Marginal Benefit from Device Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale



Marginal Benefit from Device Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale







BACKGROUND

The optimal management of patent foramen ovale (PFO) in the setting of cryptogenic stroke is unclear. Prior to the publication of RESPECT, it was unclear whether closure of a PFO was efficacious for secondary stroke prevention after a cryptogenic stroke. A randomized trial using the STARFlex septal closure system (CLOSURE I) did not show superiority over medical therapy alone; however, observational studies had shown newer closure devices to have improved safety features.


OBJECTIVES

To evaluate whether closure of a PFO reduces recurrent ischemic stroke when compared to medical therapy.


METHODS

Prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label trial performed at 69 sites in the United States and Canada between 2003 and 2011.


Patients

980 patients with cryptogenic stroke and PFO demonstrated by transthoracic echocardiogram bubble study were randomized. Notably, patients were excluded from the trial if a mechanism other than paradoxical embolism could be identified for the index stroke.

Oct 13, 2018 | Posted by in NEUROLOGY | Comments Off on Marginal Benefit from Device Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access