Overview of Sleep in Children

section epub:type=”chapter”>



Overview of Sleep in Children



Jon Quach1,2,    1Melbourne Graduate School of Education, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC, Australia,    2Centre for Community Child Health, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia


Abstract


This chapter outlines the importance of sleep in children, which is a necessary daily activity for optimal functioning. It will examine the research related to the specific role of sleep in a child’s development and well-being, as well as the biological and environmental factors which regulate sleep. It will finally also examine how sleep problems can be defined, as well as the impact on the child and their families if they experience inadequate sleep.


Keywords


Sleep; development; sleep regulation; child behavior; child learning; parent mental health


2.1 Introduction


Sleep is an essential part of our everyday lives. Over 2500 years ago Hippocrates noted, “Disease exists if either sleep or watchfulness be excessive.” Since the early days of science, it has been consistently concluded that insufficient sleep leads to adverse effects on our bodies. For over a decade, poor sleep (i.e., insufficient or fragmented sleep) has been reported to affect over half of children from infancy to adolescence (Owens, Spirito, McGuinn, & Nobile, 2000), with varying degrees of persistence. However, poor sleep has been consistently shown to be associated with not only poorer outcomes for the child (Gozal, 1998; Hiscock, Canterford, Ukoumunne, & Wake, 2007; Meijer, Habekothe, & Wittenboer, 2000; Owens, Fernando, & McGuinn, 2005; Sadeh, Gruber, & Raviv, 2003; Smedje, Broman, & Hetta, 2001a; Stickgold, Hobson, Fosse, & Fosse, 2001), but also the parents and family. This chapter examines the field of child sleep. It is presented in four parts. First, it examines what is known about the development and regulation of sleep. Next, it explores the various considerations in defining a sleep problem. Then, it examines the epidemiology and sequelae of child sleep problems on child and parent outcomes.


2.2 Role of Sleep During Childhood


Sleep is an essential part of everyday life with the first sleep events occurring in utero (Graven & Browne, 2008; Sterman & Hoppenbrouwers, 1971). As sleep has a role in many day-to-day functions, it is not surprising that inadequate sleep leads to impaired functioning in both physical and mental domains (Beebe, 2011). Studies suggest that sleep is essential in maintaining optimal health and has a multifaceted role (Sheldon, 2005). Sleep is often considered to be a time in which the mind and body rest and recuperate, but in actuality, sleep is a period of considerable neurologic and physiologic activity (Peirano, Algarin, & Uauy, 2003). It is also a period of intense brain activity involving higher cortical functions.


The role of sleep has been predominantly unraveled through research involving the deprivation of sleep in animals and adults to identify the repercussions of fragmented or decreased sleep (Everson, 1993, 1995; Gruber et al., 2011; Orze-Gryglewska, 2010; Rechtschaffen, Gilliland, Bergmann, & Winter, 1983; Sadeh, Gruber, & Raviv, 2003; Schwierin, Borbely, & Tobler, 1999; Sgoifo et al., 2006; Van Dongen, Maislin, Mullington, & Dinges, 2003). These studies suggested that sleep is involved in the maintenance of normal bodily functions, optimal immune performance, weight regulation, heart rate regulation, and neurologic functioning.


Studies in adult humans have not observed the same long-term psychological effects as those observed in animal studies (i.e., death). Some have reported that sleep deprivation in humans leads to impaired and regressive behavior, impaired vigilance and performance, and alteration of circadian rhythm stages (Horne, Anderson, & Wilkinson, 1983; Kales et al., 1970; Sheldon, 2005). The most common and reproducible symptom of human sleep deprivation studies is the report of sleepiness or fatigue. As infants and children spend a majority of their time sleeping, it is not surprising that studies suggest that sleep plays a crucial role in the developing brain and body (Dahl, 1996b; Dewald, Meijer, Oort, Kerkhof, & Bögels, 2010; Graven, 2006). Studies in both adults and children have demonstrated an active role in brain maturation, information processing, memory consolidation, learning and executive functioning (Backhaus, Hoeckesfeld, Born, Hohagen, & Junghanns, 2008; Cheour et al., 2002; Cho et al., 2015; Dahl, 1996a; Fifer et al., 2010; Hobson & Pace-Schott, 2002; Sadeh, 2007; Siegel, 2001; Stickgold et al., 2001; Turnbull, Reid, & Morton, 2013). Studies have consistently reported that decreased sleep duration is associated with increased daytime fatigue, emotional labiality, and alertness (Astill, Van der Heijden, Van IJzendoorn, & Van Someren, 2012; Liu, Liu, Owens, & Kaplan, 2005; Nixon et al., 2008; Sadeh, 2007; Sadeh et al., 2003). Adequate sleep is therefore important for optimal learning, behavior and development.


2.3 How Is Sleep Regulated?


Regular sleep patterns, architecture, and behavior, evolve from infancy to adulthood (Galland, Taylor, Elder, & Herbison, 2012; Gradisar, Gardner, & Dohnt, 2011). Understanding what constitutes and regulates normal sleep is important in discerning sleep problems and crucial in enabling developmentally appropriate support. The sleep and wake states are not dependent upon a single area of the brain but are composed of highly synchronized states. The following section focuses on the development of sleep cycles and the regulation and initiation of the sleep–wake states in children.


2.3.1 Sleep Architecture and Cycle


Sleep begins in utero (Payne & Bach, 1965; Petre-Quadens, De Barsy, Devos, & Sfaello, 1967). Electrical discharges can be recorded from the fetal brain during sleep from about 3 months gestation, and mature and consolidate by 4 months postpartum as two distinct sleep rhythms (Mirmiran, Maas, & Ariagno, 2003). These rhythms are known as Rapid Eye Movement (REM) and nonRapid Eye Movement (NREM) sleep rhythms. These two rhythms are physiologically distinct from each other and cyclically alternate during the night in what is known as the ultradian rhythm. Differences between the two rhythms are outlined in Table 2.1.



Table 2.1




































Comparison of two sleep rhythms

Rapid eye movement Nonrapid eye movement
Brain activity High Low
Eye movement Yes No
Respiration rate Rapid, irregular, shallow Slow, rhythmic
Heart rate Increases Decreases
Blood pressure Increases Decreases
Movement Paralyzed Preserved
Body temperature Irregular Decreases

During NREM sleep, the normal regulatory systems of the body continue to function, and body movement is preserved (Mindell & Owens, 2003). NREM is categorized into four distinct stages which represent gradations in depth of sleep and difficulty of arousal. The way NREM sleep cycles through the stages is shown in Fig. 2.1. At the beginning of the night, the sleep cycle enters into stage one NREM sleep. Stage one is considered a transitional phase between sleep and wakefulness. The child can easily be woken when in this stage and it constitutes about 2%–5% of total sleep. The majority of this sleep stage occurs at the start of the night as the cycle often bypasses this stage during the sleep cycle during the night (Adair & Bauchner, 1993). Stage two is considered the onset of sleep. There are decreased eye movements, reduced muscle tone, and reductions in respiratory rate and heart rate. In childhood, about half of the total sleep time is spent in stage two which predominantly occurs in the middle of the night (Adair & Bauchner, 1993). The third and fourth stages are almost identical in nature albeit stage four is the deepest sleep stage. They are often called slow-wave sleep (Mindell & Owens, 2003). The child will have a relaxed body, slow and rhythmic breathing, and a decreased heart rate. This stage is the hardest to wake a child from, and, if awoken, they may appear confused and disorientated. These two stages appear predominantly in the early period of sleep and constitute about 20% of total sleep time (Adair & Bauchner, 1993). NREM ends when REM sleep commences.



REM sleep is characterized by absent muscle tone, high levels of cortical activity, and bursts of phasic eye movements under closed eyelids as well as irregular heart and respiratory rates (Mindell & Owens, 2003). It is thought to be the time for the brain to assimilate images by replaying them during dreams and to enable the child to learn from the experiences of the day (Adair & Bauchner, 1993). The child’s muscles are generally paralyzed during this period which is thought to prevent a child from acting out their dreams. The proportion of REM sleep is highest in infancy and declines throughout childhood (Garcia-Rill, Charlesworth, Heister, Ye, & Hayar, 2008). A short period of REM sleep may follow after which the child descends back into the four NREM sleep stages before passing into REM sleep again. This episode of REM sleep ends when the child enters stage two NREM sleep. If the child enters stage one NREM, then brief arousal may occur.


During a typical night of sleep, individuals cycle through the REM and NREM stages, often referred to as the ultradian rhythm. In infants, these cycles last up to 50 minutes, increasing to about 1.5 hours in adults. At the end of each cycle, it is common to experience a brief arousal followed by a rapid return to sleep. Therefore children may briefly wake up to 5–7 times a night. The proportion of REM and NREM changes throughout the night. At the start of the night, individuals spend longer in NREM sleep (first third of the night), with the proportion decreasing with each cycle to the point in which individuals spend longer in REM sleep (last third of the night). The duration and timing of each sleep stage is influenced by a number of factors. Individuals who have experienced sleep disruptions will have a higher proportion of slow-wave (i.e., deep sleep) during subsequent recovery sleep.


2.3.2 Development of Sleep


Sleep patterns change and develop from infancy to adulthood. Newborn babies exhibit an even distribution of about 8 h in each of REM and NREM sleep (Roffwarg, Muzio, & Dement, 1996). From birth, there is a gradual decrease in REM sleep to just 1 hour in adults, whilst NREM sleep decreases to about 6–7 hours per day in adults (Coons & Guilleminault, 1982; Roffwarg et al., 1996). At 6 months, REM sleep is predominantly at night, and daytime naps cease around age four. The increase in waking hours over time is predominantly at the expense of REM sleep duration (Garcia-Rill et al., 2008). By the time infants have reached their second 6 months of life, they should have passed through a series of developmental and physiological milestones which enable them to initiate and maintain sleep through the night (Coons & Guilleminault, 1982). In contrast to infants, who spend majority of their time sleeping throughout the day with multiple night-time awakenings, sleep begins to consolidate into one to two naps by 1 year of age, to one nap in the toddler period to eventually all night-time sleep by the time children are aged four (Iglowstein, Jenni, Molinari, & Largo, 2003). As children reduce their naps, their overnight sleep should become consolidated with fewer nocturnal awakenings (Iglowstein et al., 2003; McLaughlin Crabtree & Williams, 2009). Despite this, however, over one-fifth of Australian primary caregivers report their child has problems with night wakings in their preschool years (Hiscock et al., 2007; Quach, Hiscock, Canterford, & Wake, 2009).


Sleep and wakefulness are regulated by two coupled processes, known as the “two process” sleep system, as proposed by Alexander Borbely from studies in rats (Borbely, 1982; Borbély, Daan, Wirz-Justice, & Deboer, 2016). The two processes are:



It is postulated that these two systems function in opposition to each other and that transitions between sleep and wake occur rapidly such that intermediate states are rare. The following sections describe these two processes in greater detail.


2.3.3 Circadian Regulation (Process C)


Circadian rhythm refers to the natural biological cycles that attune individuals to day and night. Consolidated overnight sleep is thought to occur as the result of an increase in circadian sleep drive during the night that opposes the decline in homeostatic sleep drive during sleep (Dijk & Czeisler, 1995; Edgar, Dement, & Fuller, 1993).


The circadian rhythm is a predictive rather than reactive process regulated by the suprachiasmatic nucleus of the hypothalamus (Mistlberger, 2005). Prior to waking, body temperature, sympathetic autonomic tone, and plasma cortisol levels rise, possibly anticipating the body’s increased energy demands associated with wakefulness. The rhythm is characterized by periods of maximum sleepiness (circadian troughs) and maximum wakefulness (circadian nadirs). There are two periods of maximum sleepiness, one being in the late afternoon and one in the middle of the night, and two periods of maximum wakefulness, one in the early morning and one in the evening. Although these circadian patterns exist, the level of wakefulness and alertness is influenced by other factors such as individual variation, nature of tasks, and environmental factors. For example, high energy activities (e.g., playing sport, running) before bedtime can increase wakefulness which makes going to sleep harder.


In addition, the circadian rhythm is synchronized to environmental cues, otherwise known as zeitgebers. The most powerful of these zeitgebers is the light–dark cycle (Fisk et al., 2018). The light–dark cycle is regulated by the release of an endogenous substance known as melatonin from the pineal gland (Wetterberg, 1999). In a dark environment, melatonin is released to activate the sleep pathway in the brain. In a light environment, melatonin release is inhibited (Zisapel, 2018). The light–dark cycle can affect the sleep–wake cycle since light can be a cue for decreased sleep drive. However, the process can be overridden if the person’s sleep drive is strong enough. The circadian rhythm is also influenced by other time cues such as the timing of meals, alarm clocks, and other scheduled activities, for example, going to school.


Therefore, the activation and regulation of sleep is controlled by environmental and internal cues. The synchronization of environmental and internal cues to the circadian rhythm highlights the importance of regulated daytime schedules and sleep environment. For example, having inconsistent time cues due to variable wake times or meal times can disrupt the circadian rhythm. Likewise, having an inappropriate sleep environment which contains light from a TV set may inhibit the release of melatonin which is crucial for the initiation of sleep.


2.3.4 Homeostatic Regulation (Process S)


The homeostatic component is the sleep drive which intensifies whilst a person is awake, and declines whilst a person is sleeping (Beersma & Gordijn, 2007; Fuller, Gooley, & Saper, 2006). Homeostatic regulation of sleep works in a similar way to the hunger homeostatic process. Your hunger drive increases the longer it has been since you have consumed food and also depends on the amount of food you last consumed. Similarly, your sleep drive increases the longer you stay awake, and can also be influenced by the quality and quantity of the last sleep you last had.


Understanding the role of sleep–wake regulation and sleep architecture provides the basic knowledge to explain the etiology for many sleep problems experienced by children. For example, night wakings are more common in infants and toddlers as prolongations of the normal night-time arousals that occur at the end of each sleep cycle. The partial arousal parasomnias, such as sleep walking and sleep terrors, usually occur in the first third of the night because that is when deep sleep is the most dominant. These sleep problems are also prevalent in children who experience conditions which increase the likelihood of rebound sleep, such as sleep deprivation or withdrawal of medications. On the other hand, nightmares are associated with light sleep due to the high cortical activity. Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is common in REM sleep, where the normal REM changes in breathing regulation compound upper airway collapse in at risk children (Horne et al., 2011).


2.4 Sleep Requirements


The requirements of sleep, in theory, are quite simple. Sufficient sleep is achieved when a child can efficiently go to sleep at night and maintain sleep for a period of time which fulfills their intrinsic sleep requirements. That is, the child can get enough sleep so that they no longer feel tired at an appropriate time of day. However, achieving this is not straightforward in practice. The following section outlines sleep requirements for children.


2.4.1 Sleep Duration


Sleep duration is an important indicator of sleep need and varies between different age groups and also between individuals (Acebo et al., 2005; Galland et al., 2012; Iglowstein et al., 2003; Price et al., 2013; Sadeh, 2007; Spilsbury et al., 2004; Williams, Zimmerman, & Bell, 2013). However, few studies have examined the differences between age and individuals in a large longitudinal cohort.


Although there are recognized national guidelines, such as the American Academy of Sleep and Australian Sleep Health Foundation, there is substantial individual variation in a person’s sleep needs and their tolerance for sleep loss (Hirshkowitz et al., 2015). Parents are good at recognizing when a child is tired in association with an acute sleep loss like a missed nap or late bedtime but do not always associate these daytime symptoms with chronic sleep loss. Total sleep duration is highest in infancy, with an average of 14.0 h (SD=2.2 h) for infants under 6 months spread over about six sleep episodes. This total duration decreases to about 10 hours (SD=2 h) by the time children are 9 years of age, with further decreases to about 8 hours by adolescence (Price et al., 2013). In addition to changes in sleep duration, consolidation of night-time sleep occurs during the first year of life, with a decreasing trend of daytime sleep as children have fewer naps. Typically, regular daytime naps disappear by the age of 4 years, with any naps being of <30 minutes past this age.


Longitudinal studies in different countries have affirmed similar development of sleep duration patterns, signifying the underlying biological regulation of sleep need (Iglowstein et al., 2003; Price et al., 2013; Williams et al., 2013). A child’s sleep duration tends to track over time. Children who sleep only short periods compared to their contemporaries in early childhood also do so during later childhood (Jenni, Molinari, Caflisch, & Largo, 2007; Russo, Bruni, Lucidi, Ferri, & Violani, 2007). This is also true for long sleepers. In addition, some children may naturally stay awake later and rise later (commonly known as owls), whilst other children may go to bed earlier and rise early the next morning (commonly known as larks) (Blader, Koplewicz, Abikoff, & Foley, 1997). The research indicates that an important indicator of good sleep is that a child’s intrinsic sleep requirements are fulfilled rather than a child achieves a set amount of sleep per 24 h per se.


For many children, the first instance they are required to be awake by a required time may be when they attend preschool or commence school or their parents go back to work. This may be particularly problematic for children who are natural night “owls,” as they are woken before their intrinsic sleep requirements are achieved after going to sleep later than their “lark” peers. Children who have a further distance to commute may have to wake up earlier than their peers and thus also experience shorter sleep durations (Adam, Snell, & Pendry, 2007). The reduced sleep durations during the week may lead some children to sleep in later on weekends (Touchette, Mongrain, Petit, Tremblay, & Montplaisir, 2008). A reduction in as little as 30 minutes of sleep from a child’s normal sleep duration can impact on the child’s daytime functioning through decreased attention, memory retention, and increased behavioral difficulties (Sadeh et al., 2003; Suratt et al., 2007). However, research has also highlighted that there are not specific thresholds of optimal sleep for child outcomes, highlighting the individual variation in a person’s intrinsic sleep need (Price, Quach, Wake, Bittman, & Hiscock, 2016). Therefore, children need to have an adequate bedtime which allows for an appropriate amount of sleep to be achieved before they need to wake up to prepare for school.


2.4.2 Sleep Hygiene


Sleep hygiene refers to a list of behavioral and environmental conditions and other sleep-related factors connected to effective and efficient sleep (Spilsbury et al., 2005; Stepanski & Wyatt, 2003). The importance of sleep hygiene was first reported for adults (Hauri, 1992) and then children (Blum & Carey, 1996; Owens & Witmans, 2004). Poor sleep hygiene exists when a child has variable sleep and wake-up times, poor sleep-related behaviors, or a poor sleep environment. Behavioral sleep interventions must target these components in order to develop and/or maintain positive sleep hygiene practices (see Chapter 5). Development of appropriate sleep hygiene may set the foundation for the development of long-lasting positive sleep behaviors as children become adolescents and adults (Mindell & Meltzer, 2008; Owens & Witmans, 2004).


Good sleep hygiene practices are considered to include: having a set bedtime routine which is consistent for all nights of the week, avoiding caffeine or high sugar consumption in the afternoon, avoiding excessive media exposure (>2 hours per day), avoiding television and game system use before bed and making the period before bedtime relaxing (Mindell, Meltzer, Carskadon, & Chervin, 2009; Owens & Witmans, 2004; Uebergang, Arnup, Hiscock, Care, & Quach, 2017).


Children with poor sleep hygiene practices are more likely to have a sleep problem. A study of 4243 US adolescents reported caffeine consumption was associated with a 1.9 times increased likelihood of difficulty sleeping and 1.8 times increased likelihood of morning tiredness due to later bedtime (Orbeta, Overpeck, Ramcharran, Kogan, & Ledsky, 2006). Similar figures have been reported in Australian children in the first year of primary school, with approximately 30% reporting having a high sugar or caffeinated drink after school (Quach, Hiscock, & Wake, 2012).


The importance of a consistent nightly bedtime routine has been highlighted in a randomized controlled study involving 206 infants (aged 7–18 months) and 199 toddlers (aged 18–36 months). By establishing a consistent nightly bedtime routine, intervention mothers reported improved infant and toddler sleep and an improvement in their own mood (Mindell, Telofski, Wiegand, & Kurtz, 2009). Another study of 135 Japanese children aged 4–6 years reported that irregular bedtimes were associated with increased behavioral problems in a community sample (Yokomaku et al., 2008). Whilst a recent study, in 4901 Australian children starting primary school (aged 5–6 years), found that inconsistent bedtimes on both school and nonschool nights were associated with a twofold increase in the likelihood of the child having a sleep problem, once considering other factors such as media use at bedtime, gender, and socioeconomic status (SES; Uebergang et al., 2017). This suggests that a consistent bedtime and bedtime routine are critical for achieving and establishing good sleep patterns and should be the foundation of any behavioral sleep intervention. However, the relationship between consistent bedtimes and sleep problems remains to be explored in children once they have commenced school.


Televisions have existed in homes for many decades and are widely watched by children (Bernard-Bonnin, Gilbert, Rousseau, Masson, & Maheux, 1991). The impact of media use on sleep problems was first described in a study of parents of 495 students from kindergarten to fourth grade in the United States (Owens et al., 1999). The authors reported that, although parents closely monitor their child’s TV viewing habits, almost a quarter of children had a television in their bedroom. Children who watched more TV during the day and around bedtime had more problems with bedtime resistance, sleep-onset delay, anxiety around sleep, and shortened sleep duration. A study of 321 US children aged 5–6 years reported that children who are exposed to television, either watching actively or passively in the same room, are at greater risk of having sleep problems such as going to bed (Paavonen, Pennonen, Roine, Valkonen, & Lahikainen, 2006). In particular, children who are passively exposed to television are almost three times more likely to have sleep disturbances. In 19,299 Chinese children, those who watched more than 2 hours of television per day were 1.63 times more likely to have bedtime resistance problems and 1.37 times more likely to have poor sleep duration (Li et al., 2007). Another study of 1473 caregivers reported that for children aged over 3 years, simply having a TV in the child’s bedroom is associated with a reduced sleep duration (Mindell et al., 2009). Similar findings have also been reported in other studies and have been extended to other media such as computer and game system use in school-aged children (Dworak, Schierl, Bruns, & Struder, 2007; Gaina et al., 2007; Kuriyan, Bhat, Thomas, Vaz, & Kurpad, 2007; Mistry, Minkovitz, Strobino, & Borzekowski, 2007). The appropriate daily use of television, particularly around bedtime, may be important in reducing child sleep problems. Current guidelines in Australia and America recommend limiting media use to a maximum of 1 hour per day for children between 2 and 5 years, with no screen time in the hour before bed (Cain & Gradisar, 2010; Council on Communications and Media, 2016). Although the same recommendations do not suggest a maximum amount of screen time for children aged 5–18 years, it also highlights that screens (i.e., televisions) should be present in the bedroom as well as not in the hour before bed. These studies suggest that media exposure is strongly associated with increased sleep problems and therefore should be discussed as part of an intervention.



These studies suggest that poor sleep hygiene, especially media exposure at bedtime and inconsistent bedtimes, are associated with child sleep problems.


2.5 Defining a Child Sleep Problem


Sleep problems can be broadly categorized as either a medical problem (e.g., OSA) or nonmedical (behavioral) problem. It is important that definitions of normal sleep patterns, sleep requirements, and sleep disorders in childhood incorporate the wide range of developmental and maturational changes across childhood as well as cultural, environmental, and social influences. Defining sleep problems requires weighing up personal belief, cultural influences, and international definitions in addition to factors such as variances in sleep patterns and sleep duration requirements in children.


2.5.1 Classification: International Classification of Sleep Disorders


The International Classification of Sleep Disorders (ICSD) was first published in 1990 and has been revised several times with the latest revision published in 2014 (American Academy of Sleep Medicine, 2014). It has gained wide acceptance as an important tool for clinicians and researchers in sleep medicine, as it provides a comparative framework to enable research results to be translated into clinical practice. The classification has attempted to classify disorders according to their clinical significance and expression.


Some of the disorders described in the ICSD, such as limit-setting disorder, are almost exclusively found in children, whereas others, such as insomnia, list diagnostic criteria that are intended to be applied to both adult and pediatric populations. This latter approach may not adequately capture developmental considerations or reflect the most common clinical presentations of these disorders when they occur in preschool and school-aged children (Mason & Pack, 2007; Mindell & Owens, 2003; Robinson & Waters, 2008). In addition, the stringent classification criteria do not acknowledge the validity of parental concerns and opinions regarding their child’s sleep patterns and behaviors. The perception of a child sleep problem may be a potential trigger for seeking help from healthcare providers. One study of 154,957 patients aged 0–18 years reported that 3.7% of children meet ICSD criteria for a sleep problem (Meltzer, Johnson, Crosette, Ramos, & Mindell, 2010). This is substantially lower than prevalence rates reported by objective (i.e., actigraphy) and subjective (i.e., parent report) measures in epidemiological studies, which suggests that the exclusive use of the ICSD may result in underdiagnosis of sleep problems in children (Hiscock et al., 2007; Lazaratou, Dikeos, Anagnostopoulos, Sbokou, & Soldatos, 2005; Owens, Spirito, et al., 2000).


2.5.2 Classification: Parasomnias and Dyssomnias


Another way in which sleep disorders can be classified is by their timing. Sleep disorders can be classified as either dyssomnias or parasomnias.


Dyssomnias are disorders in which the child has difficulty initiating sleep. They can be further classified into three groups: circadian rhythm disorders, intrinsic dyssomnias, and extrinsic dyssomnias. Circadian rhythm disorders occur when the child has an irregular daily routine, which disrupts the circadian rhythm and causes the child to have difficulty initiating sleep at an appropriate time. Intrinsic dyssomnias refer to disorders which originate or develop within the body, such as narcolepsy. Extrinsic dyssomnias originate or develop from causes external to the child, such as sleep-onset association disorder whereby a child requires an external association to fall asleep (i.e., television or adult) and limit-setting disorder. These are the most common sleep disorders in preschool and primary school-aged children.


Parasomnias are disorders in maintaining sleep and are often a consequence of genetic disposition combined with disassociation between wakefulness, NREM sleep and REM sleep (Kotagal, 2008; Mahowald & Schenck, 1992). They occur predominantly during sleep but also during the transition period between sleep and wake states. They are often broadly grouped as either (1) arousal disorder (sleep terror), (2) parasomnias associated with REM sleep (nightmares), (3) sleep–wake transition (rhythmic movement disorder), and (4) parasomnias associated with any sleep stage. Although parasomnias are considered a benign phenomenon (i.e., they do not usually have a serious impact on sleep quality and quantity), they can result in injury to the child and be disturbing for either the child or the family (Petit, Touchette, Tremblay, Boivin, & Montplaisir, 2007).


2.5.3 Classification: Variations in Beliefs Between Cultures


Cultural norms are another important factor in distinguishing the boundary between “normal” and “problematic” sleep in the family context. It is unreasonable to assume that all families have the same beliefs and expectations when it comes to children’s sleep. What defines a sleep problem is highly dependent upon a family and their cultural background. The when, how long, with whom and where of “normal” sleep is not easily defined, as research has highlighted that numerous aspects of sleep are influenced by cultural standards (Jenni & Werner, 2011; Mindell, Sadeh, Kwon, & Goh, 2013; Palmstierna, Sepa, & Ludvigsson, 2008). Common disparities in child sleep expectations have centered around sleep needs and duration, bedtime routine, and sleeping arrangements (Milan, Snow, & Belay, 2007).


Sleep duration and sleep need are the main focus of most studies involving children’s sleep. Children in Italy between the ages of two and four have been reported to have shorter sleep durations then children in other countries because they often participate in evening social activities with adults (Ottaviano, Giannotti, Cortesi, Bruni, & Ottaviano, 1996). Chinese and Japanese school children have shorter sleep times due to later bedtimes and early rise times associated with a societal focus on academic success (Liu, Liu, & Wang, 2003; Steger, 2003). However, one study comparing sleep patterns and durations between elementary-aged children in the United States (n=494, 5–11 years old) and China (n=517, 7–13 years) reported that the differences in sleep duration between the two cultures, 1 hour less in Chinese students, was associated with more sleep problems and increased daytime tiredness (Liu et al., 2005). The authors did not measure whether there were differences in caregiver perception of a child sleep problem as their measure was originally validated in US children and reflected common practices in that country. The result from this study suggests that the amount of sleep a child needs does not necessarily differ amongst cultures, even though expectations may.


Another common difference is the importance of a set bedtime routine. Most western countries tend to have a high focus on having a distinct presleep routine (Beltramini & Hertzig, 1983). The routine often commences after dinner and involves events such as a bath, dressing in sleep clothes, telling stories, and the child sleeping in their own bed, in their own room, at a set bedtime. By contrast, other countries such as Italy, Spain, and Greece have an unstructured and flexible bedtime (Jenni & O’Connor, 2005; Ottaviano et al., 1996). Although the benefits of having a set bedtime routine have been demonstrated (Mindell et al., 2009), caregivers who do not have an expectation of a consistent bedtime routine and sleep hours may define sleep problems differently than those who do have expectations in these areas. One study of 510 preschool children (age 2–5 years) compared sleep schedules in white, black, and Hispanic families over a 24-hour-period in the United States (Lavigne et al., 1999). Children from the three different cultures had the same amount of sleep. However, the distribution of sleep differed, with more black and Hispanic children reported to have an afternoon nap. Although this may be acceptable during the preschool years, it would impact on child sleep duration at school entry as naps at school are generally not accepted in many Western countries.


The practice of cosleeping refers to when parents share the same bed as their children. This practice has been widely studied with the predominant western conception being that it is not “normal” to cosleep (BaHammam, Alameri, & Hersi, 2008; Berkowitz, 2004; Claudill & Plath, 1966; Cortesi, Giannotti, Sebastiani, & Vagnoni, 2004; Cortesi, Giannotti, Sebastiani, Vagnoni, & Marioni, 2008; Jenni, Fuhrer, Iglowstein, Molinari, & Largo, 2005; Latz, Wolf, & Lozoff, 1999; Liu et al., 2003; Mao, Burnham, Goodlin-Jones, Gaylor, & Anders, 2004; McKenna, Ball, & Gettler, 2007; Shweder, Jensen, & Goldstein, 1995; Weimer et al., 2002; Worthman & Brown, 2007). However, research has shown that it is more often the norm than not. The practice is not isolated to less industrialized countries but is common in technologically advanced countries such as Japan (Latz et al., 1999; Mao et al., 2004).


Many of these cultural beliefs have been influenced by climatic factors, family size, availability of space, and the beliefs about individual independence or family interdependence (Stearns & Rowland, 1996). Therefore, a vast difference in sleep beliefs and expectations exists between cultures and informs the notion of normal sleep for particular families. It is important to take parental perception into account when offering an intervention program. Parents who identify a sleep problem may be more likely to seek assistance and follow through with interventions to improve their child’s sleep than parents who do not.


2.6 Identifying Child Sleep Problems in Clinical Practice


Although it is well-accepted that sleep problems are common, it has also been consistently reported that sleep problems are underdiagnosed in clinical settings (Blunden et al., 2004; Meltzer et al., 2010; Owens, 2001; Smedje, Broman, & Hetta, 1999; Stein, Mendelsohn, Obermeyer, Amromin, & Benca, 2001; Tamay et al., 2006). This disparity between clinical definitions and clinical recognition of child sleep problems may be a reflection of the complexity of detecting sleep problems in areas such as (1) caregiver versus clinician perception of the importance of sleep, (2) what each believes to be a sleep problem, and (3) clinician training in the area of pediatric sleep.


Studies examining clinician competence in defining a sleep problem have often relied on clinical definitions. One study of 361 Australian children aged 4–16 years found that 24.6% of children scored above the clinical range of the Sleep Disturbance Scale for Children. However, only 4.1% of caregivers discussed the problem with their general practitioner and only 7.9% of general practitioners discussed sleep problems with families (Blunden et al., 2004). One study of 472 US children aged between 4 and 12 years reported that only half of caregivers who identify a child sleep problem discussed the issue with their pediatrician (Stein et al., 2001). Another study of 621 US pediatricians reported that less than half felt confident in screening for sleep problems and in their ability to successfully treat child sleep problems (Owens, 2001). One study of 212 directors of psychology programs in the United States reported that only 6% offer formal training programs in sleep and about third offer classes on the treatment of sleep problems (Meltzer, Phillips, & Mindell, 2009). Of the programs that do offer courses and instruction on sleep problems, it was not reported how much of the program is directed towards sleep problems in pediatric populations.


These studies highlight the importance of raising practitioner awareness of the importance of identifying and addressing sleep problems in children. However, simply emphasizing that it is the clinician’s responsibility to identify sleep problems does not take into account caregiver perceptions. Although this could be easily done in clinical settings; it requires greater consideration in community settings.


2.7 Prevalence of Child Sleep Problems in the Community


The prevalence of sleep problems in the general community has been well-documented in preschool and school-aged children (Blader et al., 1997; Fricke-Oerkermann et al., 2007; Hiscock et al., 2007; Kahn et al., 1989; Mindell, 1993; Neveus, Cnattingius, Olsson, & Hetta, 2001; Owens, 2008; Owens, Spirito, et al., 2000; Paavonen et al., 2000; Smedje et al., 1999; Sung, Hiscock, Sciberras, & Efron, 2008). Studies have observed that up to 43% of children have sleep problems, such as difficulty falling asleep and frequent night waking, measured either objectively (actigraphy) or via parent report. Other studies have reported that up to 10% of primary school-aged children have sleep apnea or other sleep disordered breathing problems (Marcus, 2001; Schlaud, Urschitz, Urschitz-Duprat, & Poets, 2004). Thus, the majority of sleep problems reported by parents appear to be behavioral in nature (Hiscock et al., 2007; Owens, Spirito, et al., 2000; Smedje et al., 1999; Smedje, Broman, & Hetta, 2001b).


The Longitudinal Study of Australian Children (LSAC) is a nationally representative study of Australian children’s development and well-being (Nicholson & Sanson, 2003). It has been tracking two cohorts (infant cohort, n=5000, mean age 15 months and preschool cohort, n=5000, mean age=4.6 years) every 2 years since 2004. In the original LSAC preschool cohort, 33.6% of children aged between 4 and 5 years had a sleep problem reported by primary caregivers. The majority of sleep problems were behavioral in nature with 17.8% of primary caregivers reporting a problem with their child waking during the night and 12.4% reporting their child having difficulty getting off to sleep at night. Similar proportions were reported in a follow-up study in the same cohort when the children were 6–7 years old and had commenced school (Quach et al., 2009).


The results from these studies suggest that sleep problems are not homogenous in the population and that a suitable population-level intervention must address the variety of sleep problems reported by caregivers.


2.8 Impact of Sleep Problems on the Child


Several recent studies have delineated the seriousness of the reduction in school performance and quality of life and increased behavior problems that accompany sleep difficulties in school-aged children. Managing sleep difficulties could improve these outcomes. However, majority of these studies have been cross-sectional in nature, and therefore causation cannot be confirmed. If these outcomes improved in a carefully designed and implemented randomized controlled trial of a sleep intervention, then it would suggest that poor sleep does indeed cause child behavioral problems, school difficulties, reduced quality of life, and not vice versa. The next section outlines research into the effect of sleep problems on child behavior, health-related quality of life, learning, and transition to school.



2.8.1 Behavior


The relationship between sleep problems and child behavior has been widely studied. The majority of the studies have been cross-sectional and have consistently reported that poor sleep is associated with increased internalizing and externalizing behavior problems (Chervin et al., 2003; Fallone, Owens, & Deane, 2002; Gau, 2006; Golley, Maher, Matricciani, & Olds, 2013; Gozal & Kheirandish-Gozal, 2007; Hiscock et al., 2007; Meltzer & Mindell, 2008; Mindell, Owens, & Carskadon, 1999; Nixon et al., 2008; Owens, Maxim, Nobile, McGuinn, & Msall, 2000; Owens & Witmans, 2004; Sadeh et al., 2003; Sivertsen et al., 2015; Smedje et al., 2001b; Stein et al., 2001; Sung et al., 2008; Touchette et al., 2009; Urschitz et al., 2004; Yokomaku et al., 2008). In one Australian, longitudinal study, persistent sleep problems from preschool to school had a greater effect on child behavior than new or resolving sleep problems. Children who had a persistent sleep problem had behavior effect size scores of 1.0 for parent report and 0.5 for blinded teacher report when compared to those with no sleep problem.


In a separate study (n=635, 6–8 year olds), specific sleep disturbances were associated with particular dimensions of behavior (Smedje et al., 2001a). Children who had difficulty falling asleep were 2.7 times more likely to have emotional problems, children who exhibited bedtime resistance were 2.6 times more likely to have conduct problems, and children who had problems sleeping through the night were 2.9 times more like to have hyperactivity problems. Another study (n=166, 8–9-year olds), has reported an association between behavioral sleep problems and poorer emotional functioning (El-Sheikh, Buckhalt, Keller, Cummings, & Acebo, 2007; El-Sheikh, Buckhalt, Mark Cummings, & Keller, 2007). In a further study, children with habitual snoring (n=1144, grade 4–6) sleep problems were associated with 2.4 times increased likelihood of hyperactive behavior and four times increased the likelihood of inattentive behavior (Urschitz et al., 2004). Whilst a recent Australian study found evidence for a bidirectional relationship between child sleep problems and externalizing problems, it appeared that sleep problems contributed to later internalizing difficulties but not vice versa (Quach, Nguyen, Williams, & Sciberras, 2018). A similar pattern was also seen in infants and preschoolers (Williams, Berthelsen, Walker, & Nicholson, 2017). This suggests that the pathway between sleep problems and child behavior may vary based on the type of behavioral difficulty.



The association between child sleep problems and behavioral problems may be caused by the sleep deficiency associated with sleep problems. Sleep deficiency affects the frontal lobe of the brain, which is responsible for the control of emotions, spontaneity, language, and social behavior (O’Brien, Tauman, & Gozal, 2004). As previously described, sleep deficiency decreases a child’s ability to control emotions and increases behavioral problems and daytime fatigue (Chervin et al., 2003; Fallone et al., 2002; Gozal & Kheirandish-Gozal, 2007; Meltzer & Mindell, 2008; Nixon et al., 2008; Owens & Witmans, 2004; Sadeh et al., 2003). One study has demonstrated that children whose sleep problems have resolved have better behavioral outcomes than those with new or persistent sleep problems (Quach et al., 2009).


2.8.2 Health-Related Quality of Life


The impact of sleep problems on the child’s health-related quality of life (HRQoL) has received limited attention in preschool and older school-aged children (Garetz, 2008; Gustafsson et al., 2016; Hiscock et al., 2007; Mitchell & Kelly, 2007; Paiva, Gaspar, & Matos, 2015; Quach et al., 2009; Stewart, Glaze, Friedman, Smith, & Bautista, 2005; Sung et al., 2008). In public health research, the concept of HRQoL refers to a patient’s (or caregiver’s) perceived impact of a condition on the patient’s daily functioning in a variety of domains, including physical, mental and social domains (Guyatt, Feeny, & Patrick, 1993; Pal, 1996; Vivier, Bernier, & Starfield, 1994). These domains are similar to the World Health Organization’s definition of health (WHO, 1948). However, the measurement of HRQoL in pediatric populations needs to be developmentally appropriate. Measuring HRQoL is an important outcome in pediatric populations where many conditions do not result in mortality but still demonstrate a burden of disease. In school populations, traditional measures such as school absences have been criticized as being unreliable indicators of the burden of illness (McCowan, Bryce, Neville, Crombie, & Clark, 1996).


Studies that have examined the effect of treating child sleep problems and compared pre- and postintervention HRQoL have to date only been conducted in children with obstructive apnea (De Serres et al., 2002; Garetz, 2008; Mitchell & Kelly, 2007; Stewart et al., 2005). These studies have reported a positive improvement in the child’s HRQoL after surgical intervention (Mitchell & Kelly, 2007; Stewart et al., 2005). In one study of children whose OSA improved, 95% reported an improvement in their HRQoL (Mitchell & Kelly, 2007). In another study of 101 children (mean age 6.2 years) with OSA, caregivers reported an effect size of 1.6 between pre- and postintervention scores for child HRQoL (De Serres et al., 2002)—that is, HRQoL scores improved by 1.6 of a standard deviation postintervention.


2.8.3 Learning and Academic Achievement


Many cross-sectional studies have observed an association between child sleep problems and various domains of academic achievement (Curcio, Ferrara, & De Gennaro, 2006; Fallone, Acebo, Arnedt, Seifer, & Carskadon, 2001; Mayes, Calhoun, Bixler, & Vgontzas, 2008; Meijer, 2008; Quach et al., 2009; Ravid, Afek, Suraiya, Shahar, & Pillar, 2009; Sadeh et al., 2003; Shochat, Cohen-Zion, & Tzischinsky, 2014; Steenari et al., 2003; Talamini, Nieuwenhuis, Takashima, & Jensen, 2008; Tarokh, Saletin, & Carskadon, 2016; Touchette et al., 2007; Wilhelm, Diekelmann, & Born, 2008).


Academic achievement is the result of the interplay between multiple factors such as the child’s intelligence, motivation, behavior, achievement motivation, and external influences such as SES and caregiver education achievement (Wolfson & Carskadon, 2003). The role of sleep in learning and memory consolidation has been well-studied in both children and adult populations (Mograss, Guillem, & Godbout, 2008; Nissen et al., 2006; Stickgold et al., 2001; Talamini et al., 2008; Wilhelm et al., 2008). Consistently, absence or lack of sleep is associated with poorer learning and memory consolidation and retention (see also Chapter 7).


In a study of children aged 9–14 years (Meijer et al., 2000), poor sleep was associated with poor attention. The quality of sleep had a direct positive relationship with the child’s receptiveness to the teacher’s influence, self-image, achievement motivation, and control of aggression. These effects were echoed in another study (n=146, mean 8.1 years), where children who experienced daytime tiredness had poorer teacher ratings of academic performance (Chervin et al., 2003). Similarly, child sleep problems have been reported to impair other domains of learning such as alertness, attentiveness, and academic skills (Quach et al., 2009; Sadeh et al., 2003; Suratt et al., 2007; Touchette et al., 2007). A study of 166 children aged 8–9 years old reported that when children from different SES areas have adequate sleep (measured by actigraphy and self-report), there is no difference in their cognitive functioning. However, when they have poor sleep, those from low SES backgrounds performed worse than those from high SES areas (Buckhalt, El-Sheikh, & Keller, 2007). Whilst considering the role of underlying factors such as child IQ and memory formation, sleep problems may extrinsically impact the child’s ability to fulfill their intrinsic capabilities through decreasing their motivation and openness to learning. This in turn may adversely impact on a child’s educational progression.


2.9 Impact of Sleep Problems on the Primary Caregiver


The impact of child sleep problems is not isolated to the child. As these problems occur in the family setting, they may also impact on the child’s caregivers. The most widely studied area has been parent mental health (Bayer, Hiscock, Hampton, & Wake, 2007; Hiscock & Wake, 2001; Martin, Hiscock, Hardy, Davey, & Wake, 2007; Meltzer & Mindell, 2007). A study of children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder found that poor child sleep is also associated with poorer parent work attendance (Sung et al., 2008).


2.9.1 Mental Health


Sleep problems are associated with poor parent mental health in the preschool years (Bayer et al., 2007; Hiscock & Wake, 2001; Martin et al., 2007; Parfitt & Ayers, 2014), but it is not known if this is true for school-aged children. Research in chronically ill children suggests an association between child sleep and poor parent mental health (Boman, Lindahl, & Bjork, 2003; Cottrell & Khan, 2005; Jan et al., 2008; Meltzer & Moore, 2008; Moore, David, Murray, Child, & Arkwright, 2006). However, it is unclear whether the sleep problems had a direct association with parent mental health or whether the child’s diagnosis was the predominant factor. In infants, sleep problems increase maternal report of postnatal depression symptoms, and treatment of the infant’s sleep problem results in a significant improvement in maternal mood (Hiscock & Wake, 2001, 2002).


Only a few studies have examined the impact of preschool and school-aged child’s sleep problems and parent mental health in healthy populations.



In a study of 47 mothers of children aged 3–14 years (Meltzer & Mindell, 2007), the authors reported that child sleep problems predicted poor maternal sleep quality. In addition, poor maternal sleep predicted poorer daytime functioning, variations in mood and increased stress and fatigue. These conclusions were similar to those reported in another study of 107 caregivers of children aged 2–12 years (Boergers, Hart, Owens, Streisand, & Spirito, 2007). However, the results can only be interpreted as an association as opposed to a prediction given the cross-sectional nature of the study. The authors did not assess whether there was an association between child sleep problems and maternal mental health, rather they focused upon maternal sleep quality.


Another study of 4470 families in Hong Kong has reported that child sleep problems alter the sleep cycles of both mothers and fathers and is associated with a reduction in caregiver sleep duration (Zhang, Li, Fok, & Wing, 2010). The association between child sleep and poor maternal sleep quality is not surprising since adult studies have indicated that reduced sleep leads to decreased attention, poorer memory and depressed mood (Banks & Dinges, 2007).


In the LSAC preschool cohort, it was reported that preschool sleep problems are weakly associated with both maternal and paternal mental distress (Martin et al., 2007). This weak association may be a result of the study use of a general mental health measure (the Kessler 6) that only measures severe psychological distress. Infant studies have predominantly focused on specific parent mental health domains such as depression and it is possible that child sleep problems affect only certain mental health domains (Bayer et al., 2007; Hiscock & Wake, 2001). Therefore, future research which measures a number of specific mental health domains (i.e., depression, anxiety, and stress) may find a stronger association.


In school entry children, sleep problems may be associated with poorer parent mental health in specific domains and treating child sleep problems may yield similar improvements to those demonstrated in infants. However, there is no evidence to date as to which specific mental health domains, if any, would be improved by improving the child’s sleep.


2.10 Conclusion


The chapter has highlighted the importance of children’s sleep for their own well-being, as well as their parents. It has presented research as to how sleep is regulated, and the biological and environmental factors which regulate sleep in children. Difficulties in sleep can be identified, as well as the different areas in which poor or inadequate sleep impacts on children’s day-to-day functioning in areas of well-being, learning as well as their parent’s mental health.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jun 13, 2021 | Posted by in PSYCHOLOGY | Comments Off on Overview of Sleep in Children

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access