First-Generation/Typical Antipsychotic Drugs



First-Generation/Typical Antipsychotic Drugs


William Klykylo



INTRODUCTION

Although antipsychotic drugs, also commonly known as neuroleptics or major tranquilizers, are used in adults primarily to treat psychoses, in children they have also been used to treat other common nonpsychotic psychiatric disorders. At present, antipsychotics are the drugs of first choice in childhood for schizophrenia and autistic disorder. There is, however, some evidence that antipsychotics are not as effective clinically in schizophrenia with childhood onset as in schizophrenia occurring in later adolescence and adulthood (Green et al., 1984). Meyers et al. (1980) noted that serum neuroleptic levels of 50 ng/mL of chlorpromazine equivalents correspond to the threshold for clinical response in adult patients with schizophrenia and suggest that similar therapeutic serum levels are necessary in children. Because children may metabolize and excrete antipsychotics more efficiently than do adults, determination of serum neuroleptic levels, if they are available, is recommended before a trial of an antipsychotic is deemed a failure.

The use of first-generation (FGA) versus second-generation antipsychotics (SGA) in early-onset psychotic disorders remains controversial. The TEOSS (Treatment of Early-Onset Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders; Sikich et al., 2008) noted that molindone appeared to have similar efficacy to secondgeneration drugs, with more benign metabolic effects. As the potential adverse effects and cost of second-generation agents in some patients are recognized, familiarity with first-generation/typical agent remains a necessary part of clinical practice.

Shapiro and Shapiro (1989) concluded that antipsychotics were also the drugs of choice for treating chronic motor or vocal tic disorder and Tourette disorder when psychosocial, educational, or occupational functioning was so impaired that medication was required. SGAs are now often used for tic disorders, but FGAs, including haloperidol and pimozide, remain common agents (Roessner et al., 2012; Singer, 2010). Both FGAs and SGAs can lead to increases in body mass index in patients with tic disorders, with resultant metabolic effects.


Antipsychotic drugs are also clinically effective in children with severely aggressive conduct disorders, and some are approved for use in such children. Lithium is also effective in some such children, perhaps more so when an explosive affect is present, and lithium has fewer clinically significant untoward effects than neuroleptics. Because lithium is still not approved for use either in children younger than 12 years or for this indication, and because of the necessity of monitoring serum lithium levels, many clinicians prefer to use antipsychotic drugs.

The use of antipsychotics in the mentally retarded continues to be controversial, but they are prescribed frequently, especially for institutionalized patients. In optimal doses, antipsychotics are effective in decreasing irritability, sleep disturbances, hostility, agitation, and combativeness and may improve concentration and social behavior in agitated individuals with severe intellectual disabilities (American Medical Association, 1986). Aman and Singh (1988) cautioned that the influential studies of the mentally retarded by Breuning, which showed significant detrimental effects on cognition resulting from antipsychotic use, appear to have been fabricated. However, concerns over overuse and misuse of these medications in this population continue, especially as psychosocial resources are threatened.


ANTIPSYCHOTIC DRUGS IN THE TREATMENT OF ATTENTION-DEFICIT/HYPERACTIVITY DISORDERS

Some antipsychotic agents (e.g., haloperidol) have been approved for treating children with symptoms such as excessive motor activity, impulsivity, difficulty sustaining attention, and poor frustration tolerance, which would be found in most children diagnosed with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Double-blind, controlled studies have shown antipsychotic drugs to be effective in treating children who would meet the criteria for ADHD. However, studies comparing antipsychotic drugs with stimulants almost always show that, overall, stimulants are statistically more effective clinically than antipsychotics (Green, 1995; Gittelman-Klein et al., 1976). In addition, many clinicians are reluctant to use antipsychotics to treat patients with ADHD because of the risk that an irreversible tardive dyskinesia (TD) might develop, the possibility of adverse metabolic effects, and the worry that the sedative effects of antipsychotics may interfere significantly with cognition and learning. Because of such factors, antipsychotics should be thought of as third-rank drugs to be used primarily in the treatment of ADHD, which is severely disabling and which has not responded to stimulants and other drugs with untoward effects of more acceptable risk.

Although these caveats in using antipsychotics are not to be dismissed, data moderating these dictums should be cited: (a) the influential studies of Breuning and his colleagues, which showed significant detrimental effects on cognition in mentally retarded patients treated with antipsychotic drugs, appear to have been fabricated (Aman and Singh, 1988); (b) other studies have reported minimal impairment of cognition in subjects diagnosed with ADHD who were treated with appropriate doses of antipsychotics (Klein, 1990/1991); (c) Sallee et al. (1994) examined the effects of haloperidol and pimozide in patients with Tourette syndrome, including subjects with ADHD and found no decrement in cognition associated with FGA use.

In a randomized, crossover, double-blind study, Weizman et al. (1984) noted that the combination of a stimulant and neuroleptics may be useful in some children who do not respond adequately to stimulants alone. Clinically, this may be a potentially useful option for a small subgroup of children who do not respond adequately to stimulants or to other drugs alone. The combination of stimulant and neuroleptic would presumably achieve a satisfactory result that would either not be achieved by the neuroleptic alone or would require higher doses of neuroleptics, which would carry an increased risk of untoward effects, such as TD and cognitive dulling.







INTERACTIONS OF ANTIPSYCHOTIC DRUGS WITH OTHER MEDICATIONS

The most frequent clinically important reactions are with other central nervous system depressants such as alcohol, sedatives and hypnotics, benzodiazepines, antihistamines, opiates, and barbiturates, in which an additive central nervous system depressive effect occurs.

Antipsychotic drugs also have varying degrees of anticholinergic effects. When combined with another anticholinergic (antiparkinsonian) agent, such as when one is used prophylactically to prevent acute dyskinesia, pseudoparkinsonism, or akathisia, central nervous system symptoms of cholinergic blockade may result. These symptoms may include confusion, disorientation, delirium, hallucinations, and worsening of preexisting psychotic symptoms. Of clinical importance, this picture may be mistaken for inadequate treatment or worsening of the psychosis, rather than an untoward effect.

The combination of antipsychotic drugs and lithium carbonate, particularly if high doses are used, may lead to an increased incidence of central nervous system toxicity, including neuroleptic malignant syndrome.

Combined use of antipsychotic drugs with tricyclic antidepressants or monoamine oxidase inhibitors may increase plasma levels of antidepressants.

Neuroleptics may also have noteworthy interactions with many other medications. Given today’s easy access to databases of drug interactions, a review of all possible interactions in every patient receiving these drugs should be standard clinical practice.



Jun 25, 2016 | Posted by in PSYCHOLOGY | Comments Off on First-Generation/Typical Antipsychotic Drugs

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access