Peer and Consumer Involvement in the Psychiatric Emergency Service



Peer and Consumer Involvement in the Psychiatric Emergency Service


Lisa Halpern

Ken Duckworth



Emergency department (ED) caregivers, particularly when coping with psychiatric emergencies, face numerous challenges in the delivery of comprehensive and respectful care. These include challenging interactions with consumers (or survivors or ex-patients—there is a vibrant debate among people living with mental illness about the labels that should be used to refer to them) and family members, lengthy waits for inpatient beds, frequent understaffing, the risk of staff injury during a behavioral emergency, and other unpredictably difficult circumstances and risks. Further complicating the situation, coverage may be provided by a moonlighting resident who is not integrated into the clinical team. Despite these pressures, given the fragmentation and underfunding of mental health services (1), EDs will continue to be an essential element of psychiatric care.

Similarly, the consumer and family component of the service equation is fraught with challenges. The individual who arrives seeking services, or who is brought involuntarily, is likely to be experiencing fear, anxiety, desperation, rage, and shame. Arriving in an involuntary manner compounds the intake process. In addition, the consumer may be delusional, manic, intoxicated, suicidal, abused, impoverished, or assaultive. Family members may be allies or in conflict with the individual seeking psychiatric services.

These two halves of this service equation can add up to difficult interfaces. In a 2006 Internet survey conducted by the National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI) of 465 consumer members and 254 family members or friends who accompanied the consumer to ED services following a suicide attempt, many troubling experiences were reported. Fewer than 40% of consumers felt that the ED staff listened to them, described the nature of treatments to them, or took their suicide attempt seriously. Additionally, more than half of the consumers and more than a third of family members felt directly rebuked or stigmatized by staff. Consumers and family members also reported negative experiences involving a perception of unprofessional staff behavior and long wait times (2).



A BRIEF HISTORY OF THE CONSUMER MOVEMENT

During the past decade, “recovery” has been the mantra bringing about massive change in the models that offer to explain mental health and inform mental health services. For example, the President’s New Freedom Commission for Mental Health in 2002 endorsed a “recovery-based model of community services.” Prior to this point, consumers had to reconnoiter a mental health system that considered serious psychiatric disorders harbingers of doom (3). Despite the longitudinal body of evidence by Harding et al. (4,5) demonstrating long-term improvements for many, people with serious mental illness were frequently told to accept that a “normal” life was impossible, independence unattainable, and institutionalization unavoidable.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jun 13, 2016 | Posted by in PSYCHIATRY | Comments Off on Peer and Consumer Involvement in the Psychiatric Emergency Service

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access