of lacy calcification (i.e., “chicken wire”) are a distinctive finding. Moreover, these tumors stain positively for S-100 and vimentin. Table 6.3 summarizes the main characteristics and differences between chondromas and chondroblastomas.



Table 6.3

Primary Cartilaginous Tumors




















Chondroma Chondroblastoma
Clinical Adolescence Older patients
Radiological Presence of calcification
Peripheral hypointensity on T2
Presence of calcification
Heterogeneous contrast-enhancement
Histological May resemble low-grade CS Chondroblasts and “chicken wire”

CS , chondrosarcoma.




Primary Osseous Tumors


Osteoma and Osteoblastoma


Osteomas are benign osseous neoplasms that commonly occur in patients during the second and third decade of life. They have a propensity to involve the posterior elements of the vertebra in the spine, but occur more frequently in the cranial vault and paranasal sinuses in the skull, especially the frontoethmoidal region. The skull base (i.e., clivus) is rarely affected. These tumors may be also a part of Gardner’s syndrome (multiple cranial osteomas, soft-tissue tumors, and colonic polyposis). Osteoblastomas, although histologically similar to osteomas, tend to occur in slightly older patients, have a greater propensity to involve the spine, may behave more aggressively, and undergo malignant transformation.


Pain, including painful scoliosis, is the most common clinical manifestation of spinal lesions. For osteomas, characteristically, pain is more intense at night and responsive to salicylates. These features are not commonly observed in osteoblastomas. Radiculopathy and neurological deficits may be present and are more common in osteoblastomas (up to 70% of cases). Skull base tumors are often asymptomatic but may present with headaches, visual symptoms, and, rarely, spontaneous rhinorrhea and signs of central nervous system infection (i.e., meningitis and brain abscess).


Radiologically, osteomas present as a well-demarcated, hyperdense intraosseous tumor with a diameter smaller than 2 cm. Osteoblastomas are larger (>2 cm), may be predominantly osteolytic, and extend into the soft tissue thus resembling other malignant tumors. MR imaging often reveals a hypo- to isointense tumor on T1- and T2-weighted images corresponding to foci of calcification. Osteoblastomas enhance avidly following contrast injection. Histologically, these tumors show increased osteoid tissue formation surrounded by a vascular fibrous stroma and perilesional sclerosis. The osteoid production and vascularity are more intense in osteoblastomas.


Asymptomatic tumors should be treated conservatively. Radiological signs of tumor progression, intractable pain, and presence of neurological symptoms warrant surgical intervention. Adjuvant radiotherapy is reserved for recurrent cases. Table 6.4 summarizes the main differences between osteomas and osteoblastomas.



Table 6.4

Primary Osseous Tumors: Osteoma Versus Osteoblastoma




















Osteoma Osteoblastoma
Clinical Second and third decades
Nocturnal pain responsive to salicylate
Third and fourth decades
More aggressive behavior
Malignant transformation
Radiological Hyperdense
Diameter < 2 cm
May be osteolytic
Diameter > 2 cm
Avid contrast-enhancement
Histological Osteoid production
Vascular stroma
Higher osteoid production
Increased vascularity


Osteosarcoma


Osteosarcomas are neoplasms of mesodermal origin and represent the most common primary malignant bone tumor (excluding multiple myeloma). They occur most frequently in young adults and the elderly, although patients of all ages may be affected, and may arise as primary lesions (i.e., osteosarcoma de novo) or secondary to fibrous dysplasia, Paget’s disease, retinoblastoma, and prior radiation therapy. The axial skeleton is rarely affected (only 4% of all cases). Spinal osteosarcomas represent up to 14.5% of all spinal cancers and most commonly affect the sacral region, while skull base tumors are exceedingly rare.


The clinical presentation of spinal and skull base osteosarcomas resembles that of other malignant bone tumors, and neurological deficits are frequent at the time of diagnosis. Elevation of the serum alkaline phosphatase may be observed. On CT imaging, osteosarcomas often demonstrate an osteoblastic appearance with regions of osteolysis, periosteal remodeling, and destruction of cortical bone. On the other hand, telangiectatic osteosarcomas are predominantly lytic lesions and may resemble aneurysmal bone cysts. On MR imaging, osteosarcomas are typically hypointense on T1-weighted images and hyperintense on T2-weighted images. Densely mineralized tumors are hypointense on all sequences. Tumor enhancement is evident following contrast administration.


Histologically, osteosarcomas may be classified in several subgroups depending on their appearance. Nevertheless, the vast majority is grouped as “conventional” tumors and characterized by anaplastic spindle-shaped cells with pleomorphic and hyperchromatic nuclei in addition to an extracellular matrix composed of immature bone (osteoblastic-type), cartilage (chondroblastic-type), or fibrous tissue (fibroblastic-type). Treatment options include surgical resection, radiation therapy, and chemoteraphy.


Giant Cell Tumor


Giant cell tumors (GCTs) of bone are rare and locally aggressive lesions that often occur in the epiphyses of long bones during the third and fifth decades of life. They arise from differentiated mesenchymal cells of the bone marrow through endochondral ossification and account for approximately 9% of all bone tumors. In the axial skeleton, GCTs affect predominantly the sacrum (up to 8% of cases) followed by the mobile spine (up to 2% of cases) and skull base, with predilection for the sphenoid and temporal bones (only 1% of cases).


Pain, with or without a palpable mass, is the most common presenting symptom. Pathological fractures may occur in spinal tumors. Since about 1% of all cases of GCTs will develop the so-called “benign lung metastasis,” metastatic workup is recommended. This event seems to be much more frequent, with a reported incidence of approximately 13%, in patients with spinal GCTs. Cases of sarcomatous transformation are also reported, usually following irradiation.


Neuroimaging studies reveal an expansile, osteolytic lesion with no evidence of mineralized matrix. Characteristically, sacral tumors involve both sides of the midline and commonly extend across the sacroiliac joints. Spinal tumors frequently involve the vertebral body, though extension into the posterior elements and paraspinal soft tissue is common. MR imaging demonstrates a low to isosignal intensity on T1-weighted images and a characteristic heterogenenous low to intermediate signal on T2-weighted images. These tumors display a variable pattern of enhancement following contrast injection and cystic changes may be also seen within the mass. A curvilinear area of low signal intensity on T1 and T2 images is also reported in spinal lesions, although this finding had been previously described in plasmacytoma and hemangioma.


Histologically, GCTs consist of osteoclast-like multinucleated giant cells intermixed throughout a spindle-shaped, fibroblast-like cell stroma, and round nuclear cells resembling monocytes. Reactive osteoid production may be seen after pathologic fracture. Occasionally, erythrocyst lakes (aneurysmal bone cyst-like changes), xanthomatous changes within collections of histiocytes, and areas of fibrous tissue are observed. Surgery, with the aim of complete tumor resection, is the treatment of choice. The role of radiotherapy for GCTs is still controversial.


Intraosseous Hemangioma


Intraosseous spinal hemangiomas are benign bone tumors usually found incidentally or in 10% of routine autopsies. Most lesions are located in the thoracic spine. Skull hemangiomas, on the other hand, account for less than 1% of all bone tumors. Skull base lesions are exceedingly rare and most commonly arise from the petrous bone. Their etiopathogenesis remains unknown. Histologically, these tumors are composed of thin-walled vascular channels of variable pattern (e.g., cavernous or capillary) lined by a single layer of mature endothelial cells interspersed among bony trabeculae and reactive spindle cell proliferation. The stroma between the osseous trabeculae may be rich in fat tissue.


Although the vast majority of spinal hemangiomas are clinically silent, some patients may present with a palpable mass, local pain, and neurological deficit. Hormone regulation and hemodynamic factors, such as those observed during pregnancy, are well-documented risk factors for symptomatic conversion. A small subset of symptomatic vertebral lesions displays locally aggressive behavior characterized by bone destruction, pathological fractures, extension to adjacent soft tissue, and disturbance of local blood flow. Proptosis and cranial neuropathies are reported in patients with skull base lesions. Primary clival hemangiomas may cause basilar invagination.


CT imaging reveals an expansile, osteolytic lesion with preservation of the cortex and marginal sclerosis. Imaging of vertebral lesions also shows the characteristic “polka dot” and “jail bar” appearances of the vertebral body on axial and sagittal/coronal images, respectively. On MR imaging, hemangionas are most commonly hypo- to isointense on T1-weighted images, heterogeneously hyperintense on T2-weighted images, and markedly enhanced by contrast. Tumors with a “fatty” stroma may present with a high-intensity signal on T1-weighted images. Treatment is only indicated for symptomatic lesions. Table 6.5 summarizes the main differences between osteosarcomas, GCTs, and hemangiomas.



Table 6.5

Primary Osseous Tumors: Osteosarcoma, Versus Giant Cell Tumor and Hemangioma
























Osteosarcoma Giant Cell Tumor Hemangioma
Clinical Young adults/elderly
Aggressive behavior
Pain
Neurological deficits
Third and fifth decades
Pain, palpable mass
Pathological fractures
“Benign lung metastasis”
Most are asymptomatic
10% of all autopsies
Growth: pregnancy
Radiological Destruction of cortex
Osteoblastic appearance
Regions of osteolysis
Expansile, osteolytic
Extension into soft tissue
Heterogeneous low T2 signal
Expansile, osteolytic
“Polka dot,” “jail bar”
High T1 signal possible
Histological Anaplastic cells
Variable matrix
Giant cells
Fibroblast-like cell stroma
Vascular channels




Central Nervous System Tumors


Schwannoma


Trigeminal schwannomas are extra-axial, slow-growing, benign neoplasms that account for less than 0.5% of all intracranial tumors and up to 8% of all intracranial schwannomas. They may be associated with neurofibromatosis type-2 and schwannomatosis. Malignant transformation is uncommon. They occur most frequently in women during the fourth and fifth decade of life and may arise anywhere along the trigeminal nerve. Most patients complain of trigeminal nerve–related dysfunction, such as hemifacial hypesthesia, as the presenting symptom. Depending on tumor location, size, and growth pattern patients may develop signs of intracranial hypertension, dysfunction of multiple cranial nerves, and long tract signs (i.e., pyramidal and cerebellar signs). These tumors may erode the petrous apex, clivus, sella turca, and middle fossa floor and, therefore, be misdiagnosed as a skull base chondrosarcoma.


Sacral schwannomas are usually solitary lesions; they most commonly arise from the sheath of the sacral nerve roots and very rarely from within the bone as intraosseous tumors. Patients initially complain of lower back pain with or without radiculopathy. Motor weakness and sphyncteric disturbance (i.e., cauda equina syndrome) occur later in the course of the disease. These tumors may also compress the rectum and cause constipation.


Neuroimaging studies reveal a skull base tumor that is usually iso- to slightly hyperdense on CT images, and hypo- to isointense on T1-weighted and hyperintense on T2-weighted MR images. Strong, uniform enhancement is common following contrast injection. Intratumoral cysts may be present. A dumbbell-shaped tumor located within the trigeminal cave and enlargement of skull base foramina (i.e., foramina rotundum and ovale) is highly suggestive of trigeminal schwannoma. Sacral schwannomas may also present with significant bone erosion and should be differentiated from chordomas and other primary bone tumors. Lack of intratumoral calcification and absence of adjacent soft tissue and sacroiliac joint involvement are characteristic of schwannomas.


Histologically, schwannomas demonstrate a biphasic pattern with compact arrays of elongated, spindle-shaped cells organized in fascicles along with palisading nuclei (i.e., Verocay bodies) alternating with less cellular areas of myxoid or loose connective tissue. Nuclear pleomorphism, microcystic changes, rare mitotic figures, and necrosis may be identified. Schwannomas also stain diffusely positive for S-100 on immunohistochemical analysis. Treatment options include surgery and radiation therapy.


Pituitary Macroadenoma


Pituitary tumors account for approximately 15% of all intracranial neoplasms. Among these lesions, giant pituitary adenomas (GPAs) (diameter ≥ 4 cm) represent up to 14% of all adenomas in surgical series. GPAs can extend from the pituitary fossa inferiorly, cause significant bone destruction in the clival region, and occasionally be misdiagnosed as primary osseous tumors. Very rarely, ectopic pituitary adenomas may arise within the clivus.


Clinically, GPAs tend to present with visual impairment due to compression of the optic pathways (i.e., optic chiasm) and hypopituitarism. A thorough endocrinological history may reveal signs and symptoms of hormone hypersecretion (e.g., amenorrhea-galactorrhea, acromegaly and Cushing’s syndrome) strongly suggesting the presence of a pituitary adenoma. Therefore, proper endocrinological evaluation, with a full pituitary panel, is recommended especially for skull base tumors affecting simultaneously the clival region and the pituitary fossa.


Non-functioning adenomas, invasive prolactinomas and GH-secreting adenomas are the types most frequently associated with clival involvement.


Pituitary adenomas are usually hypointense to the normal pituitary gland on MR T1-weighted images, hyperintense on T2-weighted images and may present, not as vividly as the normal gland, a homogenous or heterogeneous contrast enhancement. Identification of the normal gland may not be possible in larger tumors and patients with hypopituitarism. CT imaging is less useful for diagnosis of pituitary adenomas but it may reveal, in greater detail, erosion of the sellar floor and sphenoid bone, including the clival region.


Histologically, pituitary adenomas are easily differentiated from cartilaginous and osseous tumors. They display loss of the normal acinar architecture of the pituitary gland and cellular monomorphism. Delicate septae of connective tissue, small perivascular spaces, multinuclear cells and pleomorphism may be seen. Increased mitotic figures, cellular atypia and anaplasia should raise concerns for more aggressive tumors (i.e., atypical and anaplastic adenoma) and metastatic disease. Pituitary adenomas are positive for synaptophysin and neuron-specific enolase and negative for glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and cytokeratin on immunohistochemical studies, which will also reveal the hormonal content of the adenoma cells (e.g., prolactin-secreting, ACTH-secreting, GH-secreting). Treatment modalities include surgical excision, medical therapy and radiation therapy.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Feb 21, 2019 | Posted by in NEUROSURGERY | Comments Off on Differential Diagnosis of Clival and Spinal Tumors

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access