Evaluation of Erectile Disorder


302.72 (F52.21)

A. At least one of the three following symptoms must be experienced on almost all or all (approximately 75–100%) occasions of sexual activity (in identified situational contexts or, if generalized, in all contexts):

1. Marked difficulty in obtaining an erection during sexual activity

2. Marked difficulty in maintaining an erection until the completion of sexual activity

3. Marked decrease in erectile rigidity

B. The symptoms in Criterion A have persisted for a minimum duration of approximately 6 months

C. The symptoms in Criterion A cause clinically significant distress in the individual

D. The sexual dysfunction is not better explained by a nonsexual mental disorder or as a consequence of severe relationship distress or other significant stressors and is not attributable to the effects of a substance/medication or another medical condition

Specify whether:

Lifelong: The disturbance has been present since the individual became sexually active

Acquired: The disturbance began after a period of relatively normal sexual function

Specify whether:

Generalized: Not limited to certain types of stimulation, situations, or partners

Situational: Only occurs with certain types of stimulation, situations, or partners

Specify current severity:

Mild: Evidence of mild distress over the symptoms in Criterion A

Moderate: Evidence of moderate distress over the symptoms in Criterion A

Severe: Evidence of severe or extreme distress over the symptoms in Criterion A


Reprinted with permission from the diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, Fifth Edition, (Copyright 2013). American Psychiatric Association.





Best Practice and Evidence-Based Approach to Diagnosis



Background of ED Diagnosis


Numerous consensus meetings have attempted to formulate best-practice guidelines to diagnose and treat ED patients. The International Consultations on Sexual Medicine was one such series of meetings, first convened in 1999 with subsequent conferences in 2004, 2009 and 2015. This eventually reflects the interest of clinicians to achieve the optimal diagnostic and therapeutic tools to mange patients with ED. The goal-directed approach was combined with evidence-based practice to create diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms and establish standard-of-care practices [2, 78]. A two-level diagnostic approach is a logical guide for treating patients with ED. Currently, a tailored diagnostic pathway with full consideration of the patient’s goals is recommended. Lue [2] proposed the “goal-directed approach to diagnose and treat ED” more than 20 years ago, and this approach is still valid. In general, a detailed medical and psychosexual history that includes standardized questionnaires such as the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) is useful for assessing the severity of ED [79]. A thorough physical examination, although does not usually reveal the cause of ED its use is recommended to identify information of value such as Peyronie’s plaques, atrophic testes in hypogonadism, uncontrolled hypertension and neurological disorders [50]. Appropriate laboratory investigations are useful for uncovering potentially serious comorbidities. Complete blood count, fasting blood glucose, lipid profile, kidney function, and others if indicated should be obtained [80, 81]. Additional tests such as serum testosterone, prolactin, and thyroid function tests can be included at the physician’s discretion, based on the clinical scenario [82]. For an appropriate treatment the evaluation methods should address these inquiries, whether the cause of ED is organic or psychogenic; the severity and possible reversibility of ED; and the patient’s and probably the partner’s ambition and expectations. The tailored diagnosis of ED not only allows the physician to avoid further costly evaluation, but also saves the patient from invasive diagnostic techniques. Dynamic color Doppler ultrasonography of the penis is not necessary for all patients with ED. However, penile hemodynamics assessment is useful in evaluating thePDE5-Is nonresponders, young men with primary or secondary ED and a history of pelvic trauma or drug abuse, or before surgical interventions for treating PD, differentiating psychogenic from organic ED, undiagnosed penile pain with occult septal scarring and in medico-legal cases [83, 84]. Invasive diagnostic tools such as penile angiography and cavernosography/cavernosometry can be used in certain undiagnosed cases. The recent years has focused on neuroimaging, biomarkers of vascular health to further refine and personalize workup. There are ongoing investigations which stabilize the role of gene, stem cell, as well as tissue engineering therapies [85].


Diagnostic Tests



Medical and Psychosexual History


A multifaceted comprehensive approach is required for a full evaluation to diagnose ED. Despite the availability of innovative diagnostic tests, a detailed sexual and medical history remains the key to the diagnosis of ED. It can also differentiate between different disorders of sexual function. Psychosexual and medical history should address any unstable interpersonal relationships, or emotional stressors that can play a huge role in sexual health. Further, it should focus on the concurrent risk factors, medical comorbidities, and medications which are pivotal parts of the diagnostic evaluation. As by far the most common presenting complaint is reduction of rigidity and duration of erection rather than complete absence of erection, sexual desire and inventory of sexual partners, therefore they should also be included in history. Assessment of the onset of ED, the presence of morning erection, and any psychological conflict may help to classify psychogenic from organic ED.

Sexual history can also direct further evaluation and treatment of ED associated with other conditions especially endocrinopathy in patients who may present with a recent history of ED and low libido [80]. Early recognition of psychogenic ED not only allows the physician to avoid further costly workup, but also save the patient from unnecessary, sometime invasive diagnostic techniques. As ED is known to be associated with many risk factors, common medical comorbidities and medications, thorough inquiring may yield insights regarding peripheral vascular or coronary artery disease, diabetes, psychological, neurologic, chronic debilitating disease, or tobacco and alcohol consumption. These risk factors may direct further evaluation. Clinically, patients with multiple risk factors and medical comorbidities such as old age, long history of diabetes, and vascular disease are likely to have ED secondary to vascular and neuropathic disease [45].

On the other hand, young patients with psychiatric illness are more likely to have psychogenic or possibly secondary ED due to psychotropic medications. A patient’s past surgical history of abdomen and pelvis such as radical prostatectomy, abdominoperineal resection, pelvic trauma, and irradiation are well known to be associated with ED [86, 87].


Distinguishing Organic from Psychogenic ED


Clues to suggest a psychogenic etiology include sudden onset, good quality spontaneous or self-stimulated erections, major life events, or previous psychological problems. Conversely, gradual onset, lack of tumescence, and normal libido are more suggestive of an organic etiology [88]. Recent study classified men with ED into those that have difficulty achieving an erection. The authors reported that patients who cannot achieve tumescence are more likely to have organic etiologies. While maintaining an erection appears to have a considerable psychologic component [89]. Supporting to that men who struggle with maintaining an erection were younger, healthier, had a lower degree of penile insufficiency and a higher prevalence of normal nocturnal erections [90].


Physical Examination


The physical examination should focus on the vascular, neurological, and endocrine systems [91, 92]. Physical examination with particular attention to sexual and genital development may reveal micropenis, penile chordee, Peyronie’s plaque. Furthermore, small soft atrophic testes or gynecomastia may necessitate an endocrine evaluation. A careful neurologic examination should also be performed. Testing for genital and perineal sensation and the bulbocavernosus reflex is important in assessing possible neurogenic ED. Patients with certain genetic syndromes, such as Kleinfelter’s, or Kallmann’s may present with obvious physical signs of hypogonadism and a distinctive body habitus. Signs of either hyper or hypothyroidism as well as stigmata of end stage organs disorders such as liver, renal, cardiac failure should be assessed. Hypertension, arrhythmia and anemia should also be excluded. The presence of obesity noted by waist circumference, high blood pressure, or abnormal pulses may require more extensive vascular workup. In many cases, a careful history and physical examination will direct the physician to the most expedient and cost-effective approach, and eliminate the need for unnecessary diagnostic tests [93].


Laboratory Investigation


The laboratory investigation is directed to identify undetected medical illnesses that may contribute to ED, e.g., metabolic disturbances such as renal insufficiency, diabetes, and endocrine abnormalities (hypogonadism, hyperprolactinemia). Laboratory investigations should follow clinical suspicion of specific disorders. Hemoglobin A1c and serum glucose may be measured to detect occult diabetes, and a lipid screen performed to assess the presence of dyslipidemia [92, 94]. A complete laboratory evaluation includes serum chemistry, renal function, a complete blood count, urine analysis, and hormonal evaluation, i.e., generally serum testosterone and prolactin should be done in the initial evaluation.


Further Investigations when Needed



Vascular Workup



Penile Brachial Pressure Index (PBI)

The penile brachial index represents the penile systolic blood pressure divided by the brachial systolic blood pressure. A penile brachial index of 0.7 or less has been used to indicate arteriogenic ED [95]. This test gained some initial popularity because of its low cost and noninvasiveness. However this test has limited clinical utility because measurement in the flaccid state will not reveal the full functional capacity of the cavernous arteries in the erect state; also because the data are based on superficial and deep penile arterial pressure, whereas erectile function depends on the deep arteries exclusively. Therefore, a normal PBI cannot be relied upon to exclude arteriogenic ED. Since PBI is inaccurate and poorly reproducible no justification for its continued use is suggested [96].


Penile Plethysmography (Penile Pulse Volume Recording)

This test is performed by connecting a 2.5- or 3-cm cuff to an air plethysmograph. The cuff is inflated to a pressure above brachial systolic pressure, which is then decreased by 10-mmHg increments and tracings are obtained at each level. In patients with vasculogenic ED the waveform shows a slow upstroke, a low rounded peak, slow downstroke, and no dicrotic notch. Its height varies considerably; patients with vascular insufficiency usually have the lowest mean height [97]. However due to the inconsistence of results, its clinical uses is abandoned.


Combined Intracavernosal Injection and Stimulation Test (CIS)

A vascular workup aims to evaluate arterial blood inflow, subsequent engorgement, and blood retention within corporeal bodies. Combined intracavernosal injection and stimulation is a first-line easy to carry with high yielding option. Vasoactive drugs (e.g., papaverine, phentolamine, alprostadil) can be used. This pharmacologic screening test allows the clinician to bypass neurogenic and hormonal influences and to evaluate the vascular status of the penis directly and objectively.

Assessment of penile rigidity and duration of response is then conducted. Normally, a full erection is achieved within 15 min (i.e., an erection > 90° that is firm to palpation) and lasts longer than 15 min [98]. Carful interpretation of the data is required due to the occasional false-positive results due to improper response secondary to anxiety, needle phobia, or inadequate injection dosage or false-negative results particularly in men with penile arterial insufficiency with an intact veno-occlusive mechanism [99, 100].


Duplex Ultrasonography

Intracavernosal injection test is a subjective evaluation of penile rigidity by the assessor. Duplex ultrasound , on the other hand, provides a quantitative component to the evaluation of blood flow. A high-resolution ultrasonography and color-pulsed Doppler is used in this technique. In 1985, Lue and associates introduced high-resolution sonography and pulsed Doppler blood flow analysis (duplex ultrasonography) with intracavernosal injection of a vasoactive agent such as papaverine (15–30 mg) or Alprostadil (10 μg) [101, 102]. Sonographic assessment of the penis is then repeated 3–5 min after the injection. Each main cavernous and dorsal artery is individually assessed. Cavernous arterial diameter and pulsation are recorded.

Flow velocities are measured after vasodilator injections. In a normal Doppler study, the peak systolic velocities (PSV) have been used to establish normal from abnormal erectile response. The mean PSV typically ranges from 35 to 47 cm/s. If velocities are below 25 cm/s, abnormal pudendal arteriography is confirmed with 100% sensitivity, 95% specificity [103].

Hence, patients with a peak velocity of >35 cm/s are supposed to have normal cavernous arterial inflow, while those with values <25 cm/s are diagnosed with cavernous arterial insufficiency. In regards to veno-occlusive dysfunction, resistive index (RI) can be a useful tool. RI =Peak systolic flow − End diastolic velocity/Peak systolic flow

Hence, the RI calculation approaches a value of one. Patients with an RI >0.9 have normal veno-occlusive function, and those with an RI <0.75 raise suspicion for veno-occlusive dysfunction, that is, dysfunctional corporal retention. In a study that investigated the association between RI and cavernosography, in men with an RI >0.9, 90% had normal cavernosography while in those with a RI <0.75, 95.5% had corporal leakage [104]. Ultrasonography has some limitations such as anatomic arterial variants that affect the accuracy of testing and the high false-positive results especially in young men [105].


Comparison with Other Tests

Duplex sonography provided significant advantages over previous techniques especially, is noninvasive and can be performed in the office setting; allows the ultrasonographer to image the individual cavernous arteries and provides an additional advantage of easier assessment of direction of blood flow and communication among the cavernous, dorsal and spongiosal arteries, which are crucial in penile vascular and reconstructive surgeries. Attempts to correlate duplex sonography with pudendal arteriography have been achieved with varying degrees of success and showed reasonable correlation [106, 107]. Previous study compared duplex ultrasonography with NPT monitoring and reported a good correlation, except in patients with neurogenic ED [108]. A good correlation in 71% of patients between color-coded duplex sonography and penile blood gas measurements was reported [109].


Pitfalls of Ultrasonography

Ultrasonography has some limitations; it is performed in a nonsexual setting with little privacy and can increase the patient’s anxiety level and cause a sympathetic response that will inhibit his response to injection [110]. The result of the sonographic study may also be influenced by the temporal response to intracavernosal injection. Arterial flow decreases significantly during the full erection phase, and ultrasonography performed during this period will yield a deceptively low peak velocity. Anatomic arterial variants that affect the accuracy of testing and the high false-positive results especially in young men [105] are also reported. Lastly, ultrasonography is operator-dependent that is influenced by the clinician experience.


Penile Angiography

Penile arteriography was introduced by the pioneering work of Michal and Pospichal [111]. Currently, selective pudendal arteriography performed with the aid of intracavernosal injection is considered by many to be the gold standard for evaluating penile arterial anatomy [107]. Penile angiography is typically reserved for nonsmoking, less than 40 years patients with post-traumatic arterial injury and as a preparation for revascularization surgery [15, 94].

In this test, the internal pudendal artery is selectively cannulated, and then radiographic contrast is injected for visualization of the internal pudendal and penile arteries. A true limitation of the utility of this modality is penile vascular anatomic variations that exists and making it difficult for the angiographer to determine congenital from acquired abnormalities. Furthermore, like all invasive radiographic tests, the study is performed under artificial conditions, which may produce a significant sympathetic response and inhibit the erectile response. Penile angiography is potentially serve as a diagnostic tool and recently limited clinical data demonstrated contemporary endovascular utility as a therapeutic option in select patients [112].


Penile Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Penile magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has promise in detailing penile anatomy and microcirculation. Another technique of assessing penile function was reported by using sequential contrast-enhanced MRI of the penis in a flaccid state. Subjects with normal erectile function showed gradual and centrifugal enhancement of the corpora cavernosa, while those with ED showed poor enhancement with abnormal progression [113]. The use of MRI during the workup of prostate cancer has recently become more popular. Owing to the vicinity of the genital organs, penile anatomy and vasculature are often depicted on these imaging studies. In a study that investigated pelvis MRI for staging prostate cancer in patients who underwent prostatectomy. On MRI a correlation between a patient’s self-reported sexual function and perfusion-related parameters was also noted [114].


Cavernosometry and Cavernosography

The current standard diagnostic study for veno-occlusive dysfunction is pharmacologic cavernosometry and cavernosography. Cavernosometry involves simultaneous saline infusion and intracorporeal pressure monitoring. Wespes et al. (1984), introduced dynamic cavernosometry and cavernosography during artificial erection produced by saline infusion [115]. Veno-occlusive dysfunction is indicated by either the inability to increase intracorporeal pressure to the level of the mean systolic blood pressure with saline infusion or a rapid drop of intracorporeal pressure after cessation of infusion [116]. Cavernosography involves the infusion of radiocontrast solution into the corpora cavernosa during an artificial erection to visualize the site of venous leakage.

It should always be performed after activation of the veno-occlusive mechanism by intracavernosal injection of a vasoactive agent, various leakage sites to the glans, corpus spongiosum, superficial and deep dorsal veins, and cavernous and crural veins can then be detected [117]. The phenomenon of incomplete trabecular smooth-muscle relaxation (in a nonsexual setting) will falsely suggest veno-occlusive dysfunction in some normal subjects [118]. The normal maintenance rate in patients with complete smooth-muscle relaxation is reported to be less than 5 ml/min with a pressure diminish from 150 mmHg of less than 45 mmHg in 30 s.


Neurologic Workup



Background of Neurologic Testing

Neurologic testing should assess peripheral, spinal, and supraspinal centers and both somatic and autonomic pathways associated with all three types of erection (nocturnal, psychogenic, and reflexogenic) and sexual arousal. However, although post radical prostatectomy cavernosal nerves injury may completely eliminate spontaneous erection, a high percentage of patients with complete upper spinal cord injury are known to have adequate erections. Therefore, it is clear that the effect of neurologic deficit on penile erection is a complicated phenomenon and, with a few exceptions, neurologic testing will rarely direct management. Moreover, there is no reliable test to assess neurotransmitter release, which reflects a real deficiency in the current assessment of overall neurologic function associated with penile erection. In the clinical assessment, the aim of neuro-urologic testing should aim to reveal reversible neurologic disease such as dorsal nerve neuropathy secondary to long-distance bicycling; assess the extent of neurologic deficit from a known neurologic disease such as diabetes mellitus or pelvic injury; and determine whether a referral to a neurologist is mandatory [80].


Somatic Nervous System

Although numerous neurologic tests had been proposed to evaluate the neurologic system as a cause of sexual dysfunction, however, they carry limited clinical utility due to limited impact on management of ED, poor reproducibility, and sensitivity.


Penile Glans Biothesiometry

This test is designed to measure the sensory perception threshold to various amplitudes of vibratory stimulation produced by a handheld electromagnetic device (biothesiometer) placed on the pulp of the index fingers, both sides of the penile shaft, and the glans penis. Questions regarding utility of this test have been raised as it does not accurately mimic the neurophysiologic function of the glans penis. In addition, there is a marked intra-individual variation in vibration sensitivity, raising the issue of reproducibility and accuracy [119].


Sacral Evoked Response—Bulbocavernosus Reflex Latency

This test is designed to evaluate the somatosensory reflexogenic mechanism of erections. Two electrodes with direct stimulator are placed on the penis, one at the corona and one approximately 3 cm proximal to the corona. Concentric needle electrodes are placed in the right and left bulbocavernous muscles to record the response. Latency period is defined as the time from the electrical impulse delivery to the muscle response. The mean response time is approximately 30 ms, and an abnormal response is defined as > 3 standard deviations from the mean. However, pudendal nerve conduction appears relatively late in various forms of neurogenic ED including diabetes, making it an unreliable diagnostic test [120].


Dorsal Nerve Conduction Velocity

Two electrodes are placed on the penis, one at the glans and another at the base. A stimulus is delivered from each electrode. Conduction velocity is then calculated by dividing the distance between the electrodes by the difference in latency times recorded at each site. Slower conduction velocity has been associated with neurogenic ED. In men with neurologic ED, the most frequently observed finding was decreased conduction of the penile dorsal nerve [121].


Genitocerebral Evoked Potential Studies

This test involves electrical stimulation of the dorsal nerve of the penis as described for the BCR latency test. Instead of recording EMG responses, this study records the evoked potential waveforms overlying the sacral spinal cord and cerebral cortex. This study might provide an objective assessment of the presence, location, and nature of afferent penile sensory dysfunction in patients with subtle abnormalities on neurologic examination [80].


Autonomic Nervous System


Heart Rate Variability and Sympathetic Skin Response

Testing the autonomic system remains less sensitive and reproducible even than the somatic system. Although autonomic neuropathy is an important cause of ED, direct testing is not available. The test of heart rate control (mainly parasympathetic) and blood pressure control (mainly sympathetic) are indirect methods of assessment. Because heart rate and blood pressure responses can be affected by many external factors, these tests must be done under standardized conditions [122]. Sympathetic skin response (SSR) measures the skin potential evoked by electric shock stimuli. SSR was absent in 11 of 30 cases but was normal in all patients with non-neurogenic ED [123]. In a more recent study Yiou et al. reported that, post-radical prostatectomy, penile sensory thresholds for warm and cold sensations increased significantly after non-nerve sparing technique only [124]. This paper supported the idea of testing penile sensation to evaluate the extent of cavernous nerve damage caused by prostatectomy.


Smooth-Muscle EMG and Single Potential Analysis of Cavernous Electrical Activity

Direct recording of cavernous electrical activity with a needle electrode during flaccidity and with visual sexual stimulation was reported [125]. The normal resting flaccid electrical activity from the corpora cavernosa was a rhythmic slow wave with an intermittent burst of activity. Patients with suspected autonomic neuropathy demonstrated a discoordination pattern with continuing electrical activity during visual sexual stimulation. In normal subjects, single potential analysis of cavernous electrical activity (SPACE) shows a regular pattern of activity [126]. In patients with disruption of the peripheral autonomic supply, asynchronous potentials with higher frequencies and an irregular shape are typical. In those with complete spinal cord lesions, abnormal as well as normal electrical activity is found.


Endocrine and Hormonal Workup



Hypogonadism

In 2010, the Endocrine Society published “Testosterone Therapy in Men with Androgen Deficiency Syndromes: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline” which addressed important issues surrounding the diagnosis and treatment of male hypogonadism [127]. A more recent systematic analysis critically updated the endocrine society clinical practice guidelines for male hypogonadism [128]. Theoretically, the best measurement of androgenic milieu is determined by calculating bioavailable testosterone, that is, the summation of free and albumin-bound testosterone. However, for screening purposes total serum testosterone is thought to be adequate. Blood draws should occur in the morning, when serum testosterone levels peak. The normal range is large, typically quoted between 280 and 1000 ng/dl. However, if an initial testosterone level falls below normal range, a repeat confirmatory test is recommended [79].

If hypogonadism is suspected based on symptoms and serum testosterone, further workup with serum luteinizing hormone (LH) and prolactin should be applied. In primary hypogonadism (i.e., gonadal dysfunction), LH and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels are elevated in response to low androgen level. Many men will present with ED or infertility and some of them may present with the classic features of Kleinfelter’s (i.e., micropenis, microorchidisism, eunuchoid body habitus). Of men with Kleinfelter’s, 22.7% experienced severe ED, and 60.9% had hypoactive sexual desire [129].

In secondary hypogonadism (i.e., central dysfunction), LH and FSH levels are inappropriately normal or low. Hyperprolactinemia can ultimately lead to secondary hypogonadism through suppression of gonadotropin-releasing hormone and pulsatile secretion of LH secretion. When prolactin levels are very high (>200 ng/ml, MRI imaging of the pituitary should be considered to exclude prolactin secreting tumors. Medications, i.e., antipsychotics, tricyclic antidepressants, opiates, prolactin-secreting tumors, hypothyroidism, cirrhosis, and hypothalamic lesions are contributory factors for secondary hypogonadism [130].


Thyroid Dysfunction

During endocrine workup of ED, serum thyroid function tests should also be considered. Hyperthyroidism may increase aromatization of testosterone into estrogen, ultimately raising levels of SHBG and decreasing percent of bioavailable testosterone. Fatigue, weight loss, hyperactivity, palpitations, and heat intolerance are common symptoms that help in diagnosis of this condition. Laboratory diagnosis reveals high thyroid hormone concentrations (total or free T4) with low serum thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) levels [130]. In contrast, diagnosis of hypothyroidism is made when serum basal TSH is elevated, and thyroid hormone concentrations are low.


Further Investigations



Nocturnal Penile Tumescence Testing (NPT)

The NPT test was one of the earliest tools to study ED. Nocturnal penile tumescence or sleep-related erection is a recurring cycle of penile erections associated with REM sleep in potent men. The association between sleep and erections was documented as early as 1940 by Halverson, and further studies revealed the association with the REM phase [131]. In 1970, Karacan suggested that NPT could be used to evaluate ED, as its mechanism is presumed to rely on neurovascular responses similar to those of erotically induced erections. The primary goal of NPT testing is to distinguish psychogenic from organic causes of ED [132]. Morales et al. (1994) found that patients with documented erections at night also exhibited erectile episodes during napping and proposed that diurnal penile tumescence is a summary reflection of NPT episodes [133].

In 1985 the Rigiscan was introduced. This combines the sophisticated monitoring of rigidity, tumescence and number and duration of events with the convenience and economic advantage of an ambulatory monitoring system [134]. Because the Rigiscan measures radial rigidity (compressibility), the validity of this measurement has been questioned. Allen et al. (1993) reported that, when Rigiscan base and tip radial rigidity exceeded 60% of maximum, correlation with axial rigidity and observer ratings was poor [135]. Normal NPT results include at least four erections, with a mean duration of 30 min, with a maximal rigidity above 70% [85]. Many investigators have advocated the use of NPT studies to differentiate organic from psychologenic ED [108]. The shortcomings associated with various NPT tests, such as false-negative results were documented. NPT was abandoned as a routine part of the ED evaluation. However, in some patients with complex and confusing histories NPT is a useful tool in confirming the clinical diagnosis.


Rating Scales

A complete medical and sexual history is the most important component of ED diagnosis. First step is to distinguish ED from other sexual dysfunctions, such as premature ejaculation and loss of libido. Several well tested sexual questionnaires, such as the IIEF (International Index of Erectile Function) and EDITS (Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction), allow identification of ED severity and post treatment satisfaction. The IIEF is composed of 15 questions; an abridged 5-item version, called the sexual health inventory for men (SHIM), has been developed and validated [136].

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Dec 12, 2017 | Posted by in PSYCHIATRY | Comments Off on Evaluation of Erectile Disorder

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access