Research in the Sleep Center



Research in the Sleep Center


Allen Boone








Research is the reconnaissance party of industry, roving the unknown territories ahead independently, yet not without purpose, seeing for the first time what all the following world will see a few years hence.

S. M. Kinter

In the world of medicine, there is an always evolving desire for discovery in the efforts to prolong wellness and prevent or decrease pain and suffering while effectively and safely treating those in need. Since its beginnings, the practice of medicine has evolved hand-in-hand with research, and there remains a close-knit relationship to this day.

Research of sleep and wake has taken several iterations, from investigatory exploration and experimentation in the efforts to better understand just exactly what occurs during this quasi-hibratory physical state. Of greatest significance was the discovery and quantification of the stages and cycles occurring during sleep. From these discoveries and detailed research came the foundations from which impaired or disrupted sleep and wake functions were appropriately evaluated.

As the developing field of sleep medicine progressed, research began shifting from scientific inquiries needed to define the physiologic functions of sleep toward the pathologies and disorders associated with disrupted, excessive, or insufficient sleep. As eloquently described in the 2005 publication of the History of the Development of Sleep Medicine in the United States (1), the science-based foundation paved the way for detailed quantifications of disorders such as narcolepsy, restless legs syndrome, and rapid eye movement behavior disorder.


Today’s medical research environment involving sleep and wake is considerably different from that of earlier years. There are more medical sites available to conduct research, and rather than being scientifically focused, these sites are clinically based. These sites are involved in the observation and treatment of patients, and many of the participants involved in clinical trial activities are recruited from their practice databases.

Another significant change in today’s sleep/wake-related clinical research is the diversity of investigation. Although there will always be the need for basic science, the majority of clinical trials involve pharmaceuticals or device manufacturers who seek to prove their products’ clinical effectiveness. But like the electroencephalogram (EEG), polysomnography (PSG) is also playing a role as a safety measure. Just as the EEG has been, and continues to be, used to measure brainwave activity that could be an indication of an adverse event or serious adverse event, the PSG has come into its own as a means to help investigators identify these safety occurrences. As sleep professionals will attest, there are many events that occur primarily during sleep. Thus, if an investigational product (IP) (drug being investigated) predisposes the study participant to an untoward medical condition during sleep, then the PSG removes ambiguity and provides high-quality, robust data for documentation and quite possibly intervention purposes.


DEFINITION OF RESEARCH

Research is defined as the systematic investigation into and study of materials and sources in order to establish facts and reach new conclusions (2). The National Institutes of Health’s (NIH’s) definition of clinical research indicates the “aim to advance medical knowledge by studying people, either through direct interaction or through the collection and analysis of blood, tissues, or other samples” (3).

Clinical trials involve research participants, referred to as “subjects.” Trials follow a predefined and preapproved plan in the form of a protocol to observe, document, and analyze the effects (“outcomes”) of an IP, device, or behavioral intervention. Participation in clinical trials not only increases participants’ role in their health care but also plays a critical role of increasing the generalizable knowledge gained during the investigation. Participants have the potential opportunity to access experimental treatments, to which their outcomes can directly contribute to medical research. There are numerous terminology and government agencies specific to clinical research protocols and documents. Please refer to Appendix Q—Research Terminology, Acronyms, and Government Agencies.

The Federal Drug Administration (FDA) specifically recognizes the following trial types (4):



  • Treatment research typically involves interventions, such as medication/drug, psychotherapy, devices, or new surgery techniques or radiation intervention.


  • Prevention research investigates ways or methods to prevent disorders or diseases from developing or recurring. Prevention research may study medicines/drugs, vitamins, vaccines, minerals, lifestyle changes, or combination therapies.


  • Diagnostic research investigates new or improved methods to identify a particular disorder, disease, or condition.


  • Screening research investigates new or improved methods to identify certain disorders or health conditions.


  • Quality of life research investigates new or improved methods to increase comfort and possibly the quality of life for those with chronic illness.


  • Genetic studies investigate new or improved methods to improve prediction of disorders by identifying and understanding how genes and illnesses may be related. Research in this area explores the ways in which genes make an individual more or less likely to develop a disorder.


  • Epidemiologic studies investigate new or improved methods to identify patterns, causes, and control of disorders in groups of people.

There are other clinical research involving the validation and verification of medical devices. According to the FDA, the goal of human factors engineering is to reduce or eliminate errors that occur during use of a device that could cause harm or degrade medical treatment to the greatest extent possible (5). This involves assessments at one or more stages during the device development process to identify strengths, weaknesses, or deficiencies that could possibly harm the user. The assessment process utilizes market research, competitor research, failure mode and effects analysis (6), formative and summative in small groups, and well-designed protocols for clinical trials. Device manufacturers developing new or improved positive airway pressure (PAP) machines, hoses, and interfaces are reliant upon this process, and they frequently utilize sleep centers, personnel, and patients as trial participants during the usability segments of development. The results of these trials are then used to make improvements on current designs or validate user acceptance criteria.

For the purposes of discussing an area of greatest relevance to the sleep diagnostic and treatment community, this chapter will focus primarily on pharmacologically related clinical trials. Device trials, such as those investigated for premarket release trials (nasal PAP and other sleep-related equipment), are governed by 21 CFR 812 (7).


DRUG DEVELOPMENT PROCESS

The first step in the process of bringing a new compound to market is the discovery and development phase. Researchers discover new drugs using several methods that include:



  • Newly revealed knowledge or insights within a disease that allows researchers to formulate a product
    that will at the minimum stop the disease progress or possibly reverse the effects of the disease.


  • Testing multiple molecular compounds with the intent of identifying beneficial effects when applied to any of a large number of diseases.


  • Investigating already existing compounds or treatments that have effects that were not anticipated in the original design.


  • Technologic developments that provide new methods or pathways that were not previously available as a means to assist treatment. Examples of this include new surgical devices that allow access within specific areas of the body or genetic coding.


STAGES OF DRUG DEVELOPMENT

The stages of drug development follow a standard process and timeline, as depicted in Table 73-1. The identification of a promising compound leads to further experiments in order to gather information on items like absorption, distribution, metabolization, and excretion. Other information collected includes dosage, delivery route, side effects or adverse reactions, and intractability with other drugs. All of these results are gathered to serve as the basis for what will become the investigator’s brochure. This document summarizes the body of knowledge gained through testing and experimentation throughout the development of the IP or study drug.

The second step is preclinical research. Researchers must find out if the newly discovered compound has the potential to cause serious harm before testing is conducted in humans. Specifically, the effort is to identify its toxicity, conducted through two types of preclinical research areas: in vitro and in vivo. An in vitro test is conducted with glass or plastic laboratory vessels (“petri dishes”), whereas in vivo testing is conducted within the body of a living organism.

The FDA requires researchers to use good laboratory practices (GLPs) for preclinical laboratory studies. This requirement is defined in medical product development regulations. GLP regulations are found in 21 CFR Part 58.1: Good Laboratory Practice for Nonclinical Laboratory Studies.








Table 73-1 Stages of Drug Development

















Drug discovery preclinical


3-6 y


Clinical trials; Phases I-III


6-7 y


FDA application and review drug production post FDA approval


6 mo-2 y


Postmarketing safety surveillance clinical trials (Phase IV)


Approximately first half of patent life


FDA, Federal Drug Administration.


Following the successful conclusion of preclinical testing, the IP is ready for human application. Preclinical research, as thorough as it is at answering basic safety questions, is no substitute for actual IP applications in the human. Clinical trials reveal a wealth of information when the IP interacts with the human body in ways bench testing cannot. However, before ever making the first human application, the developers carefully design the overall clinical study (or study plan). They consider what is to be accomplished at each phase. This begins the investigational new drug (IND) process, in which an IND application is submitted to the FDA before clinical research begins. This application includes data from animal studies, toxicity, and any prior human research. Additionally, information about the investigator, manufacturing information, and the clinical protocols (study plan) are included in the submission. Only after FDA approval can the development move to clinical trials.

In clinical drug research, there are four phases of trials (8, 9).


Phase 1 Trials

This is when the IP makes its first contact with humans. This is a highly controlled trial that typically includes between 20 and 100 volunteer participants. The primary focus of this phase is to test the IP for safety, tolerance (usually to dose escalation regimens), and pharmacokinetics (or what the body does to the IP). Healthy volunteers are most commonly used during this phase; however, certain drug designs carry a higher toxicity level in order to be effective to a targeted disease. This higher toxicity would be unethical to administer to a healthy person because it carries a high risk of harm. To this end, the Phase 1 trials for these more toxic compounds will include only participants with the targeted disease. An example of this would be anticancer agents or compounds. According to the FDA, approximately 70% of IND moves on to the next phase. Likewise, it is very rare for Phase 1 trials to occur within a sleep testing facility.


Phase 2 Trials

Phase 2 trials are rigid and well controlled and include a small homogeneous patient population, usually no more than 200 participants. These participants have the targeted disease, but no other confounding illnesses. The primary purpose of this phase is to determine whether or not the IP demonstrates efficacy for its intended indication, and within the safe dose range established during the Phase 1 trial. This trial will typically involve use of “double blinding” where neither the investigator nor the participant is aware of which compound is the “active” (IP) or the “comparator” (a similar already-marketed drug for the same indication), or a placebo. In order to be able to measure the effects of these compounds,
participants are randomized in different drug sequences (a means to reduce bias) that involve a period of time per drug and then a “crossover” to the next drug. Hence, the terminology of “Double-Blind Randomized Crossover Trial.” This trial phase is more commonly seen in sleep facilities and may only include 5 to 10 investigating sites.

At or near the conclusion of the Phase 2 trial, the sponsor (investigating agent) will meet with the FDA to review all the data collected to this point, and the determination to advance to a Phase 3 trial is made. Of the number of INDs that have made it to this point, the FDA estimates only 33% will move forward to Phase 3 trials.


Phase 3 Trials

This trial phase is an expanded clinical trial intended to gather additional evidence of effectiveness for specific indications and to better understand safety and drug-related adverse effects. This is also referred to as “primary efficacy studies” (10). Phase 3 trials typically have large numbers of participants, ranging from 350 to 1,000 patients. Trials involving large numbers of participants require the developer to seek participants from a wide variety of geographic areas. Factors such as culture, race, and ethnicity can impact participant behavior, whereas reduced or limited diversity can place limits on the generalizability of the findings (11). Therefore, the developer will seek to spread the recruitment efforts across a wide area and, in some cases, take their efforts to other countries in order to satisfy statistical diversification needs.

In the world of clinical trials involving a sleep component, sponsors work with their contract research organization (CRO) to identify multiple facilities capable of handling the protocol requirements as well as the participant volumes. It is very common to see study plans written where the participants are required to have multiple sleep studies in order to complete their trial requirements. To put this into perspective, it is typical practice to have a protocol that, among other requirements, is written to include five or more overnight sleep studies. The plan may or may not include a daytime multiple sleep latency test or maintenance of wakefulness test. If, for example, a hypothetical trial is “powered” (statistically required number of participants needed in order to increase the probability of significant results) by 980 participants and if each of these participants completes the protocol requirements of 5 nocturnal polysomnography (NPSG) studies, a total of 4,900 PSG recordings will be produced for this phase of the study plan. If the sponsor awards the trial to 50 sites, on average each site would generate 98 PSGs for roughly 20 participants. This kind of volume can be burdensome for some sites, whereas others can absorb the volume without issue. Site qualification visits are the sponsors’ means for performing due diligence in determining whether or not sites are adequately equipped to handle their specific trial.

Phase 3 trials can be active for long durations in order to meet the enrollment criteria. For sleep-related trials, duration can be from 18 to 36 months in order to meet the threshold. At the conclusion of the Phase 3 trial, the sponsor makes a formal appeal to the FDA in the form of a new drug application. This request to allow for marketing of the new drug essentially tells the FDA that the sponsor has completed the necessary safety and efficacy requirements in order to gain official approval (12). With formal approval from the FDA, the sponsor can then begin actively promoting and selling their new compound.


Phase 4 Trials

Phase 4 trials begin after the marketing application to the FDA has been approved. The primary purpose of Phase 4 trials is to gather long-term safety data as a condition of the FDA approval. These trials are frequently conducted to compare new compounds with other already-marketed products. Because of the length of time it takes to bring a new compound to market, there can be changes in standards of care for the targeted disease or condition. The FDA will often require the sponsor to continue gathering data as a means of postmarketing surveillance.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Dec 12, 2019 | Posted by in NEUROLOGY | Comments Off on Research in the Sleep Center

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access