G-CSF
Control
P
Number of cases
19
26
Gender
Male
13
20
Female
6
6
Age (years)
57.7 ± 9.34 (38–68)
58.5 ± 18.0 (23–85)
0.871
Cause of injury
Fall
11
16
Road trauma
6
8
Sports
1
1
Falling object
1
0
Others
0
1
Level of injury
C2/3
0
2
C3/4
5
7
C4/5
8
7
C5/6
4
8
C6/7
2
2
ASIA impairment scale (AIS)
A
1
7
B
2
2
C
5
5
D
11
12
Time of first examination after injury (h)
3.95 ± 2.74 (1–12)
10.3 ± 14.6 (1–48)
0.068
Time of G-CSF administration after injury (h)
32.4 ± 16.6 (6–48)
27.2.4 AIS
The change of AIS grade between the first examination and 3 months after onset is shown in Table 27.2. In the analysis of total cases, AIS grade improved at least one step in 11 of 19 (57.9 %) patients in the G-CSF group and in 9 of 26 (34.6 %) patients in the control group (Table 27.3). In cases of incomplete paralysis (AIS grade at first examination: B, C, or D), AIS grade improved at least one step in 11 of 18 (61.1 %) patients in the G-CSF group and in 6 of 15 (31.6 %) patients in the control group (Table 27.3). Furthermore, when we restricted the subjects to incomplete paralysis cases with severe and moderate symptoms (AIS grade at first examination: B or C), AIS grade improved at least one step in all 7 patients in the G-CSF group and in 3 of 7 (42.9 %) patients in the control group (P < 0.05) (Table 27.3).
Table 27.2
ASIA impairment scale (AIS)
G-CSF group | Control group | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Grade at first examination | Grade at 3 months after onset | Grade at first examination | Grade at 3 months after onset | ||||||||
A | B | C | D | E | A | B | C | D | E | ||
A | 1 | A | 4 | 2 | 1 | ||||||
B | 1 | 1 | B | 1 | 1 | ||||||
C | 4 | 1 | C | 1 | 2 | 2 | |||||
D | 7 | 4 | D | 9 | 3 |
Table 27.3
Improvement of AIS
G-CSF (%) | Control (%) | P | |
---|---|---|---|
Total cases | 11/19 (57.9) | 9/26 (34.6) | 0.106 |
Incomplete paralysis cases (AIS: B, C, D) | 11/18 (61.1) | 6/15 (31.6) | 0.07 |
Incomplete paralysis cases (AIS: B, C) | 7/7 (100) | 3/7 (42.9) | 0.035* |
27.2.5 ASIA Motor Score
In the analysis of total cases, the ASIA motor score at the first examination was 61.6 ± 27.3 in the G-CSF group and 51.3 ± 36.6 in the control group; thus, scores were higher in the G-CSF group, although this difference was not statistically significant (Table 27.4). At 1 week after onset, the improvement in motor score was greater in the G-CSF group (increased points: 13.6 ± 11.3) than in the control group (increased points: 2.69 ± 7.9) (P < 0.01). Still greater improvement in scores was observed at the three-month follow-up in the G-CSF group (increased points: 26.1 ± 18.9) compared to the control group (increased points: 12.2 ± 14.7) (P < 0.01) (Table 27.4).
Table 27.4
ASIA motor score (total cases)
G-CSF (n = 19) | Control (n = 26) | P | |
---|---|---|---|
At first examination | 61.6 ± 27.3 (14–98) | 51.3 ± 36.6 (0–97) | 0.497 |
1 week after onset | 75.2 ± 23.4 (27–100) | 54.0 ± 37.3 (0–100) | 0.075 |
Increased points for 1 week | 13.6 ± 11.3 (1–50) | 2.69 ± 7.9 (−11–24) | 0.0011* |
3 months after onset | 87.7 ± 17.5 (35–100) | 63.7 ± 36.5 (0–100) | 0.052 |
Increased points for 3 months | 26.1 ± 18.9 (1–73) | 12.2 ± 14.7 (−7–48) | 0.0067* |
In cases of incomplete paralysis (AIS grade at first examination: B, C, or D), the ASIA motor score at the first examination was 63.6 ± 26.8 in the G-CSF group and 65.0 ± 32.6 in the control group; the difference between groups was not statistically significant (Table 27.5). At 1 week after onset, greater improvement in motor score was observed in the G-CSF group (increased points: 13.9 ± 11.6) than in the control group (increased points: 3.58 ± 9.0) (P < 0.01). The improvement was still observed at the three-month follow-up in the G-CSF group (increased points: 27.1 ± 18.9) compared with the control group (increased points: 15.1 ± 15.9) (P < 0.05) (Table 27.5).
Table 27.5
ASIA motor score (incomplete paralysis cases)
G-CSF (n = 18) | Control (n = 19) | p | |
---|---|---|---|
At first examination | 63.6 ± 26.8 (14–98) | 65.1 ± 32.6 (7–97) | 0.475 |
1 week after onset | 77.4 ± 21.9 (27–100) | 68.7 ± 31.9 (6–100) | 0.574 |
Increased points for 1 week | 13.9 ± 11.6 (1–50) | 3.58 ± 9.0 (−11–24) | 0.0049* |
3 months after onset | 90.6 ± 12.3 (51–100) | 80.2 ± 26.3 (19–100) | 0.417 |
Increased points for 3 months | 27.1 ± 18.9 | 15.1 ± 15.9 | 0.044** |
27.2.6 Blood Data
In the G-CSF group, white blood cell (WBC) counts immediately before G-CSF administration averaged 9.55 ± 3.58 (×103/mm3). During the administration, WBC counts increased to 34.2 ± 10.9 (×103/mm3), ranging from 12.4 to 56.9 (×103/mm3) (Table 27.6). G-CSF mobilized cells of the neutrophil lineage, while lymphocytes were unaffected (Table 27.6). G-CSF also increased the level of circulating monocytes and basophils. There was no significant change in inflammation during G-CSF administration, as indicated by C-reactive protein levels (Table 27.6).
Table 27.6

Blood data before and after G-CSF administration

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Full access? Get Clinical Tree


