Fig. 4.1
The impact of postnatal depression on the mother-infant interaction and development can be conceptualised as having multiple influences as illustrated (Adapted from Milgrom et al. 1999)
Pre-existing Vulnerability Factors
In a large study involving >40,000 pregnant women, Milgrom et al. (2008) reported factors found to have predictive value for postnatal depression. Six variables were found: antenatal depression, antenatal anxiety, major life events, practical/emotional support, partner support and previous history of depression.
Whist these factors emerge consistently in studies of psychosocial risk factors in depressed mothers, other important risk factors that will impact on a woman’s parenting capacity include a mother having had a poor relationship with their own mother, any history of or current domestic or family violence (Howard et al. 2013a), childhood abuse (Banyard et al. 2003; Pears and Capaldi 2001) or drug and/or alcohol abuse (Ross and Dennis 2009). These experiences, especially those in early life, may contribute to a reduced competence in parental care and interactive abilities (Raphael-Leff 1991). In addition both depression and parenting need to be understood in the context of a woman’s cultural and religious beliefs, major traumas (including migration due to war) as well as the experience of growing up with family members struggling with their own mental health problems (Stein et al. 2014).
Howard et al. (2014) in reviewing the evidence conclude that a history of any psychopathology and psychosocial adversities are key predictors of mental health disorders in the perinatal period, but few systematic reviews exist, and there is a need for more studies using standardised diagnostic measures, longitudinal approaches and comparison groups. The impact of psychosocial risk factors on the infant warrants further investigation.
Perinatal Precipitating Factors
A wide range of stressors including a difficult or premature birth, illness or an infant with a difficult temperament (e.g. infants who are very reactive) may reduce a mother’s capacity to respond to her infant as well as her feelings of competence (Teti et al. 1990). Feelings and symptoms of depression may be precipitated in vulnerable mothers.
Symptoms of Postnatal Depression and Anxiety and the Direct Effect on Interactions
Feelings of sadness, flatness, general loss of interest as well as anxiety make it difficult for depressed women to be emotionally available and engage in a responsive interaction with their infant. A successful interaction requires a series of the micro-behavioural exchanges that may be impaired due to symptoms of both depression and anxiety. Parental responsiveness, or contingency, during social interactions is considered key to early interaction and involves the ability to notice and respond appropriately and immediately to infant cues. Depressed women can find it difficult to engage their infants in an animated way and so are less likely to maintain their infant’s attention or contain to their infant’s anxiety. The latter is likely to be further compromised if a mother is also anxious.
The extent of the impact of depression will be moderated by a number of factors that can both accentuate difficulties or be protective.
Stress Mediating Factors: Maternal Cognitive Style and Social Support
Maternal cognitive style may moderate the effects of depression on parenting (Whitton et al. 1996; Cutrona and Troutman 1986). For example, maternal self-efficacy in particular may influence how a mother interacts with her infant and behaves in ways that lead to low rates of reinforcement from their infants.
In addition, a mother with a poor sense of competence may think her baby would be better off without her and feel a sense of failure as a parent, further contributing to her depression (Cox 1988). Cognitions regarding close relationships have been found to raise the risk for depression (Murray 2014; Gjerde 1995; Gore et al. 1993). On the other hand, high maternal self-efficacy could serve as a protective factor for coping with a demanding infant making it less likely she will experience depressed mood.
Other mediating variables may include parenting skills and resources. Stein et al. (2014) recently suggested that ‘maternal programming’ may differentiate some mothers who have a predisposition to positive parenting. Maternal reflective functioning (RF) capacity or ‘mentalisation’ has also been proposed as a mediating factor. Fonagy and colleagues (Fonagy et al. 2002) define the construct as referring to the mother’s capacity to understand her baby’s behaviour whilst considering the baby’s underlying mental states and intentions. There is a growing literature suggesting that maternal reflective capacities make it possible to accurately recognise and sensitively respond to the baby’s internal states of arousal and are the key to sensitive care giving and ultimately secure attachment. Further, a parent high in RF can see their child as different from themself in its needs, feelings, desires and intentions. Maternal representations of the baby and maternal caregiving behaviour are thought to be the manifestations of reflective functioning (Slade et al. 2005; van Ijzendoorn 1995). Grienenberger et al. (2005) have proposed that reflective functioning is a mechanism in the transgenerational transmission of attachment.
Poor Mother-Infant Interactions and Child Outcomes
Impaired mother-infant relationship may be a prime mechanism whereby postnatal depression and anxiety exert an impact on child development.
As described earlier, there is evidence that poor sensitivity to infant distress is a predictor of a child’s early social, emotional, cognitive and behavioural self-regulation (Parfitt et al. 2014; Leerkes 2011; Clark et al. 2008; Cirulli et al. 2003; Stams et al. 2002). In a study designed to test the mediating role of early interactions in a sample of women with PND, poor child cognitive and behavioural outcomes at 4 years of age were found to be mediated by maternal responsiveness at 3 months postpartum (Milgrom et al. 2004, 2006).
Recently, Murray et al. (2015) have speculated that whilst maternal responsiveness (or contingency) appears to be important for child cognitive development, other interactional behaviours may also influence later cognitive performance, such as the mother’s ability to support the infant’s attention and engagement with the environment (Eshel et al. 2006; Slater 1995; Fagen and Ohr 1985). On the other hand, parental sensitivity to the infant’s emotions may assist in developing emotional regulation, and being affectively attuned to the child’s behaviour may provide ‘emotional scaffolding’ where an infant’s difficult emotions such as anxiety are contained.
A direct effect on brain development is also implicated. There is a growing awareness of the importance of early experiences in shaping infant brain development, based on animal studies as well as emerging evidence from human infants. During the first 3 years of life, brain development is at its fastest and the brain is at its most malleable showing evidence of plasticity and susceptibility to stress. Stressful experiences may influence brain organisation, and disrupted mother-infant interaction may be an important source of stress (Mustard 2008; Cirulli et al. 2003; Perry et al. 1995). Brain development in turn underpins cognitive, behavioural and social development. Recently, we were able to demonstrate that sensitivity training for parents in the Neonatal Intensive Care Nursery, involving assisting parents to recognise subtle premature infant cues, resulted in improved brain connectivity on MRI at 40 weeks gestation (Milgrom et al. 2010).
The Vicious Cycle
Dysfunctional mother-infant interactions may be resistant to change due to ongoing negative vicious cycles of repeated interactive failures (Meager and Milgrom 1996). Interactional difficulties appear to persist even when depression improves.
‘A mother preoccupied with her sadness finds it difficult to engage with her infant who in turn may learn to gaze avert and may be less responsive. These infant behaviours then lead to feelings of rejection in the mother and further withdrawal on both parts’ (Milgrom et al. 1999). As early as 3 months of age, infants of depressed mothers appear to generalise their depressed style of interaction to non-depressed adults (Field et al. 1985). Mothers may depend on the responses they get from their babies for a sense of their own competence or effectiveness as a parent (Beebe 2010).
Other Biopsychosocial Factors
Importantly, chronicity of depression appears a key factor. Postnatal depression has shown consistent association with a range of poorer cognitive outcomes in children, with the persistence of the depression of particular importance. Other factors that may influence the relationship between depression and child development include socio-economic status (SES), gender, antenatal complications, illness, prematurity and genetic factors (Stein et al. 2014).
Implications for Treatment
Currently, treatment of postnatal depression generally targets maternal mood without a focus on the infant. Given the accumulating evidence that maternal depression impacts on child cognitive, behavioural and socio-emotional development and the likelihood that sensitivity in the mother-infant interaction is important, a number of studies have explored whether addressing the mother’s depression alone improves outcomes for the infant. In a randomised trial of specialised treatments for PND (Milgrom et al. 2005), 162 mothers with PND were randomly assigned to a number of treatments including CBT (n = 46) and routine care (n = 33). Despite the success of these interventions in treating the depressive episode, the mother-infant relationship was not substantially changed (Milgrom et al. 2006). Whilst 73 % of depressed women had a dysfunctional relationship with their baby before treatment, following treatment 56 % continued to have dysfunctional relationships (compared to 3 % of non-depressed women; Milgrom et al. 2006). This is despite a significant reduction in depression below clinical thresholds. It appears that once relationship difficulties are triggered by PND, they may persist, despite improvement in maternal depression. Other studies report similar findings, using a range of depression treatments, and all show that a substantial proportion of disturbed mother-infant interactions persist without direct intervention (Forman et al. 2007; Cooper and Murray 1997).
As a result, there is growing interest in the evidence for the effectiveness of mother-infant interventions. A number of reviews and meta-analyses of mother-infant treatments have been conducted (Barlow et al. 2015; Doughty 2007; Bakermans-Kranenburg et al. 2003) although many of these interventions have not been developed or evaluated in the context of PND.
Existing programmes include interactional coaching (Field 1997); ‘Wait, Watch and Wonder’ (Muir 1992); ‘Brazelton Neonatal Assessment Protocol’ (Brazelton et al. 1974); parent-infant psychotherapy (McDonough 1993; Fraiberg 1980); and interventions targeting maternal reflective functioning such as ‘Minding the Baby’ (Slade et al. 2005; Marvin et al. 2002) based on theories and developmental research describing the elements of a ‘good-enough’ parent interaction (Fonagy et al. 1995; Stern 1985; Winnicott 1965).
In a major systematic review of interventions that included mother-infant outcomes in the context of PND, only eight trials met inclusion criteria, but all interventions showed some improvements in mother-infant relationships (Poobalan et al. 2007). A number of studies have also shown beneficial effects in child cognitive, emotional and social development (e.g. Field et al. 2000; Cohen et al. 1999). However, only two studies have evaluated brief interventions in RCTs and a recent Cochrane Review describes these latest developments in parent-infant psychotherapy for improving parent and infant well-being (Barlow et al. 2015; Murray et al. 2003; Horowitz et al. 2001).
Surprisingly, many evaluations of mother-infant treatments have not specifically combined treatment of maternal mental health with mother-infant relationship difficulties. This is despite the finding that chronicity of depression is a key factor in later child outcomes.
The HUGS programme (Milgrom et al. 2006) is a brief 4-session intervention addressing mother-infant difficulties. This approach is in line with the conclusions by Bakermans-Kranenburg et al. (2003) that short-term mother-infant interventions (i.e. less than five sessions) appear to be as effective as 5–16 session interventions and more effective than long-term (16+ sessions) interventions.
The HUGS (Happiness, Understanding, Giving and Sharing) programme is novel in that mother-infant work is combined with treatment of maternal depression and anxiety postnatally. Although full remission of depression is not necessary to benefit from mother-infant intervention, some reduction in depressive symptoms is desirable as emotional unavailability is likely to seriously interfere with successful interactions. The 4-session HUGS programme is added to a well-evaluated 9-week cognitive-behavioural therapy intervention for PND (Milgrom et al. 2005) and builds on the therapeutic ‘momentum’ and skills learnt in the 9-week programme. Two essential elements central to the mother-infant relationship are targeted: (i) parent skills in communication, observation and responsiveness and (ii) distorted maternal internal representations. Exercises build on the pioneering work of Field (1997), who showed behavioural-level skills, can profoundly change interactions. Even small changes (around 10 %) in maternal responsiveness directly mediate substantial differences in outcome at 4 years (e.g. IQ) for children of depressed mothers (Milgrom et al. 2004). Thus, key behaviours are targeted for change in a brief intervention in order to begin a trajectory of positive interactions and break the cycle of negativity.
Initial findings suggest HUGS is a promising intervention for improving mother-infant relationship difficulties associated with depression (Milgrom et al. 2006). The weekly rate of improvement during HUGS (4.9 points per week) on the Parenting Stress Index was more than threefold higher than during the 9-week PND programme (1.6 points per week) and fell below threshold for dysfunctional interactions. In a playgroup adaptation of HUGS (Community HUGS), elements of the maternal depression treatment, play and movement were combined with HUGS to form a 10-week playgroup for women with adjustment difficulties. Post-treatment scores on the PSI short form dropped below the threshold (<90) for clinically significant levels of parenting stress (pretreatment: M = 91.56, SD = 17.67; post-treatment: M = 81.00, SD = 16.72) (Ericksen et al. in preparation).
In summary, although encouraging, existing mother-infant intervention studies have been limited methodologically, most notably non-randomised designs and small sample sizes. Further research with larger sample sizes and infant follow-up is needed, and a current study is underway (Milgrom and Holt 2014).
Father’s Mental Health
Research into the role of fathers’ mental health in outcomes for infants and the impact on their relationship with their partners is a growing field (Ramchandani et al. 2011, 2013) but outside the scope of this chapter. A brief description of pertinent issues is provided below.
In the perinatal period, around 5 % of new and expectant fathers will experience depression, anxiety and other forms of emotional distress (Condon 2004; for a more detailed review of the incidence of paternal perinatal depression, see Fletcher et al. 2015). Paternal mental health disorders (depression, anxiety and other forms of distress) are also associated with increased risk of emotional and behavioural disorders in offspring (Gutierrez-Galve et al. 2015; Velders et al. 2011) including language development (Paulson et al. 2009) and depression at 18 years (Pearson et al. 2013).
The review by Stein and colleagues (Stein et al. 2014) concludes that maternal and paternal postnatal depression have similar effects on the child’s behavioural outcomes but that maternal depression has a greater effect on the child’s emotional development. The younger the child in the study, the greater the effect of maternal depression, with older children more affected by paternal depression (Connell and Goodmans 2002).
Depression in fathers may also contribute to maternal distress, just as maternal depression can affect their partner’s mental health. Living with a depressed partner is itself a risk factor for depression (Burke 2003). Thus, given the reciprocal relationship between maternal and paternal depression/distress, it is important to also assess whether the partner’s mental health is an issue that needs to be addressed, either in the context of the mother’s presentation or independently. In addition the relationship between the couple may be at risk (Milgrom and McCloud 1996).
Women with Severe Mental Illness and Their Infants
Psychotic illnesses, mainly schizophrenia and bipolar mood disorder, but also those related to substance misuse, clearly make a major impact on women who are unfortunate enough to suffer from these conditions which as a group are traditionally called the severe mental illnesses (SMI). For many decades it has been observed that deleterious impacts are highly likely to extend to their infants and families (Sved Williams 2004). Until relatively late in the twentieth century, genes and environment were dichotomised in debates about causation of problem outcomes in offspring. As science has expanded on many fronts including genetic, molecular, neuroscientific, radiological and epidemiological, more sophisticated models focus on the interaction between heredity and environment and how one influences the other in patterns which are likely to begin antenatally and then flow through into early postnatal life (Saffery and Novakovic 2014). In this section some of these more general issues will be summarised before providing more specific information relating to each of the SMIs mentioned already and also to borderline personality disorder.
Winnicott’s goal of good-enough parenting is generally used to consider parents tuning in sensitively to their infants enough of the time to meet their needs (Winnicott 1965), as described earlier. Sadly, for parents with SMI, Maslow’s hierarchy of needs (Maslow 1943) may provide a better framework to consider whether outcomes for infants of parents with mental illness (IOPMI) are good enough, as it is clear that SMI can interfere with provision of adequate parenting at all levels including at quite fundamental levels of need, such as the need for safety, adequate food and sleep and appropriate accommodation.
In broad general terms, relevant individual factors determining outcome for infants include genetic inheritance of both parents, risk and protective factors for physical and emotional health during pregnancy and birth and early life experiences related to attuned parenting. Beyond this, epidemiological studies clearly show that socio-economic status, parental education and single-parent status have a cumulative effect on child health (Bauman et al. 2006), and these risk factors are frequently present in marginalised women with SMI. Cutler et al. describe the crucial role that early life plays in the co-evolution of socio-economic status and adult health (Cutler et al. 2008). People with SMI are more likely to be unemployed, marginalised by society and living in poverty, and so these general factors are likely to impact substantially. The complex patterns of factors involved at individual and societal levels are extremely well summarised diagrammatically by Leight et al. (2010) and are consistent with Maslow’s (1943) hierarchy of needs beginning with basic physiological needs (food, water, etc.), to safety (resources, health, property, etc.), love (friendship, family, etc.), esteem (self-esteem, respect by others, etc.) and self-actualisation (creativity, acceptance, etc.). Leight et al. (2010) draw on the original concepts from Misra et al. (2003) and present an integrated perinatal health and mental health framework beginning with distal factors (genetic, physical and societal) to proximal factors (biomedical and behavioural/psychological) and processes. Perinatal events and outcomes then follow (such as perinatal mental health issues), as also described by Milgrom et al. in Fig. 4.1.
Studies of pregnant women with SMI often focus on medical outcomes of pregnancy, in particular low birth weight, prematurity and neonatal deaths. There is no doubt that prematurity adds to the potential for negative outcomes on a large range of fronts including perinatal death, neurodevelopmental difficulties, breastfeeding problems, cerebral palsy, asthma in childhood, poor school performance, schizophrenia and young adult diabetes (Machado et al. 2014; Allen et al. 2011).
Neurodevelopment is increasingly better understood through a range of complex investigations and studies across several disciplines. Marques et al. (2013) review maternal nutrition perinatally and its interrelationship with immune system development and neurodevelopmental disorders. Sherman et al. (2015) focus on gut microbiota specifically and the interplay with neurodevelopment. The focus for Swain et al. (2014) is the oxytocin system postnatally in both mothers and fathers. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) provides insights into the brain circuits in fronto-limbic systems involved in parental responses to infants and the interrelationship with oxytocin in parental responsiveness to infant cues. They propose that these factors may be modifiable, for instance, with the administration of oxytocin.
Thus, there is increasing knowledge at micro- and macrolevels of some of the potential mechanisms by which healthy pregnancy and early life and its antithesis prematurity, low birth weight and poor maternal care may influence life-long developmental patterns, as first suggested by Barker (1990). For women with SMI, risk factors of prematurity and low birth weight are further complicated by higher rates of smoking (Judd et al. 2014; Nguyen et al. 2013), substance use and psychotropic medication as well as other lifestyle factors of intimate partner violence (Frayne et al. 2014), presumably with higher levels of risk. Much is still unknown; for instance, a recent review (McColl et al. 2013) found insufficient research on the nutritional state of pregnant women with SMI to form any conclusions regarding status. Research to provide more factual information and further elucidate the interplay between these many individual and general factors will provide more answers in the next decade about pathways to better outcomes.
Schizophrenia
Schizophrenia is generally considered to be the SMI with the most enduring overall effects on the quality of daily life and mental functioning. The features of this illness have been well reviewed already in this book, but in brief, the so-called ‘positive’ symptoms such as delusions and hallucinations may impact directly on the infant by perhaps guiding the woman to behave strangely, sometimes harmfully, to her infant, whereas the ‘negative’ symptoms cause the mother to be withdrawn, perhaps slow to learn and disorganised, all of which can potentially interfere dramatically with her ability to respond to her infant appropriately. Infants born to mothers with schizophrenia have been less well studied than those born to anxious or depressed women despite its universality across cultures and its generally accepted prevalence of 1 %, although a more recent study showed that countries with bigger income disparity between rich and poor appear to have higher rates (Burns et al. 2014).
Sadly, schizophrenia has effects for women and their infants from preconception onwards. During the earlier twentieth century, women with schizophrenia were regarded as less fertile than the general population (Laursen and Munk-Olsen 2010). In the last 30 years, treatments have changed so women with SMI are now based in the community rather than in single-sex asylums. Next, second-generation antipsychotics (SGA) are generally the current drug treatments of choice, and these medications do not increase prolactin levels with attendant infertility as with the first-generation antipsychotics (FGA). Thus, a more recent study (Vigod et al. 2012) shows trends towards change, with a general fertility rate of 1.16 % higher in women with schizophrenia conceiving in 2007–2009 compared to a decade earlier. It still seems that fertility rates are lower for women with schizophrenia (Laursen and Munk-Olsen 2010).
From conception, risks for women with schizophrenia mount. Whilst miscarriage rates are little mentioned in the literature, it is clear that there are substantial foetal and neonatal concerns with this maternal illness. Bennedsen (1998) summarised many potential risk factors for low birth weight (LBW), preterm birth and neonatal death in both the general population and women with schizophrenia. In the general population, these include smoking, alcohol, illicit substance use and psychotropic medication, all of which have significantly increased rates in the schizophrenic population. Not surprisingly, therefore they also found (Bennedsen et al. 1999) increased rates of preterm and LBW births in women with schizophrenia. Jablensky et al. (2005) discuss higher incidence of obstetric complications such as placental abruption, LBW and cardiovascular complications in offspring. As the obstetric complications were more common in women who already had this diagnosis prior to delivery, they conclude that maternal risk factors along with biological and behavioural concomitants of this illness may be major determinants of outcomes rather than genetic risk.
In a series of 63 patients, Matevosyan (2011) found higher rates of smoking, older age and less antenatal care in the mothers and a doubled risk of low APGAR scores, intrauterine growth retardation and congenital abnormalities in the offspring. Finally, Vigod et al. (2014) in a large Canadian study describe many maternal health complications including pre-eclampsia, venous thromboembolism and gestational diabetes and infants who were more likely to be preterm, small for gestational age and also large for gestational age, the latter factor highly likely to be related to the maternal use of SGAs.
Postnatally, studies have focused on the quality of interaction between the mother and infant and also longer-term outcomes. Most studies have found mothers to lack sensitivity and responsiveness to their infants, with associated infant avoidance (Riordan et al. 1999; Wan et al. 2007), maternal unresponsiveness, understimulation, inattention, a lack of expressed positive affect (both physical and verbal), expressions of hostility and a disorganised parenting routine (Snellen et al. 1999). Wan et al.’s later study (2008) identified markedly low rates of positive maternal responsiveness.
Pawlby et al. (2010) have challenged some of these findings in that not only were mothers with schizophrenia similar to other mothers in a healthy control group in their videotaped interactions with their infants but also that these mothers could learn to improve their interactions in a mother-baby unit by learning to talk more to their infants.
In trying to align these conflicting findings, it is clear that sample sizes generally are small, with many combining all mothers with SMI so group sizes of women with schizophrenia are small, usually around 15 mothers.
A more recent larger-scale prospective longitudinal study focusing on neurological problems (Buka et al. 2013) found a twofold increase at birth in these problems in infants of 58 mothers with schizophrenia compared with both infants of mothers with affective psychotic illnesses and a control group.
Studying women discharged from mother-baby units, Howard et al. (2004) noted that women with schizophrenia may have some parenting capacity. These authors found many women were discharged from a mother-baby unit (MBU) with their infants, with approximately 30 % requiring social services supervision. The latter outcome was more common with lower social class and partner psychiatric illness. Snellen et al. (1999) described 40 % of mothers with schizophrenia needing child protective service involvement after leaving an MBU, although 87 % of mothers were discharged with their infants, a much higher figure than the 50 % in an earlier study by Kumar et al. (1995).
In summary, infants of mothers with schizophrenia have many potential risk factors which may throw them from optimal life pathways, beginning with increased genetic risk, complicated by many adverse factors antenatally and then further compounded by postnatal interactional difficulties with their mother identified in the majority of studies.
Space precludes a full account of infant outcomes when pregnant and postnatal women abuse illicit substances. It is clear that infants suffer substantial compromise. Johnson and Balain (2014) provide an overview of outcomes with substance misusing mothers and neonatal abstinence syndrome in their offspring in a UK neonatal nursery over 5 years. Some authors focus on specific substance abuse such as amphetamines (Diaz et al. 2014; Gorman et al. 2014), cocaine (Molnar et al. 2014) and cannabis (Jacques et al. 2014; Saurel-Cubizolles et al. 2014). Beyond pregnancy-related effects, the general effects of psychosis will pertain to these infants as well as the often chaotic lifestyle and drug-seeking focus of affected women. Infants need parents who keep them in mind, and this is not always the case with substance-abusing mothers. Whilst some will reduce or cease their use because of pregnancy (Haug et al. 2014), this is certainly not a universal finding (Wong et al. 2014).
Resilience and positive outcomes however have long been studied alongside the gloomy prognosticators discussed (Anthony 1987), and the challenge remains to better identify the modification of risk and enhancement of protective factors. Providing support for women of childbearing years who have schizophrenia in the view of several authors begins with genetic counselling (Hippman et al. 2014), contraceptive advice and active illness management with advice on lifestyle prior to conception (Grootens 2014; Seeman 2013). Others (Nguyen et al. 2013) have suggested better antenatal care with improved team work from perinatal psychiatrist, obstetrician, patient and her family with highly proactive follow-up given the array of potential problems. Cigarette smoking, for instance, can be targeted (Howard et al. 2013b), although this group found that whilst women were motivated to quit, they found it difficult to do so.
Postnatally, services such as mother-baby units (MBUs) offer comprehensive care for the mother and infant, which includes active treatment of the illness, mother-infant interactional help and also the active involvement of child protection services where necessary to help keep mother and infant together and functioning well. At Helen Mayo House, an MBU in South Australia, a typical admission would be that of Claudia and her 1-week-old infant Basil, admitted directly from an obstetric facility because of midwife concern regarding Claudia’s parenting. Claudia had chronic schizophrenia, reasonably well stabilised on high-dose quetiapine, a second-generation antipsychotic, but she was blunted in her affect, slow to learn and sometimes lacking in concentration, making it hard for her to stay with her infant for the time he needed to bottle-feed – she had decided antenatally that breastfeeding would be too hard for her. It was clear that Claudia wished to care for Basil but found it too hard to do so without help and that she was isolated, with no extended family support and no ongoing contact with Basil’s father. During her 5-week stay in the MBU, Claudia gradually learned to make bottles with sufficient cleanliness, feed them to Basil in his time frame and master the other tasks of parenting such as changing and bathing him. At discharge, she moved to accommodation for single mothers, with in-house support, with a longer-term plan for private accommodation with a parent support worker, childcare and ongoing mental health care. This was all supervised by child protection workers, supported by legal orders to ensure ongoing appropriate care for Basil.
Community programmes for women with SMI have recently been reviewed (Bee et al. 2014) with disappointing findings in terms of child outcomes, although it is clear the mothers value support provided. For those who bear both the mother with schizophrenia and the infant in mind, challenges remain in ensuring all is well enough on both fronts (Seeman 2004).
Bipolar Mood Disorder and Puerperal Psychoses
Many authors have attempted to delineate the features of postpartum bipolar mood disorder (BPAD) and puerperal psychoses, and whilst differences are occasionally highlighted, the literature on effects on infants of both of these conditions is relatively small, and in some cases, distinctions are unclear (Jones et al. 2014). Thus, they will be considered together as it is likely that most influences on infant outcomes will be similar.
Although studies generally cannot tease out effects of illness from effects of medications used to treat the illness, it seems clear that women with BPAD carry risk for adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes. Two large birth register cohorts have had similar results. Lee and Lin (2010) in a large Taiwanese study found significant increases in prematurity, small for gestational age and low birth weight infants. Maccabe et al.’s (2007) large Swedish study found similar results, even after controlling for smoking. Working in a high-risk antenatal clinic setting which included women with schizophrenia, BPAD and non-psychotic SMI, an Australian study (Nguyen et al. 2013) concluded that there were increased rates of obstetric and neonatal complications, confounded by increased risk factors including rates of smoking, alcohol and substance misuse as well as psychotropic medications. Finally, Nguyen et al. (2014) in their retrospective study between 2005 and 2008 of all pregnancies in Californian women diagnosed with BPAD reported many adverse perinatal outcomes, including maternal health problems such as gestational hypertension and diabetes and infant problems such as higher rates of preterm birth, intrauterine foetal death and infant death. The consequences of mood-stabilising and antipsychotic medications have been reviewed elsewhere in this book, and it is clear that whilst there may be compounding effects of medication and illness, there are also beneficial effects of good illness control in pregnancy, and perhaps pregnancy and birth outcomes are no worse (Boden et al. 2012).
Postnatally, in the main, authors focus on best treatment of BPAD which of course is relevant to infant outcome (Jones et al. 2014). There are clearly some disastrous outcomes for infants of mothers with puerperal psychosis. In a German series of 96 patients reviewed over a period of 20 years, Kapfhammer and Lange (2012) noted 6 maternal suicides and 2 infanticides, findings similar to earlier studies. However, some (e.g. Noorlander et al. 2008; Hipwell et al. 2000) suggest that where safety is not an issue, children of puerperally psychotic mothers may find it easier to relate positively to their infants than those with depression.
Not surprisingly, some longer-term follow-up studies show significant compromise for offspring, (e.g. Doucette et al. 2014; Radke-Yarrow et al. 1992). A 23-year follow-up by Abbott et al. (2004) also found high rates of mental illness in offspring of women with puerperal psychosis. These studies do not tease out genetic and environmental contributions.
These somewhat gloomy predictors of problems for offspring are tempered by those such as Simeonova et al. (2014) who focus on defining potential resilience factors which may be found by longitudinal studies with a wider focus. Glangeaud-Freudenthal et al. (2011) also elaborate factors which may lead to better outcomes in their French series on women and their infants admitted to mother-baby units.
Best practice on current information must therefore include a summary of the risks of bipolar mood disorder itself and the pharmacological interventions and potential problem outcomes for offspring. Risk does not necessarily lead to development of problems studied. Maximising preconception counselling, contraception where chosen, pregnancy mood stability and postnatal care for mother and infant will be well received by people with this condition. Most are likely to choose reproducing, hopefully with expert help during pregnancy as recommended by Nguyen et al. (2013). Specialised perinatal mental health teams and mother-baby units provide excellent care, and thus, a team approach to care of vulnerable families which includes partners and extended family in treatment approaches with a biopsychosocial approach will usually be appreciated and appropriate (Sved Williams et al. 2008).
Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD)
BPD is a severe mental illness, and despite its high prevalence in psychiatric admissions and in particular in a mother-baby unit (Sved Williams et al. 2013), and in young women, very little research has focused directly on effects on infants and on management perinatally. It is at least as prevalent as BPAD with one recent American study (Tomko et al. 2014) confirming previous findings of an incidence of 2.7 % in a community sample.
Much of the literature which focuses on stress antenatally in the context of chronic depression and anxiety, already summarised in this chapter, may be relevant to borderline personality disorder. Thus, it can be assumed that foetuses of mothers with BPD are at risk through pregnancy, but no data is available to confirm this assumption. To date, only one study (Blankley et al. in press) has looked at obstetric and neonatal outcomes for mothers diagnosed with BPD in pregnancy, and this is a retrospective survey, with prospective studies sorely needed.
Postnatally, disastrous outcomes can occur. Friedman and Resnick (2007) summarised infanticides committed by mothers with BPD, noting the possibility of its recurrence but not quantifying the risk.
Looking at developmental outcomes postnatally, there has been some interest in understanding not only the genesis of borderline personality disorder in mothers but also its potential for intergenerational transfer of problems to offspring. Whilst earlier theories focused mainly on child abuse in its various forms as causative of BPD (well summarised by Kuo et al. 2015), more recent studies have compiled a nuanced understanding of interaction between genetic inheritance and style of parenting (Steele and Siever 2010) flowing through to its neurobiological basis (Newman et al. 2011). Linehan (1993, p 50) has emphasised the role of invalidation from mothers combined with heredity and parenting factors. Several authors have specifically identified maternal withdrawal in mothers when their infants are distressed, which Lyons-Ruth group have found to be the predictor of most compromised outcomes when those infants have reached adulthood (e.g. Easterbrooks et al. 2012), and this finding is consistent with Linehan’s work.
The few authors who have studied mother-infant interactions between women with BPD and their infants have consistently shown women who find it difficult to attend to their infant’s distress and may show frightened or frightening behaviours themselves (White et al. 2011; Hobson et al. 2009). It is possible to see the genesis of offspring who in turn have not been supported well enough to regulate their emotions, thus perhaps leading to intergenerational continuity of problems.
Specific treatments for the group of mothers with BPD include mentalisation-based approaches (Markin 2013; Fonagy et al. 2011). Other forms of mother-infant psychotherapy aimed at increasing maternal sensitivity and positive response to her infant are described by an increasing number of authors in this relatively unstudied area (Denard et al. 2013; Newman and Stevenson 2008).
Conclusions
For many perinatal women, the effects of anxiety and depression make for lives with great unhappiness and infants whose developmental pathways may be compromised. For women with ongoing chronic depression and anxiety, the effects are greater. Nevertheless, researchers are continually progressing effective treatments for these conditions in combination with parent-infant interventions with promising results. The role of fathers in both the genesis of problems and protection from problem outcomes is being elucidated. At the societal level, beneficial effects are being seen and approaches to stigma have been partially successful in some countries (Reavley and Jorm 2012), and this in turn aids campaigns focused on early interventions generally in families with young children (1001 Critical Days on http://www.1001criticaldays.co.uk). In many families targeted by this campaign, high stress, anxiety and depression are likely to be present. Finally, emphasis must be given to the usually positive outcomes for infants, both with and without intervention, in families with risk factors but also strengths, reflective capacity and resilience. Risk factors are not synonymous with poor outcomes, and research will continue to define both the minimisation of risk and the maximisation of resilience to change the balance of outcomes more.
For women with severe maternal mental illnesses (SMIs), there are clearly increased and varied effects on infants. The most severe include the effects of compromised pregnancy, in particular LBW and prematurity, to heightened chances of early death as adults from a large range of mental and physical health problems. In the first postnatal year, many authors have found deficits in parenting, including direct harm to infants, problems in attunement with compromised attachment relationships and life patterns of developmental dysregulation.
What hope is there for families with a member with SMI? Older notions of stigma abound. Historically, a mad woman with a child has not been treated kindly. Much of the literature on women with SMI is deficit based and problem focused. There are however more positive ways to view women with SMI and their offspring, beginning with the rapid inroads which science is making to elucidate the mechanisms by which problems occur. Some are beginning to propound changes during pregnancy, e.g. to diet (Prescott 2015) and other health-related behaviours (e.g. Davis et al. 2014). Others are moving to ensure best care of women with SMI perhaps beginning preconceptually (Temel et al. 2014) and then in pregnancy ensuring coordinated care (Nguyen et al. 2013) as well as psychoeducational interventions directed towards ceasing or reducing toxins such as cigarettes, alcohol and illicit substances. Postnatally treatment will vary depending, for instance, on the availability of mother-baby units or other intensive postnatal evidence-based treatments both for the illness itself and for psychosocial support. Negative attitudes towards mental illness generally must be tackled perhaps particularly in low-income countries where outcomes are more compromised as well as ensuring appropriate treatment for sufferers (Stein et al. 2014). A focus from forward thinking world leaders such as Seeman and Howard et al. on kindly and humane treatment of mothers with SMI provides inspiration towards improving health and social circumstances worldwide for this compromised group.
Acknowledgements
Our thanks to Dr. Alan Gemmill, Parent-Infant Research Institute, for comments on the draft chapter.
References
Abbott R, Dunn VJ, Robling SA, Paykel ES (2004) Long-term outcome of offspring after maternal severe puerperal disorder. Acta Psychiatr Scand 110(5):365–373PubMed

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

