Long-Term Efficacy of Pharmacological Treatment


Author, year

Design

Duration

Interventionb

N. patients

F:M

Agea

IRLSG scorea

Disease durationa

Outcome

Results

Allen 2014

RCT

52 weeks

Pregabalin 300 mg versus pramipexole 0.25 mg versus pramipexole 0.50 mg

540, ITT

1.6:1

55.0
 
4.6

IRLS SS improvement

(non-inferiority)

Pregabalin > pramipexole 0.25 mg

pregabalin > pramipexole 0.50 mg

CGI improvement

(non-inferiority)

Pregabalin = pramipexole 0.50 mg > pramipexole 0.25 mg

Drop out

Pregabalin 51%

pramipexole 0.25 46%

pramipexole 0.50 49%

Augmentation

Pregabalin 1.7%

pramipexole 0.25 mg 6.6%

pramipexole 0.50 mg 9.0%

Inoue 2010

ObsLRS

52 weeks

Pramipexole 0.125–0.75 mg, flexible doses

0.31 ± 0.27 mg

140

1.3:1

52.6 ± 14.0

10.1 ± 7.8

0.1 ± 0.4

IRLS SS, CGI, PSQI, ESS

↓ Mean IRLSGSS

↓ Mean CGI

↓ Mean PSQI

↓ Mean ESS

Silber 2003

ObsLRS

27 months

Pramipexole 0.125–4.5 mg, flexible doses

0.38 mg

60

1.5:1

57.7 years

(25–82 years)



Subjective RLS symptoms

67% completely effective

27% partially effective

7% ineffective

Augmentation

33%

Lipford 2012

ObsLRS

7.96 ± 3.73 years (0.6–12 years)

Pramipexole 0.25–4.5 mg, flexible doses

0.63 mg

50

1.6:1




Subjective RLS symptoms

60% partially or totally effective

28% need to add another drug

12% ineffective

Winkelman 2004

ObsLRS

21.2 ± 11.4 months

Pramipexole 0.125–1.0 mg, flexible doses 0.47 ± 0.22 mg

59

1.4:1

60.8 ± 14.4



Augmentation

Tolerance

32%

46%

Montplaisir 2006

ObsLRS

>1 year

Pramipexole (dose not specified)

195

1.3:1

55.1 ± 12.1


23.6

Discontinuation

22.1%

13.3% for inefficacy

30.5 ± 10.5 months

Pramipexole 0.125–2.25 mg, flexible doses

Median 0.59 ± 0.31 mg

152

1.2:1

53 ± 11.8


23.2

Subjective severity of RLS symptoms

Mean ↓ of 80.0% (±20.8)

Severity ↓ of > 50% in 94.7% points

130

(subgroup)




Subjective sleep measures

86.9% ↓ sleep latency

20.4% ↓ nocturnal awakenings

91.4% ↑ overall sleep quality

Garcia-Borreguero 2007

ObsLRS

52 weeks

Ropinirole 0.25–4.0 mg, flexible doses

1.64 ± 1.0 mg

309

1.5:1

56.5 ± 11.0

22.0 ± 8.7


Augmentation

Discontinuation

11.7%

19.0%

3.5% for inefficacy

233 (subgroup)




IRLS SS, CGI

↓ IRLS SS −10.0 points

71.9% CGI improvement

Ondo 2004

ObsLRS

39.2 ± 20.9 months

Pramipexole (n = 40)

ropinirole (n = 19)

pergolide (n = 12)

flexible doses

LDED: 0.79 ± 0.55 mg

83

1.6:1

56.8 ± 11.5


22.0

Subjective severity of RLS symptoms

19.3% need to add another drug

24.1% Shift among pramipexole, ropinirole, or pergolide

Augmentation

Discontinuation

28.9%

12%

2.4% for inefficacy

Oertel 2013

ObsLRS

5 years

Rotigotine stable dose after titration: 2.4 ± 1.2 mg

end: 3.1 ± 1.1

295

2.0:1

58.3 ± 10.1

27.7 ± 6.0

11.0

(6.0–24.0)

IRLS SS, CGI, RLS-6, RLS-QoL

↓ IRLS SS −18.7 ± 9.5 points

↓ CGI item 1 −2.8 ± 1.1

96% much or very much improvement CGI item 2

↓ RLS-6 scale

↓ RLS-QoL −18.4 ± 13.2

Augmentation

Discontinuation

13%

57%

11% for inefficacy

Subjective severity of RLS symptoms

61% need dose adjustment (not say up or down)

VonScheele 1990

ObsLRS

2 years

Levodopa-carbidopa

Start: 50–250 mg

Median: 100 mg

30 responders

1:1

59

(10–81)

 
Subjective RLS symptoms

86.7 L-DOPA keep to be efficient

30.0% need dose increase

26.7% kept the same dose

30.0% a decreased dose was sufficient

Discontinuation

13.3%

6.7% for inefficacy

Trenkwalder 2003

ObsLRS

12 months

Levodopa-benserazide (RR + SR, flexible doses)

Final: 314 ± 133 mg (150–640) (n = 20)

23, ITT

2.7:1

56 ± 10 (31–72)
 
20

Subjective sleep measures

Satisfaction with sleep +3.5 ± 1.9

Sleep latency (min) 131±152

Wake periods during night (min) −234 ± 129

Total sleep time +190 ± 136

Subjective RLS measures

Severity at time falling asleep −6.5 ± 3.4

Severity during the night −6.0 ± 3.5

CGI

Item 2 change ↑ in 39% points

Item 3 change ↑ in 56% points

Augmentation

Discontinuation

34.8%

56.5%

4.3% for inefficacy

21.3% for RLS severity increase

Ellenbogen 2012c

ObsLRS

52 weeks

Gabapentin enacarbil

flexible doses

Final: 1267.0 ± 409.8 mg (600–1800)

573

1.8:1

50.2 ± 11.9

(19–79)

10.4 ± 8.13
 
IRLS score

↓ IRLS SS −2.4 points

(Mean ESS at end 8.0 ± 8.29)

ObsLRS

52 weeks

Gabapentin enacarbil

flexible doses

Final: 1197.0 ± 426.4 mg (600–1800)

197 (subgroup)

1.5:1

49.5 ± 12.0(19–77)

13.8 ± 7.9
 
IRLS score

ESS

Discontinuation

↓ IRLS SS 8.4 ± 7.7 (−5.4 points)

−2.0 points

1.5% for inefficacy

ObsLRS

64 weeks

Gabapentin enacarbil

flexible doses

Final: 1303.7 ± 396.5 mg (600–1800)

376 (subgroup)

1.4:1

50.6 ± 11.8 (20–79)

23.2 ± 5.1
 
IRLS score

ESS

Discontinuation

↓ IRLS SS 7.8 ± 8.9 (−15.2 ± 8.9 points)

(not available)

2.3% for inefficacy

Inoue 2012

ObsLRS

52 weeks

Gabapentin enacarbil

flexible doses

Initial: 1150.3 ± 156.6 mg (600–1800)

Final: not specified

181

1.1:1

54.9 ± 12.2

24.4 ± 0.4

10.6 ± 11.0

IRLS score

PSQI

SF-36

Discontinuation

Dose adjustment

↓ IRLS SS -18.0 ± 0.6 points

↓ PSQI −3.6 points

↓ SF−36

0.6% for inefficacy

Dose increase in 2.2%

Dose decrease in 10.0%

Ondo 2005

ObsLRS

23 ± 12 months

(4–44)

Methadone flexible doses

Initial: 13.0 ± 5.9 mg (5–30)

Final:15.5 ± 7.7 mg (5–40)

27

1.1:1

54.8 ± 14.4

23
 
Subjective efficacy

Discontinuation

63% efficacy maintained

37%

7.4% for inefficacy

Silver 2011

ObsLRS

1year/10 years

Methadone

At 6 months median dose 10 ± mg

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Sep 23, 2017 | Posted by in NEUROLOGY | Comments Off on Long-Term Efficacy of Pharmacological Treatment

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access