Marginal Benefit from Device Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale
Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale versus Medical Therapy after Cryptogenic Stroke
Carroll JD, Saver JL, Thaler DE, et al. NEJM. 2013;368:1092-1100
BACKGROUND
The optimal management of patent foramen ovale (PFO) in the setting of cryptogenic stroke is unclear. Prior to the publication of RESPECT, it was unclear whether closure of a PFO was efficacious for secondary stroke prevention after a cryptogenic stroke. A randomized trial using the STARFlex septal closure system (CLOSURE I) did not show superiority over medical therapy alone; however, observational studies had shown newer closure devices to have improved safety features.
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate whether closure of a PFO reduces recurrent ischemic stroke when compared to medical therapy.
METHODS
Prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label trial performed at 69 sites in the United States and Canada between 2003 and 2011.
Patients
980 patients with cryptogenic stroke and PFO demonstrated by transthoracic echocardiogram bubble study were randomized. Notably, patients were excluded from the trial if a mechanism other than paradoxical embolism could be identified for the index stroke.
