Neuropsychological Aspects in Children and Adolescents with ConHD


Age group(years)

Material

Reference

>3

Bayley Scales of Infant Development

Bayley [51]

Griffith Development scales

Griffiths [52]

Alberta Infant Motor Scale

Piper and Darrah [53]

3–6

Wechsler Primary and Preschool Intelligence

Wechsler [59]

Beery Visual Motor Integration Test

Beery [54]

Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test

Dunn and Dunn [56]

Movement Assessment Battery for Children

Henderson and Sudgen [57]

NEPSY (A Developmental NeuropsychologicalAssessment)

Korkman et al. [58]

6–18

Wechsler Scale of Intelligence for Children

Wechsler [65]

Connor’s Continuous Performance Test

Connors [55]

Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test

Schmidt [63]

Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test

Rey [62]

Tower of London

Shallice [64]

Wisconsin Card Sorting Test

Heaton et al. [60]

Grooved Pegboard

Reitan and Davidson [61]

NEPSY (A Developmental NeuropsychologicalAssessment) (till 12 years)

Korkman et al. [58]

Assessment by speech pathologist
 


Difficult medical circumstances and the acute critical status of the newborn often require immediate medical intervention, reducing the importance of a neurodevelopmental testing in the early stage. Further, the functional testing that can be completed on neonates is extremely limited, and the illness of the child reduces the predictive validity of a preoperative functional assessment. However, it is highly recommended to screen for neurodevelopmental delay in all children with ConHD. Children with mild cardiac symptoms and seemingly normal neurodevelopment should also be screened because several studies proved them not to be free of neuropsychological deficits either [4, 5]. Furthermore, research shows that performances at 2 years of age can be predictive for performances at 5 years which validates the importance of early screening. Because cognitive advancements can be made by intervention provided in the first years of life [1], early identification and subsequently remediation of neuropsychological deficits should be an indispensible part in the treatment of a child with ConHD. At least should these results prompt cardiologists to thoroughly question the school progress of the child and refer for neuropsychological testing when the risk for neurodevelopmental delay is suspected.



References



1.

Orton J, Spittle A, Doyle L, Anders P, Boyd R (2009) Do early intervention programs improve cognitive and motor outcomes for preterm infants after discharge? A systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol 51(11):581–859


2.

Gaynor W, Wernovsky G, Jarvik G, Bernbaum J, Gerdes M, Zackai E, Nord A, Clancy R, Nicolson S, Spray T (2007) Patient characteristics are important determinants of neurodevelopmental outcome at one year of age after neonatal and infant cardiac surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 133:1344–1345PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef


3.

McCusker C, Doherty N, Molley B, Casey F, Rooney N, Mulholland C, Sands A, Craig B, Stewart M (2007) Determinants of neuropsychological and behavioural in early childhood survivors of congenital heart disease. Arch Child Dis 92:137–141CrossRef


4.

Visconti K, Bichell D, Jonas R, Newburger J, Bellinger D (1999) Developmental outcome after surgical versus interventional closure of secundum atrial septal defect in children. Circulation 100(19):145–150


5.

Quartermain M, Ittenbach R, Flynn T, Gaynor J, Zhang X, Licht D, Ichord R, Nance M, Wernovsky G (2010) Neuropsychological status in children after repair of acyanotic congenital heart disease. Pediatrics 126(2):E351–E359PubMedCrossRef


6.

Anderson PJ, De Luca CR, Hutchinson E, Roberts G, Doyle LW, Victorian Infant Collaborative Group (2010) Underestimation of developmental delay by the new Bayley-III Scale. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 164(4):352–356PubMedCrossRef


7.

Koseck K (1999) Review and evaluation of the psychometric properties of the revised Bayley Scales of Infant Development. Pediatr Phys Ther 11:198–204CrossRef


8.

Bellinger D, Rappaport L, Wypij D, Wernovsly G, Newburger J (1997) Patterns of developmental dysfunction after surgery in infancy to correct transposition of the great arteries. J Dev Behav Pediatr 18:75–83PubMedCrossRef


9.

Snookes S, Gunn J, Eldridge J, Donath S, Hunt R, Galea M, Shekerdemian L (2010) A systematic review of motor and cognitive outcomes after early surgery for congenital heart disease. Pediatrics 125:e818–e827PubMedCrossRef


10.

Sananes R, Manlhiot C, Kelly E, Hornberger L, Williams W, MacGregor D, Buncic R, McCrindle B (2012) Neurodevelopmental outcomes after open heart operations before 3 months of age. Ann Thorac Surg 93:1577–1583PubMedCrossRef


11.

Matsuzaki T, Matzui M, Ichica F, Nakazawa J, Hatori A, Yoshikosi A, Miyazaki M, Fujii M, Hagino I, Kagisaki K, Yagihara T (2010) Neurodevelopment in 1-year-old Japanese infants after congenital heart surgery. Pediatr Int 52(3):420–427PubMedCrossRef


12.

Long S, Galea M, Eldridge B, Harris S (2012) Performance of 2-year-old children after early surgery for congenital heart disease on the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third edition. Early Hum Dev 88:603–607PubMedCrossRef


13.

Sarajuuri A, Lönnqvist T, Mildh L, Rajantie I, Eronen M, Mattila I, Jokinen E (2009) Prospective follow-up study of children with univentricular heart: neurodevelopmental outcome at age 12 months. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 137(1):139–145PubMedCrossRef

Dec 3, 2016 | Posted by in PSYCHOLOGY | Comments Off on Neuropsychological Aspects in Children and Adolescents with ConHD

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access