Age group(years)
Material
Reference
>3
Bayley Scales of Infant Development
Bayley [51]
Griffith Development scales
Griffiths [52]
Alberta Infant Motor Scale
Piper and Darrah [53]
3–6
Wechsler Primary and Preschool Intelligence
Wechsler [59]
Beery Visual Motor Integration Test
Beery [54]
Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test
Dunn and Dunn [56]
Movement Assessment Battery for Children
Henderson and Sudgen [57]
NEPSY (A Developmental NeuropsychologicalAssessment)
Korkman et al. [58]
6–18
Wechsler Scale of Intelligence for Children
Wechsler [65]
Connor’s Continuous Performance Test
Connors [55]
Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test
Schmidt [63]
Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test
Rey [62]
Tower of London
Shallice [64]
Wisconsin Card Sorting Test
Heaton et al. [60]
Grooved Pegboard
Reitan and Davidson [61]
NEPSY (A Developmental NeuropsychologicalAssessment) (till 12 years)
Korkman et al. [58]
Assessment by speech pathologist
Difficult medical circumstances and the acute critical status of the newborn often require immediate medical intervention, reducing the importance of a neurodevelopmental testing in the early stage. Further, the functional testing that can be completed on neonates is extremely limited, and the illness of the child reduces the predictive validity of a preoperative functional assessment. However, it is highly recommended to screen for neurodevelopmental delay in all children with ConHD. Children with mild cardiac symptoms and seemingly normal neurodevelopment should also be screened because several studies proved them not to be free of neuropsychological deficits either [4, 5]. Furthermore, research shows that performances at 2 years of age can be predictive for performances at 5 years which validates the importance of early screening. Because cognitive advancements can be made by intervention provided in the first years of life [1], early identification and subsequently remediation of neuropsychological deficits should be an indispensible part in the treatment of a child with ConHD. At least should these results prompt cardiologists to thoroughly question the school progress of the child and refer for neuropsychological testing when the risk for neurodevelopmental delay is suspected.
References
1.
Orton J, Spittle A, Doyle L, Anders P, Boyd R (2009) Do early intervention programs improve cognitive and motor outcomes for preterm infants after discharge? A systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol 51(11):581–859
2.
Gaynor W, Wernovsky G, Jarvik G, Bernbaum J, Gerdes M, Zackai E, Nord A, Clancy R, Nicolson S, Spray T (2007) Patient characteristics are important determinants of neurodevelopmental outcome at one year of age after neonatal and infant cardiac surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 133:1344–1345PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
3.
McCusker C, Doherty N, Molley B, Casey F, Rooney N, Mulholland C, Sands A, Craig B, Stewart M (2007) Determinants of neuropsychological and behavioural in early childhood survivors of congenital heart disease. Arch Child Dis 92:137–141CrossRef
4.
Visconti K, Bichell D, Jonas R, Newburger J, Bellinger D (1999) Developmental outcome after surgical versus interventional closure of secundum atrial septal defect in children. Circulation 100(19):145–150
5.
6.
7.
Koseck K (1999) Review and evaluation of the psychometric properties of the revised Bayley Scales of Infant Development. Pediatr Phys Ther 11:198–204CrossRef
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
Sarajuuri A, Jokinen E, Puosi R, Mildh L, Mattila I, Lano A, Lönnqvist T (2010) Neurodevelopment in children with hypoplastic left heart syndrome. J Pediatr 157:414–420PubMedCrossRef