Introduction
As previously discussed in other chapters, single suture nonsyndromic craniosynostosis has the highest prevalence of the craniosynostosis, with sagittal synostosis being the most common followed by metopic, coronal, and lastly, lambdoid stenosis. In the multiple suture synostosis group, bilateral coronal synostosis (typically associated with a craniofacial syndrome) is the most common type. There is yet another subset of multiple suture synostosis that does not appear to be associated with a known syndrome and may include two or three sutures. All of the patients present at or soon after birth and develop rapidly progressive cranial and facial deformities. However, these patients grow to develop normally and do not appear to have association with a well-known craniofacial syndrome. Prior to our introduction of minimally invasive endoscopic procedures to treat this subgroup of patients, conventional wisdom dictated that the patient be allowed to reach the age of 10 to 12 months before undergoing treatment. Unfortunately, the rapid growth phase that occurs during this waiting period, often leads to severe cranial and facial deformities which makes successful treatment more difficult to obtain. Often, the complex nature of the untreated multisuture deformity leads surgical teams to recommend staged surgical procedures to treat the complex abnormalities. Our success with treating single suture synostosis with endoscopic techniques led us to apply these procedures to the treatment of a combination of stenosed sutures in young patients. Other authors have followed with similar results. At first the goal was simply to perform a quick, minimally invasive procedure to release the closed sutures with the goal of halting the ongoing deformation and then proceed with a standard calvarial vault reconstruction at a later date. However, we became extremely surprised when we noticed that not only was the deformity progression being halted but that actual correction was taking place without the ultimate need for a calvarial vault remodeling. In this chapter we present our surgical approach and our short- and long-term results treating this cohort of patients utilizing endoscopic techniques for the treatment of multisuture synostosis. The group can be divided into seven categories: (1) sagittal and coronal synostosis; (2) sagittal and metopic synostosis; (3) sagittal and bilambdoid synostosis; (4) bilateral lambdoid synostosis; (5) coronal and metopic synostosis; (6) sagittal, coronal, and lambdoid synostosis; and (7) sagittal and bicoronal synostosis. Clinical presentation and radiographic findings will be discussed.
Sagittal and Coronal Synostosis
As would be expected, a combination of sutural stenosis which involves the sagittal and a coronal suture will lead to a recognizable phenotypic presentation with combination of both pathologies. The clinical features include: (A) vertical dystopia; (B) nasal deviation to contralateral side of coronal stenosis ( Fig. 14.1 ); (C) sagittal plane imbalance/scoliosis ( Fig. 14.2 ); (D) recession of forehead and orbital rim ipsilateral to affected coronal suture ( Fig. 14.3 ); (E) severe frontal bossing contralateral to coronal stenosis; and (F) scaphocephaly ( Fig. 14.4 ). Radiographic features are seen in Figs. 14.5–14.7 .
Positioning
In order to have complete access to the front and back of the head, the patient is placed in the modified prone (sphinx) position. The overall set up is the same as described in detail in the sagittal synostosis chapter ( Chapter 8 ).
Incisions
The incisions used to treat this group also resemble the ones made in the sagittal synostosis group. The only difference is that the anterior incision is made at the level of the anterior fontanelle ( Fig. 14.8A ). Also, the anterior is made a bit longer and extends more towards the affected coronal sutures. Subgaleal dissection is made as described in the sagittal chapter. However more dissection is done over the affected suture and should reach all the way to the pterion. If the anterior incision is not sufficient to reach the ipsilateral squamosal suture, a second incision on the side can be made as seen in Fig. 14.8B .
Osteotomies
The amount of bone removed to treat the sagittal component is similar as to that described in the sagittal chapter ( Chapter 8 ). The amount removed is inversely proportional to the age of the patient. The vertex craniectomy is performed and the barrel stave osteotomies of the lambdoid sutures and the nonaffected coronal suture are performed as previously described. The primary difference is that the ipsilateral frontal wedge osteotomy that is placed over the stenosed coronal suture is extended all the way down to the pterion and should reach the squamosal suture, as described in the coronal chapter ( Chapter 9 ) ( Fig. 14.9 ). A skull radiograph obtained after surgery shows the amount and extent of bone removal ( Fig. 14.10 ). As with all other surgeries, the patients are placed in custom-made cranial orthoses which keep the anterior/posterior dimension constant during first 2 months while allowing the depressed temporal area and recessed forehead and orbital rim to expand and move into a normal position.
Results
There were seven patients, five males and two females. The mean age at time of surgery was 2.6 months and the median was 2.2 months. The mean estimated blood loss was 25 mL. There were no intraoperative or postoperative blood transfusions. The mean surgical time was 88 minutes. All patients were discharged on postoperative day (POD) 1. There were no complications. The preoperative cranial deformities underwent early and significant correction which has persisted long-term as evidenced by the patient in Clinical Case 1 ( Figs. 14.11–14.15 ). The other patients have achieved similar results ( Figs. 14.16–14.18 ).
Coronal and Metopic
This sutural stenosis combination causes deformational changes that affect the face, forehead, and cranium. The following clinical features are seen: (A) curved midline-forehead ridge ( Fig. 14.19 ); (B) vertical dystopia on the side of the coronal synostosis; (C) deviation of the forehead ridge toward the affected coronal suture ( Fig. 14.20 ); (D) nasal deviation away from coronal suture ( Fig. 14.21 ); (E) sagittal imbalance pivoted at the anterior fontanelle ( Fig. 14.22 ); and (F) asymmetric trigonocephaly with associated plagiocephaly of the affected coronal suture ( Fig. 14.23 ). The patients are typically irritable and uncomfortable most likely due to brain pressure from the multiple suture synostosis. Skull radiographs will show harlequin’s eye and closed metopic suture on the same patient ( Fig. 14.24 ). Computed tomography (CT) scans show marked skull base deviation of the anterior cranial base towards the affected coronal ( Figs. 14.25–14.29 ).