Left thalamic high-grade glioma





Introduction


The general treatment paradigm for high-grade gliomas is maximal resection followed by adjuvant chemoradiation; however, patients who develop deficits have worsened survival independent of the extent of resection. Deep-seated high-grade gliomas have arguably the highest surgical risk of developing neurologic deficits. Therefore the management of deep-seated high-grade gliomas remains unclear. Some practitioners perform stereotactic needle biopsies to minimize surgical morbidity, whereas others perform open resections with significant risk of iatrogenic deficits. , In this chapter, we present a case of a dominant-hemisphere thalamic high-grade glioma.



Example case


Chief complaint: right-sided arm and leg weakness


History of present illness


An 18-year-old, right-handed woman with no significant past medical history presented with progressive right arm and leg weakness. She stated that over the past 2 to 3 months her right arm has become weaker to the point where she has problems writing. In addition, her leg seems to drag more when she walks. She denies any speaking or vision problems ( Fig. 26.1 ).




  • Medications : None.



  • Allergies : No known drug allergies.



  • Past medical and surgical history : None.



  • Family history : No history of intracranial malignancies.



  • Social history : College student, no smoking, no alcohol.



  • Physical examination : Awake, alert, oriented to person, place, and time; Language: intact naming and repetition; Cranial nerves II-XII intact except slight decreased right nasolabial fold, right drift, right upper extremity 4/5, right lower extremity 4+/5, left upper extremity/left lower extremity 5/5.



  • Imaging : Chest/abdomen/pelvis with no evidence of primary disease.




Fig. 26.1


Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. (A) T1 axial image with gadolinium contrast; (B) T2 axial diffusion tensor imaging; (C) T1 coronal with gadolinium contrast magnetic resonance imaging scan demonstrating a contrast-enhancing lesion involving the left posterior thalamus with anterior displacement of the internal capsule.




































































































































































Frederick F. Lang, MD, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States Fredric B. Meyer, MD, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States Stephen J. Price, MBBS, PhD, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom Andreas Raabe, MD, University Hospital at Inselspital Bern, Switzerland
Preoperative
Additional tests requested fMRI
DTI
MRV
+/– fMRI
+/– DTI
DTI DTI
Neuropsychological assessment
Surgical approach selected Left parietal craniotomy with intraoperative MRI and 5-ALA, if available Left parietal craniotomy with asleep subcortical stimulation Supracerebellar infratentorial Left parietal craniotomy with tubular retractor with intraoperative MRI
Anatomic corridor Left superior parietal lobule Left superior parietal lobule, transsulcal, transventricular to pulvinar Supracerebellar infratentorial Left postcentral-intraparietal transsulcal
Goal of surgery Complete resection of contrast-enhancing portion if possible Extensive resection of enhancing portion of the tumor Extensive resection of enhancing portion of the tumor Extensive resection guided by mapping and intraoperative MRI
Perioperative
Positioning Left supine Right lateral with head turned to the right Prone Left lateral with 20-degree head tilt and turn to the right
Surgical equipment Surgical navigation
IOM (SSEP, phase reversal)
Brain retractor
Surgical microscope with 5-ALA, if possible
Ultrasonic aspirator
Intraoperative MRI
Surgical navigation
IOM (MEP)
Surgical microscope
Brain retractor
Suction brain stimulator
Surgical navigation
Surgical microscope
Ultrasonic aspirator
Ultrasound
Budde halo retractor
Surgical navigation
IOM (MEP, SSEP)
Ultrasound
Surgical microscope with augmented reality
Ultrasonic aspirator
Intraoperative MRI
Medications Steroids
Antiepileptics
Steroids
Antiepileptics
SteroidsMannitol
Steroids
Antiepileptics
Anatomic considerations Motor cortex, AF, internal capsule/CST Posterior limb of internal capsule Avoiding optic tracts and CST Sensory pathways, AF, optic tract, thalamus, internal capsule, crus cerebri, CST, perforating arteries
Complications feared with approach chosen Motor deficit, sensory deficit, language dysfunction Worsening motor deficit Motor, visual deficit Motor, language, or visual deficit
Intraoperative
Anesthesia General General General General
Skin incision Lateral-based U-shaped flap Linear horizontal Midline linear from occiput to C2 with option of hockey stick incision Linear
Bone opening Left parietal Left parietal Occipital craniotomy eccentric to the right Left parietal
Brain exposure Left superior parietal lobule Left superior parietal lobule Cerebellar hemispheres and transverse sinus Left parietal
Method of resection Craniotomy centered over superior parietal lobule near midline, open dura medially, phase reversal to identify perirolandic area, confirm entry point behind sensory cortex in superior parietal lobule, preserve veins, 2 x 2 cm corticectomy, follow path down to lesion with navigation, advance retractors once tumor is reached, internally debulk, dissect tumor until completely removed, intraoperative MRI for possible further resection Craniotomy centered on selected sulcus based on navigation, dural tack up sutures, dural opening, sulcus opened and retracted with brain retractor (circular or single blade), divide U-fibers vertically, enter ventricle under navigation, choroid plexus is swept away and cottonoid placed to prevent spillage of blood products and tumor, horizontal incision in pulvinar based on appearance and stereotaxis, debulk tumor with suction and bipolar, stimulate with suction tip to identify internal capsule at 3–4 mA, continuous MEP, debulk tumor from medial to lateral, protect small perforators, avoid aggressive cauterization, water tight dural closure Midline dissection from occiput to C1, burr holes on each side of the keel, craniotomy going up to transverse sinus eccentric to the right, Y-shaped dural opening, care of draining veins, drain CSF, depress cerebellum from tentorium, enter pineal region, corticectomy over tumor (ultrasound and image guidance), internal debulking of tumor, aim for cyst laterally, aim for subtotal resection, watertight dural closure Left parietal craniotomy based on navigation, identification of interparietal and postcentral sulci, placement of tubular retractor, resect tumor with ultrasonic aspirator under microscopic visualization with augmented reality and continuous motor mapping, resect tumor until 3–4 mA threshold reached, intraoperative MRI with DTI, further resection until 2 mA threshold reached, repeat intraoperative MRI with DTI as needed
Complication avoidance Phase reversal to confirm superior parietal lobule, preserve veins, navigation for trajectory, brain retractor to hold corridor, intraoperative MRI for possible further resection Transsulcal approach, corridor kept open with retractor, cottonoid pledge to protect spillage, use of stimulating suction to identify internal capsule, continuous MEP, medial to lateral resection, avoid aggressive cauterization Supracerebellar approach to minimize cortical entry, internally debulking of tumor, target lateral cyst Transsulcal approach, tubular retractor, augmented reality, continuous motor mapping, intraoperative MRI with DTI
Postoperative
Admission ICU ICU Floor ICU
Postoperative complications feared Motor weakness, language dysfunction Progressive hemiparesis, thalamic pain syndrome Difficulty accessing tumor, hemianopia, motor deficit, CSF leak Motor of language deficit, seizures
Follow-up testing MRI within 24 hours after surgery MRI within 24 hours after surgery
Physical and occupational therapy evaluation
MRI within 72 hours after surgery MRI within 48 hours after surgery
Neuropsychological assessment
Visual field testing
Follow-up visits 2 weeks after surgery with neurosurgery, neurooncology, radiation oncology 6 weeks after surgery with neurosurgery
2 weeks after surgery with neurooncology and radiation oncology
7 days after surgery 4 weeks after surgery
Adjuvant therapies recommended
IDH status Mutant–radiation followed by temozolomide
Wild type–radiation/temozolomide
Mutant–radiation/temozolomide
Wild type–radiation/temozolomide
Mutant–radiation/temozolomide
Wild type–radiation/temozolomide
Mutant–temozolomide (GTR), temozolomide/radiation (STR)
Wild type–radiation/temozolomide
MGMT status Methylated–radiation/temozolomide
Unmethylated–radiation/temozolomide
Methylated–radiation/temozolomide
Unmethylated–radiation/temozolomide
Methylated–radiation/temozolomide
Unmethylated–radiation/temozolomide
Methylated–radiation/temozolomide
Unmethylated–radiation/temozolomide

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Feb 15, 2025 | Posted by in NEUROSURGERY | Comments Off on Left thalamic high-grade glioma

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access