Fig. 1
Patents in positional therapy
In 1900, L.E. Wilson, from Nebraska, filed a patent for a “Shoulder brace and antisnoring attachment” [26]. The device consisted of a metal “prodding device”, kept in place by adjustable, washable and ventilated straps. Not only did the device block the patient from adopting the supine position, the device also forced the patient to roll over to a lateral position. The first patent for a device for medical application was filed by T. Thomas in 1907: “A belt and shield to be worn at night to give support to the wearer, prevent his sleeping on his back, to prevent dreaming and snoring…” [27].
In 1908, two patents were filed, both titled “Antisnoring device” by C.F. Rohwer and L.F. Liebhardt. These devices aimed to “provide a simple and easily applied device, which will effectively prevent snoring, sleep talking, bad dreams and other disagreeable features with which many persons contend when sleeping on their backs”, by securing a hollow ball composed of compressible material, such as rubber on the wearer’s back [28, 29].
E.R. Boots invented a new sleeping garment, for which a patent was filed in 1941 [30]. This garment consisted of a pocket sewn onto the back panel of a nightshirt or pyjama, sized to retain a so-called “anti-snore medium such as a sponge rubber ball”. This ball served as an obstacle for the wearer to sleep in supine position.
Under a decade later, the journal CHEST published a letter written by a patient’s wife [31]. She had cured her husband’s sleep apnea snoring problem by “having sewn a pocket into the back of a T-shirt and having inserted a hollow, lightweight plastic ball, to prevent her husband sleeping on his back”. To our best knowledge, this is the first publication of “positional therapy” in medical literature.
It was not until the mid-1980s that the first scientific studies on positional therapy were published.
Kavey published the results of two patients who had been instructed to attach a ball in a sock to the back of their nightshirt in such a way as to make the supine position uncomfortable [32]. Henceforth, variations of the tennis ball techniques have been described in the literature varying from vests, “shark fins” or special pillows, as shown in Table 1. After running a thorough search strategy in the MEDLINE and Embase databases, 24 relevant articles were found. Seven studies were excluded from the overview. Two studies did not provide information on the effect of PT on OSA parameters and were omitted from the overview. Five studies evaluated the effect on OSA of an array of devices resulting in an elevated posture and head extension. As these devices did not prevent the patient from assuming the supine position, the studies were not included in the overview. All studies report positive effect of positional therapy on the AHI [24–33, 40, 43, 44, 48, 49, 55, 56, 58].
Table 1
Overview literature on positional therapy
Year | Design | LoE | No. | BMI (kg/m2) | PT method | Mean AHI without PT | Mean AHI with PT | Mean TST in supine position without PT (%) | Mean TST in supine position with PT (%) | AHI in supine position without PT | AHI in supine position with PT | AHI in non-supine position without PT | AHI in non-supine position with PT | Sleep efficiency without PT (%) | Sleep efficiency with PT (%) | Follow-up | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cartwright [48] | 1985 | Case series | 4 | 10 | 30.6 | Positional alarm | 54.7 | 21.4 | 51.4 | 2.1 | 72.0 | 11.0 | 19.3 | 21.6 | ND | ND | – |
Kavey [32] | 1985 | Case series | 4 | 2/4 | 24.5 | Ball in sock on back | 9.2b,c | 3.8b,c | 40.4c | 8.8c | 13.7b,c | 5.1b,c | ND | ND | ND | ND | 4–12 months |
Kavey [32] | 1985 | Case series | 4 | 2/4 | 26.5 | Verbal instructions | 40.8b,c | 2.8b,c | 92.1c | 11.2c | 42.4b,c | 6.9b,c | ND | ND | ND | ND | 3–4 months |
Cartwright [49] | 1991 | Case series | 4 | 15/60 | ND | Positional alarm | 33.3 | 20.8 | 141.1f | 3.4f | 62.5 | 32.9 | 9.7 | 21.7 | ND | ND | 8 weeks |
Cartwright [49] | 1991 | Case series | 4 | 15/60 | ND | Verbal instructions | 26.7 | 7.7 | 101.3f | 16.5f | 87.3 | 26.8 | 7.7 | 4.6 | ND | ND | 8 weeks |
Braver [33] | 1994 | Randomized crossover trial | 2b | 20 | 36 | Foam wedges | 17.5 | 14.1 | 68 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | – |
Jokic [43] | 1999 | RCT | 2b | 13 | 30 | Backpack with softball inside | 17.9 | 9.5 | 25.6 | 1. | 63.8 | ND | 4.9 | ND | ND | 82 | – |
Maurer [34] | 2003 | Case series | 4 | 12 | 26.5 | Vest with semirigid foam on dorsal part | 26.7 | 7.6 | 300f | 63f | 39.3 | ND | 5.5 | ND | 81 | 83 | – |
Zuberi [35] | 2004 | Case series | 4 | 22 | 23–48a | Triangular pillow | 23.5 | 11.1 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | – |
Oksenberg [36] | 2006 | Case series | 4 | 28825 | 28.1 | Tennis ball technique | 46.5 | 17.5 | 79 | 12.3 | 57.0 | 44.4 | 11.6 | 13.8 | 80.9 | 78.9 | 2 months |
Wenzel [37] | 2007 | Case series | 4 | 12 | 28.1 | Vest with semirigid foam on dorsal part | 31.3 | 13.8 | 72.2 | 2.1 | ND | ND | ND | ND | 86.3 | 78.9 | – |
Loord [38] | 2007 | Case series | 4 | 18/23 | ND | Soft vest attached to a board with pillow | 21.8 | 14.3 | ND | ND | 50.4 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | 3 months |
Skinner [44] | 2009 | Randomized crossover trial | 2b | 20 | 30.7 | Thoracic anti-supine band (TASB) | 22.7 | 12.0 | 34.4 | 6.3 | 59.6 | 37.8 | 4.7 | 10.3 | ND | ND | 1 month |
Permut [60] | 2010 | Randomized crossover trial | 2b | 38 | 31 | Vest with semirigid foam on dorsal part | 11d | 2d | 40d | 0d | 31d | ND | 2d | ND | 89d | 88d | – |
Choi [39]
Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channelFull access? Get Clinical TreeGet Clinical Tree app for offline access |