General Concepts: Stroke Systems of Care



Fig. 27.1
The stroke post-acute continuum, showing the processes that could reduce the risk of poor outcomes, such as readmission and poor functional status



ESD was initially developed and tested in randomized controlled trials in Europe and Canada, summarized in a Cochrane Review [54], and is now part of the standard of care in the UK and Canada. In the European model, mild to moderate stroke patients (about 37 % of the stroke population) [55] are discharged home early, and are treated by a team that integrates stroke specialty care and rehabilitation in the home. In addition to efficacy, ESD reduces cost and improves function. The Canadians have projected that optimal stroke care in Canada avoids $307 million direct costs and that access to ESD generates $132.9 million of the direct cost savings [55]. In addition to the cost savings patients spend less time in hospital-based rehabilitation programs, and have better community engagement, improved patient satisfaction and self-management strategies for recovery, and reduced death and dependency at 6 months.

ESD has not been implemented in the USA, perhaps because of the traditional gaps between acute care and post-acute care. Home health services are generally not equipped or staffed to provide care for patients with significant disabilities, and therefore before ESD could be implemented in the USA, there will need to be a reengineering of home health agencies to provide more intensive services early after discharge, along with extended support from a hospital stroke specialty team and primary care with stroke expertise. Current payer models and CMS regulatory issues do not support this level of care in the home; therefore ESD would require a new payer model.

As illustrated above, the major contributions to the wide variation, high cost, and poor quality in stroke post-acute care are the fragmentation of care amongst the many possible sites where care is delivered. As patients move through these post-acute care silos, in most cases they have different providers at each location, each associated with handoffs of care, often with little or no integration or careful coordination of care and services in between. The Medicare Post-acute Care Advisory Committee (MedPAC) has thus suggested bundled payments for post-acute services as a method to incentivize providers to work together throughout the post-acute continuum to integrate services and thus improve care by reducing readmissions and improving quality [45]. Although the interdisciplinary nature of post-acute care is emphasized in the latest policy recommendations for integration of stroke systems of care, the integration of post-acute care services for stroke was not even mentioned [15]. Given the success of ESD in Canada and the UK, models of post-acute stroke care do not necessarily need to be reinvented, but focused efforts towards integration of post-acute services are clearly needed in the USA.




Conclusion


The systems described above place an emphasis on organization within each epoch of care to promote consistency and efficiency, thereby improving stroke therapy and outcomes. Although acute stroke systems have been developed and most likely contribute to increased utilization of IV tPA and thus better early outcomes, the lack of integration between systems in the post-acute continuum is evident and should be the focus of future efforts to reduce costs and improve long-term outcomes in stroke survivors.


References



1.

Morris DL, Rosamond W, Madden K, Schultz C, Hamilton S. Prehospital and emergency department delays after acute stroke: the Genentech Stroke Presentation Survey. Stroke. 2000;31(11):2585–90.CrossRef


2.

Tong D, Reeves MJ, Hernandez AF, Zhao X, Olson DM, Fonarow GC, et al. Times from symptom onset to hospital arrival in the Get With The Guidelines-Stroke program 2002 to 2009: temporal trends and implications. Stroke. 2012;43(7):1912–7.CrossRef


3.

Rossnagel K, Jungehülsing GJ, Nolte CH, Müller-Nordhorn J, Roll S, Wegscheider K, et al. Out-of-hospital delays in patients with acute stroke. Ann Emerg Med. 2004;44(5):476–83.CrossRef


4.

Rosamond WD, Gorton RA, Hinn AR, Hohenhaus SM, Morris DL. Rapid response to stroke symptoms: the Delay in Accessing Stroke Healthcare (DASH) study. Acad Emerg Med. 1998;5(1):45–51.CrossRef


5.

Morgenstern LB, Staub L, Chan W, Wein TH, Bartholomew LK, King M, et al. Improving delivery of acute stroke therapy: the TLL Temple Foundation Stroke Project. Stroke. 2002;33(1):160–6.CrossRef


6.

Hodgson C, Lindsay P, Rubini F. Can mass media influence emergency department visits for stroke? Stroke. 2007;38(7):2115–22.CrossRef


7.

Buck BH, Starkman S, Eckstein M, Kidwell CS, Haines J, Huang R, et al. Dispatcher recognition of stroke using the National Academy Medical Priority Dispatch System. Stroke. 2009;40(6):2027–30.CrossRef


8.

Ramanujam P, Guluma KZ, Castillo EM, Chacon M, Jensen MB, Patel E, et al. Accuracy of stroke recognition by emergency medical dispatchers and paramedics—San Diego experience. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2008;12(3):307–13.CrossRef


9.

Kothari RU, Pancioli A, Liu T, Brott T, Broderick J. Cincinnati prehospital stroke scale: reproducibility and validity. Ann Emerg Med. 1999;33(4):373–8.CrossRef


10.

Kidwell CS, Starkman S, Eckstein M, Weems K, Saver JL. Identifying stroke in the field. Prospective validation of the Los Angeles prehospital stroke screen (LAPSS). Stroke. 2000;31(1):71–6.CrossRef


11.

Bray JE, Martin J, Cooper G, Barger B, Bernard S, Bladin C. Paramedic identification of stroke: community validation of the Melbourne Ambulance Stroke Screen. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2005;20(1):28–33.CrossRef


12.

Lahr MMH, Luijckx G-J, Vroomen PCAJ, van der Zee D-J, Buskens E. Proportion of patients treated with thrombolysis in a centralized versus a decentralized acute stroke care setting. Stroke. 2012;43(5):1336–40.CrossRef

Jun 14, 2017 | Posted by in NEUROLOGY | Comments Off on General Concepts: Stroke Systems of Care

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access