CHAPTER 11 Inge Petersen1, Arvin Bhana1, Crick Lund2 and Helen Herrman3 1 School of Applied Human Sciences, Howard College, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa 2 Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, Cape Town, South Africa 3 Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia In the context of the growing burden of mental disorders, there is increasing concern over the cost and capacity of societies worldwide to provide treatment services. Increasing evidence of the effectiveness of mental disorder prevention, as well as economic evaluation studies showing a substantial return on investment, particularly for interventions early in the lifespan [1, 2], make the case for increased investment in prevention of mental disorders. Using an integrated measure of disability adjusted life-years (DALYs)1 which combines years lived with disability (YLD) with years of life lost (YLL), the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) Report 2004 indicates that neuropsychiatric disorders account for 13% of the GBD. The burden varies according to country income levels, accounting for 25% of the total burden in high-income countries, 16.6% in middle-income countries and 8.8% in low-income countries [3]. Globally, unipolar depression is the third leading overall burden and the leading burden amongst women (15–44 years). It is predicted to rise to the overall leading GBD by 2030 [4]. The prevention of mental disorders follows the public health understanding of prevention, occurring at three levels, namely, primary, secondary and tertiary [5]. Primary prevention aims to reduce the onset of mental disorders, thus reducing incidence. Secondary and tertiary prevention do not reduce incidence, but seek to lower the prevalence of established cases. Secondary prevention is concerned with early detection and treatment of mental disorders and tertiary prevention aims to reduce relapse and disability as well as enhance rehabilitation and morbidity. Secondary and tertiary prevention thus do not aim to reduce incidence, but together with primary prevention and treatment, share the common goal of reducing the burden of mental disorders [6]. Mental health promotion overlaps with primary prevention and is essentially concerned with promoting optimal mental and behavioural health and psycho-physiological development [7, 8]. Both mental health promotion and primary prevention aim to reduce risk factors for mental ill health as well as strengthen protective factors for mental well-being. They are thus interrelated. Promoting mental health may have an effect on reducing the incidence of mental disorders, as positive mental health is protective against mental disorders. Mental disorder prevention may use mental health promotion strategies. Both concepts may thus be present in the same intervention, but have different and complementary outcomes [9]. The scope of this chapter is limited to primary prevention, although the relationship between mental health promotion, the different levels of prevention and with treatment is often blurred. For example, treatment of depression in adults may prevent the onset of mental disorders in their children, and treatment of childhood depression can help to prevent depression in adulthood [6]. Primary prevention interventions can be universal, selective or indicated. Universal interventions target the whole population, with the assumption that the intervention is likely to benefit the entire population. Selective interventions target individuals or groups whose risk of developing a mental disorder is elevated as a result of biological, social or psychological risk factors. Indicated prevention programmes target individuals having preclinical minimum but detectable signs of mental illness that do not warrant a diagnosis of a mental disorder. Selective and indicated interventions are likely to show more focused benefits, given the elevated risk among the target groups for the development of disorders. Gordon [10] understands primary prevention as being aimed at people who do not show any suffering, discomfort or disability from the disorder to be prevented. Consequently, it has been suggested that indicated primary prevention overlaps with secondary prevention or early intervention for symptoms that may be part of the initial or prodromal phase of a disorder [11]. The importance of indicated prevention is, however, underscored by findings that the longer the duration of a disorder, the more difficult it is to treat [12]. Thus, even if it is considered early intervention, indicated prevention is likely to have better outcomes than delayed treatment. Primary prevention interventions are essentially concerned with reducing risk and strengthening protective factors for the development of mental disorders. Risk factors refer to conditions that increase the probability of onset of a mental disorder, as well as greater severity and duration of the disorder. By contrast, protective factors serve to improve a person’s resilience to risk factors through modifying, mediating, ameliorating or altering conditions to promote more adaptive responses to environmental stressors [13]. The recent surge in evidence from developmental neuroscience and life course development and epidemiological studies provide evidence of malleable social and environmental risk factors that are associated with the development of mental disorders. While family and gene association studies have demonstrated a genetic susceptibility to mental disorders, such as autism, schizophrenia, addiction and bipolar disorder; evidence from advances in developmental neuroscience indicate that the onset of most mental disorders is determined by an interaction of multiple interacting genetic and environmental factors as well as life experiences. The impact of environmental factors and life experience on the development of a mental disorder is mediated by genetic vulnerability. In turn, the impact of genetic vulnerability is mediated by environmental factors and life experiences [6]. Developmental neuroscience also provides biological evidence of, inter alia: (i) The neural plasticity of the human brain – how physiological processes, environmental factors and life experiences affect basic neurodevelopmental processes such as neuronal migration, synaptogenesis, synaptic pruning and myelination, all of which can effect neurocognitive and socio-emotional functioning; (ii) The epigenetic modification of genes to the environment that has enduring effects and can even be transmitted to the next generation. Early exposure to stress, for example, can result in epigenetic modifications in a person’s stress response which influences reactivity to stress later in life; and (iii) There are also sensitive periods in brain development where environmental influences can affect specific developmental processes. The most sensitive period is during prenatal development and infancy, although plasticity does persist into adulthood. In adults, this is thought to underpin the mechanisms by which the brain can compensate or recover from a mental disorder. For example, through cognitive reappraisal, adults can improve self-regulatory control of thoughts, emotions and behaviour, learning to reassign different emotional labels to stimuli that previously evoked unpleasant emotions. This is a technique used in cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), commonly used to treat anxiety and depressive disorders in adolescents and adults [6]. These advances in developmental neuroscience, together with epidemiological and life course development studies, have resulted in an emerging body of evidence that highlights specific opportunities for strengthening protective factors and reducing risk factors at critical developmental stages when the effect of such interventions are likely to be most beneficial. The emerging evidence on the role played by social determinants (discussed in the Section ‘Risk factors for mental disorders across the lifespan’) and their interaction with genetic influences in the onset of mental disorders suggests that mental disorders can be prevented by reducing environmental risk factors and negative life experiences and enhancing protective factors. Given particular developmental vulnerabilities across the lifespan, the need for a developmental approach which is sensitive to this is indicated. The multifaceted nature of risk influences also demands a multifaceted response. This supports the adoption of an ecological developmental approach such as that provided by Bronfenbrenner [14] three decades ago. An ecological developmental approach provides a framework for addressing the multiple risk and protective factors that interact in the development of mental disorders, as well as being sensitive to particular developmental vulnerabilities associated with lifespan development. As indicated in the Section ‘Recent evidence from advances in developmental neuroscience’, the most sensitive period in the life of a human being is during prenatal development and infancy. Environmental exposure and life experiences during this period lay the foundation for future development and well-being. The preschool years (3–5 years), middle childhood (6–12 years) and adolescence are all associated with specific developmental vulnerabilities that interact with environmental factors and life experiences to affect the development of adult competencies, which in turn can impact on the development and health of the next generation. As indicated, risk and protective factors for the development of mental disorders are also multifaceted. They range from individual level factors, that include genetic influences, personality and physical health; proximal interpersonal and immediate factors related to family, peer, school and community factors; to more distal factors related to societal structural and cultural factors, that provide the context for exposure to environmental influences and life experiences. Mental ill health generally results from the interplay of multiple risk factors within the context of a paucity of protective factors, having a cumulative effect on the development of mental disorders. In view of the emerging evidence on social determinants of mental disorders, there is a need for distal societal and population level interventions to reduce risk factors that result from upstream social determinants. These include gender and socio-economic policies that promote inequities resulting in marginalized populations being more vulnerable to risk factors for mental disorders. Addressing distal gender and economic policy level factors are key public health endeavours that overlap with many initiatives aimed at combating socio-economic inequities and promoting human and socio-economic development globally. They are not unique to the prevention of mental disorders. In the main, interventions that are unique to the prevention of mental disorders operate at the individual and proximal levels, strengthening protective factors to moderate or mediate the impact of risk factors, building resilience in the face of exposure to risk. With moderation, the outcome of exposure to a risk factor is moderated by protective factors that interact with a risk factor. For example, a supportive warm relationship with an existing caregiver can moderate the impact of loss of an attachment figure in a child’s life. With respect to mediation, the effect of a protective factor operates independently from a risk factor, compensating for the negative outcome of the risk factor. For example, the impact of early loss of a caregiver can be compensated for by the introduction of another attachment figure following the loss [6, 15]. The most successful examples of primary prevention programmes are those that target strengthening multiple protective factors. For example, a review of the determinants of family resilience in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) emphasised the dynamic transactions and relationships between the individual, the community and the dominant culture. Social support and community ties were noted to be particularly important in promoting resilience in LMICs [16]. As indicated in the Section ‘Recent evidence from advances in developmental neuroscience’, developmental neural plasticity is most prominent during prenatal development and early infancy. During this period, the brain develops rapidly and environmental influences can affect basic neurodevelopmental processes such as neuronal migration, synaptogenesis, synaptic pruning and myelination. Together with epidemiological and life course studies, there is an emerging body of evidence on the impact of the following risk factors on these neurodevelopmental processes. Prenatally, micronutrient deficiencies, especially low vitamin folic acid and iodine can affect brain development causing irreversible neurocognitive deficits [17, 18]. Vitamin folic acid deficiency has been associated with disorders in the formation of the neural tube [6]. Iron deficiency can also cause neurocognitive deficits and poor socio-emotional development in children [17, 18]. Epidemiological studies indicate increased risk of schizophrenia in children born during famines. This is thought to be a result of deprivation of essential micronutrients causing disruptions in brain development [19]. Prenatal exposure to infectious diseases such influenza, rubella and toxoplasmosis can also affect neural developmental processes increasing risk for mental retardation, schizophrenia and autism [6]. Prenatal and postnatal exposure to environmental toxins such as lead, arsenic, pesticides, tobacco smoke and alcohol also negatively affects the developing brain, placing the developing foetus and infant at risk for neurocognitive deficits. For example, alcohol prenatally can result in foetal alcohol syndrome (FAS) associated with facial anomalies, growth retardation and abnormalities in the central nervous system, which can cause neurocognitive and social deficits in children, as well as substance abuse in adulthood [20, 21]. Prenatal and postnatal exposure to lead and prenatal exposure to tobacco smoke can result in attention deficit and conduct disorder in school-going children [22, 23]. Premature birth and low birth weight are also risk factors for a number of disorders including schizophrenia, autism and learning disabilities [6]. Anoxia as a consequence of birth trauma, is associated with brain malfunction, which can cause a range of mental and physical disabilities [20]. Postnatally, the development of a secure attachment relationship between an infant and his/her caregiver is essential for healthy development [20]. Disturbances in early infant–caregiver relationships such as loss of primary attachment figures, caregiver depression, as well as abuse and neglect can result in disturbances in social and emotional development and interpersonal attachments later in life in the form of behavioural disorders, anxiety, depression and attention problems [20]. This is thought to be a result of the development of abnormalities in stress-response hormone production [6]. Deprivation in cognitive and psychosocial stimulation during infancy has also been found to be associated with cognitive and socio-emotional impairment [20]. The development of synapses or connections between neurons reaches its peak during infancy; the synapse being the primary site of information transfer in the nervous system. Cognitive and socio-emotional impairment during this period is thought to be as a result of synaptic pruning, whereby some synaptic connections that are unused as a result of lack of environmental stimulation are pruned. Given plasticity persists throughout childhood and adulthood, regeneration of neurons and synapses is possible, but is contingent on environmental stimulation [6]. Many of these risk factors during prenatal development and infancy are more prevalent in scarce-resourced contexts. Iron deficiency anaemia is widespread in LMICs, and associated with dietary deficiency as well as helminthic infestations, malaria and diarrheal disease [17]. A third of children in LMICs under the age of 5 years have stunted growth for their age, a measure of chronic under-nutrition [17]. LMICs also have a much higher rate of infectious diseases such as HIV/AIDS and malaria that can result in neurocognitive deficits if untreated [4]. Raised lead exposure affects about 40% of children in LMICs [17]. Preschool children (3–5 years) begin to start regulating their attention, emotions, motor behavior and cognitions, developing a sense of a distinct self-identity [20]. They begin to be exposed to influences beyond the family and the development of social relatedness and self-regulatory control, which form the building blocks for healthy cognitive and social competence, are important developmental tasks. Exposure to undue stress such as child maltreatment, family conflict/violence or parental loss/separation can interfere with the emerging self-regulatory processes, resulting in regressive behaviours such as bed-wetting and anxiety in preschool children.
Primary Prevention of Mental Disorders
Introduction
Definition of primary prevention
Recent evidence from advances in developmental neuroscience
An ecological developmental approach
Risk factors for mental disorders across the lifespan
Prenatal development and infancy
Childhood and adolescence

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

