Recurrence rate (%)
After first unprovoked seizure
40
After two unprovoked seizures
73
After three unprovoked seizures
76
After treating first unprovoked seizure
15
Table 15.2
Risk of seizure recurrence after first symptomatic seizure (Hesdorffer et al.)
Acute (%) | Remote (%) | |
---|---|---|
Stroke | 33 | 71.5 |
TBI | 13.4 | 46.6 |
CNS Infection | 16.63 | 63.5 |
Table 15.3
Seizure recurrence rates at 6 and 24 months, after treatment or no treatment
Seizure rate | |||
---|---|---|---|
Untreated (%) | Treated (%) | ||
Italian FIRST study 1993 (n = 397) | 6 months | 41 | 17 |
24 months | 51 | 25 | |
UK MESS study 2005 (n = 1443) | 6 months | 26 | 18 |
24 months | 39 | 32 |
- v.
Seizure recurrence after the first unprovoked seizure according to etiologic factors and EEG findings Berg and Shinnar [ 4 ]:
Etiology
Idiopathic 32 %
Symptomatic 57 %
EEG
Normal 27 %
Epileptiform 58 %
Etiology + EEG
Idiopathic + Normal 24 %
Symptomatic + Abnormal EEG 65 %
Focal onset seizures had higher risk of recurrence than generalized-onset seizures. A first seizure occurring during sleep also had higher risk for recurrence than a seizure occurring during wakefulness. The other risk factors for seizure recurrence included status epilepticus as first seizure, abnormal interictal neurological examination, abnormal brain imaging, multiple or clustered seizures at onset, and strong family history of seizures.
Treatment decision after first seizure
This subject has always been controversial as scholars usually differ in their practices of treating or not treating the first seizure. In general, about 60 % of the patients who had their first seizure will never have another one. In this case, it is appropriate to give the facts to the patient and let them make their decisions. If the patient prefers not to be treated and understands the risk of receiving no treatment, it is perfectly acceptable not to treat. Some patients will insist on being treated since they do not want to risk another seizure. In this case, treatment is offered for these patients provided that they understand the seizure recurrence risk is decreased but not necessarily eliminated with treatment. After an acute or remote symptomatic (cerebral insult) seizure in a clinically unstable patient, treatment is usually indicated without waiting for a second seizure. Selecting an appropriate antiepileptic (AED) is quite challenging task in most cases. This is due to the presence of multiple AED options and very little predictability of good response. In addition, efficacy and tolerability of AEDs may strongly differ among individuals.
There are several available factors that could help us make an educated decision of what AED would be best to start with. The spectrum of a particular AED (narrow or broad) is one of these factors (Table 15.4). In general, narrow spectrum AEDs are reserved for seizures with known. When seizure classification is unclear, it is wiser to initiate a broad spectrum agent AED. The reason for this approach is that most narrow spectrum AEDs will not benefit patients with generalized-onset seizures or generalized epilepsies. On the contrary, some narrow spectrum AEDs could cause worsening of seizures if given to a patient with generalized-onset seizures (see Table 15.4).
Table 15.4
Grouping of AEDs according to their spectrum of activity
Broad spectrum AEDs | Narrow spectrum AEDs |
---|---|
Valproate | Phenytoin* |
Felbamate | Ezogabine* |
Phenobarbital# | Perampanel* |
Lamotrigine | Lacosamide* |
Topiramate | Carbamazepine~ |
Zonisamide | Gabapentin~ |
Levetiracetam | Pregabalin~ |
Benzodiazepines | Tiagabine~ |
Primidone | Oxcarbazepine~ |
Vigabatrin@ | |
Rufinamide | |
Ethosuximide |
Mechanism of action (MOA) is another factor that may influence the selection of an AED (Table 15.5). However, the role of MOA is very limited, and the existing data do not support consideration of MOA as a major criterion in choosing an AED. Many AEDs have multiple MOAs, and some have unknown MOAs. This makes it even more difficult to make a judgment based on MOA alone [5, 6]. According to a study by Deckers CL et al., there is some evidence showing that AED polytherapy based on MOA may enhance effectiveness. In particular, combining a sodium channel blocker with a drug enhancing GABAergic inhibitor could be an advantageous combination. Combining two GABA mimetic drugs or combining an AMPA antagonist with an NMDA antagonist may enhance efficacy, but tolerability may be reduced with this combination.
Table 15.5
Mechanism of action of AEDs
AED | Enhancement of GABA-mediated excitation | Blockade of sodium channels | Blockade of calcium channels | Inhibition of glutamate | Other |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benzodiazepines& | + | +* | |||
Carbamazepine | + | ||||
Ethosuximide | + (T-type) | ||||
Phenobarbital& | + | + | + | ||
Phenytoin | + | ||||
Valproate | + | + | + (T-type) | + | |
Gabapentin | + (L-type)$ | ||||
Pregabalin | + (L-type)$ | ||||
Felbamate | + | + | + | ||
Lamotrigine | + | + (L-type) | |||
Levetiracetam | +@ | ||||
Oxcarbazepine | + | + (L-type) | |||
Tiagabine^ | + | ||||
Topiramate~ | + | + | + (L-type) | + | + |
Zonisamide~ | + | + (L-type) | + | + | |
Lacosamide | +# | ||||
Rufinamide | +# | ||||
Vigabatrin% | + |
Other Factors Influencing AED Selection
Seizure type/classification
Epilepsy syndrome
Established drug efficacy for a particular seizure type or epilepsy syndrome
Safety
Tolerability profile
Co-morbidities (weight, cognition, psychiatric, other)
Side-effect profile
Metabolic status (renal, hepatic)
Drug-drug interactions
Drug formulations
Ease of administration/titration
Pregnancy or contraceptionStay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel
Full access? Get Clinical Tree