Forschung und Öffentlichkeit





9.

Chalmers l (2002) Lessons for research ethics committees. Lancet 359: 174–174PubMedCrossRef


10.

Chimonas S, Brennan T, Rothman D (2007) Physicians and drug representatives: exploring the dynamics of the relationship. J Gen Intern Med 22: 184–190PubMedCrossRef


11.

Choudhry NK, Stelfox HT, Detsky AS (2002) Relationships between authors of clinical practice guidelines and the pharmaceutical industry. JAMA 287 (5): 612–617


12.

Clade H (2001) Drittmittelfinanzierung: Strenge Regeln für das Sponsoring. Dtsch Ärztebl 98 (40): C2043–C2044


13.

Collier J, Iheanacho I (2002) The pharmaceutical industry as an informant. Lancet 360: 1405–1409PubMedCrossRef


14.

Connell CM, Shaw B, Holmes SB, Forster NL (2001) Caregivers’ attitudes toward their family members’ participation in Alzheimer disease research: implications for recruitment and retention. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 15: 137–145PubMedCrossRef


15.

Cowley AJ, Skene A, Stainer K, Hampton JR (1993) The effect of lorcainide on arrhythmias and survival in patients with acute myocardial infarction: an example of publication bias. Int J Cardiol 40 (2): 161–162


16.

Coyle SL (2002) Physician–industry relations. Part 1: Individual physicians. Ann Intern Med 136: 396–402PubMedCrossRef


17.

Davidoff F, De Angelis CD, Drazen JM, Nicholls MG, Hoey J, Hojgaard L, Horton R, Kotzin S, Nylenna M, Overbeke AJ, Van Der Weyden MB, Wilkes MS (2001) Sponsorhip, autorship and accountability. Ann Intern Med 135: 463–466PubMedCrossRef


18.

De Angelis C, Fontanarosa PB (2010) Strengthening the credibility of clinical research. Lancet 376: 234CrossRef


19.

De Angelis CD (2000) Conflict of interest and the public trust. JAMA 284 (17): 2237


20.

De Angelis CD, Drazen JM, Frizelle FA, Haug C, Hoey J, Horton R, Kotzin S, Laine C, Marusic A, Overbeke AJ, Schroeder TV, Sox HC, Van Der Weyden MB (2005) Is this clinical trial fully registered? Statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Lancet 365: 1827–1829


21.

DFG (1998/2011) Sicherung guter wissenschaftlicher Praxis. http://wwwdfgde/en/research_funding/legal_conditions/good_scientific_practice/indexhtml. Zugegriffen: 05.01.12


22.

Dhanda RK (2002) Guiding Ikarus – Merging bioethics with corporate interests? Wiley, New York


23.

Dieperink ME, Drogemuller L (2001) Effects of industry sponsorship of grand rounds. JAMA 286 (8): 918


24.

Dittmann RW, Linden M, Osterheider M, Schaaf B, Ohnmacht U, Weber HJ (1997) Antidepressant drug use: differences between psychiatrists and general practitioners. Results from a drug utilization observation study with Fluoxetin. Pharmacopsychiat 30 (suppl): 28–34


25.

Drazen JM, Curfman GD (2002) Financial associations of authors. N Engl J Med 346 (24): 1901–1902


26.

E.T.H. Zürich (2011) Richtlinien für Integrität in der Forschung und gute wissenschaftliche Praxis an der ETH Zürich. http://www.rechtssammlung.ethz.ch/pdf/414_Integrit%C3%A4t_Forschung.pdf. Zugegriffen: 02.02.13


27.

Editorial (2001) Look, no strings: publishing industry-funded research. CMAJ 165 (6): 733–733


28.

Editorial (2012) Promoting research integrity: a new global effort. Lancet 380: 1445


29.

Editorial (2002) The controlling interests of research. CMAJ 167 (11): 1221–1221


30.

Editors of Medical Journals (2011) Committee on publication ethics (COPE). http://publicationethics.org/about. Zugegriffen: 04.02.13


31.

European Science Foundation (2003) Press release on registration of randomised controlled trials. http://www.esf.org/esf_pressarea_page.ph…nt=1&language=o&section=66&newsrelease=60. Zugegriffen: 04.02.13

Jan 6, 2017 | Posted by in PSYCHOLOGY | Comments Off on Forschung und Öffentlichkeit

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access