Psychiatric Occupational Therapy in the Corporate, Insurance and Medico-legal Sectors

13
Psychiatric Occupational Therapy in the Corporate, Insurance and Medico-legal Sectors


Lee Randall


Occupational Therapy private practitioner, Director of Integrated Disability Equity Action CC, Johannesburg, South Africa


Introduction


Psychiatric illness and disability affect individuals’ day-to-day functioning, sometimes in devastating ways. This may include a loss of work capacity, which has been defined as the balance between abilities and work demand (Gold & Shuman 2009), and the ability to integrate into the labour market. van Niekerk et al. (2004, p. 3) have pointed out that ‘numerous barriers at the human, family, organisational and societal levels prevent people with psychiatric disabilities from performing their work roles in accordance with their own needs to participate in work, or not’. Inadequate functional capacity and work capacity are of concern not only for the ill or disabled person and his/her family but also for employers, insurers and attorneys. Occupational therapists’ expertise in assessing residual functional capacity, coupled with their knowledge and skills in relation to activity analysis, allows them to accurately determine the requirements of a particular job, self-care task, home management activity or leisure pursuit and to match these to the individual’s residual abilities and limitations. They can then express considered opinions as to whether or not individuals are likely to meet the relevant task demands. Such opinions are useful for employers (in making decisions regarding the affected employee’s work), insurers (in processing disability claims) and attorneys (in quantifying and resolving compensation claims and civil matters).


Thus, the role of an occupational therapist in the corporate, insurance and medico-legal sectors is chiefly that of an independent, objective expert advisor/consultant/evaluator. There is no therapist–client relationship in the traditional sense, and services are primarily rendered to the referring party (employer, insurer or attorney). Indeed, in many instances, the therapist and client have no further contact after a single evaluation session. The resulting report is typically not given to the client but is instead forwarded directly to the referral agent (from whom the client may request a copy). In medico-legal matters where the case goes to trial, the occupational therapy report may also become a matter of public record.


History of occupational therapy services in the corporate, insurance and medico-legal sectors


Employers and their disability insurers have long called on occupational therapists to assist with the processing and managing of disability claims, which have significant economic consequences for employees, employers and insurers. Indeed, the group life insurance industry in South Africa began employing occupational therapists as claims assessors as long ago as 1991 (Byrne 2003) and has for many years also contracted with occupational therapists to act as evaluators, treating practitioners and case managers in relation to claimants. Medico-legal occupational therapy services in South Africa also began largely in the 1990s, when attorneys began making widespread use of occupational therapists to serve as expert witnesses in matters such as Road Accident Fund (RAF) claims and civil claims (Randall & Crosbie 2004).


Being able to predict return-to-work prospects and evaluate work capacity is crucial in the insurance and corporate fields, where occupational therapists’ main roles are to comment on and intervene in relation to work-related functioning. In the medico-legal field, occupational therapists are asked to express opinions not only on individuals’ work capacity but also on their functional capacity in general, as part of the process of quantifying functional losses and loss of the amenities of life. Kennedy (1997a, p. 2) sums it up as follows:



changes in the law regarding compensation for loss of capacity to perform household services have led to increased demand for occupational therapists’ assessment skills to determine the impact of impairment upon individuals’ abilities to perform unpaid labour such as housekeeping, child care or yard work and the cost of replacing this labour. Judges now require detailed information on functional abilities. Individuals such as entrepreneurs or farm wives, whose work is multi-dimensional, can benefit from the occupational therapist’s ability to analyse and describe their jobs and relate this to their past, present and potential function. It is a positive sign that occasionally both sides in a dispute will agree to share the cost of an occupational therapy assessment and analysis of costs of future care.


Referrals from employers, insurers and attorneys typically rest on a need to answer questions about an individual’s residual abilities and limitations, following an illness, disabling event or incident with functional sequelae. From the perspective of a psychiatric occupational therapist, referrals may derive from the following needs:



  • An employer would like to know if an employee who has been off work with a stress-related illness still has sufficient work capacity to perform a particular job.
  • A company doctor would like to know what reasonable accommodations are needed for an employee recently diagnosed with bipolar affective disorder.
  • A claims assessor at a disability insurance company would like to know whether a claimant who has been out of the workplace for some time after being diagnosed with schizophrenia has sufficient work capacity to return to his/her usual occupation or move into an alternative occupation.
  • A risk manager at a disability and absenteeism management consultancy would like to know the current work capacity of an employee with a history of taking excessive sick leave for mental health reasons – this is part of a pre-claims screening or early intervention process, designed to avert inappropriate disability claims.
  • An attorney would like to know whether a claimant who was in a car accident and has psychiatric and psychological sequelae will manage with his/her day-to-day tasks and whether he/she has any loss of work capacity.
  • An attorney handling a divorce matter would like to know whether the wife’s long-term depression has affected her work capacity and ability to perform home management and parenting tasks, as this will have a bearing on spousal support and child custody issues.

In all of these instances, occupational therapists may be appointed to provide a properly substantiated and unbiased professional opinion, with no vested interest in the outcome of the matter. The tools of the trade are the evaluation processes, methods and tests utilised to come up with one’s opinion, and the finished product in each case is a written report. Where costs of disability are relevant, as in medico-legal matters, occupational therapists are able to help quantify these over the client’s lifespan. As pointed out by Duncan et al. (2011, p. 62), ‘mental illness, in particular psychotic disorders that are untreated or poorly managed, introduces a range of costs that may fall under the radar of health economists and mental health service providers’. On a very practical level, occupational therapists can help determine the likely costs involved.


Prerequisites for effective work in the corporate, insurance and medico-legal sectors


Occupational therapists stepping into these sectors may be strangers in a strange land and should be confident in their own roles and adept at explaining what occupational therapists do and how they do it. Psychiatric occupational therapists face particular challenges, given that social perceptions of the profession often focus on physical rehabilitation, occupational therapy for schoolchildren and work in geriatric settings and support organisations. As a result, employers, insurers and attorneys may underestimate the depth of occupational therapists’ mental health training and skills. At times, their expertise is also confused with that of industrial psychologists. For all these reasons, there are particular prerequisites for providing effective corporate, insurance and medico-legal services.


Each of these three sectors could justify a chapter in itself, so this is an introduction to the key concepts rather than an in-depth presentation of what is required to work in each setting. Other chapters in this book, particularly those on clinical reasoning, vocational rehabilitation, models which underpin occupational therapy, ethics and forensic occupational therapy, will overlap in certain respects with the information contained in this chapter. With regard to medico-legal work, the focus is on the South African legal system, but similar issues arise for occupational therapists practising in other countries.


Many occupational therapists feel ill-equipped to enter corporate, insurance and medico-legal territory, especially when they have been trained largely in health care settings, have client-centred orientations and are used to the back-up of a multidisciplinary team. Newly qualified therapists would be wise to stay away from this kind of work until later in their careers, and those wishing to take it on should ideally find a mentor with suitable experience to help them develop the necessary competencies. For instance, Byrne (2003) has noted in relation to insurance work that occupational therapists need to equip themselves with additional skills and knowledge which are not generally included in under- or postgraduate training. Before launching into corporate, insurance or medico-legal work, occupational therapists need to develop a solid appreciation for the role of occupational therapy in different settings and to be familiar with the highest ethical principles of practice. They need to appreciate the difference between a patient who receives therapy and a client who comes simply for an evaluation. A certain amount of work experience, life experience and business acumen is useful, prior to taking on the extra challenges of working in these sectors. As ambassadors for the profession, occupational therapists must show objectivity and professionalism and need to be acutely sensitive to the particular context in which they are working at the time, including the cultural, organisational and legal nuances and principles shaping that context. This sensitivity will reflect in their general communication style and choice of terminology, in their clothing and dress style and in their adherence to norms relating to timekeeping, general behaviour towards others, manner of using facilities, manner of running their own practices and billing for their services. Employers, claims assessors, attorneys and judges will become frustrated with occupational therapists who do not appreciate business realities, have naïve or utopian expectations and show ignorance of occupational health and safety regulations. They may also advise courses of action that contravene labour legislation and industrial relations principles or violate laws and principles relating to expert witnessing. To avoid falling into these traps, occupational therapists should seek exposure to the following, prior to entering these sectors:



  • A range of real-life work settings, with different work methods, work tools, work equipment and workplace cultures.
  • Prevailing employment practices and labour legislation (including any relevant codes of good practice attached to such legislation) (Randall 2003). This would include, in South Africa, the Employment Equity Act (Act No. 55 of 1998), the Labour Relations Act (Act No. 66 of 1995), the Basic Conditions of Employment Act (Act No. 75 of 1997) and the Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Act (Act No. of 130 of 1993) and any amendments, regulations or technical guidelines connected to these.
  • Probable and possible outcomes of a variety of diagnostic conditions (the so-called natural course of illnesses and injuries).
  • The spectrum of interventions, equipment, assistive devices, human assistance and task modifications which can help maximise individuals’ day-to-day functioning. This includes, very importantly, the approximate costs and lifespans of equipment and the likely costs, frequency and duration of interventions and forms of assistance.
  • The role and duties of medico-legal expert witnesses and relevant statutes, such as the RAF Act (Act No. 56 of 1996) and its various amendments and regulations (see, for instance, Institute of Occupational Therapists in Private Practice 2011).

In the corporate setting


Occupational therapists in a corporate setting must appreciate the difficulties both employers and employees face, must be aware of relevant legislation and employment practices in the broader labour market, must grasp the realities of the particular business and type of job which is under scrutiny and must be supersensitive to the concept that ‘time is money’. They must be able to differentiate clearly between illness and disability and between work settings and rehabilitation settings.


In the insurance setting


Occupational therapists performing insurance work must show sensitivity to the purpose and limitations of a range of disability and income replacement policies and should understand concepts like temporary and permanent disability, partial and total disability, lump sum payments, monthly benefits and top-up benefits. They should be aware of the vested interests of different parties, especially those of insurers and policyholders and their families, but also those of employers. They need to accurately grasp the role of various stakeholders including brokers, policyholders/claimants, claims assessors, chief medical officers employed by insurance companies, company doctors and nurses, human resource practitioners, line managers and clients’ treating health practitioners. They must follow legal and ethical requirements with regard to releasing information derived from their professional examinations of claimants, and must be aware of the broader protective mechanisms available to insurance consumers (such as an ombudsman’s office for life assurance). Due to reportedly high levels of fraudulent or spurious disability insurance claims and the possibility that large financial incentives may lead claimants to distort their symptoms, they need to be vigilant for signs of symptom exaggeration and inconsistencies in the information presented to them. They should, if in any doubt, gather sufficient collateral evidence to satisfy themselves that they have reached a full and fair understanding of the functional status of the claimant/employee.


Where guidelines exist for the evaluation of disability claimants (Occupational Therapists in Life Assurance undated; Life Offices Association of South Africa (LOA) 2003), occupational therapists should follow these guidelines.


In the medico-legal setting


Occupational therapists in a medico-legal setting need to present themselves in a way which shows appreciation of their particular role in serving the ends of justice – for instance, as an expert witness or as an advisor to a court or a mediating body. It is crucial that they avoid being ‘hired guns’ (i.e. being overly influenced and having their expertise exploited by one side in a dispute) and understand that their role is to serve the court and justice system rather than the instructing party (Luke 2009). Thus, they need to reach an objective opinion regardless of which legal team has hired them. They also need to grasp the roles and vested interests of a large variety of stakeholders including attorneys and advocates for the plaintiff and for the defendant, claimants and their families, claims handlers, compensation systems (such as the RAF), and fellow expert witnesses from their own and other disciplines. Even more so than in the insurance sector, they need to understand what is sometimes termed compensationitis – i.e. the tendency for people who have submitted compensation claims to consciously or unconsciously exaggerate their symptoms, in the hope of maximising their compensation payouts.


Occupational therapists performing medico-legal work also need a grasp of basic legal language, including terms such as plaintiff and defendant, special and general damages, loss of earnings, loss of amenities of life, undertakings, possibility versus probability, pleadings, summons, apportionment and contingency. It is useful to have a basic legal textbook or dictionary available, for instance, Kleyn and Viljoen (2001).

Jun 10, 2016 | Posted by in PSYCHIATRY | Comments Off on Psychiatric Occupational Therapy in the Corporate, Insurance and Medico-legal Sectors

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access