Left perirolandic metastatic brain cancer





Introduction


The most common type of brain tumor in adults is metastatic brain tumors, with an incidence 3 to 14 per 100,000 people per year. , Approximately 10% to 20% of these metastatic brain tumors occur in eloquent locations, which include primary motor, somatosensory, speech, and/or visual cortices. The general management of large, symptomatic metastatic brain tumors is surgery followed by radiation therapy. , , However, lesions in eloquent regions are surgically more challenging, and therefore typically undergo radiation therapy to minimize the risk of surgically induced morbidity. Radiation without surgical therapy, however, does little to improve symptomatic mass effect in the immediate period. , , In this chapter, we present a case of a patient with a dominant hemisphere perirolandic metastatic brain tumor.



Example case


Chief complaint: headaches and right-hand weakness


History of present illness


An 80-year-old, right-handed man with a history of hypertension, coronary artery disease, and bladder cancer status postresection and radiation therapy presented with headaches over the past couple of weeks unresponsive to pain medications, and difficulties with writing and buttoning his shirts over the same time frame. He saw his oncologist who ordered systemic imaging, and a brain lesion was seen ( Fig. 33.1 ).




  • Medications : Aspirin, irbesartan, hydrochlorothiazide.



  • Allergies : No known drug allergies.



  • Past medical and surgical history : Hypertension, coronary artery disease, bladder cancer status postresection 5 years prior.



  • Family history : No history of intracranial malignancies.



  • Social history: Retired, independent with activities of daily living, remote smoking history, and no alcohol.



  • Physical examination : Awake, alert, oriented to person, place, and time; Language: naming difficulties, impaired repetition; Cranial nerves II to XII intact, except slight right facial droop; Right upper extremity 4+/5, Right lower extremity 5/5, Left upper extremity 5/5, Left lower extremity 5/5.



  • Computed tomography chest/abdomen/pelvis : Several liver lesions concerning for metastatic disease.




Fig. 33.1


Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging.

(A) T1 axial image with gadolinium contrast; (B) T1 coronal image with gadolinium contrast; (C) T1 sagittal image without gadolinium contrast magnetic resonance imaging scans demonstrating a heterogeneously enhancing lesion in close proximity to the precentral cortex and rolandic fissure.




























































































































































Sunit Das, MD, PhD, St. Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada Peter E. Fecci, MD, PhD, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States Alessandro Olivi, MD, Giuseppe Maria Della Pepa, MD, A. Gemelli University Hospital, Rome, Italy Ganesh Rao, MD, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
Preoperative
Additional tests requested DTI
fMRI
DTI
Oncology evaluation for prognosis
DTI
fMRI
DTI
Surgical approach selected Left parietal craniotomy or SRS Left fronto-parietal craniotomy with awake speech and motor mapping Left fronto-parietal craniotomy with asleep motor mapping Left parieto-occipital craniotomy with asleep motor mapping
Anatomic corridor Left parietal, transsulcal, MIPS Left parietal Left fronto-parietal Left parieto-occipital
Goal of surgery Gross total resection and neurologic preservation Gross total resection, local disease control, palliative symptom control Gross total resection and neurologic preservation Gross total resection
Perioperative
Positioning Left supine semilateral Left lateral Left supine with right rotation Left three-quarter prone
Surgical equipment Surgical navigation
Surgical microscope
Ultrasonic aspirator
Ultrasound
Surgical navigation
Surgical microscope
Brain stimulator
Surgical navigation
IOM (SSEP/MEP)
Brain stimulator
Surgical navigation
Ultrasound
Brain stimulator
IOM (SSEP, EMG)
Medications Steroids Steroids
Antiepileptics
Mannitol
Steroids
Antiepileptics
Steroids
Anatomic considerations Motor and somatosensory cortex, CST Receptive speech area, motor cortex, CST, AF, optic radiations Central sulcus, motor and sensory cortices, CST, IFOF Motor and somatosensory cortex, CST
Complications feared with approach chosen Motor and sensory deficits Language dysfunction, motor deficit CST injury Injury to motor cortex and CST, Gerstmann syndrome
Intraoperative
Anesthesia General Asleep-awake-asleep General General
Skin incision Linear Linear Linear Linear/curvilinear
Bone opening Left parietal Left parietal Left parietal Left parietal
Brain exposure Left fronto-parietal Left fronto-parietal Left parietal and possible central lobe Left parieto-occipital
Method of resection Craniotomy based on navigation, ultrasound to identify lesion, dural opening, determine suitability of sulcal opening, sulcal dissection under microscopic visualization, pial opening to access tumor, sequential mobilization with internal debulking, goal of gross total resection, ultrasound assessment, dural tack up sutures Craniotomy based on navigation while patient asleep, patient awakened and following commands, dura opened, cortical stimulation of speech and motor areas starting at 1 mA, corticectomy planned based on negative mapping sites, en bloc vs. piecemeal resection depending on tumor consistency, patient sedated for closure Craniotomy based on navigation with preoperative identification of planned trajectory posterior to somatosensory cortex, C-shaped dural opening, place strip electrode for MEP or phase reversal to identify central sulcus, stimulate electrode to find negative mapping area to enter tumor, corticectomy but ideally transsulcal, internal debulking of tumor, tumor margins dissected from parenchyma, ultrasound to check for residual, dural closure with pericranium if necessary Craniotomy based on navigation, dura opened, cortical mapping to identify motor and sensory cortices, transcortical approach based on negative mapping sites, subcortical stimulation along trajectory, intralesional resection because of the size of the lesion, ultrasound to verify extent of resection
Complication avoidance Transsulcal, ultrasound assessment, internal debulking Cortical and subcortical mapping, method of resection depending on tumor consistency Trajectory posterior to sensory cortex, internal debulking to minimize manipulation, ultrasound Cortical and subcortical mapping, intralesional resection, ultrasound
Postoperative
Admission Floor ICU ICU ICU
Postoperative complications feared Motor and sensory deficit Language dysfunction, motor deficit Seizures, ischemia Motor deficit
Follow-up testing MRI within 48 hours after surgery MRI within 24 hours after surgery MRI within 24 hours after surgery MRI within 24 hours after surgery
Follow-up visits 1 month after surgery 14 days after surgery and 4 weeks after surgery 10 days and 1 month after surgery 7–10 days after surgery and 1 month after surgery for MRI
Adjuvant therapies recommended SRS or hypofractionated radiation to cavity SRS Radiation therapy SRS or hypofractionated radiotherapy

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Feb 15, 2025 | Posted by in NEUROSURGERY | Comments Off on Left perirolandic metastatic brain cancer

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access