First-Generation/Typical Antipsychotic Drugs
William Klykylo
INTRODUCTION
Although antipsychotic drugs, also commonly known as neuroleptics or major tranquilizers, are used in adults primarily to treat psychoses, in children they have also been used to treat other common nonpsychotic psychiatric disorders. At present, antipsychotics are the drugs of first choice in childhood for schizophrenia and autistic disorder. There is, however, some evidence that antipsychotics are not as effective clinically in schizophrenia with childhood onset as in schizophrenia occurring in later adolescence and adulthood (Green et al., 1984). Meyers et al. (1980) noted that serum neuroleptic levels of 50 ng/mL of chlorpromazine equivalents correspond to the threshold for clinical response in adult patients with schizophrenia and suggest that similar therapeutic serum levels are necessary in children. Because children may metabolize and excrete antipsychotics more efficiently than do adults, determination of serum neuroleptic levels, if they are available, is recommended before a trial of an antipsychotic is deemed a failure.
The use of first-generation (FGA) versus second-generation antipsychotics (SGA) in early-onset psychotic disorders remains controversial. The TEOSS (Treatment of Early-Onset Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders; Sikich et al., 2008) noted that molindone appeared to have similar efficacy to secondgeneration drugs, with more benign metabolic effects. As the potential adverse effects and cost of second-generation agents in some patients are recognized, familiarity with first-generation/typical agent remains a necessary part of clinical practice.
Shapiro and Shapiro (1989) concluded that antipsychotics were also the drugs of choice for treating chronic motor or vocal tic disorder and Tourette disorder when psychosocial, educational, or occupational functioning was so impaired that medication was required. SGAs are now often used for tic disorders, but FGAs, including haloperidol and pimozide, remain common agents (Roessner et al., 2012; Singer, 2010). Both FGAs and SGAs can lead to increases in body mass index in patients with tic disorders, with resultant metabolic effects.
Antipsychotic drugs are also clinically effective in children with severely aggressive conduct disorders, and some are approved for use in such children. Lithium is also effective in some such children, perhaps more so when an explosive affect is present, and lithium has fewer clinically significant untoward effects than neuroleptics. Because lithium is still not approved for use either in children younger than 12 years or for this indication, and because of the necessity of monitoring serum lithium levels, many clinicians prefer to use antipsychotic drugs.
The use of antipsychotics in the mentally retarded continues to be controversial, but they are prescribed frequently, especially for institutionalized patients. In optimal doses, antipsychotics are effective in decreasing irritability, sleep disturbances, hostility, agitation, and combativeness and may improve concentration and social behavior in agitated individuals with severe intellectual disabilities (American Medical Association, 1986). Aman and Singh (1988) cautioned that the influential studies of the mentally retarded by Breuning, which showed significant detrimental effects on cognition resulting from antipsychotic use, appear to have been fabricated. However, concerns over overuse and misuse of these medications in this population continue, especially as psychosocial resources are threatened.
ANTIPSYCHOTIC DRUGS IN THE TREATMENT OF ATTENTION-DEFICIT/HYPERACTIVITY DISORDERS
Some antipsychotic agents (e.g., haloperidol) have been approved for treating children with symptoms such as excessive motor activity, impulsivity, difficulty sustaining attention, and poor frustration tolerance, which would be found in most children diagnosed with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Double-blind, controlled studies have shown antipsychotic drugs to be effective in treating children who would meet the criteria for ADHD. However, studies comparing antipsychotic drugs with stimulants almost always show that, overall, stimulants are statistically more effective clinically than antipsychotics (Green, 1995; Gittelman-Klein et al., 1976). In addition, many clinicians are reluctant to use antipsychotics to treat patients with ADHD because of the risk that an irreversible tardive dyskinesia (TD) might develop, the possibility of adverse metabolic effects, and the worry that the sedative effects of antipsychotics may interfere significantly with cognition and learning. Because of such factors, antipsychotics should be thought of as third-rank drugs to be used primarily in the treatment of ADHD, which is severely disabling and which has not responded to stimulants and other drugs with untoward effects of more acceptable risk.
Although these caveats in using antipsychotics are not to be dismissed, data moderating these dictums should be cited: (a) the influential studies of Breuning and his colleagues, which showed significant detrimental effects on cognition in mentally retarded patients treated with antipsychotic drugs, appear to have been fabricated (Aman and Singh, 1988); (b) other studies have reported minimal impairment of cognition in subjects diagnosed with ADHD who were treated with appropriate doses of antipsychotics (Klein, 1990/1991); (c) Sallee et al. (1994) examined the effects of haloperidol and pimozide in patients with Tourette syndrome, including subjects with ADHD and found no decrement in cognition associated with FGA use.
In a randomized, crossover, double-blind study, Weizman et al. (1984) noted that the combination of a stimulant and neuroleptics may be useful in some children who do not respond adequately to stimulants alone. Clinically, this may be a potentially useful option for a small subgroup of children who do not respond adequately to stimulants or to other drugs alone. The combination of stimulant and neuroleptic would presumably achieve a satisfactory result that would either not be achieved by the neuroleptic alone or would require higher doses of neuroleptics, which would carry an increased risk of untoward effects, such as TD and cognitive dulling.
PHARMACOKINETICS OF ANTIPSYCHOTIC DRUGS
Rivera-Calimlim et al. (1979) reported plasma chlorpromazine levels in a total of 24 children aged 8 to 16 years who were treated with chlorpromazine for psychiatric disorders, including various psychoses, mental retardation with aggression, hyperactivity, self-injurious behavior, and mood disorders with anxiety. The authors reported wide interpatient variations in chlorpromazine plasma levels for a given dose; for example, nine children receiving 0.8 to 2.9 mg/kg/day achieved mean plasma levels of 6.6 ng/mL, with a range from undetectable to 18 ng/mL. One child receiving 9.8 mg/kg/day showed only trace levels of plasma chlorpromazine. Children and adolescents had chlorpromazine plasma levels that were two to three-and-a-half times lower than those for adults, for a given dose per kilogram of body weight. Clinical improvement in these children usually began when plasma chlorpromazine concentration was at least 30 ng/mL and optimal levels ranged between 40 and 80 ng/mL; suggested optimal plasma levels for adults treated with chlorpromazine were higher, between 50 and 300 ng/mL. A final, clinically important observation was that plasma chlorpromazine levels declined over time in most patients who were on fixed doses (Rivera-Calimlim et al., 1979). It was suggested that one possible reason might be autoinduction of enzymes that metabolize chlorpromazine.
CONTRAINDICATIONS FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF ANTIPSYCHOTIC DRUGS
Known hypersensitivity to the drug and toxic central nervous system depression or comatose states are absolute contraindications. If a severe adverse event develops (e.g., agranulocytosis, neuroleptic malignant syndrome TD, or a withdrawal dyskinesia), children and adolescents should be managed without antipsychotics, if at all possible.
Neuroleptics may lower the seizure threshold; they should be used cautiously in patients with seizure disorders, and chlorpromazine probably should not be used in such patients.
INTERACTIONS OF ANTIPSYCHOTIC DRUGS WITH OTHER MEDICATIONS
The most frequent clinically important reactions are with other central nervous system depressants such as alcohol, sedatives and hypnotics, benzodiazepines, antihistamines, opiates, and barbiturates, in which an additive central nervous system depressive effect occurs.
Antipsychotic drugs also have varying degrees of anticholinergic effects. When combined with another anticholinergic (antiparkinsonian) agent, such as when one is used prophylactically to prevent acute dyskinesia, pseudoparkinsonism, or akathisia, central nervous system symptoms of cholinergic blockade may result. These symptoms may include confusion, disorientation, delirium, hallucinations, and worsening of preexisting psychotic symptoms. Of clinical importance, this picture may be mistaken for inadequate treatment or worsening of the psychosis, rather than an untoward effect.
The combination of antipsychotic drugs and lithium carbonate, particularly if high doses are used, may lead to an increased incidence of central nervous system toxicity, including neuroleptic malignant syndrome.
Combined use of antipsychotic drugs with tricyclic antidepressants or monoamine oxidase inhibitors may increase plasma levels of antidepressants.
Neuroleptics may also have noteworthy interactions with many other medications. Given today’s easy access to databases of drug interactions, a review of all possible interactions in every patient receiving these drugs should be standard clinical practice.
UNTOWARD EFFECTS OF ANTIPSYCHOTIC DRUGS
Although antipsychotic drugs may have numerous serious untoward effects, those of greatest concern in children and adolescents are the effects of sedation on cognition and the extrapyramidal syndromes, in particular the possible development of irreversible TD with the standard antipsychotics. We note that even older references documenting these effects remain current and unchallenged.
Agranulocytosis
Agranulocytosis is a major concern in patients treated with clozapine; it is discussed in more detail later. Agranulocytosis has also been reported with other antipsychotics. It usually occurs relatively early in treatment (e.g., for chlorpromazine, usually between the 4th and 10th weeks). Parents and older patients should be warned to report indications of sudden infections, such as fever and sore throat, to the physician. White blood cell count should be determined immediately, and if it is significantly depressed, medication should be stopped and therapy instituted.
Untoward Cognitive Effects
Both high-potency and low-potency antipsychotic agents are effective when given in equivalent doses, but they differ in the frequency and severity of their untoward effects. Usually, the higher-potency antipsychotic drugs cause less sedation, fewer autonomic side effects, and more extrapyramidal untoward effects; the lower-potency antipsychotic drugs cause greater sedation, more autonomic side effects, and fewer extrapyramidal effects (Baldessarini, 1990). Because of the great importance of minimizing any cognitive dulling in schoolchildren and in the mentally retarded, whose cognition is already compromised, high-potency, less-sedative antipsychotic drugs are often preferred. Over a period of days to weeks, however, considerable tolerance often develops to the sedative effects of high-dose, lowpotency antipsychotic drugs, and thus they are still useful when untoward effects are carefully monitored (Green, 1989).
Extrapyramidal Syndromes
Significant numbers of children and adolescents receiving antipsychotic medication develop extrapyramidal syndromes. Baldessarini (1990) has enumerated six types of extrapyramidal syndromes associated with the use of antipsychotic drugs. The risk of extrapyramidal syndromes with clozapine and other atypical antipsychotics appears to be considerably reduced compared with that of standard antipsychotics.
Effects Usually Appearing During Drug Administration
Acute Dystonic Reactions
The period of maximum risk is within hours to 5 days of initiation of neuroleptic therapy. There may also be increased risk following increments in dose. High-potency, low-dose antipsychotic drugs are more likely to precipitate an acute dystonic reaction than are low-potency, high-dose antipsychotic drugs, and young males, both children and adolescents, may be at increased risk (APA, 1980b). Untreated acute dystonic reactions may last from a few minutes to several hours, and they may recur. Symptoms, which may be painful and frightening, particularly if the patient does not understand what is happening, include muscular hypertonicity; tonic contractions (spasms) of the neck (torticollis), mouth, and tongue, which may make speaking difficult; oculogyric crisis (eyes rolling upward and remaining in that position); and opisthotonos (spasm in which the spine and extremities are bent with an anterior convexity). Acute dystonic reactions respond rapidly to anticholinergic
and antiparkinsonian drugs, such as 25 to 50 mg diphenhydramine (Benadryl) orally or intramuscularly, or 1 to 2 mg benztropine (Cogentin) intramuscularly. (The manufacturer of benztropine cautions that, because of its atropine-like untoward effects, its use is contraindicated in children younger than 3 years and that it should be used with caution in older children [Physicians’ Desk Reference (PDR), 1995].) If the dystonia is very severe, administering either 25 mg of diphenhydramine or 1 to 2 mg of benztropine intramuscularly will reverse the dystonia within a few minutes. The prophylactic use of anticholinergic and antiparkinsonian agents to prevent acute dystonic reactions is discussed following the section on “Akathisia.”
and antiparkinsonian drugs, such as 25 to 50 mg diphenhydramine (Benadryl) orally or intramuscularly, or 1 to 2 mg benztropine (Cogentin) intramuscularly. (The manufacturer of benztropine cautions that, because of its atropine-like untoward effects, its use is contraindicated in children younger than 3 years and that it should be used with caution in older children [Physicians’ Desk Reference (PDR), 1995].) If the dystonia is very severe, administering either 25 mg of diphenhydramine or 1 to 2 mg of benztropine intramuscularly will reverse the dystonia within a few minutes. The prophylactic use of anticholinergic and antiparkinsonian agents to prevent acute dystonic reactions is discussed following the section on “Akathisia.”
Parkinsonism (Pseudoparkinsonism)
Symptoms of parkinsonism include tremor, cogwheel rigidity, drooling, and decrease in facial expressive movements (mask-like or expressionless facies), and akinesia (slowness in initiating movements). These symptoms respond to antiparkinsonian medications; for example, benztropine (Cogentin), 1 to 2 mg given two or three times daily, usually provides relief within a day or two. Antiparkinsonian medication may be withdrawn gradually after 1 or 2 weeks to see if it is still necessary for symptomatic relief.
The period of maximum risk for developing parkinsonism is 5 to 30 days after initiation of neuroleptic therapy. The risk for development of parkinsonism appears to be greater for females and to increase with age. It is rarely seen in preschool children treated with therapeutic doses of neuroleptics; it occurs commonly in school-aged children and adolescents (Campbell et al., 1985). Richardson et al. (1991) reported that 21 (34%) of 61 hospitalized children and adolescents, of whom only 7 were diagnosed with psychotic or affective disorders, who were taking neuroleptics at the time of evaluation exhibited symptoms of parkinsonism when rated on several movement disorder scales. Three (14.3%) of the 21 children were rated as having parkinsonism despite the fact that they were concurrently receiving antiparkinsonian drugs. Development of parkinsonism was significantly (P = .05) associated with a longer duration on medication at the time of evaluation (mean of 117 days for patients with parkinsonism and mean of 34 days for patients without parkinsonism).
Akinesia, perhaps the most severe form of parkinsonism, is defined by Rifkin et al. (1975) as a “behavioral state of diminished spontaneity characterized by few gestures, unspontaneous speech and, particularly, apathy and difficulty with initiating usual activities” (p. 672). It may be particularly difficult to differentiate from the negative symptoms of schizophrenia, such as apathy and blunting. Van Putten and Marder (1987) suggested that akinesia might be the most toxic behavioral side effect of antipsychotic drugs. The authors noted that a subjective sense of sedation or drowsiness, excessive sleeping, and a lack of any leg-crossing during an interview of approximately 20 minutes correlated with the presence of akinesia. Akinesia also interferes with social adjustment, and the patient may appear to have a “postpsychotic depression.” Patients with akinesia are often less concerned with any psychotic symptoms and report that everything is fine; they may experience an absence of emotion and appear emotionally dead (Van Putten and Marder, 1987). Although antiparkinsonian drugs may be helpful, in some cases they do not adequately control symptoms of akinesia. There is some evidence that antiparkinsonian drugs become less effective at higher daily dosages of antipsychotics (Van Putten and Marder, 1987).
The prophylactic use of anticholinergic and antiparkinsonian agents to prevent pseudoparkinsonism is discussed following the section on “Akathisia.”
Akathisia (Motor Restlessness)
The period of maximum risk for developing this condition is 5 to 60 days after initiation of neuroleptic therapy, but it has been reported to occur in as few as 6 hours after an oral dose of a neuroleptic (Van Putten et al., 1984). Symptoms include
constant uncomfortable restlessness, a feeling of tension in the lower extremities often accompanied by a strong or irresistible urge to move them, inability to sit still, and foot-tapping or pacing. Clinically, blunted affect, emotional withdrawal, and motor retardation may also be observed (Van Putten and Marder, 1987).
constant uncomfortable restlessness, a feeling of tension in the lower extremities often accompanied by a strong or irresistible urge to move them, inability to sit still, and foot-tapping or pacing. Clinically, blunted affect, emotional withdrawal, and motor retardation may also be observed (Van Putten and Marder, 1987).
Akathisia may or may not respond to antiparkinsonian drugs such as trihexyphenidyl (Artane). Van Putten and Marder (1987) noted the dual nature of akathisia: a subjective experience of restlessness and observable motor restlessness. In their clinical experience, all patients with moderate or severe akathisia exhibited either rocking from foot to foot or walking on the spot. Akathisia was also strongly associated with depression, dysphoria, and, at times in severe and treatment-resistant cases, exacerbation of psychotic symptoms and homicidal and suicidal ideation and behavior (Van Putten and Marder, 1987). Of particular clinical importance, patients who have unpleasant untoward effects, especially akathisia, with antipsychotics, are more likely to be noncompliant and to unilaterally discontinue medication early in treatment (Van Putten and Marder, 1987).
Fleischhacker et al. (1989) have published a rating scale for akathisia that includes two subjective items: “a sensation of inner restlessness” and “the urge to move,” and three items that characterize the frequency and magnitude of observed akathisia phenomena.
Propranolol may be helpful in ameliorating akathisia (Adler et al., 1986); benzodiazepines and clonidine have also been reported to be effective in some cases.
Clonazepam was administered to 10 first-onset psychotic adolescents (8 of whom were diagnosed with schizophrenia, paranoid subtype) between 16 and 19 years of age who experienced distressing akathisia following treatment with antipsychotics (Kutcher et al., 1987). Nine of the patients had also been receiving benztropine concomitantly with their antipsychotic medication. All patients reported subjective improvement, and scores on an akathisia subscale decreased significantly after 1 week’s treatment with 0.5 mg/day of clonazepam.
In some cases, reduction in dose of the antipsychotic may be necessary. Neppe and Ward (1989) recommend that if only akathisia develops (i.e., without accompanying parkinsonism), a beta-blocker be used rather than an anticholinergic agent.
Prophylactic Use of Antiparkinsonian Agents for Acute Dystonic Reaction, Parkinsonism, and Akathisia
The use of antiparkinsonian (anticholinergic) agents prophylactically to minimize the likelihood of the patient’s developing an acute dystonic reaction, parkinsonism, or akathisia from antipsychotic drug use is controversial. Some of the reasons relate to the effects caused by the anticholinergic agents themselves. Anticholinergic agents may adversely affect cognition and may aggravate psychotic symptomatology. In addition, there is some suggestion that at least part of the effectiveness of these agents is that they may lower the serum concentration of the antipsychotic drug (Rivera-Calimlim et al., 1976). Because of their reluctance to give an additional medication that itself may have untoward effects, many clinicians choose to minimize the risk of these extrapyramidal effects by beginning with a low dose and titrating the medication slowly. If an acute dystonic reaction should occur, it may be treated with diphenhydramine and the dosage of antipsychotic lowered temporarily if necessary. Conversely, some clinicians routinely prescribe an agent such as benztropine for approximately 1 month to 6 weeks, covering the period of maximal risk for the development of both acute dystonic reactions and parkinsonian untoward effects. Another option for outpatients is to prescribe a small amount of an anticholinergic (e.g., diphenhydramine) with an explanation of how it is to be administered should a dystonic reaction occur (e.g., to take one capsule should such a reaction begin, to take another dose in 20 to 30 minutes if there is no improvement, and to go to an emergency room if the reaction is severe and alert the physician to the medication being taken).
In their review of the management of acute extrapyramidal syndromes induced by neuroleptics, Neppe and Ward (1989) note that anticholinergics can significantly reduce the rate of acute dystonias especially in the highestrisk group, males younger than 30 years of age treated with high-potency antipsychotic agents. However, as acute dystonic reactions tend to be transient, prophylactic treatment for more than 2 weeks is not usually indicated. These authors recommend no prophylaxis for parkinsonism and akathisia because they rarely present as dramatically emergent a picture as acute dystonia. The parents and/or patient, as appropriate, may be carefully informed about the possibility of these conditions arising, to aid in their early detection. The clinician can then decide how best to treat the particular symptom in the particular patient (Neppe and Ward, 1989).
Van Putten and Marder (1987) point out that prophylactic use of antiparkinsonian drugs may not fully prevent symptoms of akinesia from developing and that some schizophrenic patients who have been stabilized using antiparkinsonian medication may experience increased anxiety, depression, general dysphoria, and suffering when the anticholinergics are withdrawn.
The clinician should decide on a case-by-case basis which of the preceding possibilities is best for a given patient. This decision will be based on such factors as whether a high- or low-potency neuroleptic is given, how rapidly the dose is increased, previous experience of the patient, whether it is administered to an outpatient or an inpatient (who has ready access to clinical staff), how such a reaction might affect the relationship with the patient and/or the parents and subsequent compliance, and the patient’s environment. For example, it can be particularly difficult for a patient and family if the patient develops an acute dystonic reaction while attending school.
Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome
Neuroleptic malignant syndrome is life-threatening and can occur after a single dose, but occurs most frequently within 2 weeks of initiation of neuroleptic therapy or an increase in dosage; males and younger individuals appear to be most often affected (for review see Kaufmann and Wyatt, 1987). Symptoms include severe muscular rigidity, altered consciousness, stupor, catatonia, hyperpyrexia, labile pulse and blood pressure, and occasionally myoglobinemia. Most patients have elevated creatine phosphokinase (CPK) levels. Neuroleptic malignant syndrome can persist for up to 2 weeks or longer after medication is discontinued and can be fatal. Treatment consists of immediate cessation of medication and hospitalization, under intensive care, with supportive treatment. Dopaminergic agonists (e.g., bromocriptine and amantadine) and/or dantrolene have also been reported to reduce the mortality rate significantly (Sakkas et al., 1991). Antiparkinsonian drugs are not useful.
Latz and McCracken (1992) conducted an extensive literature search and reported a total of 49 cases of neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) in patients 18 years or younger. The youngest reported case was that of an 11-month-old. Five (83%) of the six preschoolers developed NMS after a single dose of neuroleptic that either was an accidental overdose or was prescribed for a nonpsychiatric illness. Overall lethality for all cases reviewed was 16.3% (8 of 49). However, the death rate for patients 12 years of age or younger was 27% (3 of 11), more than twice the death rate of 13% (5 of 38) for adolescents 13 to 18 years old.
Steingard et al. (1992) also published a review with detailed summaries of 35 cases of neuroleptic malignant syndrome in patients younger than 19 years of age. Fever, rigidity, altered mental status, and tachycardia were present in >70% of the cases. Five (14%) of the patients died; however, only one of these died within the past two decades, and that was a 2-year-old who had ingested chlorpromazine accidentally. Croarkin et al. (2008) reported on 16 cases in subjects 18 years old
and younger from 1991 through 2007, mostly male, all of whom survived. These data suggest that the standard of care for these patients has improved, but do not address reporting bias.
and younger from 1991 through 2007, mostly male, all of whom survived. These data suggest that the standard of care for these patients has improved, but do not address reporting bias.

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Full access? Get Clinical Tree


