Chapter 75 Organizing and funding health care
The organization and funding of health care affect patients as well as health care providers. Doctors, as health care providers, may be restricted in their actions owing to the existing organization of health care, or they may feel that their patients’ access to certain expensive tests or interventions is restricted.
We concentrate on three countries, the UK (with a predominantly state-run welfare system), the USA (with a predominantly free-market system), and Germany (with a mixed-health economy), representing the major ways health care is organized and funded (Table 1). Total expenditure per capita on health (including private and public health expenditure) in these three countries differs considerably, as does the proportion of the gross national product spent on health care.
Table 1 Three different ways of funding and organizing health care provision
UK | USA | Germany |
---|---|---|
UK
All citizens of the UK are included in the NHS. The NHS is a universal, tax-funded health care system. Doctors, nurses and hospitals are paid by the state. The NHS requires some additional payments from patients, for example, for prescriptions and dental check-ups, but the overwhelming majority of care provision is free of charge. Treatment is decided on (mostly) by doctors. GPs are gate-keepers in this system, selecting patients and referring patients to the appropriate specialist. Medical care is available to all, and is therefore without stigma or significant financial cost to the poor. However, there is a problem of waiting lists in certain areas (see pp. 154–155). This has stimulated an increase in the small but growing private health care sector. In the UK this includes sales of over-the-counter medicines and private payments for alternative therapies and hospital treatment. The latter is often provided by the same doctors in the same hospitals as the standard NHS care.

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

