Rehabilitation in Subacute and Chronic Stage After Stroke



Fig. 33.1
Hypothetical pattern of recovery after stroke with timing of intervention strategies. Reproduced by permission of Lancet [1]



There are two main mechanisms of neurological recovery. The first is activity-dependent neuroplasticity in the injured cortical representation area, which is the underlying mechanism of task-oriented repetitive training, like the constraint-induced movement therapy, and robotic-assisted gait or arm training. Second is vicariation, which is an operating mechanism as a substitute for the injured brain function in the remnant cortical area, outside of the damaged brain area. This appears in the early stage of stroke or in the severe cerebral infarction stage. This stroke recovery is affected by many factors that influence reorganization of the damaged brain-nervous system and early rehabilitation; furthermore, intensive rehabilitation and organized enriched environments also significantly affect recovery. In addition, there is a substantial body research about new rehabilitation treatment, including repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), transcranial direct current therapy (tDCT), robotic therapies, mirror therapy, virtual reality training, and drug augmentation.


33.1 Evolutional Time Course for Stroke Rehabilitation: From the Acute, Subacute Stages to the Chronic Stage


After the onset of stroke, treatment should be different at each stage [2]. The acute phase is the time when disease treatment should be focused on according to the critical path specific to the pathophysiology of acute stroke. In the subacute or convalescent phase, rehabilitation programs should be the focus in order to treat several impairments, including hemiplegia, aphasia, neglect, and shoulder subluxation, as well as to manage activity limitations, such as walking, feeding, transferring, etc. In the chronic phase, compensatory rehabilitation programs, such as house reconstruction, transfer system, caregiver education with the view of quality life, and control of environmental factors, should be prioritized. Likewise, depending on the time of the onset, several experts or care facilities are involved in damage from disease, shift from disease to impairment, and, furthermore, quality of life. To make these things systematic, the stroke liaison critical path for stoke is needed [2].

Peak neurologic recovery of stroke occurs within 1–3 months after the onset of stroke. From this time to 6 months, recovery slows down and 5% of the patients, especially those who show severe functional damage at the early stage, continuously recover up to 1 year after the onset. Also, functional recovery mostly occurs 3 months after the onset, suggesting that functional recovery is strongly related to neurologic severity. According to the Copenhagen Stroke Study, the patients with a mild case recover within 8.5 weeks after the onset, while the patients with a severity case recover within 13 weeks and the patients with an advanced case get better within 17–20 weeks [3]. However, functional recovery or communication skills could continuously progress and reduce activity limitations, even in cases when neurological impairment would not recover anymore. This means that the correlation between impairments and activity limitations is not linear, which was obtained by the use of technical aid for the affected limb and/or compensatory use of the unaffected limb. It can be helpful for the patients who cannot recover from neurological impairment anymore in order to reduce activity limitations and participation restriction using some compensatory strategies. Therefore, these comprehensive multidisciplinary rehabilitation programs are considered to be major stroke management strategies.


33.2 Assessment of Stroke Patients for Rehabilitation



33.2.1 Meaning and Time Schedules of Stroke Assessment


There are four stages in rehabilitation for stroke patients. The first is an assessment of the patient’s functional status and his/her requirement of rehabilitation. The second is setting a realizable, optimizing rehabilitation goal. The third is a rehabilitation program to achieve the goal. The last is a reassessment of the rehabilitation process and goal achievement.

Patient assessment is categorized into global assessment and specific assessment. With the acute phase, radiologic imaging study and assessment of global neurological impairment, consciousness, muscle power, and pain are performed to figure out the neurological status within 24–48 h after hospitalization. Based on these parameters, the necessity of early rehabilitation or intensive rehabilitation is determined. With the subacute phase, an assessment of the global activity limitation, balance, hand function, and swallowing function is performed to establish the patient’s functional status. In order to perform these various assessments, multidisciplinary comprehensive approaches with a rehabilitation specialist, physical therapist, occupational therapist, speech therapist, clinical psychologist, social worker, and caregiver are needed. That is why a comprehensive rehabilitation stroke unit is required. With the chronic phase, an assessment is performed from the point of view related to the stroke patient’s quality of life at home or in an institution and maintenance of ADL. In addition, all assessment tools should be standard tools with reliability and validity and should be performed by experts. To hospitalize in a stroke rehabilitation unit, a patient should be in medically stable and have some functional impairment. Also, the patient should have a cognitive ability to communicate to some degree and be able to maintain in the sitting position on a wheelchair to actively participate in one session of the rehabilitation training for about 20–30 min.


33.2.2 Goal Setting and ICF-Based Stroke Assessment


In order to explain chronic disease that constantly affects humans, the World Health Organization International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (WHO ICF 2001) introduced new concepts of human functioning. There are three parts of functioning, namely, body structure and function, activity, and participation. Both individual and environmental factors interact with functioning here. WHO wanted to make a kind of a frame to collect the data commonly available in the world [4]. However, what constitutes ICF was so large-scale that WHO made several comprehensive core sets and brief core sets; clinically brief core sets are more likely to be used [5]. A brief core set for stroke consists of 18 components: six related to body functions, two to body structures, seven to activities and participation, and three to environmental factors. With an objective and scientific assessment of a stroke patient using the ICF stroke core set, his/her functioning or disabilities make it possible to recognize neurological impairment, individual activity limitation, interpersonal and social participation restriction, and the information about nearby medical facilities, family members, and house structure. The global neurological impairment assessments include National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), among others. The global assessments for activity limitations are Modified Barthel Index (MBI), Functional Independence Measure (FIM), and modified Rankin Scale (mRS); also for participation restriction, there are Europal-5D, SF-18, etc. (Table 33.1).


Table 33.1
ICF stroke core set-based functional evaluation for stroke patients
































( ): Negativity
 
ICF: Functioning or disability

ICF domains

Disease (Pathology)

Body function and structure (Impairment)

Activity (Limitation)

Participation (Restriction)

Modification of ICF stroke core set

Cerebral infarct

ICH

SAH

Others

Conscious functions

Orientation functions

Muscle power

Mental functions of language

Attention functions

Memory functions

Structure of brain

Structure of upper and lower extremity

Walking

Speaking

Toileting

Eating

Washing

Dressing

Communication

Driving

Return to work, gainful employment

Evaluation tools

Brain CT or MRI

SPECT, PET

Doppler

TMS

SEP

NIHSS or GCS

FMA

MMSE

MAS

WAB

MBI

FIM

mRS

BBS

Euroqol-5D

SF-18

SIP


Abbreviations: ICF International Classification of Functioning, ICH intracranial hemorrhage, SAH subarachnoid hemorrhage, SPECT single-photon emission computed tomography, PET positron emission tomography, TMS transcranial magnetic stimulation, SEP somatosensory evoked potential, NIHSS National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, FMA Fugl-Meyer Assessment, GCS Glasgow Coma Scale, MMSE Mini-Metal State Examination, MAS modified Aschowers scale, WAB Western Aphasia Battery, MBI Modified Barthel Index, FIM Functional Independence Measure, mRS modified Rankin scale, BBS Berg Balance Scale, SF-18 Short-Form Health Survey, SIP Stroke Impact Profile


33.2.3 Comprehensive Stroke Rehabilitation Units


Comprehensive stroke rehabilitation units should consist of well-organized team members who work in different professional fields and have sufficient experience on rehabilitation. They should manage stroke patients’ complications and/or comorbidities with evidence-based practice. Furthermore, each stroke patient should be provided with individualized, different rehabilitation programs depending on the severity of stroke through a multidisciplinary systematic evaluation [6]. Stroke patients with more moderate severity have an opportunity to be admitted into comprehensive stroke rehabilitation units. Once a week, every member should attend a conference for patients and pay attention to family, caregivers, and sociopsychological factors. In report on the systematically randomized comparative trials for the patients hospitalized in comprehensive stroke rehabilitation units or in a general ward, Stroke Unit Trialists’ Collaboration reported that the patients who were hospitalized in comprehensive stroke rehabilitation units had a more functional recovery, lower death rate, shorter length of hospital stay, and severe stroke patients’ lower rate of admission in a long-term care institution [2].


33.3 Stroke Recovery Mechanism



33.3.1 General Principles of Functional Stroke Recovery


Functional impairment after stroke onset is due to neural loss of the injured area as well as to the decrement of the neural function of another area connected to the injured area. The degree of diaschisis, which is a malfunction in the opposite area connected to the damaged brain tissue, represents the degree of brain nerves’ damage, and reversal of diaschisis is an indicator of functional recovery. The mechanism of recovery after a stroke is not exactly known; however, the mechanism of early functional recovery is mainly known as (1) reversal of diaschisis, (2) hyperactivity of the existing neuronal pathway, and (3) neuroplasticity developed by the relearning process. Let us examine neuroplasticity, which is the main mechanism of functional recovery by rehabilitation.


33.3.2 Neurological Recovery


Brain plasticity is a broad term connected to adapting characteristics of the human brain after environment, experience, and brain injury. The adaptability in a changing environment is the basic attribution and basic element of learning. This occurs in several levels, from molecules to cortical reorganization in brain cells [7].

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Oct 17, 2017 | Posted by in NEUROLOGY | Comments Off on Rehabilitation in Subacute and Chronic Stage After Stroke

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access