Neuroprotective Therapy Using Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor for Acute Spinal Cord Injury: A Multicenter Prospective Controlled Clinical Trial

 

G-CSF

Control

P

Number of cases

19

26
 
Gender

Male

13

20
 
Female

6

6
 
Age (years)
 
57.7 ± 9.34 (38–68)

58.5 ± 18.0 (23–85)

0.871

Cause of injury

Fall

11

16
 
Road trauma

6

8
 
Sports

1

1
 
Falling object

1

0
 
Others

0

1
 
Level of injury

C2/3

0

2
 
C3/4

5

7
 
C4/5

8

7
 
C5/6

4

8
 
C6/7

2

2
 
ASIA impairment scale (AIS)

A

1

7
 
B

2

2
 
C

5

5
 
D

11

12
 
Time of first examination after injury (h)

3.95 ± 2.74 (1–12)

10.3 ± 14.6 (1–48)

0.068

Time of G-CSF administration after injury (h)

32.4 ± 16.6 (6–48)
  




27.2.4 AIS


The change of AIS grade between the first examination and 3 months after onset is shown in Table 27.2. In the analysis of total cases, AIS grade improved at least one step in 11 of 19 (57.9 %) patients in the G-CSF group and in 9 of 26 (34.6 %) patients in the control group (Table 27.3). In cases of incomplete paralysis (AIS grade at first examination: B, C, or D), AIS grade improved at least one step in 11 of 18 (61.1 %) patients in the G-CSF group and in 6 of 15 (31.6 %) patients in the control group (Table 27.3). Furthermore, when we restricted the subjects to incomplete paralysis cases with severe and moderate symptoms (AIS grade at first examination: B or C), AIS grade improved at least one step in all 7 patients in the G-CSF group and in 3 of 7 (42.9 %) patients in the control group (P < 0.05) (Table 27.3).


Table 27.2
ASIA impairment scale (AIS)
























































































G-CSF group

Control group

Grade at first examination

Grade at 3 months after onset

Grade at first examination

Grade at 3 months after onset

A

B

C

D

E

A

B

C

D

E

A

1
       
A

4

2

1
   

B
   
1

1
 
B
 
1

1
   

C
     
4

1

C
 
1

2

2
 

D
     
7

4

D
     
9

3


AIS grade

A: complete paralysis

B: sensory incomplete paralysis, motor complete paralysis

C: motor incomplete paralysis (muscle grading <3/5)

D: motor incomplete paralysis (muscle grading >3/5)

E: normal



Table 27.3
Improvement of AIS




























 
G-CSF (%)

Control (%)

P

Total cases

11/19 (57.9)

9/26 (34.6)

0.106

Incomplete paralysis cases (AIS: B, C, D)

11/18 (61.1)

6/15 (31.6)

0.07

Incomplete paralysis cases (AIS: B, C)

7/7 (100)

3/7 (42.9)

0.035*


*P < 0.05

Data are expressed as number of neurologically improved patients/number of examined patients (neurological improvement was defined as an increase in at least one clinical grade)


27.2.5 ASIA Motor Score


In the analysis of total cases, the ASIA motor score at the first examination was 61.6 ± 27.3 in the G-CSF group and 51.3 ± 36.6 in the control group; thus, scores were higher in the G-CSF group, although this difference was not statistically significant (Table 27.4). At 1 week after onset, the improvement in motor score was greater in the G-CSF group (increased points: 13.6 ± 11.3) than in the control group (increased points: 2.69 ± 7.9) (P < 0.01). Still greater improvement in scores was observed at the three-month follow-up in the G-CSF group (increased points: 26.1 ± 18.9) compared to the control group (increased points: 12.2 ± 14.7) (P < 0.01) (Table 27.4).


Table 27.4
ASIA motor score (total cases)






































 
G-CSF (n = 19)

Control (n = 26)

P

At first examination

61.6 ± 27.3 (14–98)

51.3 ± 36.6 (0–97)

0.497

1 week after onset

75.2 ± 23.4 (27–100)

54.0 ± 37.3 (0–100)

0.075

Increased points for 1 week

13.6 ± 11.3 (1–50)

2.69 ± 7.9 (−11–24)

0.0011*

3 months after onset

87.7 ± 17.5 (35–100)

63.7 ± 36.5 (0–100)

0.052

Increased points for 3 months

26.1 ± 18.9 (1–73)

12.2 ± 14.7 (−7–48)

0.0067*


Patients whose AIS grade at the first examination was A, B, C, or D were analyzed

*P < 0.01

In cases of incomplete paralysis (AIS grade at first examination: B, C, or D), the ASIA motor score at the first examination was 63.6 ± 26.8 in the G-CSF group and 65.0 ± 32.6 in the control group; the difference between groups was not statistically significant (Table 27.5). At 1 week after onset, greater improvement in motor score was observed in the G-CSF group (increased points: 13.9 ± 11.6) than in the control group (increased points: 3.58 ± 9.0) (P < 0.01). The improvement was still observed at the three-month follow-up in the G-CSF group (increased points: 27.1 ± 18.9) compared with the control group (increased points: 15.1 ± 15.9) (P < 0.05) (Table 27.5).


Table 27.5
ASIA motor score (incomplete paralysis cases)






































 
G-CSF (n = 18)

Control (n = 19)

p

At first examination

63.6 ± 26.8 (14–98)

65.1 ± 32.6 (7–97)

0.475

1 week after onset

77.4 ± 21.9 (27–100)

68.7 ± 31.9 (6–100)

0.574

Increased points for 1 week

13.9 ± 11.6 (1–50)

3.58 ± 9.0 (−11–24)

0.0049*

3 months after onset

90.6 ± 12.3 (51–100)

80.2 ± 26.3 (19–100)

0.417

Increased points for 3 months

27.1 ± 18.9

15.1 ± 15.9

0.044**


Patients whose AIS grade at the first examination was B, C, or D were analyzed

*P < 0.01

**P < 0.05


27.2.6 Blood Data


In the G-CSF group, white blood cell (WBC) counts immediately before G-CSF administration averaged 9.55 ± 3.58 (×103/mm3). During the administration, WBC counts increased to 34.2 ± 10.9 (×103/mm3), ranging from 12.4 to 56.9 (×103/mm3) (Table 27.6). G-CSF mobilized cells of the neutrophil lineage, while lymphocytes were unaffected (Table 27.6). G-CSF also increased the level of circulating monocytes and basophils. There was no significant change in inflammation during G-CSF administration, as indicated by C-reactive protein levels (Table 27.6).
Mar 11, 2017 | Posted by in NEUROSURGERY | Comments Off on Neuroprotective Therapy Using Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor for Acute Spinal Cord Injury: A Multicenter Prospective Controlled Clinical Trial

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access