Neurologic Disorders

Chapter 11


Neurologic Disorders



11.1


Central Nervous System Hypersomnias




Overview


Excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) is one of the most common complaints encountered in sleep disorder clinics. If the patient or bedmate reports symptoms suggestive of sleep-disordered breathing (SDB), the clinician will almost reflexively order a diagnostic polysomnogram (PSG) test. If the workup is not suggestive of SDB or EDS persists despite adequately treating the SDB, the sleep clinician should conduct a thorough investigation for other causes that may include medical or psychiatric illnesses and/or alcohol or drug use, circadian rhythm disorders, inadequate sleep hygiene with irregular sleep schedule, and insufficient sleep times. In the absence of any of these conditions, the sleep clinician should next evaluate for one of the central nervous system (CNS) hypersomnias. This chapter provides an overview of the classification, clinical features, pathophysiology, evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment for the commonly encountered CNS hypersomnias and includes a brief review of Kleine-Levin syndrome (KLS).



Classification and Prevalence


The classification of CNS hypersomnias is being revised for the International Classification of Sleep Disorders, third edition (ICSD-3). The ICSD-3 will further subdivide narcolepsy with and without cataplexy into narcolepsy with and without hypocretin deficiency. The terms type 1 narcolepsy and type 2 narcolepsy may be introduced to denote the presence or absence of hypocretin deficiency, respectively, to parallel the accepted nomenclature for diabetes. For the purpose of this chapter, we refer to the current (second) International Classification of Sleep Disorders (ICSD-2), summarized in Box 11.1-1.



The prevalence of hypersomnia disorders, depending on the classification system used, ranges between 0.3% and 1.5% of the general population. The prevalence of narcolepsy with cataplexy is between 0.02% and 0.04% of the general population. These figures have been well established in population samples. In contrast, no prevalence data have been systematically ascertained for other CNS hypersomnias.



Clinical Features and Epidemiology


CNS hypersomnias may manifest as a variety of symptoms, including cataplexy, sleep paralysis, hypnagogic and hypnopompic hallucinations, EDS, disrupted nocturnal sleep, automatic behaviors, and sleep inertia. Narcolepsy typically manifests more of these symptoms than idiopathic hypersomnia (IH) does, but these symptoms, excluding cataplexy, may also occur outside the context of a CNS hypersomnia in the general population (Fig. 11.1-1).




Cataplexy


Except for cataplexy, which is pathognomonic for narcolepsy with hypocretin deficiency, no symptoms are unique to CNS hypersomnias. Typical cataplexy is described as the sudden onset of a transient loss of skeletal muscle tone that may last from seconds to minutes, most often triggered by positive emotions, such as laughter and joking. Cataplexy occurs in 60% to 70% of narcoleptic patients. The challenge in recognizing cataplexy is that normal subjects can endorse cataplexy-like symptoms. The prudent clinician should then inquire about the presence of cataplexy with a vague, initial question such as, “Does anything unusual happen when you tell a joke or a funny story, hear something funny or laugh, or make some witty verbal remark?” It is often helpful for the clinician to ask patients to describe their first and last episode, inquiring about emotional triggers, muscle groups affected, duration, and frequency of attacks (Fig. 11.1-2). Awareness is maintained throughout the episode. Although difficult to ascertain, reflexes are abolished during a cataplectic episode. Recovery is usually complete and immediate, although abrupt transitions from wakefulness to sleep may follow an episode.



image


Figure 11.1-2 Characterization of cataplexy: emotional triggers, muscle groups affected, duration, and frequency.
A, Comparison of emotional triggers for typical cataplexy and cataplexy-like episodes (e.g., physiologic muscle weakness) in narcoleptics (n = 63) and nonnarcoleptic subjects (n = 416/909). Surprisingly, cataplexy-like symptoms were claimed by 46% of the nonnarcolepsy subjects. Cataplexy is best differentiated from other types of muscle weakness when triggered by only three typical situations: when hearing or telling a joke, while laughing, or when angry. B, Muscle groups affected in typical cataplexy. The most commonly affected muscle groups involve the legs/knees. A typical episode is often indiscernible from normal behavior by an observer; it results in the knees buckling, arms dropping to the sides, slurred speech, and/or a slight dropping of the jaw. C, Duration of cataplexy episodes. Cataplexy typically lasts from a few seconds to nearly 30 seconds. D, Frequency of cataplexy episodes in narcolepsy cases. Episodes typically occur from once per day to several times per week. All subjects (n = 351) were human leukocyte antigen (HLA) DQB1*06:02 positive. (A, Modified from Anic-Labat S, Guilleminault C, Kraemer HC, et al: Validation of a cataplexy questionnaire in 983 sleep-disordered patients. Sleep 1999;22[1]:77-87. B, C, and D, Modified from Okun ML, Lin L, Pelin Z, Hong S, Mignot E: Clinical aspects of narcolepsy-cataplexy across ethnic groups. Sleep 2002;25[1]:27-35.)


Cataplexy typically starts in teens and adolescents. It usually manifests within 5 years of the onset of excessive sleepiness, although it can be delayed for more than 20 years after the onset of sleepiness. Interestingly, cataplexy symptoms often abate with advancing age, which may reflect the ability of the individual to learn and subsequently avoid triggers for cataplexy, or it may show the effectiveness of treatment. In children, however, cataplexy can occur without any recognizable trigger; these events are referred to as “cataplectic facies” (Fig. 11.1-3), which may result in facial muscle weakness, dropped eyelids and facial grimaces with the eyes kept open, facial slackening, mouth opening and/or tongue protrusion, and a sort of “drunken, droopy look” (Video 11-1). In a rare manifestation of cataplexy, so-called status cataplecticus, the episodes may persist for hours and may confine the patient to bed. Rebound cataplexy, which may result in status cataplecticus, occurs after the abrupt discontinuation of an antidepressant and usually results in more intense and frequent cataplectic attacks.




Sleep Paralysis and Hallucinations


Although cataplexy, sleep paralysis, and hallucinations are all regarded as rapid eye movement (REM)-related phenomenon, described as an abnormal dissociated state between REM sleep and wakefulness, cataplexy is the only REM-related phenomenon specific for narcolepsy with hypocretin deficiency. Sleep paralysis and hallucinations—which may be precipitated by stress, sleep deprivation, and an irregular sleep-wake schedule—are reported in 20% to 60% of narcolepsy cases and less commonly in IH. Sleep paralysis and hallucinations are reported in approximately 6% to 20% of the general population, respectively. Sleep paralysis, often a very frightening experience, is a transient episode that lasts from seconds to a few minutes, in which patients find that they are unable to perform any voluntary movements. Paralysis should be clearly differentiated from a strong desire not to move. Dreamlike, unpleasant visual hallucinations are common and may also invoke auditory and tactile senses; these may be perceived as so realistic that the patient acts upon them (e.g., checking the front door after “hearing” the doorbell ring; calling the police to report an intruder in the house, only to realize it was a hallucination). Psychiatric illnesses may coexist with narcolepsy and other hypersomnias and should be part of the differential diagnosis in the evaluation of CNS hypersomnias, particularly when hallucinations and paralysis are part of the symptom complex.



Excessive Daytime Sleepiness


Prevalence of EDS in the general population ranges from 4% to 30%, depending on how sleepiness is defined. Patients often have a difficult time distinguishing sleepiness from fatigue. Sleepiness should be characterized in terms of 1) time of day, 2) frequency, 3) circumstances in which it occurs, 4) precipitating factors, and 5) alleviating factors. Involuntary sleep episodes, or “sleep attacks,” may occur during sedentary activities and during unusual circumstances, such as while eating or talking. Sleep attacks occur more often in narcolepsy than in IH. Brief naps are typically more refreshing for narcoleptics compared with individuals who have IH, who may report prolonged episodes of nonrefreshing sleep. Subjects with IH frequently report waking up in an irritable or confused state, a constellation of symptoms commonly referred to as sleep drunkenness or sleep inertia, which is estimated to occur in up to 50% of IH cases, compared with about 1% of the general population. Severe sleepiness may result in “automatic behaviors,” in which the patient performs usual activities—such as talking, writing, or driving—in a semiautomatic manner; this lasts from seconds to up to 30 minutes, for which the individual is amnestic afterward. These episodes are typically associated with “microsleeps,” transient episodes of sleep, and may result in a dramatically impaired performance, such as writing or talking in a nonsensical fashion.



Disrupted Nocturnal Sleep


Although daytime symptoms such as sleepiness and cataplexy represent the primary complaints of narcoleptic patients, disrupted nocturnal sleep affects approximately 50% of narcoleptic patients and can be very disabling. The sleep clinician should therefore focus on nocturnal symptoms as well as daytime symptoms. Patients usually report trouble maintaining sleep, rather than trouble initiating sleep, with frequent nighttime awakenings. In addition, vivid dreaming, REM behavior disorder (RBD), and other REM-related symptoms can disturb sleep. Despite these complaints and findings, narcoleptics do not sleep more than normal individuals over the 24-hour day. Individuals with IH, on the other hand, typically report sleeping soundly and efficiently and, in some cases, for prolonged periods.



Kleine-Levin Syndrome


KLS is a rare sleep disorder that primarily affects adolescent boys more than girls. It is characterized by relapsing and remitting periods of severe hypersomnia, cognitive impairment, derealization, and apathy. More than half of affected individuals experience hyperphagia, hypersexuality, or depressed mood and, less commonly, hallucinations and delusional thoughts. These alarming symptomatic periods last from a few days to several weeks and stand in stark contrast to asymptomatic periods, during which the patient acts entirely normal. Flulike symptoms are typically associated with the first episode and occasionally with relapses, which occur every 1 to 12 months. Intriguingly, the syndrome generally persists for years before spontaneously resolving by age 30. The differential diagnosis for KLS should include psychiatric illness, such as bipolar disorder, and menstrual-related hypersomnia.


The pathophysiologic mechanism of KLS remains unknown, but imaging studies have revealed widespread abnormalities that include the hypothalamus and thalamus, possibly mediating sleepiness, and other cortical areas (Fig. 11.1-4). Treatment is largely supportive, but stimulants and mood stabilizers may be beneficial in some cases.




Pathophysiology


Our understanding of the pathophysiology of CNS hypersomnias is mostly limited to narcolepsy. The cause of narcolepsy was discovered as a result of research in canines and rodents (see Fig. 11.1-3). In humans, narcolepsy with cataplexy is due to the loss of hypocretin neurons in the posterior hypothalamus (Fig. 11.1-5). Hypocretin-1 is deficient in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in most patients who have narcolepsy with cataplexy and in some cases of secondary narcolepsy and neurologic disorders. In contrast, CSF hypocretin levels are normal with IH and periodic hypersomnias.



image


image


Figure 11.1-5 Hypocretin peptides and neurons in the lateral hypothalamus of narcoleptics versus controls and cerebrospinal fluid hypocretin levels in central nervous system hypersomnias and other conditions.
A, Dramatic reduction of hypocretin mRNA (gene expression) in the lateral hypothalamus in a narcoleptic (left) versus a control brain (right). B, Dramatic reduction of hypocretin-stained peptides (hypocretin cells) in the lateral hypothalamus in a narcoleptic (left) versus a control brain (right). Narcoleptics have an 85% to 95% reduction in the number of hypocretin neurons. f, fornix. C, Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) hypocretin levels and HLA DQB1*06:02 status in controls, central nervous system hypersomnias, and other sleep disorders. Each point represents the crude concentration of hypocretin-1 (normal, >200 pg/mL; low, <110 pg/mL) in a single person, with the total number of subjects noted (digits without parentheses) in each range and median value, denoted with a horizontal bar in each group. HLA-DQB1*06:02 positivity is a percentage, denoted in parentheses. Normal hypocretin levels were noted in most of the controls and in all the periodic hypersomnias, idiopathic hypersomnias, and other sleep disorders. Almost all hypocretin-deficient narcolepsy cases are HLA DQB1*06:02 positive, whereas healthy control subjects are DQB1*06:02 positive in up to 38% of cases (18% in this figure). No consistent data are available for HLA DQB1*06:02 status in idiopathic hypersomnia and secondary narcolepsy. (A, Modified from Peyron C, Faraco J, Rogers W, et al: A mutation in a case of early onset narcolepsy and a generalized absence of hypocretin peptides in human narcoleptic brains. Nat Med 2000;6:991-997. B, Modified from Thannickal TC, Moore RY, Nienjuis R, et al: Reduced number of hypocretin neurons in human narcolepsy. Neuron 2000;27[3]:469-474. C, Modified from Nishino S, Mignot E: Narcolepsy and cataplexy. Handb Clin Neurol 2011;99:783-814.)


In most cases of narcolepsy, mounting environmental and genetic evidence suggests that an autoimmune mechanism underlies the destruction of the hypocretin cell neurons (Fig. 11.1-6, A to D). As for many other autoimmune diseases, infections have been identified as potential triggers for narcolepsy, such as group A Streptococcus and influenza A. Seasonality in the incidence of narcolepsy has been well documented. Titers for antistreptolysin (ASO) antibodies, a marker for recent Streptococcus infection, are elevated in early-onset narcolepsy cases compared with late-onset cases. Most interestingly, the 2009 pandemic H1N1 outbreak was associated with an increased incidence of narcolepsy in children, and some cases developed after H1N1 vaccination with Pandremix.



image


image


Figure 11.1-6 Environmental triggers and genetic factors in narcolepsy.
A, Seasonality and the incidence of narcolepsy in China. Data as mean ± standard error of the mean of monthly occurrences, corrected by the number of days per month and leap years, in percentage of 12 months across the year (mean of 15-year data). Onset of disease is approximately sixfold to sevenfold more frequent in the late spring and early summer versus late fall or early winter (shaded areas). B, Antistreptolysin O (ASO) antibodies in patients with narcolepsy with hypocretin deficiency (n = 200) and age-matched controls (n = 200). Higher ASO titers were seen in narcoleptics, particularly closer to disease onset, compared with controls. This suggests that streptococcal infections are probably a significant environmental trigger for narcolepsy. C, The 2009 H1N1 pandemic in China was associated with a threefold increase in narcolepsy onset. Monthly counts of onset occurrences over a 15-year period (raw data) with a 3-month moving average trend line are depicted in red (n = 629 diagnosed with narcolepsy/hypocretin deficiency at People’s Hospital, Beijing University, China). Note the clear seasonal fluctuations of the trend line with lower onset counts in fall and winter (shaded areas) and higher onset counts in spring and summer. Number of H1N1 infections documented by governmental statistics is depicted in green. The peak of infections was followed by a large increase in incident narcolepsy cases in 2010, which was largely independent of H1N1 vaccination (only 8 of 142 patients recalled receiving the vaccination), followed by an abrupt decline in both infections and narcolepsy cases in 2011. D, H1N1 vaccination with Pandremix was associated with an increased incidence of the diagnosis (Dx) of childhood narcolepsy in Sweden, Ireland, and Finland. All cases that underwent HLA typing were found to be HLA DQB1*06:02 positive. E, Known narcolepsy loci involved in immune processes and increased narcolepsy susceptibility. HLA DQB1*06:02, a specific allele for one of the many HLA genes located on human chromosome 6, is tightly associated with hypocretin deficiency. These HLA genes encode for major histocompatibility complexes that present antigens to other immune cells. Polymorphisms in the T-cell receptor (TCR)-α locus, P2RY11 purinergic receptors, TNFSF4 (formerly OX40), and CTSH (Cathepsin-H) are all involved in immunity, and all increase the risk of narcolepsy. TCR is the receptor for HLA antigen presentation on T cells. Purinergic receptors, which are known to have immune-modulatory effects—such as chemotaxis, maturation, and regulated cell death—are poorly understood. OX40, for example, is a co-stimulatory molecule for T- and B-cell activation. CTSH, a member of the papain-like family, participates in intracellular protein degradation. Mutations in DNMT1, a widely expressed DNA methyltransferase involved in development, have been identified in autosomal-dominant cerebellar ataxia, deafness, and narcolepsy (ADCA-DN). (A and C, Modified from Han F, Lin L, Warby SC, et al: Narcolepsy onset is seasonal and increased following the 2009 H1N1 pandemic in China. Ann Neurol 2011;70[3]:410-417. B, Modified from Aran A, Lin L, Nevsimalova S, et al: Elevated anti-streptococcal antibodies in patients with recent narcolepsy onset. Sleep 2009;32[8]:979-983. D, Data from Partinen M, et al: Increased incidence and clinical picture of childhood narcolepsy following the 2009 H1N1 pandemic vaccination campaign in Finland. PLoS One 2012;7(3):e33723. E, Courtesy Dr. Juliette Faraco.)


In addition to environmental triggers for the development of narcolepsy, clear genetic risk factors for its development also exist. Monozygotic twins are 25% to 32% concordant for narcolepsy, and first-degree relatives of people with narcolepsy carry a 1% risk of developing the disorder. A major susceptibility factor for narcolepsy is a specific allele for one of the many human leukocyte antigen (HLA) genes located on human chromosome 6. HLA genes encode for specific protein complexes (major histocompatibility complexes) found on the surface of immune cells that present antigens to other immune cells, such as T cells (antigen-presenting cells [APCs]). DQB1*06:02, an allele of the HLA gene DQB1, is the most specific genetic marker for narcolepsy and is found in almost 99% of cases with hypocretin deficiency, which are typically associated with cataplexy, versus 12% to 38% of the general population, depending on ethnicity (Fig. 11.1-7). In addition to HLA, polymorphisms in the T-cell receptor (TCR) α-locus, P2RY11 purinergic receptors, OX40, and Cathepsin-H, which are all involved in immune processes, increase the susceptibility for narcolepsy (see Fig. 11.1-6, E).



image


Figure 11.1-7 Human leukocyte antigens (HLA) involved in narcolepsy susceptibility.
The HLA genes are located on chromosome 6 and are distributed over more than 4000 kilobases (kb). Antigen-presenting cells, macrophages, and dendritic cells have HLA class I (A, B, and C) and II (DQ, DR, and DP) protein; the locations of genes enclosing these proteins are shown. The HLA gene family is divided into two classes and is located in major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I (A, B, and C) and class II (DQ, DR, and DP) regions. Close to the HLA genes in the MHC class III region are genes that encode complements 2 and 4, tumor necrosis factor (TNF), and heat shock protein (HSP40). The HLA DR and DQ genes are located very close to each other. HLA class II DR and DQ genes are heterodimers encoded by two genes each: one generates an α-chain, the other a β-chain. All these genes are located within a small genetic distance, leading to extremely high linkage disequilibrium. DRA is monomorphic and does not contribute significantly to HLA diversity, in contrast with DQA1, DQB1, and DRB1, which have several hundred possible alleles. The most important genetic factor in narcolepsy is HLA DQB1*06:02. In whites and Asians, the associated DR2 subtype DRB1*15:01 is typically observed with DQB1*06:02 (and DQA1*01:02) in narcoleptic patients. In African Americans, either DRB1*15:03, a DNA-based subtype of DR2, or DRB1*11:01, a DNA-based subtype of DR5, is observed most frequently, together with DQB1*06:02—the most specific marker for narcolepsy across all ethnic groups. DQB1*06:02 forms a heterodimer (in gray) with an α-chain that binds specific regions of peptides with the peptide-binding pocket (in green). This HLA-peptide complex is presented to T cells with the T-cell receptor recognition surface (in blue). (Modified from Nishino S, Mignot E: Narcolepsy and cataplexy. Handb Clin Neurol 2011;99:783-814; and Jones EY, Fugger L, Strominger JL, Siebold C: MHC class II proteins and disease: a structural perspective. Nat Rev Immunol 2006;6:271-282.)


These findings suggest that a single peptide unique to hypocretin cells is mistakenly recognized by the immune system as foreign via several proposed immune pathways, leading to the autoimmune destruction of the hypocretin cell neurons (Fig. 11.1-8). In contrast, secondary cases of narcolepsy, referred to as narcolepsy due to a medical condition in the ICSD-2, may be due to a direct insult to the hypocretin system, rather than an autoimmune mechanism, a theory supported by the fact that most tumors associated with narcolepsy are located in the hypothalamus (Fig. 11.1-9). In other cases, narcolepsy may be the result of complex pathology, whether associated with cataplexy or hypocretin deficiency or neither, including myotonic dystrophy; ataxia, deafness, narcolepsy, and dementia; Prader-Willi syndrome; Niemann-Pick disease; and various other pathologies.



image


Figure 11.1-8 Potential pathways for a role of influenza A or streptococcal infections in the development of the autoimmune destruction of hypocretin cells.
A peripheral H1N1 influenza or Streptococcus pyogenes (Strep) infection could stimulate autoreactive T cells or B cells via several different mechanisms. Selected resting autoreactive T cells and B cells may have reactivity toward hypocretin (Hcrt) cells, having escaped negative selection in the thymus. These could be activated in the following ways. (i) Molecular mimicry, T cells. Antigens from the virus or bacteria are presented, for example, by major histocompatibility complex (MHC) DQA1*01:02-DQB1*06:02 on an antigen-presenting cell (APC). The T cell recognizes the antigen and is activated. The same T cell, or a clone, migrates to the brain, where it recognizes an Hcrt cell–specific antigen (cross-reactivity), thereby inducing the autoimmune attack. (ii) Molecular mimicry, B cells. An autoreactive B cell can be activated if it also recognizes an antigen from the pathogen. This process requires signals from activated T cells (T-cell help). (iii) Superantigens from Streptococcus cross-link the MHC and T-cell receptor (TCR) molecules independent of antigen specificity, activating the autoreactive T cell. (iv) Bystander activation. Resting autoreactive cells are activated as a result of general immune activation independent of specific antigens. (v) Lymphocyte migration to the central nervous system (CNS). Once activated, the T cells can migrate to the brain. Depending on the type of T cell, a variety of mechanisms could account for the autoimmune attack. MHC class II expression is restricted to microglia, but MHC class I molecules are expressed in various brain cells, including neurons. (vi) Opening of the blood-brain barrier. Fever and other factors associated with the general immune response allow lymphocytes to penetrate the blood-brain barrier more easily and also allow antibodies to access the CNS. (vii) Production of autoantibodies. This can also occur as a secondary response to Hcrt cell death via APCs from the brain that have phagocytosed the dead neurons. Red dots indicate processes in which release of cytokines or cytotoxic substances plays an important role. H1N1, H1N1 influenza A virus or epitopes from adjuvanted vaccines. (Modified from Kornum BR, Faraco J, Mignot E: Narcolepsy with hypocretin/orexin deficiency, infections, and autoimmunity of the brain. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2011;21:897-903.)



Although hypocretin deficiency has been identified as the cause of narcolepsy, the pathophysiologic mechanisms underlying sleepiness, cataplexy, and other REM-related phenomenon in narcolepsy are complicated and, at times, controversial. A simplistic model depicts the hypocretin system sending widespread projections throughout the CNS, such as monoaminergic nuclei to promote wakefulness and motor neurons and the ventrolateral periaqueductal gray matter/lateral pontine tegmentum (vlPAG/LPT) to maintain muscle tone (Fig. 11.1-10).



image


Figure 11.1-10 A theoretic and simplified model for the hypocretin system in the promotion of wakefulness and control of muscle tone.
A, Hypocretin neurons in the lateral hypothalamus innervate wake-promoting nuclei, including neurons that produce histamine (HA, tuberomammillary nucleus), norepinephrine (NE, locus ceruleus), serotonin (5-HT, dorsal raphe), dopamine (DA, ventral tegmental area), and acetylcholine (Ach, basal forebrain, pedunculopontine, and laterodorsal tegmental nuclei). In addition, the hypocretin neurons provide direct, excitatory inputs to the cortex, thalamus, and spinal cord. GABA, γ-aminobutyric acid. B, Several pathways suppress atonia during normal wakefulness (left). Atonia is driven by neurons in the sublaterodorsal tegmental nucleus (SLD) that activate neurons in the spinal cord and medial medulla (MM) that inhibit motor neurons using GABA and glycine. During wakefulness, this atonia system is inhibited by neurons in the ventrolateral periaqueductal gray matter/lateral pontine tegmentum (vlPAG/LPT) and by monoaminergic neurons, such as NE and 5-HT. The hypocretin neurons are active during wakefulness and are silent during rapid eye movement sleep. They help maintain normal muscle tone by exciting monoamine neurons, motor neurons, and neurons in the vlPAG/LPT. In narcolepsy (right), the loss of the hypocretin neurons plus strong, positive emotions can trigger cataplexy. Positive emotions may activate neurons in the amygdala that excite the SLD and inhibit the vlPAG/LPT. The SLD may also be activated by cholinergic inputs and a sudden withdrawal of monoamine tone. The SLD then excites neurons in the medial medulla and spinal cord that strongly hyperpolarize motor neurons, resulting in cataplexy. Normally, the effects of the hypocretin system and a continued monoaminergic drive to the pons and directly to motor neurons would counter this triggering of atonia, but in the absence of hypocretin, these excitatory drives are lost, and cataplexy occurs. Solid pathways from filled nuclei are active; dashed pathways from unfilled nuclei are inactive. Green pathways are excitatory; red pathways are inhibitory. (Modified from Burgess CR, Scammel TE: Narcolepsy: neural mechanisms of sleepiness and cataplexy. J Neurosci 2012;32[36]:12305-12311.)



Evaluation and Diagnosis



Epworth Sleepiness Scale and Fatigue Severity Scale


The clinician must first differentiate sleepiness from fatigue and exhaustion. The severity of the symptom can then be further characterized with subjective scales such as the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (see Chapter 8, Fig. 8-16) and the Fatigue Severity Scale (Box 11.1-2).




Overnight Polysomnography, Multiple Sleep Latency Test, and Maintenance of Wakefulness Test


A PSG is routinely performed to characterize sleep architecture and evaluate for sleep disorders such as SDB and periodic limb movements during sleep (PLMS). In narcolepsy/hypocretin deficiency, the PSG typically shows sleep fragmentation, increased stage 1 sleep, and, in 50% of cases, a sleep-onset REM period (SOREMP), defined as a REM latency of 15 minutes or less (Fig. 11.1-11). A SOREMP on the PSG is diagnostic for narcolepsy, but the PSG shows no findings diagnostic for IH. A high sleep efficiency and/or prolonged total sleep time on the PSG in the proper clinical context may be suggestive of IH.



If the overnight PSG is not diagnostic for a sleep disorder to account for the EDS, then a multiple sleep latency test (MSLT), which measures the tendency of a patient to fall asleep, or, alternatively, a maintenance wakefulness test (MWT), which measures the ability to maintain wakefulness, is performed. The MSLT is a series of four to five naps across the day taken in 2 hour intervals and is typically used for diagnostic purposes, whereas the MWT is a series of four 40-minute trials across the day in 2-hour intervals, routinely performed to document the ability of a person (e.g., an airline pilot) to maintain wakefulness after a prescribed therapy, such as after the successful treatment of SDB with a continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) machine. During each nap of an MSLT, the patient is instructed to try to fall asleep and is given 20 minutes to do so; if no sleep is observed, the “nap” is ended. If the patient falls asleep, the nap continues for another 15 minutes, and the presence or absence of REM sleep (SOREMP) in each nap is recorded (Fig. 11.1-12). A regular sleep schedule and adequate sleep time, ideally documented with a sleep diary and/or actigraphy, should be maintained for 2 weeks before the MSLT. Medications that affect the ability to fall asleep, such as stimulants, or those that affect the propensity to enter REM sleep, such as antidepressants, should be discontinued for at least 2 weeks before the MSLT. Ideally, a blood or urine drug screen should be performed on the day of the MSLT. Most of the technical procedures of the MWT and MSLT are similar, except in the MWT, the subject is instructed to try to stay awake. The MWT trial is terminated after maintaining wakefulness for 40 minutes or after the first epoch of unequivocal sleep.



Current MSLT criteria for narcolepsy include a mean sleep latency (MSL) of 8 minutes or less and two or more SOREMPs. A diagnosis of IH usually requires an MSL of 8 minutes or less and fewer than two SOREMPs on the MSLT. However, in IH, if total daily sleep times are extremely prolonged, a normal MSLT can also be found. Importantly, however, an MSL of 8 minutes or less is found in approximately 22% of the general adult population. An MSL of 8 minutes or less and two or more SOREMPs is found in 4% of the general adult population regardless of symptoms; therefore MSLT findings must be interpreted in conjunction with the clinical history.



Cerebrospinal Fluid Hypocretin Measurement and HLA Typing


HLA typing alone is not diagnostic for narcolepsy because 12% to 38% of the general population is positive. If the patient is DQB1*06:02 negative, however, it essentially eliminates the possibility of hypocretin deficiency because 99% of patients, mostly those with cataplexy, are HLA DQB1*06:02 positive. For this reason, HLA typing is a useful first step before performing a lumbar puncture for CSF hypocretin measurement as a diagnostic test. Because most patients with hypocretin deficiency (95%) have a positive MSLT and cataplexy, biologic confirmation is not necessary in most cases. In other instances, however, such as when the MSLT is unexpectedly negative, the case is difficult (poor treatment response, atypical or no cataplexy), or other factors make the MSLT impossible to interpret (shift work, severe sleep apnea, secondary pathology), CSF hypocretin measurement is the best diagnostic test to conduct.


The most difficult decision pertains to the use of CSF hypocretin measurement in patients who do not have cataplexy. This is mostly useful when a definitive diagnosis is needed to essentially confirm a lifelong diagnosis. Hypocretin deficiency, in these cases, is more common when symptoms are severe; onset is recent, and cataplexy has not yet developed; and PSG findings are rich in REM abnormalities.




Treatment


Treatment of CNS hypersomnias generally requires both behavioral and pharmacologic treatments. Behavioral treatments include the maintenance of a regular sleep schedule and naps. Educating the patient and family about the disease helps foster a supportive network (support groups, school adaptation) and treatment compliance. Pharmacologic management includes medications to treat EDS, cataplexy, and other REM-related phenomena and disrupted nocturnal sleep. Medications include stimulants, antidepressants, and sodium oxybate (Table 11.1-1). A conservative pharmacologic regimen is generally encouraged, particularly if the clinical picture or etiology is unclear or multifactorial in nature (e.g., narcolepsy without cataplexy or hypocretin deficiency) because many of these pharmacologic agents possess significant side effect profiles and come with a potential for abuse. In contrast, when cataplexy is present or hypocretin deficiency is documented, the disease is lifelong, and treatment is more codified and generally mandates aggressive optimization of medications.




Suggested Readings



Anic-Labat, S, Guilleminault, C, Kraemer, HC, et al. Validation of a cataplexy questionnaire in 983 sleep-disordered patients. Sleep. 1999; 22(1):77–87.


Arnulf, I, Rico, TJ, Mignot, E. Diagnosis, disease course, and management of patients with Kleine-Levin syndrome. Lancet Neurol. 2012; 11:918–928.


Dauvilliers, Y, Arnulf, I, Mignot, E. Narcolepsy with cataplexy. Lancet. 2007; 369:499–511.


2005. International Classification of Sleep Disorders: Diagnostic and Coding Manual. ed 2, Westchester, IL: American Academy of Sleep Medicine; 2005.


Mignot, E. A practical guide to the therapy of narcolepsy and hypersomnia syndromes. Neurotherapeutics. 2012; 9:739–752.


Mignot, E, Lammers, GJ, Ripley, B, et al. The role of cerebrospinal fluid hypocretin measurement in the diagnosis of narcolepsy and other hypersomnias. Arch Neurol. 2002; 59(10):1553–1562.


Ohayon, MM, Dauvilliers, Y, Reynolds, CF, 3rd. Operational definitions and algorithms for excessive sleepiness in the general population: implications for DSM-5 nosology. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2012; 69(1):71–79.



11.2


Movement Disorders in Sleep




Overview


The second version of the International Classification of Sleep Disorders (ICSD-2) lists several sleep-related movement disorders (see Box 11.2-1). A summary of all movement disorders is shown in Figure 11.2-1. The ones most commonly experienced in sleep medicine are restless legs syndrome (RLS), also known as Willis-Ekbom disease, and periodic limb movement disorder (PLMD), which is the focus of this chapter. A brief discussion is also provided to cover three other sleep-related movement disorders that sleep clinicians may also encounter: sleep-related leg cramps, bruxism, and rhythmic movement disorder. Although hypnic jerks (Fig. 11.2-2), or “sleep starts,” are common and can have an extreme and almost violent phenomenologic appearance, they are physiologically normal and do not constitute a disorder. The remaining conditions listed as ICSD-2 sleep-related movement disorders are of limited, if any, clinical significance.






Periodic Limb Movements in Sleep and Periodic Limb Movement Disorder



History and Definition


The initial descriptions of periodic limb movements (PLMs) in sleep mistakenly classified these as abrupt, repetitive movements that represented a “nocturnal myoclonus,” a term used in the literature mostly before 1970, erroneously suggesting some relation to epileptic phenomena. These movements have now been appreciated as leg movements that can reflect variable characteristics—even within a single night, for one person—for duration, onset and offset patterns, periodicity, and even in muscle groups involved in the movements. The World Association of Sleep Medicine (WASM) developed the current generally accepted criteria for defining these movements (Fig. 11.2-3). As shown in Figure 11.2-4, these movements can be frequent; in some patients, they are associated with arousals from sleep. Because these limb movements can occur during wakefulness or sleep, they are referred to as PLMS when they occur during sleep and PLMW when they occur during wakefulness. Movements may also occur in the arms but generally are limited to the legs.





Evaluation of Periodic Limb Movements of Sleep and Wakefulness


Subjective reports, especially from bedmates, indicate the possible presence of PLMS/PLMW, but an all-night polysomnogram (PSG) recording is required to objectively determine and measure the presence of either. Standard sleep electroencaphalogram (EEG) is required to determine whether PLMs are occurring during sleep or in an awake state. The movements are best recorded from surface electromyogram (EMG) electrodes placed longitudinally on the belly of the anterior tibialis muscle, 2 to 3 cm apart and symmetrical with the midline of the muscle. For patients with short legs, the electrodes may be placed closer together, at one third the length of the muscle. Bilateral recordings of each muscle on a separate channel are required for accurate assessment of PLMs in sleep or waking.


Ambulatory leg activity monitors, such as personal activity monitors (PAM), record the patient’s physical activity and store the data for later download; these monitors provide a limited alternative to the PSG and have the advantage of being able to record for multiple days. Given marked day-to-day variability in PLMs, a 5-day recording is considered desirable to obtain a stable measure for a single person. These monitors, however, do not discern sleep or wakeful states and thus report all PLMs during the night recording, not just PLMS. For most people, wakeful time during the night is much less than the sleep time. Therefore assuming all PLMs during nocturnal sleep time are PLMS does not usually represent a significant error, but this does not apply to patients with low sleep efficiency. Activity monitors also do not exclude leg movements associated with respiratory events; thus such monitors should be used cautiously for patients with a history of confirmed or suspected untreated sleep-disordered breathing (SDB).



Biology and Pathophysiology


Sleep, and to some extent the drowsy resting state, inhibits spinal leg-flexor reflexes. This has been demonstrated for sleep-related inhibition of the leg-flexor response to high-frequency stimulation of the medial plantar nerve. PLMS may be associated with loss of this inhibition that occurs with aging and with some disorders, such as restless legs syndrome (RLS). Decreased spinal inhibition or, alternately phrased, increased spinal excitability, has been documented during sleep in patients with PLMS and RLS. The Hoffmann’s reflex inhibition that occurs for up to 0.5 seconds after it has been stimulated is reduced in patients with RLS during the evening awake resting time. This indicates increased spinal excitability for RLS that is limited to rest and to the time of day associated with RLS symptoms. In this commonly accepted view of PLMS, leg movements occur during sleep because of the failure to inhibit periodic descending spinal activation signals. Periodic descending activation events have been associated with the basic cycling alternating pattern (CAP) of sleep. CAP describes cycling between deeper (quiet) and more aroused (active) sleep, with PLMS occurring during the active cycle. PLMS and the associated activating events also occur with increases in blood pressure and heart rate that indicate autonomic arousal (Fig 11.2-5; see also Fig. 11.2-4). The periodic activating events, and not the PLMS, appear to be primary. Inhibiting the leg movements by dopaminergic drugs fails to alter CAP or these episodic autonomic activating events. Thus PLMS serves as a motor sign of failure to inhibit central nervous system (CNS)–activating events that have clinical and physiologic consequences, but the leg movements themselves do not cause the arousal events.



PLMS and PLMW are age-related phenomena. PLMS occurs commonly in healthy adults older than 40 years, whereas PLMW occurs mainly in people younger than 19 years (Fig. 11.2-6) and to some extent in adults older than 60 years (Fig. 11.2-7). These differences in age effects suggest that neurobiologic origins differ for PLMW and PLMS.





Clinical Significance


The common occurrence of PLMS and PLMW in healthy individuals indicates that they are not sensitive markers for indicating any specific underlying disease state. They may, however, be a specific motor sign for some disease states, such as RLS, in which 80% to 90% of the patients have PLMS at rates greater than 5 per hour. PLMS and PLMW may act as indicators, albeit less sensitive, for both narcolepsy and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep behavior disorder. In addition, they can also result from medications such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) or serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs; Fig. 11.2-8).



PLMS that occurs at high rates for age with a sleep complaint unexplained by another disorder or medication has been assumed to define a sleep-related disorder referred to as periodic limb movement disorder (PLMD). Clinical guidelines for PLMD are given in Box 11.2-2. Despite considerable clinical experience that supports this condition, no studies have been done to clearly document this disorder. PLMS should be viewed first as markers of possible disease risk and is not a disorder itself. Some patients with high rates of PLMS and sleep complaints when treated with levodopa or a dopamine agonist developed RLS for the first time, indicating that PLMS may also occur as a forme fruste of RLS.




Clinical Guidelines



Restless Legs Syndrome




Diagnosis


RLS has been well defined by the International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group (IRLSSG). The diagnostic criteria are available online at www.irlssg.org and are also listed in Box 11.2-3. The diagnosis requires all four of the basic essential criteria that define the disorder (Fig. 11.2-9) plus a differential diagnosis that excludes common RLS “mimics.” These mimics produce symptoms close to those of RLS that can be differentiated from RLS by careful history taking. Indeed, patients may sometimes find it difficult to articulate symptoms of RLS (Fig. 11.2-10), which may be one reason why the condition may not be very easily recognized by practitioners who first encounter patients with this condition. Several conditions need to be considered in the differential diagnosis of RLS (Table 11.2-1). The core symptom of RLS is the sensation of a strong urge to move the legs that occurs while resting, particularly in the evening or night. Thus RLS has a sensory disturbance with a movement response that sometimes occurs involuntarily. It is therefore considered a sensorimotor neurologic disorder precipitated by rest or sleep. Box 11.2-4 summarizes key clinical features for RLS diagnosis.



Box 11.2-3   Diagnostic Criteria for Restless Legs Syndrome


International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group


Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is diagnosed by ascertaining symptom patterns that meet the following five essential criteria, with additional clinical specifiers added when appropriate.



Essential Diagnostic Criteria (All Must Be Met)



1. An urge to move the legs usually, but not always, accompanied by or felt to be caused by uncomfortable and unpleasant sensations in the legs.*


2. The urge to move the legs, and any accompanying unpleasant sensation, begins or worsens during periods of rest or inactivity, such as lying down or sitting.


3. The urge to move the legs, and any accompanying unpleasant sensation, is partially or totally relieved by movement, such as walking or stretching, at least as long as the activity continues.


4. The urge to move the legs, and any accompanying unpleasant sensation, during rest or inactivity only occurs or becomes worse in the evening or night rather than during the day.§


5. Occurrences of the above features are not solely accounted for as symptoms primary to another medical or a behavioral condition (e.g., myalgia, venous stasis, leg edema, arthritis, leg cramps, positional discomfort, habitual foot tapping.)image





*Sometimes the urge to move the legs is present without the uncomfortable sensation, and sometimes the arms or other parts of the body are involved in addition to the legs.


Pediatric cases must include the uncomfortable and unpleasant leg sensation.


When symptoms are very severe, relief by activity may not be noticeable but must have been previously present.


§When symptoms are very severe, the worsening in the evening or night may not be noticeable but must have been previously present.


imageThese conditions, often referred to as “RLS mimics,” have been commonly confused with RLS, particularly in surveys, because they produce symptoms that meet or at least come very close to meeting all of the above criteria. The list here gives some examples of this that have been noted as particularly significant in epidemiologic studies and clinical practice. RLS may also occur with any of these conditions, but the RLS symptoms will then be greater in degree, conditions of expression, or character than those usually occurring as part of the other condition.


The clinical course criteria do not apply for pediatric cases, nor do they apply for some special cases of provoked RLS, such as pregnancy- or drug-induced RLS, in which the frequency may be high, but it is limited to the duration of the provocative condition.



Box 11.2-4


Summary of Key Clinical Features for Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS) Diagnosis





Associated Features



Diagnostic criteria developed by the International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group (IRLSSG) in collaboration with the National Institutes of Health.


PLMS, periodic limb movements in sleep.


Data from Allen RP, Picchietti D, Hening WA, et al: Restless legs syndrome: diagnostic criteria, special considerations, and epidemiology. A report from the Restless Legs Syndrome Diagnosis and Epidemiology Workshop at the National Institutes of Health. Sleep Med 2003;4(2):101-119; and Walters AS: Toward a better definition of the restless legs syndrome. Move Disord 1995;10:634-642.





Diagnosis is supported by PLMS that occur more than expected for age, another first-degree relative with RLS, and a significant reduction in symptoms shortly after starting dopaminergic treatment. RLS generally produces a sleep disturbance with reduced sleep quality and/or quantity, and the sleep complaint further supports the diagnosis.



Medical Evaluation: Iron Status


Serum ferritin and transferrin saturation should be obtained in all RLS patients; those with ferritin level below 75 µg/L or transferrin saturation below 17% should be placed on oral iron treatment, provided that iron supplementation is not contraindicated, such as with hemochromatosis. Iron treatment should be stopped when ferritin exceeds 100 µg/L or transferrin saturation is 50% or greater. Patients with iron deficiency anemia as well as other comorbidities (Fig. 11.2-11) are at risk for developing RLS.




Biology and Pathophysiology


RLS biology provides important insights into treatment options that involve three major contributors to the disease: iron, dopamine, and glutamate. In addition, genome-wide association studies have now identified allelic variations that carry increased risk of RLS (Table 11.2-2). One of these variations, BTBD9, has been found to be related to the presence of reduced serum ferritin, but otherwise, at this point these allelic variations have not been found to relate to any particular biologic pathway that increases the risk of RLS.




Iron.

Decreased iron content in the substantia nigra in patients with RLS has been documented by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), ultrasound, and autopsy (Fig. 11.2-12). It is the best-documented biologic abnormality of RLS (Fig. 11.2-13). Iron in the brain is regionally regulated, and certain areas appear sensitive to decreased availability of iron, particularly the substantia nigra. RLS patients appear to have trouble maintaining adequate brain iron stores, possibly related to iron transport disturbance across the blood-brain barrier or failure of cellular distribution within the brain. This makes the brain iron stores particularly vulnerable to fluctuations in the peripheral iron state, and these individuals are more affected by low peripheral iron stores. Figure 11.2-14, A, shows the decreased relation between cerebral spinal fluid and serum ferritin for RLS patients compared with healthy adults without RLS. Accordingly, a critical feature of all RLS treatment is to maintain high normal levels of peripheral iron stores (i.e., serum ferritin >75 µg/L) to help augment the central iron stores and thereby reduce RLS severity (see Fig. 11.2-14, B). Future treatment development will focus on better methods of iron delivery for RLS, such as intravenous iron with formulations that promote iron transport to brain tissue.


< div class='tao-gold-member'>

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jul 11, 2016 | Posted by in NEUROLOGY | Comments Off on Neurologic Disorders

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access