Psychiatric and behaviour disorders among children and adolescents with intellectual disability



Psychiatric and behaviour disorders among children and adolescents with intellectual disability


Bruce J. Tonge



Introduction

Psychopathology is 2-3 times more common in intellectually disabled (ID) children than in the general population.(1,2) Psychiatric disorder is the most common source of additional handicap causing loss of educational, recreational, and social opportunity, burden for carers and cost to the community. Numerically, the size of this problem is approximately equal to schizophrenia, but is less well-recognized due to diagnostic over shadowing in which psychiatric disorder is not differentiated from ID as a separate condition open to diagnosis and treatment.(2) Although there is probably a significant reduction in overall prevalence of psychiatric disorders from approximately 43 per cent of children to 37 per cent of young adults with ID, psychopathology if present in childhood is likely to persist.(2) The profile of disorders varies from childhood into young adult life with the prevalence of attention-deficit hyperactivity symptoms decreasing, the frequency of symptoms of depression increasing and the prevalence of anxiety remaining stable with maturation.(2)


Diagnosis and classification

There are two approaches to the description and classification of psychopathology in young people with ID. First is the application of DSM and ICD diagnostic criteria. The reliability and validity of this approach is not well established when applied to children with ID.(3) Young people with more severe ID and language impairment are unable to report abnormalities of their emotions, thoughts, and perceptions, which are criteria for conditions such as obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and schizophrenia. Some diagnoses, for example attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)(4) require a judgement that symptoms are inconsistent with developmental level, which in a child with ID is delayed relative to chronological age. The DSM-IV TR(4) specifies that either ADHD or separation anxiety disorder should not be made ‘exclusively during the course of a pervasive developmental disorder’. These restrictions on comorbid diagnosis should not limit the necessity to describe the range of presenting symptoms and offer appropriate treatment, for example the use of stimulant medication in a child with autism and severe ADHD symptoms. Developmental level and degree of cognitive impairment influence the presentation of symptoms. For example, children with ID are more likely than children in general, to have externalizing symptoms such as disruptive, aggressive, impulsive, or avoidant behaviours; if psychotic to experience hallucinations without delusions; or if depressed to present with irritability and stereotypies. Self-absorbed, autistic, and withdrawn behaviours are more common in children with severe ID whereas anxiety, disruptive, and aggressive behaviours are more likely in children with milder levels of ID.(2) Some patterns of psychopathology recognized by DSM-IV TR(4) are specifically associated with more severe ID such as ‘stereotypic movement disorder with or without self-injurious behaviour’. Other emotional and behavioural disturbances seen in people with ID receive non-specific, atypical, or not otherwise specified classifications and await better definition. Recent attempts to produce diagnostic criteria for psychiatric disorders in people with ID (the draft ICD-10 guidelines for the psychiatric assessment
of persons with mental retardation,(5) the Royal College of Psychiatrists diagnostic criteria for psychiatric disorders for use with adults with learning disabilities(6) and the DSM-IV TR for intellectual disability(7) are mainly designed for use with adults and require clinical validation).

The second approach to the definition of psychopathology in young people with ID is the use of informant questionnaires which rate disturbed emotions and behaviour. Factor analysis produces subscales which have clinical utility and refer to dimensions of disturbance such as disruptive/antisocial behaviours, social withdrawal, self-absorbed behaviours, communication disturbance, and anxiety/depression. Two reliable questionnaires validated for use in children and adolescents with ID are the Nisonger Child Behaviour Rating form(8) and the Developmental Behaviour Checklist.(9)

The multiaxial classification system of DSM or ICD, revised for use in people with ID, should form the basis of diagnosis of psychiatric disorder in young people with ID, but are usefully supplemented with standardized information gathered from informant questionnaires.


Contributing factors and context

Assessment of the psychopathology associated with ID requires consideration of the biopsychosocial context.


(a) Cognitive profile

A standardized cognitive assessment provides essential information to inform diagnosis and guide treatment. The level of intellectual and language ability gives an indication of the child’s capacity to comprehend and communicate their perceptions, thoughts, and emotions. Subjective experiences such as grief, anxiety, hallucinations, and delusions cannot be assessed if the child is unable to communicate; therefore, psychopathology is more likely to be indirectly expressed by behaviour similar to that seen normally in younger children. For example, depression may be manifest as irritability, anxiety displayed by rocking or aggression and auditory hallucinations inferred from distressed covering of ears or self-injury.(7) Diagnosis is more speculative when the level of ID is more severe because the expression of emotions and behaviour is more atypical hence there is a greater use of unclassified or organic brain syndrome diagnoses. The cognitive subtest profile may also assist diagnosis. For example, children with autism usually perform better on visuo-motor tasks compared to verbal, imitation, and social comprehension tasks and therefore communicate and learn better if information is presented visually. The discovery of inattention and working memory deficits might help to confirm a diagnosis of ADHD.


(b) Temperament

As for the general population, difficult temperamental characteristics such as high levels of emotionality and activity and poor sociability, increase the risk of emotional and behavioural disorders, particularly in boys with mild ID. A difficult temperament might be enduring but improved parental understanding and management skills improve adaptation and reduce disturbed behaviour.


(c) Medical issues

A medical assessment is necessary, both to establish the cause of the ID, if known, and to determine if any medical conditions might be contributing to the emotional and behavioural problem. ID is associated with an increased risk of poor health in general, of brain disorders such as epilepsy (e.g. affecting 20 per cent of children with autism) and of medical complications associated with known causes of ID, such as cardiac and bowel abnormalities in Down syndrome, sensory impairments and deafness in Rubella embryopathy and the neuro-cutaneous brain lesions of tuberous sclerosis which are associated with tic disorder, autistic symptoms, and psychosis.(10) Disturbed behaviour might be the only manifestation of illnesses such as migraine, dental caries, and otitismedia in children with ID who are unable to talk about their pain. Psychoactive drugs are overprescribed in children with ID and their side effects are a well-recognized cause of behavioural and emotional disturbance and paradoxical effects. For example neuroleptic drugs may produce drowsiness, akathisia, and dystonic reactions. Irritability, anxiety, mood disturbance, and tics can be unacceptable side effects of stimulant medication. When prescribing drugs it is essential to systematically record behaviour and monitor side effects to confirm that the drug has a beneficial effect on target symptoms.(9)


(d) Behavioural phenotype

Specific genetic causes of ID often have characteristic patterns of psychopathology of relevance to diagnosis, treatment, and research (see Table 10.5.1.1).(11,12)


(e) Social and family influences

Children with ID are more likely than other children to experience adverse events such as poverty, socio-economic disadvantage, respite care and institutional care, rejection, social exclusion, teasing, school adjustment problems, abuse and neglect.(13) Their limited cognitive ability to comprehend adverse experiences may compromise adaptation. Parental stress, grief, guilt, and mental health problems and poor socio-economic circumstances are factors which are likely to adversely affect attachment and the quality of family care and aggravate child psychopathology.(14) In turn, behaviour problems, communication difficulties and lack of social responsiveness, for example in children with autism, predict maternal stress and mental health problems and placement of the child in out of home care.(15) Cultural responses, expectations, and attitudes may also influence parenting practices and the nature of care provided to children with ID. Observation and assessment of the quality of care, adverse events, parental mental health, family stress, resources, and community support is necessary to understand their contribution to psychopathology and implications for management. These factors are listed in AXIS V of the draft ICD-10 guide for mental retardation.(5)

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Sep 9, 2016 | Posted by in PSYCHIATRY | Comments Off on Psychiatric and behaviour disorders among children and adolescents with intellectual disability

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access